Volume 12, Issue 1 (2-2014)                   IJRM 2014, 12(1): 77-82 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jarahzadeh M H, Jouya R, Mousavi F S, Dehghan-tezerjani M, Behdad S, Soltani H R. Propofol or Thiopental sodium in patients undergoing reproductive assisted technologies: Differences in hemodynamic recovery and outcome of oocyte retrieval: A randomized clinical trial. IJRM 2014; 12 (1) :77-82
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-471-en.html
1- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2- Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , dr.dehghan@gmail.com
4- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
5- Scientific Society of Medicine, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 465 kb]   (562 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2495 Views)
Full-Text:   (330 Views)
Introduction
 
Ttransnvaginal ultrasonography-guided oocyte retrieval is a temporary outpatient procedure requiring a quickly and effectively anesthetic technique with minimal side effects (1). Since the first time anesthetics were found in the follicular fluid controversial theories have been proposed for the deleterious effects of anesthetics on oocyte retrieval during in vitro fertilization (IVF) (2, 3). Some studies suggest that these drugs may adversely affect oocyte fertilization and embryonic development (4, 5). As a result, the optimal anesthetic technique for these assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures is unknown. Propofol (2, 6 disopropylphenol) is a popular anesthetic drug that is a hypnotic agent. It produces mild to moderate sedation with reported side effects like bradycardia and Asystole (1.4 per 100.000 patients) (4, 5).
In 1998, Tatone et al questioned Propofol’s safety in ART while before that several evidences had confirmed its safety in IVF (6-9). From then on, several studies have been conducted with the aim of evaluating and comparing the efficacy of Propofol and its side effects on oocyte retrieval. This study was conducted to evaluate the side effects, hemodynamic effects, and pregnancy outcome of these drugs in women who were candidate for ART and were suffering from male factor infertility.
 
Materials and methods
 
The double blinded randomized controlled trial method was used in this study. Patients and data collectors were blinded during study. This study was done in Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences from June to September 2012.
 
Samples
Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) candidate women at their pregnancy age (15-35 years) were randomly (using even and odd list) and consequently selected during a convenience sampling for the study (47 patients received Propofol versus 43 patients that received thiopental). The criteria based on which the candidates were selected were the lack of infertility problems in the women and the presence of fertility problems in their husbands.
Also all the patients who exposed to an unintended clinical problem during the anesthesia excluded from the study Informed consent form was conducted for all samples. Ethic Committee of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences confirmed the plan of the study (Reference number: 3763). Consort flow diagram of this study show the population and exclusion step by step (Figure 1).
 
Data Collection Procedure
The thiopental (Nani pharmaceutical ltd. India) and Propofol (Dangkook Pharmacology ltd. South Korea) groups were respectively induced with 5mg/kg of thiopental Sodium and 2.5 mg/kg of Propofol. Before the induction process, all the participants underwent a pre-oxygenation and then, received 1 mg/kg of midazolam and 2 mg/kg of fentanyl. In cases where a longer consciousness was needed, again Propofol 40 mg for the Propofol group and thiopental 100 mg for the thiopental group were used while no cases needed additive drugs.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse rates of the participants were measured immediately after the induction and then at five-minute intervals (10, 15, 20 minutes after start) during the experiment. Mature MII oocytes were selected to be included in the ICSI process. After 16-18 post-oocyte microinjections, all oocytes were microscopically observed for signs of fertilization. Fertilization was confirmed when two pronuclei were present within the ooplasm. The rate of fertilization was calculated as the percentage of the fertilized oocytes per MII oocytes. Oocyte quality and level of βHCG were evaluated in two groups.
Exactly 24 hours after fertilization, cleaved embryos were assessed and graded according to the degree of fragmentation and size of blastomeres. These were categorized into four groups: A (score 18-20), B (score 16-17), C (score 14-15) and D (score 12-13) (10). In general, grade D embryos were discarded. Also, Transvaginal oocyte retrieval was done using a 17-gauge needle using ultrasound guidance. When the needle was introduced into a follicle, suction was applied to 90-100 mm Hg until the follicle was emptied. This process was performed for each ultrasonically visible follicle larger than 12 mm in diameter.
 
Statistical analysis
The data from the samples were analyzed using ANOVA, Chi-square, Fishers Exact test, and Mann-Whitney U-test. The analytical software employed in the study was SPSS version 20. The significance level for the study was considered to be p>0.05.
 
Results
 
Mean of age in Propofol group was 30.23±4.42 versus 28.72±5.19 years in Thiopental sodiumgroup (p=0.26). While 12 (26.7%) of the participants in Thiopental sodium group had vomiting, it was not a case in the Propofol group. 49 cases entered experiment group (receiving Propofol), one case experienced severe unstable hemodynamic and excluded from the study. Also another case excluded due to incomplete data in analyzing and patients (n=43) in thiopental group had no exclusion, 4 (31.1%) of the participants in the thiopental group were reported to have nausea while no case in the Propofol group was observed.
The results of the analysis indicated that vomiting (p=0.001) and nausea (0.000) in the Propofol group were significantly less than the thiopental group. Moreover, oocyte quality (p=0.23), fertility success (p=0.09), cleavage 
outcome (p=0.12), and βHCG results were not significantly different (p=0.33). Mean of the time of rapid response to the acoustic stimulation in Propofol was 3.25±1.58 seconds while this time in Thiopental sodium group recorded as 6.35±1.99 seconds, Mann Whitney U test showed a significant difference between two groups (p=0.001). Data of vital sign during anesthesia (Table I) and recovery (Table II) are shown in figurs 2-4.

 
Table I. Vital signs measurement during anesthesia


Table II. Vital signs measurement during recovery



Figure 1. Consort flow diagram.



Figure 2. Systolic blood pressure means (mmHg) of the participants during different anesthesia (A) and recovery (B) periods are shown. During anesthesia (A) an obvious difference is seen in minute 10, Also in recovery (B) during 0 and 5 minutes difference appears to be important but no intervals in this figure during separated times were significantly different.



Figure 3. Diastolic blood pressure means (mmHg) of the participants during different anesthesia (A) and recovery (B) periods are shown. No significant difference during different intervals in separated times is seen.



Figure 4. Pulse rate means (mmHg) of the participants during different anesthesia (A) and recovery (B) periods are shown. No significant difference during different intervals in separated times is seen.


Discussion
 
Since the first time anesthetics were observed in the follicular fluid, controversial theories have been proposed for the deleterious effects of anesthetics with a focus on their probable side effects (2, 3). As an anesthetic, Propofol has enjoyed a continuous popularity. The results of a study conducted in Taiwan showed no statistically significant difference between thiopental and Propofol in terms of fertility, cleavage, pregnancy, fertility, and abortion rate. Particularly, less vomiting and nausea was reported for thiopental in the study (11). Also, Pierce et al investigated the pregnancy rate after GIFT (Gamete Intra-fallopian Transfer) and found no significant difference between thiopental and Propofol (12).
The findings of the present study are similar to those of the above-mentioned studies since no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of oocyte quality, pregnancy and cleavage outcomes, and βHCG on the 15th day after embryo implantation. Of course, among the studies referred to above none had investigated the βHCG on the 15th day after embryo implantation. In all similar studies Propofol is preferable to thiopental. Therefore, in a number of other studies Propofol has been compared with other drugs during the ART process. In a study done in 2008, the effect of local anesthesia on ART was explored by injecting Remi fentanyl. The findings of the study suggested that Remi fentanyl had no effect on the retrieved oocyte (13).
The results of a study conducted in the USA indicated that Propofol and Isoflurane had no impact on pregnancy rate in GIFT (14, 15). The findings of another study in the USA did not report a huge difference in the pregnancy and fertility rates of the 117 women anaesthetized by Propofol in comparison with those who did not received the drug during oocyte retrieval (16). In other hand, Propofol provides rapid onset and offset with context-sensitive decrement times of approximately 10 minutes when infused for less than 3 hours and less than 40 minutes when infused for up to 8 hours.
Its mechanism of action is thought to be potentiation of γ-amino butyric acid (GABA)-induced chloride currents (17). At therapeutic doses, Propofol produces a moderate depressant effect on ventilation. It causes a dose-dependent decrease in blood pressure primarily through a decrease in cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance. A unique action of Propofol is its antiemetic effect, which remains present at concentrations less than those producing sedation (18). In many other surgeries the effects of Propofol and thiopental have been compared (19). This is due to the fact that thiopental has been one of the most widely-used anesthetics and with the introduction of Propofol, it is giving way to Propofol. It should be noted that the effects of Propofol have been compared with other drugs, too.
 
Conclusion
 
In the light of the findings of the present study and other similar studies, it can be argued that there is no significant difference between thiopental sodium and Propofol in terms of pregnancy outcomes. Also, there is no evidence suggesting that the two drugs can influence oocyte quality and fertility rate negatively. However, Propofol is followed by less vomiting and nausea. Moreover, Propofol has a better performance in controlling the pulse rate of patients. In addition, it guarantees a faster recovery, and makes it possible for patients to get their normal breathing back quicker. Therefore, it is recommended that Propofol be used as the anesthetic option for surgeries required during ART.
 
Acknowledgments
 
We thank Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences for financial support.
 
Conflict of interest
 
Authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest

 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Martin R, Tsen LC, Tzeng G, Hornstein MD, Datta S. Anesthesia for in vitro fertilization: the addition of fentanyl to 1.5% lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 523-526. [DOI:10.1213/00000539-199903000-00010]
2. Soussis I, Boyd O, Paraschos T, Duffy S, Bower S, Troughton P, et al. Follicular fluid levels of midazolam, fentanyl, and alfentanil during transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 1995; 64:1003-1007. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57919-9]
3. Endler GC, Stout M, Magyar DM, Hayes MF, Moghissi KS, Sacco AG. Follicular fluid concentrations of thiopental and thiamylal during laparoscopy for oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 828-833. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59539-9]
4. Pierce ET, Smalky M, Alper MM, Hunter JA, Amrhein RL, Pierce EC Jr. Comparison of pregnancy rates following gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) under general anesthesia with thiopental sodium or Propofol. J Clin Anesth 1992; 4: 394-398. [DOI:10.1016/0952-8180(92)90164-V]
5. Tramer MR, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Propofol and bradycardia: causation, frequency and severity. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 642-651. [DOI:10.1093/bja/78.6.642]
6. Tatone C, Francione A, Marinangeli F, Lottan M, Varrassi G, Colonna R. An evaluation of Propofol toxicity on mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 430-435. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.2.430]
7. Palot M, Harika G, Lamiable D, Pigeon F, Visseaux H, Leon A, et al. [General anesthesia with Propofol alone for ovocyte removal. Concentration of follicular liquid and rate of cleavage]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1989;
8. 8 (Suppl.): R68. (In French) 8. Imoedemhe DA, Sigue AB, Abdul Ghani I, Abozeid MA, Abdel Halim MS. An evaluation of the effect of the anesthetic agent profofol (Diprivan) on the outcome of human in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992; 9: 488-491. [DOI:10.1007/BF01204057]
9. Stetson PL, Domino EF, Sneyd JR. Determination of plasma Propofol levels using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with selected-ion monitoring. J Chromatogr 1993; 620: 260-267. [DOI:10.1016/0378-4347(93)80014-U]
10. Hill G, Freeman M, Bastias M, Rogers B, Herbert 3rd C, Osteen K and Wentz A. The influence of oocyte maturity and embryo quality on pregnancy rate in a program for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertility and sterility 1989; 52:801-806 [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)61034-8]
11. Huang HW, Huang FJ, Kung FT, Tsai MY, Lin H, Chang SY, et al. Effects of induction anesthetic agents on outcome of assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of Propofol and thiopental sodium. Chang Gung Med J 2000; 23: 513-519.
12. Pierce ET, Smalky M, Alper MM, Hunter JA, Amrhein RL, Pierce EC, Jr. Comparison of pregnancy rates following gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) under general anesthesia with thiopental sodium or Propofol. J Clin Anesth 1992; 4: 394-398. [DOI:10.1016/0952-8180(92)90164-V]
13. Milanini MN, D'Onofrio P, Melani Novelli AM, Dabizzi S, Cozzi C, Evangelisti P, et al. Local anesthesia versus intravenous infusion of remifentanil for assisted reproductive technologies. A retrospective study. Minerva Ginecol 2008; 60: 203-207.
14. Ma YY, Shen Y, Zhang LS. [Comparison of midazolam and Propofol as conscious sedation in oocyte retrieval of IVE-ET]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2008; 37: 304-307. (In Chinese)
15. Beilin Y, Bodian CA, Mukherjee T, Andres LA, Vincent RD Jr, Hock DL, et al. The use of Propofol, nitrous oxide, or isoflurane does not affect the reproductive success rate following gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT): a multicenter pilot trial/survey. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 36-41. [DOI:10.1097/00000542-199901000-00007]
16. Rosenblatt MA, Bradford CN, Bodian CA, Grunfeld L. The effect of a Propofol-based sedation technique on cumulative embryo scores, clinical pregnancy rates, and implantation rates in patients undergoing embryo transfers with donor oocytes. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9: 614-617. [DOI:10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00197-9]
17. Erdogan MA, Begec Z, Aydogan MS, Ozgul U, Yucel A, Colak C, et al. Comparison of effects of Propofol and ketamine-Propofol mixture (ketofol) on laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions and hemodynamics in elderly patients: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial. J Anesth 2013; 27: 12-17. [DOI:10.1007/s00540-012-1484-5]
18. Tontisirin O, Rojanasakul A, Srisombut C, Wongkularb A, Chatasingh S. Propofol anesthesia for transvaginal ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval. J Med Assoc Thai 1996; 79: 618-623.
19. Ghatak T, Singh D, Kapoor R, Bogra J. Effects of addition of ketamine, fentanyl and saline with Propofol induction on hemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions in oral clonidine premedicated children. Saudi J Anaesth 2012; 6: 140-144. [DOI:10.4103/1658-354X.97027]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb