Volume 12, Issue 11 (12-2014)                   IJRM 2014, 12(11): 737-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Chen Y, Li C, Lee S, Hsu B, Wu W, Kuo C, et al . Growth changes in infants born of adolescent mothers: Results of a national cohort study in Taiwan. IJRM 2014; 12 (11) :737-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-493-en.html
1- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University (CSMU), Taichung 402, Taiwan
2- School of Nursing, CSMU, Taichung 402, Taiwan
3- School of Nursing, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
4- Wurih District Public Health Center, Taichung 402, Taiwan
5- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 365, Taiwan , mcl@csmu.edu.tw
Full-Text [PDF 364 kb]   (517 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2550 Views)
Full-Text:   (368 Views)
Introduction
 
Pregnancy and fertility rate of teens have been decreasing in the past decade in Taiwan. Of all teens aged less than 19 who became pregnant, 20% delivered a live infant and the rate was approximately 8 births per 1000 teenage girls (ages 15-19), or 3.6% of all birth in 2005 (National Statistics, DGBES, TW) (1). Although teenage pregnancy in Taiwan is lower than western countries, such as 10% and 7% of all births in USA and the UK, the related issues have become pressing social concerns, particularly the delivery of low birth weight (LBW) or preterm infants (2, 3).
Adolescent mothers are associated with less knowledge about parenting and child development, have less confidence in their parenting abilities, and express more problematic parenting beliefs and styles when compared to adult mothers (4-6). There is also increased risk for premature delivery and LBW births, which could pose a threat to poorer developmental outcomes among young children (7-10). Children of adolescent mothers are at risk for future developmental and behavioral problems, increased risks of developmental delay, decreased self-sufficiency and continued cognitive/behavioral problems (11-13). Some studies have shown that factors such as greater maternal education and more favorable living conditions are likely to improve growth and developmental outcomes for those children (14).
Infant growth is not only affected by health related practices, such as breastfeeding  and smoking, but also predisposing factors consisted of infant sex, birth order, and degree of intra-uterine constraint (15-17). Slow infant growth may indicate inadequate living conditions, inappropriate nutrition or other health problems, although factors contributing to growth vary by population such as underfeeding and infection observed in developing countries (18-20). In contrast, there is increasing evidence that rapid infant growth is associated with higher risk of developing diseases in childhood, adolescence and adulthood (21-25). The pattern of infant growth has drawn attention to the effects on lifelong health (26, 27). Breastfeeding is the best way of feeding an infant and provides well-known benefits to the infant and the mother (28, 29).
Studies have shown that total duration of breastfeeding is associated with slower growth in the first year of life and can contribute to the protective effects of breastfeeding against overweight and obesity (30-34). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) up to 6 months for newborn infants (35, 36). However, breastfeeding duration is affected by many factors, such as social status, insufficient milk supply, parity, maternal work situation and infant health problems (37, 38). In the present study we focused our investigation on the associations of growth change over time with parenting factors in a birth cohort study from Taiwan and compared the differences between children born to adolescent and adult mothers.
 
Materials and methods
 
Children of 2005 birth cohort
This was a longitudinal study using the dataset from a population-base Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) that covered a total of 24,200 pairs of mothers and newborns from the time of birth in 2005 until December of 2007 (39). This TBCS provides a wide range of longitudinal information about children’s development. Infants with major disorders or congenital anomalies were excluded from this study. The study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (National Health Research Institute) and Data Protection Board in Taiwan before initiated. After written informed consent was obtained, all eligible subjects (mother-child dyads) were categorized into two groups according to maternal ages of giving birth, of which 878 were adolescent mothers (≤20 years at the time of the child’s birth) and 20,370 were adult mothers (aged 20 or older).

Data collection
Data was collected by trained research assistants with the use of a structured questionnaire at home interviews. The first and secondary home interviews with the 24,200 post-partum women were conducted at 6, 12 and 18 months after their deliveries during the period from June 2005 to December 2007. A total of 21,248 women completed interviews, giving a response rate of 87.8%. Information related to birth characteristics, including birth weight, birth order, gender, gestational age, head circumference, birth number (singleton or multiple pregnancy), method of delivery, patterns of infant feeding and caregiving status were obtained.
All of the weight and length or height measurements were retrieved from Child Health Handbook, in which records of periodic health examinations (at 1st, 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 30th and 36th month) documented for all children up to 6 years old on a free-of-charge basis by National Health Insurance Program in Taiwan. The effects of breastfeeding on growth in infancy were analyzed by repeated measurements of child growth up to 18 months. The weights and lengths or heights were measured by trained nurses and recorded to the nearest 100g and millimeter (mm), respectively. Feeding practice was described by a categorical variable and included as a time-dependent variable to assess its association with growth rate.
 
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) version 9.2 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA). Categorical variables are presented as a count and percentage and compared with a Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables are summarized by a mean and standard deviation and compared with a two-tailed independent samples t-test and results reported at a 0.05 significance level. Means, medians, standard deviations, frequencies and percentages were calculated for descriptive data.
Trend and differences in growth for body weight, body height and head circumference between babies born to adolescent and adult mothers were analyzed using repeated measure ANOVA and Z test statistics which is comparable across ages and provides a more sensitive assessment of deviations of growth. The longitudinal associations between variables and the change of growth with time from birth to 18 months old were analyzed using fitted generalized estimating equation (GEE) models. SAS PROC GENMOD was used for logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between growth and each of the dependent variables.
 
Results
 
Infants born to adolescent mothers accounted for 4.13% of births in 2005 as revealed from TBCS dataset (Table I). No significant difference in the male/female ratio of infants bone to adolescent mothers was observed, however, we noted that boys were 5% higher in the group of adult mothers. Higher percentage of adolescent mothers gave birth spontaneously in comparison with adult mothers (81.0% vs. 65%, p<0.001). Although there was no statistical difference in preterm birth between two groups (p=0.306), a markedly higher incidence of LBW was observed among infants born to adolescent mothers than adult mothers (9.6% vs. 6.8%, p<0.05).
The average maternal ages at the time of giving birth of adolescent and adult mothers were 19.1±1.1 and 29.3±4.5 years, respectively. Although the vast majority of adolescent and adult mothers with singleton births stopped breastfeeding when their children were 18 months of age (96.7% and 93.5%), significant difference was detected for those were still breastfeeding between the two groups (adolescent mothers vs. adult mother: 3.3% vs. 6.5%; p<0.001). Moreover, adult mothers had significantly higher educational level in comparison to adolescent mothers (p<0.001). Higher ratio of breastfeeding and more working women were found among adult mothers at 18th month (p<0.001). Conversely, 64.7% of adolescent mothers have been the main caregivers for their infants up to 18 months old, which was statistically significantly higher than adult mothers.
The growth patterns of infants born to adolescent and adult mothers, displayed in figure 1 indicate that the velocity and slop of growth were similar in terms of body weight (BW), body height (BH) and head circumference (HC) from birth to 18 months, although the significant differences existed in each stage (Table II). The BW of infants born to adult and adolescent mothers was 3108.1±447.5 g and 3013.8±453.0 g, representing a difference of 95 g between the two groups. At the time of 18 months old, the difference decreased to 61 g. Children born to adolescent mothers were associated with statistically significant lower birth BW, BH and HC (p<0.001 for all). Trend analysis of infants between two groups showed no significant change or gain in overall weight. Although there was significant difference in changes of BH (p<0.001), no difference in overall height gain was observed. However, significant change and greater gain of HC were found in infants born to adolescent mothers (p<0.001, Table II).
The association between breastfeeding, daytime caregiving and growth from birth to 18 months old was assessed and depicted in Figure 2. Growth rates were significantly affected by breastfeeding in the first 6 months. Aside from both variables of breastfeeding and mother as the daytime caregiver were associated with lower growth of infants in all measures, the difference in weight velocity from 12-18 months was significant. GEE models were used to estimate the growth in terms of BW, BH and HC and the changes of growth from birth to 18 months old as functions of predictors. The results indicated that child gender, gestational age, method of delivery, and breastfeeding at 18 months were significant predictors that contributed to growth change (Table III-V). Male babies were significantly positively correlated with BW (β= 33.56, p<0.001), BH (β= 0.04, p<0.001) and HC (β= 0.04, p<0.001). The growth of preterm babies was positively correlated with age for their BW (β= 20.92, p<0.001), BH (β= 0.12, p<0.001) and HC (β= 0.07, p<0.001).
Adolescent mothers were negatively associated with birth BW, BH and HC; however, the predictive power no longer existed over the time. Breastfeeding was negatively associated with growth change with age (p<0.001 for BW, BH and HC). Cesarean sections were positively correlated with the changes in BW (β= 2.72, p<0.05) and BH (β= 0.02, p<0.001), however, negatively correlated to HC (β= -0.03, p<0.001). The variable of mother as the primary daycare caregiver negatively contributed the change in BW       (β= -4.86, p<0.001) and no significant effect on BH and HC. Multiple births and educational levels were not significantly associated with the growth changes.


Table I. Demographic characteristics of adolescent (n= 878) and adult (n= 20,370) mothers and their children in Taiwan



Table II. Growth from birth to 18 months old of babies born to adolescent (n= 878) vs. adult (n= 20,370) mothers



Table III. Generalized estimating equations model that assess the association between predictive factors and body weight from birth to 18 months



Table IV. Generalized estimating equations model that assess the association between predictive factors and body height from birth to 18 months




Table V. Generalized estimating equation models that assess the association between predictive factors and head circumstance from birth to 18 months






Figure 1. Growth trends (upper panel-A, B, C) and differences (lower panel-D, E, F) in body




Figure 2. The changes in body weight (BW), body height (BH) and head circumference (HC) for children with or without breastfeeding (A) and mother caregiving at daytime (B) from birth to 18 months old.


Discussion
 
In this study, the population-representative TBCS dataset was used to examine whether children bone to adolescent mother or adult mother were associated with growth changes over the first 18 months of life. The findings of higher incidence of LBW and prematurity among children born to adolescent mothers than their peers born to adult mothers were consistent to a previous report, although some discrepancies existed due to grouping of different age ranges (40). During the following 18 months, no significant difference in weight gain or height gain was observed; resulting in the significant differences remained. However, children of adolescent mothers not only” caught up” the growth of head circumference but even had larger size than those born to adult mothers (Table II). However, report of a systematic review indicated that early catch-up growth of infants born preterm could be associated with adverse metabolic consequences in adulthood. These infants can be shorter and lighter than term-born peers during childhood, adolescence, and adulthood, despite beneficial for neurodevelopmental outcome may be observed (41).
Our finding added to the understanding that the general higher educational level among adult mothers was likely to associate with higher breastfeeding rate, higher work engagement and lower caregiving at daytime. Furthermore, the mean age of adolescent mothers was 19±1.1 years old which was closer to adults than adolescents. They were more likely to have a wanted pregnancy and might be not associated with negative parenting behaviors in spite of lower birth outcomes.
With the use of GEE models in this study, child gender and gestational age were found to be predictive factors for birth outcomes in terms of BW, BH and HC and correlated changes over time. Adolescent mother was a predictive factor for newborns with lower BW, BH and HC. However, environmental factors, such as socioeconomic status, disadvantaged background, co-residence with other supportive family, and overall parenting quality that identified as more important predictors than maternal age for developmental outcomes in large-scale studies were not evaluated in our study (42-44).
According to the study of 5 birth cohorts, weight gain from 0-24 months had the strongest relationships with schooling outcomes followed by birth weight (45). The authors also suggested that growth failure in early childhood should be viewed as a marker of lack of nutrients at the cellular level that has systemic effects on growth and development in general, including the brain and neurological development. Children born at lower gestational age (32-38 weeks) and LBW were also associated with school performance, not limited to those born extremely premature (<28 weeks) or with a very low birth weight (<1500g) (46).
Our findings indicate that the duration of breastfeeding did not contribute to greater percentage of growth, which is consistent with previous studies showing that breastfeeding is associated with slower growth in the first year of life (30-32). Mothers as the caregivers at daytime did not predict better infant growth in our study. Since the home environment and family resources such as mothers of adolescent mothers, adolescent fathers, family income and other determinative factors may also affect specific caregiving behaviors  that were not assessed in this study, we were unable to draw further conclusion to what extent was infant growth influenced by mothers’ caregiving (47, 48).
This population-based cohort study has several strengths. The dataset provides a large national sample allowing these findings can be generalized to the entire Taiwan. The longitudinal nature of the data providing with the information over a period of time is better for assessing causal relationships than cross-sectional designs. There were some limitations of this study that must be addressed. In this paper we analyzed the physiological measurements; however, many environmental exposures (e.g. smoking, iodine deficiency and alcohol intake) and genetic variants associated with several different outcomes were not evaluated. Some potentially relevant factors, such as maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and gestational diabetes that may be related to postpartum growth were not available. Apart from breastfeeding, insufficient data were collected for complementary feeding, so we are unable to address potential nutritional explanations for the growth change that was manifest toward the end of the second year of life (49). Teen pregnancy and parenting remain important public health issues that deserve continued attention.
It is more difficult for adolescent mothers to engage in a mature and sensitive manner with their children as a consequence of they face more risk factors. All of these issues can affect outcomes of the infants of adolescent mothers. The first year postpartum is a particular challenging period for adolescent mothers, as they cope with distinctive personal and social changes (50). Although children born to adolescent mothers were not at much greater risk for growth delays than their peers born to adult mothers in our study, their developmental outcomes in older ages remain unknown since we could only characterize infant growth changes in weight or length in a period of time like other studies (16, 51, 52).
 
Acknowledgments
 
The authors would like to thank the research team of TBCS, which include interviewers, research scientists, computer technicians and nurses, and all the families who took part in the study.
 
Conflict of interest
 
The authors of this paper have no conflicts of interest to report.



 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Fielding RA. Effects of exercise training in the elderly: impact of progressive- resistance training on skeletal muscle and whole-body protein metabolism. Proc Nut Soc 1995; 54: 665-675. [DOI:10.1079/PNS19950066]
2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. National vital statistics reports 2007;56:1-103.
3. Ohno H, Kizaki T, Ohishi S, Yamashita H, Tanaka J, Gasa S. Effects of swimming training on the lysosomal enzyme system in brown adipose tissue of rats: an analogy between swimming exercise and cold acclimation. Acta Physiol Scand 1995; 155: 333-334. [DOI:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1995.tb09983.x]
4. Berlin LJ, Brady-Smith C, Brooks-Gunn J. Links between childbearing age and observed maternal behaviors with 14 month olds in the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project. Infant Ment Health J 2002; 23: 104-129. [DOI:10.1002/imhj.10007]
5. Luster T, Vanderbelt, M. Caregiving by low-income adoles- cent mothers and the language abilities of their 30-month-old children. Infant Ment Health J 1999; 20: 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199922)20:2<148::AID-IMHJ3>3.0.CO;2-1 [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199922)20:23.0.CO;2-1]
6. Pomerleau A, Scuccimarri, C., Malcuit, G. Mother-infant behavioral interaction in teenage and adult mothers during the first six months postpartum: Relations with infant development. Infant Ment Health J 2003; 24: 495-509. [DOI:10.1002/imhj.10073]
7. Klein JD. Adolescent pregnancy: current trends and issues. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 281-286. [DOI:10.1542/peds.2005-0999]
8. Goldenberg RL, Klerman LV. Adolescent pregnancy-another look. New Eng J Med 1995; 332: 1161-1162. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM199504273321709]
9. Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, Reedy NJ, Lowe TW, McIntire DD. Maternal youth and pregnancy outcomes: middle school versus high school age groups compared with women beyond the teen years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 184-187. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(94)90467-7]
10. Elfenbein DS, Felice ME. Adolescent pregnancy. Pediatr Clin North Am 2003; 50: 781-800. [DOI:10.1016/S0031-3955(03)00069-5]
11. Pogarsky G TT, Lizotte A. Developmental outcomes for children of young mothers. J Marriage Fam 2006; 68: 332-344. [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00256.x]
12. Hardy JB, Shapiro S, Astone NM, Miller TL, Brooks-Gunn J, Hilton SC. Adolescent childbearing revisited: the age of inner-city mothers at delivery is a determinant of their children's self-sufficiency at age 27-33. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 802-809. [DOI:10.1542/peds.100.5.802]
13. Rafferty Y, Griffin KW, Lodise M. Adolescent motherhood and developmental outcomes of children in early head start: the influence of maternal parenting behaviors, well-being, and risk factors within the family setting. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2011; 81: 228-245. [DOI:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01092.x]
14. Luster T BL, Fitzgerald H, Vandenbelt M. Factors related to successful outcomes among preschool children born to low-income adolescent mothers. J Marriage Fam 2000; 62.
15. Kramer MS, Guo T, Platt RW, Shapiro S, Collet JP, Chalmers B, et al. Breastfeeding and infant growth: biology or bias? Pediatrics 2002; 110: 343-347.
16. Baker JL, Michaelsen KF, Rasmussen KM, Sorensen TI. Maternal prepregnant body mass index, duration of breastfeeding, and timing of complementary food introduction are associated with infant weight gain. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 1579-1588. [DOI:10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1579]
17. Ong KK, Preece MA, Emmett PM, Ahmed ML, Dunger DB. Size at birth and early childhood growth in relation to maternal smoking, parity and infant breast-feeding: longitudinal birth cohort study and analysis. Pediatr Res 2002; 52: 863-867. [DOI:10.1203/00006450-200212000-00009]
18. Bithoney WG, Epstein D, Kim M. Decreased serum bicarbonate as a manifestation of undernutrition secondary to nonorganic failure-to-thrive. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1992; 13: 278-280. [DOI:10.1097/00004703-199208000-00007]
19. Liu YX, Jalil F, Karlberg J. Risk factors for impaired length growth in early life viewed in terms of the infancy-childhood-puberty (ICP) growth model. Acta Paediatrica 1998; 87: 237-243. [DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1998.tb01431.x]
20. Ashworth A, Morris SS, Lira PI. Postnatal growth patterns of full-term low birth weight infants in Northeast Brazil are related to socioeconomic status. J Nutr 1997; 127: 1950-1956.
21. Ong KK, Ahmed ML, Emmett PM, Preece MA, Dunger DB. Association between postnatal catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2000; 320: 967-971. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.320.7240.967]
22. Ong KK, Petry CJ, Emmett PM, Sandhu MS, Kiess W, Hales CN, et al. Insulin sensitivity and secretion in normal children related to size at birth, postnatal growth, and plasma insulin-like growth factor-I levels. Diabetologia 2004; 47: 1064-1070. [DOI:10.1007/s00125-004-1405-8]
23. Horta BL, Barros FC, Victora CG, Cole TJ. Early and late growth and blood pressure in adolescence. J Epidemiol Com Health 2003; 57: 226-230. [DOI:10.1136/jech.57.3.226]
24. Forsen T, Osmond C, Eriksson JG, Barker DJ. Growth of girls who later develop coronary heart disease. Heart 2004; 90: 20-24. [DOI:10.1136/heart.90.1.20]
25. Stettler N, Kumanyika SK, Katz SH, Zemel BS, Stallings VA. Rapid weight gain during infancy and obesity in young adulthood in a cohort of African Americans. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 1374-1378. [DOI:10.1093/ajcn/77.6.1374]
26. Singhal A, Lucas A. Early origins of cardiovascular disease: is there a unifying hypothesis? Lancet 2004; 363: 1642-1645.
27. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Pinal C. The developmental origins of adult disease. Matern Child Nutr 2005; 1: 130-141. [DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8709.2005.00020.x]
28. Quinn PJ, O'Callaghan M, Williams GM, Najman JM, Andersen MJ, Bor W. The effect of breastfeeding on child development at 5 years: a cohort study. J Paediatr Child Health 2001; 37: 465-469. [DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00702.x]
29. Singhal A, Cole TJ, Lucas A. Early nutrition in preterm infants and later blood pressure: two cohorts after randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 413-419. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04004-6]
30. Atladottir H, Thorsdottir I. Energy intake and growth of infants in Iceland-a population with high frequency of breast-feeding and high birth weight. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000;54:695-701. [DOI:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601078]
31. Nielsen GA, Thomsen BL, Michaelsen KF. Influence of breastfeeding and complementary food on growth between 5 and 10 months. Acta Paediatrica 1998; 87: 911-917. [DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1998.tb01757.x]
32. Michaelsen KF, Petersen S, Greisen G, Thomsen BL. Weight, length, head circumference, and growth velocity in a longitudinal study of Danish infants. Danish Med Bul 1994; 41: 577-585.
33. Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Camargo CA, Jr., Berkey CS, Frazier AL, Rockett HR, et al. Risk of overweight among adolescents who were breastfed as infants. JAMA 2001; 285: 2461-2467. [DOI:10.1001/jama.285.19.2461]
34. Harder T, Bergmann R, Kallischnigg G, Plagemann A. Duration of breastfeeding and risk of overweight: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162: 397-403. [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwi222]
35. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding, The Optimal Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding. Geneva: WHO: 2001. Available at: http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/ infantfeeding_recommendation/en/.
36. Organization WH. Promoting Proper Feeding of Infants and Children. Geneva: WHO: 2004. Available at: http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/infantfeeding/ en/.
37. Thulier D, Mercer J. Variables associated with breastfeeding duration. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 2009; 38: 259-268. [DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01021.x]
38. Ludvigsson JF, Ludvigsson J. Socio-economic determinants, maternal smoking and coffee consumption, and exclusive breastfeeding in 10205 children. Acta Paediatrica 2005; 94: 1310-1319.
39. Chiang TL, Lin SJ, Chang MC. Taiwan Birth Cohort Study: Backgrounds. Design and Participants. Taichung, Taiwan. Bureau of Health Promotion DOH; 2009. Available at: http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/ English/ClassPrint.aspx?No= 201401 290001.
40. Kuo CP, Lee SH, Wu WY, Liao WC, Lin SJ, Lee MC. Birth outcomes and risk factors in adolescent pregnancies: results of a Taiwanese national survey. Pediatr Int 2010; 52: 447-452. [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02979.x]
41. Euser AM, de Wit CC, Finken MJ, Rijken M, Wit JM. Growth of preterm born children. Hormone Res 2008; 70: 319-328. [DOI:10.1159/000161862]
42. Geronimus AT. Teenage childbearing as cultural prism. Br Med Bul 2004; 69: 155-166. [DOI:10.1093/bmb/ldh019]
43. Geronimus AT, Korenman, S., Hillemeier, M.M. Does young maternal age adversely affect child development? Evidence from cousin comparisons in the United States. Population Dev Rev 1994; 20: 585-609. [DOI:10.2307/2137602]
44. Wadsworth J, Taylor B, Osborn A, Butler N. Teenage mothering: child development at five years. J Child Psychol Psychiatr Allied Disc 1984; 25: 305-313. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1984.tb00151.x]
45. Martorell R, Horta BL, Adair LS, Stein AD, Richter L, Fall CH, et al. Weight gain in the first two years of life is an important predictor of schooling outcomes in pooled analyses from five birth cohorts from low- and middle-income countries. J Nutr 2010; 140: 348-354. [DOI:10.3945/jn.109.112300]
46. Kirkegaard I, Obel C, Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB. Gestational age and birth weight in relation to school performance of 10-year-old children: a follow-up study of children born after 32 completed weeks. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1600-1606. [DOI:10.1542/peds.2005-2700]
47. Savio Beers LA, Hollo RE. Approaching the adolescent-headed family: a review of teen parenting. Cur Prob Pediatr Adol Health Care 2009; 39: 216-233. [DOI:10.1016/j.cppeds.2009.09.001]
48. Davis A. Younger and older African American adolescent mothers' relationships with their mothers and female peers. J Adolesc Res 2002; 17: 491-508. [DOI:10.1177/0743558402175004]
49. Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA, Peerson JM, Lonnerdal B, Dewey KG. Energy and protein intakes of breast-fed and formula-fed infants during the first year of life and their association with growth velocity: the DARLING Study. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 58: 152-161. [DOI:10.1093/ajcn/58.2.152]
50. Birkeland R, Thompson JK, Phares V. Adolescent motherhood and postpartum depression. J Clin Child Adol Psychol 2005; 34: 292-300. [DOI:10.1207/s15374424jccp3402_8]
51. Kalies H, Heinrich J, Borte N, Schaaf B, von Berg A, von Kries R, et al. The effect of breastfeeding on weight gain in infants: results of a birth cohort study. Eur J Med Res 2005; 10: 36-42.
52. Griffiths LJ, Dezateux C, Cole TJ. Differential parental weight and height contributions to offspring birthweight and weight gain in infancy. Int J Epidemiol 2007; 36: 104-107. [DOI:10.1093/ije/dyl210]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb