Volume 13, Issue 7 (9-2015)                   IJRM 2015, 13(7): 425-432 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghazali S, Talebi A R, Khalili M A, Aflatoonian A, Esfandiari N. Large nuclear vacuoles in spermatozoa negatively affect pregnancy rate in IVF cycles. IJRM 2015; 13 (7) :425-432
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-664-en.html
1- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , Prof_talebi@ssu.ac.ir
3- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
Abstract:   (2276 Views)
Background: Recently, motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) criteria as a new real time tool for evaluation of spermatozoa in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles has been considered.
Objective: The aim was to investigate the predictive value of MSOME in in vitro fertilization (IVF) in comparison to ICSI cycles and evaluation of the association between MSOME parameters and traditional sperm parameters in both groups.
Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional prospective analysis of MSOME parameters in IVF (n=31) and ICSI cycles (n=35). MSOME parameters were also evaluated as the presence of vacuole (none, small, medium, large or mix); head size (normal, small or large); cytoplasmic droplet; head shape and acrosome normality. In sub-analysis, MSOME parameters were compared between two groups with successful or failed clinical pregnancy in each group.
Results: In IVF group, the rate of large nuclear vacuole showed significant increase in failed as compared to successful pregnancies (13.81±9.7vs7.38±4.4, respectively, p=0.045) while MSOME parameters were the same between successful and failed pregnancies in ICSI group. Moreover, a negative correlation was noticed between LNV and sperm shape normalcy. In ICSI group, a negative correlation was established between cytoplasmic droplet and sperm shape normalcy. In addition, there was a positive correlation between sperm shape normalcy and non-vacuolated spermatozoa.
Conclusion: The high rate of large nuclear vacuoles in sperm used in IVF cycles with failed pregnancies confirms that MSOME, is a helpful tool for fine sperm morphology assessment, and its application may enhance the assisted reproduction technology success rates.
Full-Text [PDF 462 kb]   (500 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (362 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17-18. [DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-F]
2. Cassuto NG, Bouret D, Plouchart JM, Jellad S, Vanderzwalmen P, Balet R, et al. A new real-time morphology classification for human spermatozoa: a link for fertilization and improved embryo quality. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1616-1625. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.088]
3. Bonde JPE, Ernst E, Jensen TK, Hjollund NHI, Kolstad H, Scheike T, et al. Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet 1998;352:1172-1177. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10514-1]
4. Van Waart J, Kruger T, Lombard C, Ombelet W. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 495-500. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/7.5.495]
5. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander F, Lombard C, Van der Merwe J, Van Zyl J, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1118-1123. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49891-2]
6. De Vos A, Van De Velde H, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 42-48. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04571-5]
7. Li B, Ma Y, Huang J, Xiao X, Li L, Liu C, et al. Probing the Effect of Human Normal Sperm Morphology Rate on Cycle Outcomes and Assisted Reproductive Methods Selection. Plos one 2014; 9: e113392. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0113392]
8. Oliveira JBA, Massaro F, Mauri A, Petersen C, Nicoletti A, Baruffi R, et al. Motile sperm organelle morphology examination is stricter than Tygerberg criteria. Reprod Biomed online 2009; 18: 320-326. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60088-0]
9. Coetzee K, Kruge TF, Lombard CJ. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 73-82. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/4.1.73]
10. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345: 1067-1068. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM200110043451416]
11. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real‐Time Fine Morphology of Motile Human Sperm Cells is Associated With IVF‐ICSI Outcome. J Androl 2002; 23:1-8. [DOI:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02595.x]
12. Hazout A, Dumont-Hassan M, Junca A-M, Bacrie PC, Tesarik J. High-magnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 19-25. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60975-3]
13. Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, d'Angelo D, et al. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 835-841. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60150-2]
14. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Lederman H, Peer S, Ellenbogen A, Feldberg B, et al. How to improve IVF–ICSI outcome by sperm selection. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 634-638. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61191-1]
15. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, Katz N, Barr I, Fishman A, et al. The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 185-190. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh545]
16. Souza Setti A, Ferreira RC, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga D, de Cássia Sávio Figueira R, Iaconelli Jr A, Borges Jr E. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection outcome: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21: 450-455. [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.05.017]
17. Vanderzwalmen P, Hiemer A, Rubner P, Bach M, Neyer A, Stecher A, et al. Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 617-627. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60308-2]
18. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Paul M, Adrian E, Benjamin B. The chance of having a healthy normal child following intracytoplasmic morphologically-selected sperm injection (IMSI) treatment is higher compared to conventional IVF-ICSI treatment. Fertil Sterility 2007; 88: S20. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.083]
19. Vingris L, Setti AS, De Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, De Cassia Savio Figueira R, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Sperm morphological normality under high magnification predicts laboratory and clinical outcomes in couples undergoing ICSI. Hum Fertil 2015; 8: 81-86. [DOI:10.3109/14647273.2014.956812]
20. Setti AS, Braga DP, Figueira RC, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection results in improved clinical outcomes in couples with previous ICSI failures or male factor infertility: a meta-analysis. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 183: 96-103. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.008]
21. Setti AS, Braga DPdAF, Vingris L, Serzedello T, Figueira RdCS, Iaconelli Jr A, et al. Sperm morphological abnormalities visualised at high magnification predict embryonic development, from fertilisation to the blastocyst stage, in couples undergoing ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 1533-1539. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-014-0326-9]
22. Setti AS, Braga DP, Vingris L, Serzedello T, Figueira Rde C, Iaconelli A Jr, et al. The prevalence of sperm with large nuclear vacuoles is a prognostic tool in the prediction of ICSI success. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 307-312. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-013-0157-0]
23. WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the Examination and processing of human semen. 5 ed: Cambridge University Press 2010.
24. Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Soleimani M, Razi MH. Evaluating the role of first polar body morphology on rates of fertilization and embryo development in ICSI cycles. Int J Fertil Steril 2011; 5: 110-115.
25. Khalili MA, Mojibian M, Sultan A-M. Role of oocyte morphology on fertilization and embryo formation in assisted reproductive techniques. MEFSJ 2005; 10: 72-77.
26. Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Razi MH, Agha-Rahimi A, Nottola SA. Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles. J Hum Reprod Sci 2013; 6: 65. [DOI:10.4103/0974-1208.112385]
27. Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Razi MH, Nottola SA. The effect of immature oocytes quantity on the rates of oocytes maturity and morphology, fertilization, and embryo development in ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012; 29: 803-810. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-012-9799-6]
28. Setti AS, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga D, Iaconelli Jr A, Aoki T, Borges Jr E. Twelve years of MSOME and IMSI: a review. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27: 338-352. [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.011]
29. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Ellenbogen A, Peer S, Feldberg D, Bartoov B. Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1787-1790. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/del049]
30. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H, et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1413-1419. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.05.016]
31. Akl LD, Oliveira JBA, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi R, Franco J. Efficacy of motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) for predicting pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 2. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1010]
32. De Vos A, Van de Velde H, Bocken G, Eylenbosch G, Franceus N, Meersdom G, et al. Does intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improve embryo development? A randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 617-626. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/des435]
33. Monqaut AL, Zavaleta C, López G, Lafuente R, Brassesco M. Use of high-magnification microscopy for the assessment of sperm recovered after two different sperm processing methods. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 277-280. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.071]
34. Boitrelle F, Ferfouri F, Petit J, Segretain D, Tourain C, Bergere M, et al. Large human sperm vacuoles observed in motile spermatozoa under high magnification: nuclear thumbprints linked to failure of chromatin condensation. Hum Reprod 2011: der129. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/der129]
35. Perdrix A, Travers A, Chelli M, Escalier D, Do Rego J, Milazzo J, et al. Assessment of acrosome and nuclear abnormalities in human spermatozoa with large vacuoles. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 47-58. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq297]
36. Perdrix A, Saidi R, Menard J, Gruel E, Milazzo J, Mace B, et al. Relationship between conventional sperm parameters and motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME). Int J Androl 2012; 35: 491-498. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01249.x]
37. de Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, Setti AS, Figueira RCS, Nichi M, Martinhago CD, Iaconelli Jr A, et al. Sperm Organelle Morphologic Abnormalities: Contributing Factors and Effects on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles Outcomes. Urolo 2011; 78: 786-791. [DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2011.06.018]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb