چهارشنبه 29 فروردین 1403
[Archive]
دوره 5، شماره 2 - ( 4-1386 )
جلد 5 شماره 2 صفحات 34-29 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hashemi-Tabar M, Javadnia F, Orazizadeh M, Sakei G, Baazm M. The effect of mouse embryonic fibroblast in direct differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. IJRM 2007; 5 (2) :29-34
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-61-fa.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-61-fa.html
The effect of mouse embryonic fibroblast in direct differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 1386; 5 (2) :29-34
چکیده: (2538 مشاهده)
Background: Since embryonic stem (ES) cells have the dual ability to proliferate indefinitely and differentiate into multiple tissue types, ES cells could potentially provide an unlimited cell supply for human transplantation.
Objective: In order to study the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells, they were cultured in suspension by using ES media without Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) to induce spontaneous differentiation. Cellular morphology of differentiated derivatives was then evaluated.
Materials and Methods: Undifferentiated mES from our laboratory were cultured in three different settings by using ES media containing 0.1% / 1mM trypsin/EDTA and removing LIF; in the absence of murine embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder cells (group 1), in the presence of MEF feeder cells with a density of 0.5×105 cells/ml (group 2), and 0.5×106 cells/ml (group 3). Five days after the initiation of cell culture, and inducing mES cells to form embryoid bodies (EBs), they were removed from dish by centrifugation, and then they were cultured on collagen coated dishes for 20 days. The dishes were fixed and stained by Wright-Gimsa method at the end of the study period.
Results: In group 1, mES cells showed spontaneous differentiation to all derivatives of three germ cells, including: epithelia like, fibroblast like and neron-like cells. In group 2, almost all ES cells were found to be differentiated into granular progenitor cells including hematopoietic cell lineages. In group 3, various morphologies including nerve cell lineages and fibroblast-like cells were detected.
Conclusion: Differentiation of mES cells can be a dose response process, depending on the factors that may be released from MEF feeder layer to ES media in a coculture system. Our results indicated that in the presence of low numbers of MEF cells, mES cells can spontaneously differentiate into hematopoeitic cell lineages.
Objective: In order to study the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells, they were cultured in suspension by using ES media without Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) to induce spontaneous differentiation. Cellular morphology of differentiated derivatives was then evaluated.
Materials and Methods: Undifferentiated mES from our laboratory were cultured in three different settings by using ES media containing 0.1% / 1mM trypsin/EDTA and removing LIF; in the absence of murine embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder cells (group 1), in the presence of MEF feeder cells with a density of 0.5×105 cells/ml (group 2), and 0.5×106 cells/ml (group 3). Five days after the initiation of cell culture, and inducing mES cells to form embryoid bodies (EBs), they were removed from dish by centrifugation, and then they were cultured on collagen coated dishes for 20 days. The dishes were fixed and stained by Wright-Gimsa method at the end of the study period.
Results: In group 1, mES cells showed spontaneous differentiation to all derivatives of three germ cells, including: epithelia like, fibroblast like and neron-like cells. In group 2, almost all ES cells were found to be differentiated into granular progenitor cells including hematopoietic cell lineages. In group 3, various morphologies including nerve cell lineages and fibroblast-like cells were detected.
Conclusion: Differentiation of mES cells can be a dose response process, depending on the factors that may be released from MEF feeder layer to ES media in a coculture system. Our results indicated that in the presence of low numbers of MEF cells, mES cells can spontaneously differentiate into hematopoeitic cell lineages.
نوع مطالعه: Original Article |
فهرست منابع
1. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292: 154-156. [DOI:10.1038/292154a0]
2. Williams RL, Hilton DJ, Pease S, Willson TA, Stewart CL, Gearing DP, et al. Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 1988; 336: 684-687 [DOI:10.1038/336684a0]
3. Itskovitz-Eldor J, Schuldiner M, Karsenti D, Eden A, Yanuka A, Amit M, et al. Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells into Embryoid Bodies Comprising the Three Embryonic Germ Layers. Molecular Medicine 2000: 6; 88-95. [DOI:10.1007/BF03401776]
4. Leahy A, Xiong JW, Kuhnert F, Stuhlmann H. Use of developmental marker genes to define temporal and spatial patterns of differentiation during embryoid body formation. J Exp Zool 1999; 284: 67-81.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19990615)284:1<67::AID-JEZ10>3.0.CO;2-O [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19990615)284:13.0.CO;2-O]
5. Brook FA, Gardner RL. The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997; 94: 5709-5712. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.94.11.5709]
6. Rathsen J, Rathjen PD. Mouse ES cells: experimental exploitition of pluripotent defferentiation potential. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11: 587-594. [DOI:10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00237-9]
7. Johansson BM, Wiles MV. Evidence for involvement of activin A and bone morphogenetic protein 4 in mammalian mesoderm and hematopoietic development. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15: 141-151. [DOI:10.1128/MCB.15.1.141]
8. Sato N, Sanjuan IM, Heke M, Uchida M, Naef F, Brivanlou AH. Molecular signature of human embryonic stem cells and its comparison with the mouse. Developmental Biology 2003; 260: 404-413. [DOI:10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00256-2]
9. Schuldiner M, Anuka O, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Melton DA, Benvenisty N. Effects of eight growth factors on the differentiation of cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 11307-11312. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.97.21.11307]
10. Odorico JS, Kaufman DS, Thomson JA. Multilineage differentiation from human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells 2001; 19: 193-204. [DOI:10.1634/stemcells.19-3-193]
11. Dinsmore J, Ratliff J, Deacon T, Pakzaban P, Jacoby D, Galpern W, et al. Embryonic stem cells differentiated in vitro as a novel source of cells for transplantation. Cell Transplant 1996; 5: 131-143. [DOI:10.1177/096368979600500205]
12. Rathjen PD, Lake J, Whaatt LM, Bettess MD, Rathjen J. Properties and uses of embryonic stem cells: prospects for application to human biology and gene therapy. Reprod Fertile Dev 1998; 10: 31-47. [DOI:10.1071/R98041]
13. Doetschman TC, Elistter H, Katz M, Schmidt W, Kemler R. The in vitro development of blastocyst derived embryonic stem cell lines: formation of visceral yolk sac, blood islands and myocardium. J Embryol Exp Morph 1985; 87: 27-45.
14. Kyba M, Perlingeiro RC, Daley GQ. HoxB4 confers definitive lymphoid-myeloid engraftment potential on embryonic stem cell and yolk sac hematopoietic progenitors. Cell 2002; 109: 29-37. [DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00680-3]
15. Schuldiner M, Eiges R, Eden A, Yanuka O, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Goldstein RS, et al. Induced neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Brain Research 2001; 913: 201-205. [DOI:10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02776-7]
16. Mummery C, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Doevendans P, Spijker R, van den Brink S, Hassink R, et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes: role of coculture with visceral endoderm-like cells. Circulation 2003; 107: 2733-2740. [DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000068356.38592.68]
17. Kaufman DS, Hanson ET, Lewis RL, Auerbach R, Thomson JA. Hematopoietic colony-forming cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. PNAS 2001; 98: 10716-10721. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.191362598]
18. Wobus AM., Boheler KR. Embryonic stem cells: prospects for developmental biology and cell therapy. Physiol Rrv 2005; 85: 635-678. [DOI:10.1152/physrev.00054.2003]
19. Tanaka M, Kitajima K, Kita K, Yoshikawa H, Nakano T. Differentiation status dependent function of FOG-1. Genes to Cells 2004; 9: 1213-1226. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2004.00796.x]
20. Lim JW, Bodnar A. Proteome analysis of conditioned medium from mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder layers which support the growth of human embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2002; 2: 1187-1203.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1615-9861(200209)2:9<1187::AID-PROT1187>3.0.CO;2-T [DOI:10.1002/1615-9861(200209)2:93.0.CO;2-T]
21. Valdimarsdottir G, Mummery C. Functions of the TGFβ superfamily in human embryonic stem cells. APMIS 2005; 113: 773-789. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm_3181.x]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
