International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Sat, Apr 20, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 15, Issue 4 (6-2017)
IJRM 2017, 15(4): 225-230 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ayati S, Pourali L, Pezeshkirad M, Seilanian Toosi F, Nekooei S, Shakeri M T et al . Accuracy of color Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of placenta accreta: A survey of 82 cases. IJRM 2017; 15 (4) :225-230
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-815-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-815-en.html
Sedigheh Ayati1 
, Leila Pourali * 2, Masoud Pezeshkirad3 , Farokh Seilanian Toosi3 , Sirous Nekooei3 , Mohammad Taghi Shakeri4 , Mansoureh Sadat Golmohammadi1
, Leila Pourali * 2, Masoud Pezeshkirad3 , Farokh Seilanian Toosi3 , Sirous Nekooei3 , Mohammad Taghi Shakeri4 , Mansoureh Sadat Golmohammadi1
1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Pouralil@mums.ac.ir
3- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Pouralil@mums.ac.ir
3- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract: (19403 Views)
Background: Placenta adhesive disorder (PAD) is one of the most common causes of postpartum hemorrhage and peripartum hysterectomy. The main risk factors are placenta previa and prior uterine surgery such as cesarean section. Diagnosis of placenta adhesive disorders can lead to a decrease of maternal mortality and morbidities.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of color Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of PADs.
Materials and Methods:In this is cross-sectional study, Eighty-two pregnant women who were high risk for PAD underwent color Doppler ultrasound and MRI after 18 weeks of gestation. The sonographic and MRI findings were compared with the final pathologic or clinical findings. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Mean maternal age was 31.42±4.2 years. The average gravidity was third pregnancy. 46% of patients had placenta previa. The history of the previous cesarean section was seen in 79 cases (96%). The diagnosis of placenta adhesive disorder was found in 17 cases (21%). Doppler sonography sensitivity was 87% and MRI sensitivity was 76% (p=0.37). Doppler sonography specificity was 63% and MRI specificity was 83% (p=0.01).
Conclusion: Women with high-risk factors for PAD should undergo Doppler ultrasonography at first. When results on Doppler sonography are equivocal for PAD, MRI can be performed due to its high specificity.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of color Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of PADs.
Materials and Methods:In this is cross-sectional study, Eighty-two pregnant women who were high risk for PAD underwent color Doppler ultrasound and MRI after 18 weeks of gestation. The sonographic and MRI findings were compared with the final pathologic or clinical findings. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Mean maternal age was 31.42±4.2 years. The average gravidity was third pregnancy. 46% of patients had placenta previa. The history of the previous cesarean section was seen in 79 cases (96%). The diagnosis of placenta adhesive disorder was found in 17 cases (21%). Doppler sonography sensitivity was 87% and MRI sensitivity was 76% (p=0.37). Doppler sonography specificity was 63% and MRI specificity was 83% (p=0.01).
Conclusion: Women with high-risk factors for PAD should undergo Doppler ultrasonography at first. When results on Doppler sonography are equivocal for PAD, MRI can be performed due to its high specificity.
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Baughman C, Cortevill J, Shad R. Placenta Accreta: Spectrum of US and Imaging Findings. Radio Graphics 2008; 28: 1905-1916. [DOI:10.1148/rg.287085060]
2. 17TDerman A, Nikac V, Haberman S, Zelenko N, Psha O, Flyer M. MRI of Placenta Accreta: A New Imaging Perspective. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 1514-1521. [DOI:10.2214/AJR.10.5443]
3. Balayla J, Bondarenko HD. Placenta accreta and the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Perinat Med 2013; 41: 141-141. [DOI:10.1515/jpm-2012-0219]
4. Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Is a full bladder still necessary for pelvic sonography? J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 237-241. [DOI:10.7863/jum.2000.19.4.237]
5. Blanchette H. The rising cesarean delivery rate in America: What are theconsequences? Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 689-690. [DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227b8d9]
6. Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. Incidence and Risk Factors for Placenta Accreta/ Increta/ Percreta in the UK: A National Case-Control Study. PLoS One 2012; 7: e52893. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0052893]
7. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210-214. [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70463-0]
8. Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasouliotis SJ, Ezra Y. Placenta accreta–summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta 2002; 23: 210-214. [DOI:10.1053/plac.2001.0764]
9. Usta IM, Hobeika EM, Musa AA, Gabriel GE, Nassar AH. Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1045-1049. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.037]
10. Esh-Broder E, Ariel I, Abas-Bashir N, Bdolah Y, Celnikier DH. Placenta accreta is associated with IVF pregnancies: a retrospective chart review. 66TBJOG66T 2011; 118: 1084-1089. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02976.x]
11. Warshak C, Eskander R, Hull A, 66TScioscia AL66T, 66TMattrey RF66T, 66TBenirschke K66T, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 573-581. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000233155.62906.6d]
12. Khong TY, Healy DL, McCloud PI. Pregnancies complicated by abnormally adherent placenta and sex ratio at birth. BMJ 1991; 302: 625. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.302.6777.625]
13. James WH. Sex ratios of offspring and the causes of placental pathology. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1403. [DOI:10.1093/HUMREP/10.6.1403]
14. Nageotte MP. Always be vigilant for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 87-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.04.037]
15. 66TSilver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226-123266T.
16. Lau WC, Fung HY, Rogers MS. Ten years experienceof caesarean and postpartum hysterectomy ina teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 74: 133-137. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(97)00090-0]
17. Grobman WA, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, 66TSpong CY66T, 66TLeveno KJ66T, 66TRouse DJ66T, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previain relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1249-1255. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000292082.80566.cd]
18. O'Brien JM, Barton JR, Donaldson ES. The management of placenta percreta: conservative and operative strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 1632-1638. [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70117-5]
19. Elhawary TM, Dabees NL, Youssef MA. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in pregnant women at risk for placenta accrete. 66TJ Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 66T2013; 26: 1443-1449.
20. Baughman C, Cortevill J, Shad R. Placenta Accreta: Spectrum of US and Imaging Findings. Radio Graphics 2008; 28: 1905-1916. [DOI:10.1148/rg.287085060]
21. Lam G, Kuller J, McMahon M. 66TUse of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta.66T J Soc Gynecol Invest 2002; 9: 37-40. [DOI:10.1177/107155760200900108]
22. Dwyer BK, Belogolovkin V, Tran L, Rao A, Carroll I, Barth R, Chitkara U. 66TPrenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: sonography or magnetic resonance imaging?66T J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 1275-1281. [DOI:10.7863/jum.2008.27.9.1275]
23. Kanal E. 66TGadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents for neuroradiology: an overview.66T Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2012; 20: 625-631. [DOI:10.1016/j.mric.2012.08.004]
24. D'Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 509. [DOI:10.1002/uog.13194]
25. Meng X, Xie L, Song W. Comparing the Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Placenta Accreta: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 1958-1965. [DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.05.017]
26. Maher MA, Abdelaziz A, Bazeed MF. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accrete. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 1017-1022. [DOI:10.1111/aogs.12187]
27. Lim PS, Greenberg M, Edelson MI, Bell KA, Edmonds PR, Mackey AM. Utility of ultrasound and MRI in prenatal diagnosis of placeta accrete: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 1506-1513. [DOI:10.2214/AJR.11.6858]
28. Riteau AS, Tassin M, Chambon G, Le Vaillant C, de Laveaucoupet J, Quéré MP, et al. Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta. PLoS One 2014; 9: e94866. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0094866]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
