Volume 16, Issue 12 (December 2018)                   IJRM 2018, 16(12): 783-790 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shariati F, Favaedi R, Ramazanali F, Ghoraeian P, Afsharian P, Aflatoonian B, et al . Increased expression of stemness genes REX-1, OCT4, NANOG, and SOX-2 in women with ovarian endometriosis versus normal endometrium: A case-control study. IJRM 2018; 16 (12) :783-790
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1334-en.html
1- Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Genetics, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
5- Stem Cell Biology Research Center, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
6- Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran , m.shahhoseini@royaninstitute.org
Full-Text [PDF 365 kb]   (813 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2655 Views)
Full-Text:   (729 Views)
Endometriosis is a gynecological disease in which endometrial glands and stromal tissue grow in areas outside the uterus (1).  The  multifacto- rial entity of endometriosis depends on immuno- logic, hormonal, environmental, and genetic factors. Extensive investigations in recent years lead our mind to the dynamic role of endometrial stem/pro- genitor cells in the pathogenesis of endometriosis, in the way that ‘embryonic cell rest theory’ has been described as one of the hypotheses for the origin of endometriosis (2).
Based on this theory, many recent studies focused on stemness-related genes, including pluripotency markers such as Sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX-2), NANOG, and octamer- binding transcription factor 4 ( OCT-4) (3–5). SOX- 2 regulates different developmental processes via binding to the minor groove of target DNA and play vital and substantial roles in proliferation, differentiation, and fate determination of specific cells (6). SOX-2 can form a heterodimer with OCT-
4 and regulate self-renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells as well as primordial germ cells (7). Also, NANOG, a member of homeobox family genes, has key impress in maintaining of pluripotent stem cells in self-renewal and the undifferentiated conditions (8).
SOX-2 with OCT 4 and NANOG has been found to cooperatively activate and regulate other stem cells-related gene REX-1 (Zfp-42) (9). REX-1 is known as a pluripotency marker usually found in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells (9). It has been declared by investigators that the transcrip- tion factors of  OCT  4, NANOG,  SOX-2, and REX-
1 are essential elements of self-regulating, and there are strong evidences showing the epigenetic role of these transcription factors in regulation of stem cells (10–13). OCT-4, SOX-2, and NANOG can induce expression of each other and are necessary


to retain the self-renewing and undifferentiated state of blastocyst inner cell mass and embryonic stem cells (8). They also implicate in migration and invasion of cancer cells (5, 8).
On the other hand, OCT-4 and SOX-2 form a heterodimer before binding to certain promoters and ripen functionally each other (14). Also, NANOG form heterodimer too and make feedback loop to regulate expression of other pluripotency genes (14–17). Among the four aforementioned pluripo- tency transcription factors, there are some studies that show an aberrant level of OCT-4, NANOG, and SOX-2 in endometriotic tissues (3–5). However, REX-1 is not identified exclusively in women with ovarian endometriosis in previous studies (3).
As emerging role of stemness genes in the regen- eration of endometrium in each cycle, expression profile of four stemness genes (SOX-2, NANOG, OCT-4, and REX-1) in the normal endometrium of reproductive-aged women during the menstrual cycle were analyzed. Also to investigate the poten- tial role of stemness genes in endometriosis, in this case-control study, the mRNA expression of aforesaid genes in the endometrial tissues of women with endometriosis were compared to nor- mal endometrium.
 

1.Materials and Methods

1.1.Subjects

 
Twelve endometriosis women (aged between 20–45 yr) and 23 normal women as control group (aged between 20–45 yr) participated in this case- control study.
All enrolled endometriosis patients were con- sulting for infertility and/or pelvic pain without hyperplasia or neoplasia. All endometriosis cases were in stages III or IV  of  disease,  based  on  the revised classification of American Fertility Society (18). Eutopic endometrial biopsies were collected from patients by piple (n = 10). Ectopic endometrial tissues were collected from patients with endometrioma who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for endometriosis (n = 10) (Table I). From the total samples of both eutopic (n = 10) and ectopic (n = 10) endometrial tissues, eight samples were collected from same patients. All the samples were collected through a proliferative phase.
Women of the control group had at least one child by normal gestation with  a  regular cycle, no evidence of any pathologic uterine disorders and no use of oral contraception or intrauterine device within the last 3 month. Excluding criteria of the control group were endometrial hyperplasia or neoplasia, inflammatory disease or endometriosis in checkup laparoscopy. Endometrial biopsies of this group were obtained during the proliferative phase (n = 12) and secretary phase, (n = 6) through diagnostic laparoscopic surgery (Table I) and were found not to have endometriosis during surgery. Also, endometrial biopsies in the menses phase were collected from five healthy volunteer women (Table I).
After obtaining tissue samples, every sample was divided into small pieces (50–100 mg) and each
way and stored in –80C until RNA extraction. piece was placed in RNA later solution straight-
For evaluation of the potential role of stemness genes in endometriosis, a  study  was  designed as a case-control study  and  expression  profile  of four stemness genes (SOX-2,  NANOG,  OCT-  4, and REX-1) compared in eutopic, ectopic, and normal endometrial biopsies in the proliferative phase. On the other side to check alteration of stemness genes expression in a menstrual cycle, endometrial biopsies of all control healthy women (Mense phase, n = 5, Proliferative phase, n = 12, Secretory phase, n = 6) were compared together.
 

1.1.Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

 
After tissue collection, TRIzol regent was used (Invitrogen, USA) for the extraction of the total RNA from each group according to the manufacturer’s instruction and then total RNA was treated with DNase-I endonuclease (EN0521- Thermo Scientific, Germany). cDNA synthesis was performed using RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (K1632- Thermo Scientific, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
 

1.2.Quantitative real-time PCR

 
mRNA expression levels of candidate genes were quantified by real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) as described before (19). Briefly, q-PCR reactions were performed in duplicates on a 7500 Real- Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) using SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems, USA), with designed primers for OCT-4, NANOG, SOX- 2, REX-1, and GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) as an internal control gene (Table II). The specific primers were designed using Primer 3 (version 4.0) (http://primer3.ut.ee/), Gene Runner (version 3.05), and Perl Primer (version v1.1.20) software.
Before order, the primer sequences were checked by Nucleotide Blast and Primer-Blast in the NCBI database and were then purchased from Pishgam Co., Iran. The condition of qRT-PCR reactions was
95C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95C for 15 sec
and 60C for 60 sec. Gene expression data were
analyzed using the ΔΔCt quantitative method  to
estimate relative fold change values. After each run of PCR, produced melting curve were analyzed for the confirmation of the primers, shown by the presence of a single band and no artifacts of primer-dimer.
All of the samples with a cycle threshold ratio of variation value higher than 1 degree were tested again. For confirmation of melting curve results, agent samples of the real-time PCR products were measured on 2% ultra-pure agarose (Invitrogen, USA, cat no: 16500-100) gel electrophoresis (Paya- pazhoh pars, Iran), and visualized by ethidium bro- mide (Sigma Aldrich, USA, cat no: E1510) staining
followed  by  Molecular  Imager®  Gel  Doc𝑇𝑀 XR+
(BioRad, USA).
 
 

1.1.Ethical consideration

 
This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Royan Institute (code: IR.ACECR.ROYAN.REC.1394.77). All participants were aware of the study details, and collection of tissue samples from them were performed after obtaining informed consent with complete verbal and written information.
 
 

1.2.Statistical analysis

The results were reported as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by
Post Hoc Tukey test. The level of p < 0.05 was taken
as a statistical significance.
 
 

2.Results

 
  1. Comparative evaluation of OCT- 4, NANOG, SOX-2, and REX-1 expression in control, eutopic, and ectopic tissues
 
The mean relative expressions of OCT-4, NANOG, and  SOX-2  were  significantly  higher  in ectopic endometrium compared with eutopic

and normal endometrium (p = 0.041), but the REX-1 mRNA increase was not significant between endometriosis and control groups. The analysis was carried out on the normal endometrium in the proliferative phase (p = 12) and paired eutopic (p
= 10) and ectopic endometrium specimens (p = 10) were in the proliferative phase.
 
 
  1. Expression profile of OCT-4, NANOG, SOX-2, and REX-1  in the control group during the menstrual cycles
 
Gene expression level of OCT-4, NANOG, SOX-2, and REX-1 were quantitatively evaluated in normal endometrium during the menstrual cycles. OCT-  4, SOX-2, and REX-1 showed significantly higher expression in the proliferative phase compared with the secretory phase (= 0.033, = 0.041,   p = 0.034, respectively, Figure 1). Also, OCT-4, NANOG, and REX-1 showed a significantly higher expression in the proliferative phase compared with the menstrual phase of the cycle (p = 0.031, p = 0.047, p = 0.031, Figure 2).

Table I: Sample groups analyzed in the study.



Table II: Primer sequences used in quantitative real-time PCR.




Figure 1: Comparative expression of stemness genes (SOX-2, NANOG, OCT-4, and REX-1) in proliferative phase in all groups
samples (n = 8) from normal healthy women. The results are expressed as 2∧ΔΔ𝐶𝑇 (mean ± SEM). Means labeled with asterisks including eutopic and ectopic tissue samples (n = 10 in each group) from endometriosis patients as well as normal endometrium show significant difference versus control group in p ≤ 0.05.



Figure 2: Relative mRNA expression levels of SOX-2, NANOG, OCT-4, and REX-1 stemness marker genes in normal endometrium
results are expressed as 2ΔΔCT (mean ± SEM). Means labeled with asterisks show significant difference versus control group in samples in three phases of the menstrual cycle: menstruation (n = 5), proliferative phase (n = 12) and secretory phase (n = 6). The p ≤ 0.05.
 

1.Discussion

Endometriosis is a disease with a complex and multifactorial etiology. Recently, several reports showed that adult progenitor stem cells are respon- sible for the capacity to generate endometriosis  if shed in a retrograde fashion in the menstrual cycle (20). In this regard, there are some evidence showing the functional role of three known stem- ness markers OCT-4, NANOG, and SOX-2 that synergistically regulate transcription of their tar- get genes in endometrial cells (20–22). Moreover, recent studies have shown a mathematical descrip- tion of molecular regulation in mouse embryonic stem cell and describe a network structure between OCT-4, NANOG, SOX-2, and REX-1 (21). It is
hypothesized that these stemness factors reduce apoptosis, enhance proliferation, higher migration, and invasion ability in the ectopic endometriosis tissue which is migrating to the outside of the uterus (23–25).
In the present study, the mRNA expression  level of NANOG gene was significantly increased in ectopic endometrial lesions in comparison to

eutopic and control groups. This result is similar to previous studies (5, 23), although there is an opposite data showing lower expression of NANOG gene in endometriotic tissues by RT-PCR (3). Dif- ferential expression of NANOG in our study was not observed in eutopic endometrium compared with normal endometrium, the data which was similar to previous reports (23). OCT-4 gene mRNA expression was increased significantly in ectopic endometrial lesions compared with eutopic and normal endometrium. This expression profile data is in accompany with the previous study that OCT-4 was up-regulated in ectopic sample tissues (5), but the different expression levels between ectopic endometrium group compared to eutopic and normal endometrium have not been seen in the comparable study (23). The tertiary candidate gene, SOX-2, which was checked in this study, showed a significantly higher expression level in ectopic endometrium compared to the eutopic and normal endometrium, consistent with previous reports (3, 4, 23). The last stemness marker gene analyzed through the current study showed no significant differential expression levels between three sample groups (>  0.05).  As there are  no
other quantitative reports about mRNA expression
of this gene in endometrial lesions, the current result can be assumed as a minor role of REX-1 gene compared to SOX-2, NANOG, and OCT-4, known as central and important factors in regulating the pluripotency properties. However, it should be mentioned that maybe by expanding the study with a higher number of samples, REX-1 shows a significantly increased expression; the hypothesis needs further experiments.
During this study, parallel to analyzing the endometriotic samples, the expression pattern of the four aforementioned stemness genes was mon- itored in control endometrium during the menstrual cycle in three phases. Our results showed a signifi- cant increase in mRNA levels of OCT-4, SOX-2, and REX-1 in proliferative phase, compared to secretory and menses. About NANOG, also an increased expression was observed in the proliferative phase,
although it didn’t reach a significant level (p >
0.05). We can easily construe these results with the
dynamic role of stemness genes in the proliferation and self-renewal of normal endometrium.
 

1.Conclusion

Finally, it can be concluded that the altered expression profile of stemness genes in this study indicates more the fundamental role of them in the expatriation, proliferation, invasion, and overall development of endometriosis.
 

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the technical supports of Soodeh Mahdian. They would like to dedicate this article to the memory of Dr. Saeid Kazemi Ashtiani, the late founder of Royan Institute. This project was financially supported by the Royan Institute (Grant No. 91000542).
 

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research.
 

 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. [1] Gustofson RL, Kim N, Liu S, Stratton P. Endometriosis and the appendix: a case series and comprehensive review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 298–303. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.076]
2. [2] Macer ML, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis- associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2012; 39: 535–549. [DOI:10.1016/j.ogc.2012.10.002]
3. [3] Forte A, Schettino MT, Finicelli M, Cipollaro M, Colacurci N, Cobellis L, et al. Expression pattern of stemness-related genes in human endometrial and endometriotic tissues. Mol Med 2009; 15: 392–401. [DOI:10.2119/molmed.2009.00068]
4. [4] Götte M, Wolf M, Staebler A, Buchweitz O, Kiesel L, Schüring AN. Aberrant expression of the pluripotency marker SOX-2 in endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 338– 341. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.006]
5. [5] Chang JH, Au HK, Lee WC, Chi CC, Ling TY, Wang LM, et al. Expression of the pluripotent transcription factor OCT4 promotes cell migration in endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 1332–1339. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.033]
6. [6] Fang X, Yu W, Li L, Shao J, Zhao N, Chen Q, et al. ChIP- seq and functional analysis of the SOX2 gene in colorectal cancers. OMICS 2010; 14: 369–384. [DOI:10.1089/omi.2010.0053]
7. [7] Kehler J, Tolkunova E, Koschorz B, Pesce M, Gentile L, Boiani M, et al. Oct4 is required for primordial germ cell survival. EMBO Rep 2004; 5: 1078–1083. [DOI:10.1038/sj.embor.7400279]
8. [8] Siu MK, Wong ES, Kong DS, Chan HY, Jiang L, Wong OG, et al. Stem cell transcription factor NANOG controls cell migration and invasion via dysregulation of E-cadherin and FoxJ1 and contributes to adverse clinical outcome in ovarian cancers. Oncogene 2013; 32: 3500–3509. [DOI:10.1038/onc.2012.363]
9. [9] Shi W, Wang H, Pan G, Geng Y, Guo Y, Pei D. Regulation of the pluripotency marker REX-1 by Nanog and Sox2. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 23319–23325. [DOI:10.1074/jbc.M601811200]
10. [10] Rodda DJ, Chew JL, Lim LH, Loh YH, Wang B, Ng HH, et al. Transcriptional regulation of nanog by OCT4 and SOX2. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 24731–24737. [DOI:10.1074/jbc.M502573200]
11. [11] Favaedi R, Sahhoseini M, Akhoond MR. Comparative epi- genetic analysis of Oct4 regulatory region in RA-induced differentiated NT2 cells under adherent and non-adherent culture conditions. Mol Cell Biochem 2012; 363: 129–134. [DOI:10.1007/s11010-011-1165-y]
12. [12] Loh YH, Wu Q, Chew JL, Vega VB, Zhang W, Chen X, et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 431–440. [DOI:10.1038/ng1760]
13. [13] Navarro P, Festuccia N, Colby D, Gagliardi A, Mullin NP, Zhang W, et al. OCT4/SOX2-independent Nanog autorepression modulates heterogeneous Nanog gene expression in mouse ES cells. EMBO J 2012; 31: 4547–4562. [DOI:10.1038/emboj.2012.321]
14. [14] Chew JL, Loh YH, Zhang W, Chen X, Tam WL, Yeap LS, et al. Reciprocal transcriptional regulation of Pou5f1 and Sox2 via the Oct4/Sox2 complex in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25: 6031–6046. [DOI:10.1128/MCB.25.14.6031-6046.2005]
15. [15] Glauche I, Herberg M, Roeder I. Nanog variability and pluripotency regulation of embryonic stem cells-insights from a mathematical model analysis. PLoS One 2010; 5: e11238. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0011238]
16. [16] Wang J, Levasseur DN, Orkin SH. Requirement of Nanog dimerization for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 6326–6331. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0802288105]
17. [17] Mullin NP, Yates A, Rowe AJ, Nijmeijer B, Colby D, Barlow PN, et al. The pluripotency rheostat Nanog functions as a dimer. Biochem J 2008; 411: 227–231. [DOI:10.1042/BJ20080134]
18. [18] The American Fertility Society. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 351–352. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48430-X]
19. [19] Mahdian S, Aflatoonian R, Yazdi RS, Yaghmaei P, Ramazanali F, Afsharian P, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor as a potential biomarker of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 153–159. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.031]
20. [20] Sasson IE, Taylor HS. Stem cells and the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1127: 106–115. [DOI:10.1196/annals.1434.014]
21. [21] Herberg M, Kalkan T, Glauche I, Smith A, Roeder I. A model-based analysis of culture-dependent phenotypes of mESCs. PLoS One 2014; 9: 92496. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0092496]
22. [22] Kellner S, Kikyo N. Transcriptional regulation of the Oct4 gene, a master gene for pluripotency. Histol Histopathol 2010; 25: 405–412.
23. [23] Song Y, Xiao L, Fu J, Huang W, Wang Q, Zhang X, et al. Increased expression of the pluripotency markers sex-determining region Y-box 2 and Nanog homeobox in ovarian endometriosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12: 42. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-12-42]
24. [24] Dmowski WP, Ding J, Shen J, Rana N, Fernandez BB, Braun DP. Apoptosis in endometrial glandular and stromal cells in women with and without endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1802–1808. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.9.1802]
25. [25] Taniguchi F, Kaponis A, Izawa M, Kiyama T, Deura I, Ito M, et al. Apoptosis and endometriosis. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2011; 3: 648–662. [DOI:10.2741/e277]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb