Volume 3, Issue 2 (7-2005)                   IJRM 2005, 3(2): 90-94 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sohrabvand F, Jafarabadi M. Knowledge and attitudes of infertile couples about assisted reproductive technology. IJRM 2005; 3 (2) :90-94
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-34-en.html
Abstract:   (2710 Views)
Background: Knowledge of infertile couples about assisted reproductive technology is a fundamental parameter to optimize the infertility treatment and conduct it cooperatively. Objective: To evaluate knowledge and attitude of infertile couples about assisted reproductive technology we designed a descriptive cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: 400 infertile patients were investigated by a self- administered structured questionnaire about demographic data, infertility history, and several relevant variables in an out patient infertility clinic of a university hospital. The main outcome measurements included scoring the answers in the questionnaire regarding knowledge, and grouping the answers regarding attitude. Resulted data were analyzed in relation to patient�s gender and treatment history, and educational, ethnic and religious groups. Results: Of 400 cases (251 women and 149 men) 167 patients (41.7%) were scaled to have good knowledge and 223 patients (55.7%) had a poor knowledge about ART. 74.6% of patients with advanced education and 30.3% of patients without advanced education were scaled to be good in knowledge. 45.6% of men, 43.4% of women and 64.8% of patients with a history of passing previous ART cycles had a good knowledge. The source of information was mentioned to be the ART centers in 73% of cases. 95% of patients disagreed to have sperm or ovum donation or to undergo surrogacy. 22% of all patients (27.5% of women versus 12.1% of men) agreed with embryo reduction. 94.5% of patients mentioned the ART expenses not to be affordable readily. Conclusions: Less than half of patients presented to be knowledgeable about ART. Not a great portion of the patients agreed with sperm donation. ART expense is mentioned to be burdensome by nearly all of the patients.
Full-Text [PDF 93 kb]   (554 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (330 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Braverman AM, Boxer AS, Corson SL, Coutifaris C, Hendrix A. Charactristics and attitudes of parents of children born with the use of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 1998; 70 (5):860-865. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00287-8]
2. Mori E, Nadaka T, Morika Y, Saito H. Anxiety of infertile women undergoing IVF- ET, relation of grief process. Gynecol Obstet Inves 1997; 44 (3): 157- 62. [DOI:10.1159/000291510] [PMID]
3. Schover LR, Thomas AJ, Falcone T, Attaran M, Goldberg J. Attitudes about genetic risk of couples undergoing In- vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998; 113(4): 862-6. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.4.862] [PMID]
4. Snowden, Green JM. Pre implantation diagnosis and other reproductive options. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:341-350. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.2.341] [PMID]
5. de la Fuente Fonnest I, Sondergaard F, Fonnest G, Vedsted-Jacobsen A. Attitudes among health care professionals on the ethics of assisted reproductive technologies and legal abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79(1):49-53. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079001049.x] [PMID]
6. Evans MI, Drugan A, Bottoms SF, Platt LD, Rodeck CA, Hansmann M, Fletcher JC. Attitudes on the ethics of abortion, sex selection, and selective pregnancy termination among health care professionals, ethicists, and clergy likely to encounter such situation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164:1092-9. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90592-F]
7. Dickens BM, Cook RJ. Some ethical and legal issues in assisted reproductive technology. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet 1999; 66: 55-61. [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00074-0]
8. Solursh. Council of Europe. Official Journal of the European Community 1989.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb