سه شنبه 28 فروردین 1403
[Archive]
دوره 8، شماره 1 - ( 4-1389 )
جلد 8 شماره 1 صفحات 23-18 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Niknafs B, Afshar F, Dezfulian A. The effects of different luteal support hormones on endometrial alkaline phosphatase activity and endometrial thickness in superovulated mice. IJRM 2010; 8 (1) :18-23
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-170-fa.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-170-fa.html
The effects of different luteal support hormones on endometrial alkaline phosphatase activity and endometrial thickness in superovulated mice. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 1389; 8 (1) :18-23
چکیده: (2282 مشاهده)
Background: There are some controversial data on application of progesterone and progesterone plus estrogen at luteal phase.
Objective: To investigate the effects of different luteal support hormones on the Alkaline Phosphates (ALP) activity in the endometrial epithelium and endometrial thickness during superovulation process for obtaining the optimized endometrial receptivity in animal model.
Materials and Methods: Pseudopregnant female Balb/c mice were induced for pseudopregnany through superovulation then the mice were divided into two groups. Experimental group included five groups: the pseudopregnant mice were given four consecutive daily injections of progesterone (P group) estrogen (E group) estrogen + progesterone (E+P group) antiprogesterone + estrogen (RU 486 + E) and sham group. In the control group pseudopregnancy was induced in the natural cycle. The uterus was collected after day 4.5 of pseudopregnancy. The samples were prepared for the morphological and morphometrical evaluation of the endometrial ALP activity and endometrial thickness.
Results: ALP activity was observed in all groups except P group. ALP activity of P + E group was similar to E and RU 486 + E groups. Sham group showed high ALP activity compared to the P group. The endometrial thickness was low in the P group and high in the sham group in comparison with other groups.
Conclusion: In conclusion super ovulation decreased the ALP activity. Estrogen along with progesterone at the luteal phase increased the enzyme activity and the endometrial thickness compared with the progesterone administration and thus progesterone plus estrogen could improve embryo receptivity.
Objective: To investigate the effects of different luteal support hormones on the Alkaline Phosphates (ALP) activity in the endometrial epithelium and endometrial thickness during superovulation process for obtaining the optimized endometrial receptivity in animal model.
Materials and Methods: Pseudopregnant female Balb/c mice were induced for pseudopregnany through superovulation then the mice were divided into two groups. Experimental group included five groups: the pseudopregnant mice were given four consecutive daily injections of progesterone (P group) estrogen (E group) estrogen + progesterone (E+P group) antiprogesterone + estrogen (RU 486 + E) and sham group. In the control group pseudopregnancy was induced in the natural cycle. The uterus was collected after day 4.5 of pseudopregnancy. The samples were prepared for the morphological and morphometrical evaluation of the endometrial ALP activity and endometrial thickness.
Results: ALP activity was observed in all groups except P group. ALP activity of P + E group was similar to E and RU 486 + E groups. Sham group showed high ALP activity compared to the P group. The endometrial thickness was low in the P group and high in the sham group in comparison with other groups.
Conclusion: In conclusion super ovulation decreased the ALP activity. Estrogen along with progesterone at the luteal phase increased the enzyme activity and the endometrial thickness compared with the progesterone administration and thus progesterone plus estrogen could improve embryo receptivity.
نوع مطالعه: Original Article |
فهرست منابع
1. Thomas G K, Carolina G, Sen H P. Prostaglandins and the initiation of blastocyst implantation and decidualization. Reproduction 2007; 134: 635-643. [DOI:10.1530/REP-07-0328]
2. Leesey BA. The role of the endometrium during embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 36-50.
3. Ma WG, Song H, Das SK, Paria BC, Dey SK. Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation. PNAS 2003; 100: 2963-2968. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0530162100]
4. Bansode F, Chauhan S, Makker A, Singh M. Uterine luminal epithelial alkaline phosphatase activity and pinopod development in relation to endometrial sensitivity in the rat .Contraception 1998; 58: 61-68. [DOI:10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00055-9]
5. Krajnicakova M, Lenhardt L, Valocký I, Cigánkova V, Kostecký M, Maracek I. Activity of alkaline and acidic phosphatase and non-specific esterase in the endometrium and oviduct of postpartum goes. Small Ruminant Res 2004; 53 : 47-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.09.006]
6. Sophie J, Mariann W. Expression of alkaline phosphatase in the mature mouse placenta visualized in situ hybridization and enzyme histochemistry. Anat and Embryo 2004; 187: 409-414.
7. Hawkins D, Abrahamse H. How should increase in alkaline phosphatase activity be interpreted? Laser Chemistry 2007: Article ID 49608.
8. Bucci M, Murphy CR. Alkaline phosphatase distribution in the plasma membrane of uterine epithelial cells is markedly altered during early pregnancy in the rat. Cell Biol Int 1995; 19: 921-928. [DOI:10.1006/cbir.1995.1030]
9. Bucci M, Murphy CR. Hormonal control of enzyme activity during the plasma membrane transformation of uterine epithelial cells. Cell Biol 2001; 25: 871-895. [DOI:10.1006/cbir.2001.0771]
10. Emadi M, Salehnia M. Localization and activity of mouse endometrial alkaline phosphatase after hyperstimulation and progesterone injection at implantation time. Biomed J 2004; 8: 121- 126.
11. Nilsson O, Lundknist O. Ultastructural and histochmical changes of the mouse uterine epithelium on blastocyte activation for implantation. Anat & Embryo 2004; 155: 311-321. [DOI:10.1007/BF00317644]
12. Dey SK, Lim H, Sanjoy K, Reese J, Takiko D, Haibin W. Molecular Cues to Implantation . Endocrine Rev 2004; 25: 341-373. [DOI:10.1210/er.2003-0020]
13. Gruber I, Just A, Birner M, Losch A. Serum estradiol/progesterone ratio on day of embryo transfer may predict reproductive outcome following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and in vitro fertilization. Exp & Clin Assist Reprod 2007; 4: 1. [DOI:10.1186/1743-1050-4-1]
14. Bourgain C, Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod 2003; 9: 515-522. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmg045]
15. Hubayter Z, Muasher S. Luteal supplementation in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility 2008; 89: 749-758. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.095]
16. Alsian A, Kadoch I, Phillips S, Lapensee L, Hemmings R, Bissonnette F. Adding estrogen to progesterone in luteal phase support in In Vitro Fertilization Embryo Transfer cycles produce pregnancies with higher quantitative (βhCG). Fertility and Sterility 2005; 84: S155. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.377]
17. Bancraft JD, Ganble M. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 5th ed. London; Churchill Livigstone; 2002.
18. Lindhard A, Bentin-Ley U , Ravn V, Islin H, Hviid T, Rex S, et al. Biochemical evaluation of endometrial function at the time of implantation. Fertilty and Sterilty 2002; 78: 221-233. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03240-5]
19. Fossum G, Davidson A, Paulson R. Ovarian hyperstimulation inhibits embryo implantation in the mouse. Assist Reprod Gen 1989; 6: 7-10. [DOI:10.1007/BF01134574]
20. Beverley K. Changes in vascular permeability and deciduoma formation during the peri-implantation period of the rat in response to exogenous gonadotropins. Anat & Physio 1998; 247: 20-24
21. Todd A, Marisela M, Bert W, Orla M. Mutual and intercompartmental regulation of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression in mouse uterus. Biol Reprod 1998; 59: 1143-1152. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod59.5.1143]
22. Lewin A, Benshushan A, Mezker E, Yanai N, Schenker J, Goshin R. The role of estrogen support during the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization – embryo transplant cycle: a comparative study between progesterone one alone and estrogen and progesterone support. Fertitilty and Sterility 1994; 62: 121-125. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56826-5]
23. Tay P, Lenton E. Inhibition of progesterone secretion by oestradiol administered in the luteal phase of assisted conception cycles. Med J Malaysia 2003; 58: 187-195.
24. Smitz J, Borgain C, Bourgain L, Van WM, Camus P, Devroey AC, et al. Prospective randomized study on ostradiol valerate supplementation in addition to intravaginal micronized progesterone in buserelin and HMG induced superovulation. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 40-50. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137871]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
