Volume 17, Issue 1 (January 2019 2019)                   IJRM 2019, 17(1): 67-70 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hafizi L, Ghomian N. Twin pregnancy in the unicornuate uterus and non-communicating rudimentary horn: A case report. IJRM 2019; 17 (1) :67-70
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1382-en.html
1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. , ghomiann@mums.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 1049 kb]   (823 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (6124 Views)
Full-Text:   (397 Views)
1. Introduction

Congenital uterine malformation is seen in 1–10% of the general population, and it results from an abnormal formation, fusion, or reabsorption of the müllerian duct. A unicornuate uterus is present in 0.1% of the general population (1). In this anomaly, the underdeveloped or rudimentary horn may be present, and the uterus may be communicating and may contain an endometrium-lined cavity (2).
This müllerian anomaly carries significant obstetrical risks including first- and secondtrimes term is carriage trimester miscarriage, malpresentation, fetal-growth restriction, preterm delivery, and rudimentary horn rupture (3). Firstand second-trimester rupture of rudimentary horn is thought to be due to decreased muscle mass (4). The risk of rudimentary horn rupture is 50 to 90%, of which most occur in the second trimester of the pregnancy (5).
Here, we present a rare case of twin pregnancy in the unicornuate uterus and non-communicating rudimentary horn. One fetus in the unicornuate uterus and the other one in the rudimentary horn that was ruptured and pregnancy terminated with rudimentary horn excision. Pregnancy in the unicornuate uterus was continued until 38-wk gestational age.

2. Case Report

A 24-yr-old primigravida was presented to our hospital with abdominal pain for 24 hr. Her last menstrual period was 12 wks ago, she had vomiting and dizziness. In history, she was married for one year and her menstrual cycles were regular and with dysmenorrhea.
The patient did not have any medical, family, or psychological history including relevant genetic information. She was pale on clinical examination. Her pulse rate was 110 beats per minute and her blood pressure was 90/50 mmHg.
The abdomen had generalized tenderness and fundal height was 14 wk. There was slight vaginal bleeding and uterus was tender on vaginal examination. Posterior fornix was full and cervical motion tenderness was present. In the vaginal examination, the cervix was single and the vagina was normal.
Bedside ultrasonography showed hemoperitoneum and a viable 12-wk twin pregnancy: one fetus in the unicornuate uterus and other in the rudimentary horn. Urgent laparotomy was done. Intraoperatively there were 1 L of hemoperitoneum. Unicornuate uterus with the non-communicating rudimentary horn was seen. Rupture of 2cm size in left rudimentary horn with active bleeding was present on posterior margin (Figures 1, 2).
The left fallopian tube was normal. The left ovary was attached by its ligament to the rudimentary horn. Left ruptured non-communicating rudimentary horn and fallopian tube excised from small pedicle from main uterus and defect was repaired.
Her postoperative period was uneventful and she recovered well. Postoperative ultrasonography showed viable intrauterine fetus with normal cardiac activity and gestational age of 12 wk and 5 days. She was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. The patient was given a 26-wk follow-up appointment. At 38-wk gestational age, cesarean section was performed due to premature rupture of membrane and fetus with 2900gr weight and apgars 9/10 was delivered.

2.1. Ethical consideration

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. The article was submitted to the ethical committee of Mashhad University of MedicalSciences in Iran. Upon review, the ethical committee approved the above-mentioned protocol in its session held on ‘January 21, 2107’; Reference Number: IR.MUMS.REC.1395.522.



Figure 1: Intraoperative photograph showing the anterior view of the unicornuate uterus with the rudimentary horn.




Figure 2: Intraoperative photograph showing the posterior view of the unicornuate uterus with the rudimentary horn having a 2-cm rupture with the placenta protruding.


3. Discussion

A unicornuate uterus is one of the müllerian duct malformations that is present in 0.1% of the general population and carries significant obstetrical risks including rudimentary horn rupture (1). Although some case reports of pregnancy in a non-communicating rudimentary horn were reported (1–5), Oza and colleagues reported a case of unruptured non-communicating rudimentary horn pregnancy at 15-wk gestational age with intrauterine fetal death and induction failurewhere laparotomy was performed and rudimentary horn excised (6). Kumar and co-workers reported a case of ruptured rudimentary horn at 14 wks of pregnancy where excision of the rudimentary horn was done (7). Thakur and colleagues reported a ruptured non-communicating rudimentary horn pregnancy at 19 wk of pregnancy with a previous history of cesarean delivery (5). However, twin pregnancy in the unicornuate uterus and non-communicating rudimentary horn is a rare event. Most cases remain undiagnosed until it ruptures and presents as an emergency with hemoperitoneum (8). Nanda and colleagues reported a case of twin pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus with a non-communicating rudimentary horn in which each of fetus was in the separate horn. In this case, a cesarean section was performed and two siblings were delivered successfully (9). A literature search shows that more than 20 years ago, Nahum reported a patient with surviving twins: one fetus delivered first by cesarean section and the second one was born with natural vaginal delivery in eight days later (10). The usual outcome of rudimentary horn pregnancy is a rupture in the first or second trimester (11, 12). Initial ultrasound scan leads to early detection and can
prevent maternal mortality and morbidity. In an acute abdomen with pregnancy, rupture of the rudimentary horn of the uterus is one of the differential diagnoses. In our patient, diagnosis of twin pregnancy in the unicornuate uterus with the rudimentary horn was established when she was 12 wk and presents as an acute abdomen. Intraoperative rupture of rudimentary horn and normal pregnancy in the unicornuate uterus was confirmed with good neonatal and maternal outcomes. After the termination of pregnancy, the patient had a live baby and, in her perspective, it was worth the risk of a major surgery during
pregnancy.

4. Conclusion

Twin pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn is a rare condition that carries grave risk to the mother. There is a need for increased awareness of this rare condition to prevent maternal morbidity and mortality.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the patient in cooperating with the publication of this report.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. [1] Caserta D, Mallozzi M, Meldolesi C, Bianchi P, Moscarini M.Pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2014; 8: 130. [DOI:10.1186/1752-1947-8-130]
2. [2] Reichman D, Laufer MR, Robinson BK. Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:1886–1894. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.163]
3. [3] Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38:371–382. [DOI:10.1002/uog.10056]
4. [4] Hua M, Odibo AO, Longman RE, Macones GA, Roehl KA, Cahill AG. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:558.e1–5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.022]
5. [5] Thakur S, Sood A, Sharma C. Ruptured noncommunicating rudimentary horn pregnancy at 19weeks with previous cesarean delivery: a case report. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2012; 2012: 308476–308480.
6. [6] Oza HV, Vohra HM, Patel NH, Shethna DY. Pregnancy In Rudimentary Horn: A rare entity. Gujarat Med J 2015; 70:65–66.
7. [7] Kumar A, Deepika N. Ruptured non-communicating rudimentary horn of unicornuate uterus at 14 weeks of pregnancy: a case report. Global J Med Public Health 2013; 2: 1–4
8. [8] Rackow BW, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with müllerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19: 229–237. [DOI:10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814b0649]
9. [9] Nanda S, Dahiya K, Sharma N, Aggarwal D, Sighal SR, Sangwan N. Successful twin pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus with one fetus in the non-communicating rudimentary horn. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280: 993–995. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-009-1028-x]
10. [10] Nahum GG. Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. A case report on surviving twins delivered eight days apart. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 525–532.
11. [11] Okonta PI, Abedi H, Ajuyah C, Omo-Aghoja L. Pregnancy in a noncommunicating rudimentary horn of a unicornuate uterus: a case report. Cases J 2009; 2: 6624–6626. [DOI:10.1186/1757-1626-2-6624]
12. [12] Nahum GG. Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. The 20 ℎ-century worldwide experience of 588 cases. J Reprod Med 2002; 47: 151–163.

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb