Volume 14, Issue 3 (3-2016)                   IJRM 2016, 14(3): 155-166 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghazanfarpour M, Sadeghi R, Abdolahian S, Roudsari R L. The efficacy of Iranian herbal medicines in alleviating hot flashes: A systematic review. IJRM 2016; 14 (3) :155-166
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-736-en.html
1- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Nursing and Midwifery School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Firuzabad, Fars, Iran
4- Evidence-Based Care Research Centre, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , latifnejadr@mums.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 186 kb]   (873 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (3695 Views)
Full-Text:   (446 Views)
Introduction
 
Hot flashes are the most common symptoms experienced by women around menopause time (1). Racial and cultural differences may play a role in variation of hot flashes in Western and Eastern societies (2). Hormone therapy is an effective treatment recommended for alleviating hot flashes (1, 3). In Iran, only 15% of menopausal women use hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (4, 5).
The most frequent reason for discontinuing HRT is side effects like vaginal bleeding. There has been growing interest in natural alternatives among women in Iran, with many women efficiency accepting, safety, and lower side effects of natural therapies compared to chemical medicines (5). To our knowledge, effect of Iranian herbal medicines in alleviating hot flashes in menopausal women has not been systematically assessed.
This systematic review seeks to examine the efficacy of Iranian herbal medicines in alleviating hot flashes based on the literature in this field.
 
Search Strategy
To find relevant studies, a number of English and Persian databases such as MEDLINE (1966 to January 2015), Scopus (1990 to January 2015), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, issue 1, 2015) were searched using keywords such as: hot AND (flash OR flush) AND (complementary treatments or alternative treatments or phytomedicine herbal treatments herbs evening primrose oil or St. John's wort or Hypericum perforatum or Black cohosh or cimicifuga racemosa rhizome or phytomedicine, or dong quai or Piascledine or Avacado plus or Soy or Ginseng or kava, Trigonella foenum- graecum or fenugreek or licoricered or Red clover or Evening primrose oil or yam or Flaxseed or Salvia officinalis or Vitex Agnus Castus”. In addition, SID, Iran Medex, Magiran, Medlib, Iran doc, and Google Scholar were searched in June 2014 to find equivalent keywords in Persian.
 
Criteria for inclusion of studies
1) Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared oral herbs as mono/ combined preparations with control group. 2) participants included post-perimenopause with hot flashes.
 
Data extraction
Data were extracted independently by two authors and predefined checklist included age, menopausal status, sample size, duration of treatment, randomization technique, blinding method, intention- to treatment reporting, baseline comparability, outcome measures and results.
 
Results
 
The process of searching and selecting RCTs has been described in figure 1. In total, 19 studies were included in this systematic review. Summarized characteristics of included studies are shown in table I.
 
The effect of Black cohosh on hot flashes
Fluoxetine vs. Black cohosh
Saghafi et al compared two groups of Fluoxetine and Black Cohosh findings that both groups significantly reduced hot flash frequency (6). Frequency of hot flash/day in Black Cohosh (1.82±1.12) decreased compared to Fluoxetine group (1.11±1.48), which was marginally statistically significant (p=0.08). 60% and 65% of patients in Fluoxetine and black Cohosh groups were satisfied with their treatment, respectively. Also, the comparison of two groups showed significant difference (p=0.04).
 
Black cohosh vs. placebo
In another trial, Shahnazi et al used repeated measures analysis of variance to assess the differences within and between groups (7). The frequency of hot flashes in inter-group comparison revealed a statistically significant difference in both Black Cohosh (p<0.001) and placebo (p=0.006) group across three time intervals. Comparison between groups was statistically significant at 4 (p<0.001) and 8 (p<0.001). To sum up, more clinical trial data are needed to confirm these findings.
 
Effect of pimpinella anisum on hot flashes
Nahidi et al assessed the effect of pimpinella anisum on hot flashes, using repeated measures ANOVA to assess the difference between and inter group differences (8). Gradual decrease in frequency of hot flashes was observed in Pimpinella anisum group (4.21±1.84, 3.60±1.70, 2.50±1.04, 1.63±0.80 and 1.10±0.61) and placebo group (4.24±1.87, 4.27±1.71, 4.20±1.52, 4.27±1.55 and 4.38±1.73, for five-time point’s baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4 wk respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant difference between 4 intervals only for Pimpinella anisum in intra group comparison (p<0.001).
Results of t-test showed statistically significant decrease in severity of hot flash in Pimpinella anisum group compared with placebo group, (p<0.001). 11.1%, 63.9% and 25% of women suffered from severe, moderate and mild hot flashes at baseline, while it was reduced respectively to 5.6%, 69.4% and 25% at the end of study. The corresponding results in placebo group were (13.9%, 55.6 and 30.5) and (5.6%, 69.4 and 25), respectively.

Table I. Characteristics of 22 randomized trials included in our systematic review


Table I. cont. Characteristics of 22 randomized trials included in our systematic review


Table I cont. Characteristics of 22 randomized trials included in our systematic review


Effect of Glycyrrhiza glabra (Licorice) on hot flashes
Glycyrrhiza glabra vs.placebo
Nahidi et al assessed the effect of Glycyrrhiza glabra (Licorice) on relief and recurrence of hot flashes (9). To detect recurrences, they interviewed with patients 1, 2, 3 and 4 wk after cessation of treatment, finding that frequency and severity were similar in both groups at baseline. Repeated measures ANOVA regarding the frequency of hot flashes in inter-group comparison revealed a statistically significant difference in Licorice group across eight time intervals, though this difference was not significant in placebo group.
Glycyrriz aglabra group showed statistically significant decrease in hot flashes frequency compared to placebo group in 8intervals, 1 (p<0.002), 2 (p<0.001), 3 (p<0.001), 4 (p<0.001), 5 (p<0.001), 6 (p<0.001), 7 (p<0.002), and 8 (p<0.001) wk. At the baseline, 22.2%, 46.6% and 31.1% of women suffered severe, moderate and mild hot flashes, while it was reduced to 2.3%, 33.3% and 64.4% at the end of study, respectively.
Corresponding results for placebo group were (24.4%, 40% and 35.5) and (22.3, 33.3 and 44.4). As indicated by repeated measures ANOVA, hot flash severity reduced significantly from 1-8 wk in Glycyrriza glabra group while for Placebo group, this reduction was significant only for 1 wk. Also, 2 wk after cessation of treatment, women reported significant relief of hot flashes frequency and intensity.
Another trial by Abdolahi et al showed gradual decrease in frequency of hot flashes in both Glycyrriza glabra group (6±2.8, 3.95±2.86, 2.66±1.68 and 1.06±1.19) and placebo group (4±2.4, 2.92±2.52, 3.5±2.62 and 2.38±2.59) (10). After 12 wk, only Glycyrriza glabra- at the baseline, after 4.08 and 12 wk of stud treated patients experienced statistically significant reduction (p<0.05) compared to the baseline. After 12 wk, the reduction in frequency of hot flashes in Glycyrriza glabra-treated patients was more significant than placebo group.
 
Glycyrriza glabra (Licorice) vs. HRT
Menati et al reported statistically significant decrease in frequency of hot flashes in HRT (p=0.008) and a non-significant decrease in Glycyrriza glabra group (p=0.157), however, the comparison between groups showed no significant difference (p=0.134) (5). Hot flashes severity reduced significantly in HRT group (p=0.031), but this reduction was not significant in Glycyrriz aglabra group (p=0.698) and the comparison between two (p=0.019). In fact, Glycyrriza glabra group was not significantly different from HRT with respect to frequency of hot flashes, but latter experienced more effective reduction in hot flash intensity. To sum up, based on three trials discussed above, it seems that Glycyrrizaglabra (Licorice) has alleviating effect on hot flashes, though further studies are needed to support the current evidences.
 
Effect of valerian on hot flashes
Kazemian et al found significant decrease in the frequency of hot flashes in period between baseline and 4 (p<0.05) or 8 (p<0.01) wk after trial in Valerian group (11). However, Valerian and placebo groups were not compared. The comparison of two groups in terms of severity of hot flash by Mann-Whitney test showed statistically significant difference after 8 wk (p<0.01), but this was not case after 4 wk. Another trial by Mirabi et al showed statistically significant decrease in intensity and frequency of hot flashes in Valerian group (p<0.001) while placebo group remained unaffected (12). Also, comparison of two groups showed a statistical significant difference at 4th and 8th wk of study (p<0.001). It seems that Valerian group can remarkably alleviate severity of hot flashes, though more studies are needed to support current evidences.
 
Effect of red clover on hot flashes intensity
Salehi et al and Ehsanpour et al assessed the effect of red clover on hot flashes intensity (13, 14). According to Friedman test, frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flash decreased significantly compared to baseline in both red clover (p<0.001) and placebo groups (p<0.001). Mann-Whitney test showed statistically significant decrease between groups at wk 10 the 10th wk of study (p=0.04), but it was not significant at at 2nd and 4th wk. In a meta-analysis of six trials about effect of red clover, a subgroup analysis was conducted to determine most effective dose of red clover in frequency decreasing of hot flashes (15). Pooled effect size was larger in trials in which red clover was administrated at a dose of 80 mg -0.79 (-2.35 to 0.78) followed by a dose of 40 mg -0.40 (-2.33 to 1.53) and 160 mg -0.30 (-5.54 to 4.94). It seems that higher dose of red clover might be more effective.
 
Eeffect of Vitexagnus-castus on hot flashe
Vitexagnus- castus vs. placebo
Study by Abbaspoor et al showed progressive decline in frequency of hot flashes in Vitexagnus-castus (6±2.58, 4±2.52, 2±2.38, 1.28±2.26 and 0.76±2.16) and placebo group (5.94±2.2, 6±2.34, 5.81±2.40, 5.44±2.42 and 4.75±2.84) at baseline, 2, 4 and 6 wk after trial (16). More statistically significant decrease in hot flashes frequency was also observed in Vitexagnus- castus group after 2 (p=0.015), 4 (p=0.012), 6 (p>0.001) and 8 (p>0.001) wk compared to placebo groups. Also, reduced severity of hot flashes in women receiving Vitexagnus-castus was more significant than placebo group after 2 (p=0.015), 4 (p>0.001), 6 (p>0.001) and 8 (p>0.001) wk.
 
Vitexagnus- castus vs. Passionflower
Another study by Kazemian et al which compared three groups (Passion Flower, Vitexagnus-castus and placebo), found statistically significant decrease in hot flashes intensity 2 and 4 wk after trial in Passion Flower group (17). However, no statistically significant decrease was observed between baseline and 2nd wk. Significant decline was observed between baseline and 2nd or 4th wk in Vitexagnus-castus group. No statistically significant difference, nevertheless, was observed between 2nd and 4th wk. The comparison of three groups by Kruskal-Wallis test showed statistically significant difference between them after a 30-day period, but it was not significant after 15 days. Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the difference between groups, and it indicated that mean change of Vitexagnus-castus was significantly higher than placebo group.
Passion Flower group and vitexagnus- castus group were similarly effective in alleviating hot flashes intensity. Therefore, it appeared that Vitexagnus-castus and Passion Flower is was significantly different from placebo. In a duplicate trial in 2010, Kazemian et al assessed the effect of Passion Flower on hot flash frequency (18). A gradual decrease in the frequency of hot flashes in Passion Flower group (7.26, 5.48 and 4.52) and placebo group (38.81, 23.07 and 21.7) was reported 2 and 4 wk after trial beginning . Significant decrease was observed in hot flashes frequency after 2 or 4 wk in both groups, the decrease was significance between 2nd and 4th wk only in Passion group. No statistical comparison between Passion Flower and placebo was provided. In sum, vitexagnus-castus has had significantly alleviating effect on hot flashes, though further studies are needed to support these evidences.
 
Effect of soy on hot flashes
Soy vs. placebo
Hanachi et al divided patients randomly in three groups of soy milk, soy milk plus exercise and placebo (19). Reduction of hot flashes in both soy milk (72%) and soy milk +exercise groups (83%) was significantly higher than placebo group. Another study by Abbaspour showed a gradual reduction in frequency of hot flashes in protein soy (10.38±3.38, 9.43±3.13, 7.17±2.38, 5.45±1.74) and placebo groups (10.41±2.76, 10.91±3.22, 9.94±2.84, 9±2.54) at the baseline, after 2, 3 and 4 wk of study (20). The difference between groups was observed after 2 wk (p=0.06), 3 wk (p<0.001), and 4 wk (p<0.001). This was not the case of baseline (p=0.973). The corresponding findings about hot flashes intensity were (28.9±11.06, 25.41±10.31, 16.76±6.48, 9±2.75 and 9±2.75) for the protein soy group, and (29.16±9.07, 30.22±10.17, 26.97±8.75, and 24.69±7.66) for the placebo group at the baseline (p=0.92), after 2 (p=0.07), 3 (p<0.001), and 4 wk (p<0.001) of the study.
 
Piascledine (Avacado plus soybean oil) vs. HRT
Panahi et al divided the participants into two groups: Piascledine (Avacado plus soybean oil) and HRT menopausal (21). The severity of hot flashes was measured using two different methods, hot flash questionnaires (HFQ) and visual analog scale (VAS) of hot flash severity. Former contained four questions: (the length of hot flash, the impact of hot flashes on waking up, the interference of hot flash with daily activities and possibility of having night sweat. The latter is a horizontal line graded from 0-100 (0=no hot flash and 100=unbearable hot flash). Piascledine (Avacado plus soybean oil) and HRT were similarly effective in alleviating hot flashes severity, (length of hot flash (p=0.796), the impact of hot flashes on waking up (p=0.111), the interference of hot flash with daily activities (p=0.949) and possibility of having night sweat (p=0.671). Also, VAS showed 23.57 points reduction in Piascledine group compared to a 16.21-points decrease in HRT group (p=0.800).
 
Comparison of soybeans and flaxseed with wheat flour control group
The comparison of three groups based on Kruskal-Wallis test showed statistically significant difference between groups in a 30-day period. Akbari Torkestani et al divided the participants randomly into three interventions, soybeans, flaxseed, and wheat flour groups (22). According to Kruskal-Wallis test, the intensity and frequency of hot flashes were similar in all three groups at baseline. There was not any statistically significant difference with respect to hot flash intensity between three groups at 4th wk (p=0.485) and 8th wk (p=409). The comparison of three groups based on Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant difference between groups at 8th wk of the trial, but this was not the case at 4th wk. There was statistically significant decrease in hot flash frequency only in soy group. To sum up, it seems that soy was more effective in alleviating hot flashes, though further studies are needed to support these evidences.
 
Effect of flaxseed on hot flashes
The effect of flaxseed on hot flashes was also evaluated by Baghdarin et al (23). They conducted a double-blind, randomized, cross- over study (with a wash out period of two wk) on two groups of flaxseed and placebo for six wk. Flaxseed group showed a significant reduction compared to placebo group with respect to hot flash intensity (p=0.045), but this difference was not significant with regard to hot flashes frequency. Therapeutic effect was only significant in women experiencing 5-7 cases of daily hot flashes (p<0.001). In contrast, Akbari Torkestan et al did not find any significant decrease in frequency and intensity of hot flashes, which was probably due to low dose administration (25 mg vs. 40 mg) (22). Again, more studies are needed to clarify whether high dose (40 mg) is more effective than low dose (25 mg).
 
Effect of Salvia officinalis on hot flashes
Sadeghi et al found the significant effects of Salvia of ficinalis extract and placebo on the frequency of hot flashes (24). Although the comparison of Salvia officinalis and placebo groups was significant, still further studies are needed to confirm these evidences.
 
Effect of St. John’s wort (hypericum perforatum) on hot flashes
St. John’s wort vs. passion flower
Asali et al showed a progressive decrease in intensity of hot flashes in passion flower (8.1, 5.6 and 4) and St. John's wort group (9.3, 5.8 and 4.4) at the baseline, after 3 and 6 wk of study (25). Significant decrease was observed in both groups (St. John’s wort and passion flower) at 3rd and 6th wk (p<0.05) compared to baseline. Although 60% and 27.5% of women suffered severe hot flashes in St. John's wort and passion flower groups respectively, it was reduced to 10% and 3.4% at 6th wk (the end of study).
 
St. John’s wort vs. vitexagnus-castus
Ghazanfarpour et al found significant decrease in both groups (St. John's wort and vitexagnus-castus), but this difference was not significant between flower and vitexagnus-castus groups after 1 (p=0.98) and 2 months (p=0.68) (26).
 
Effect of evening primrose oil on hot flashes
In a trial on effect of evening primrose oil on hot flashes, frequency of hot flash decreased from 5.2±1.9 to 3.2±1.8 in the evening primrose and from 5.4±1.9 to 3.7±20 in placebo group (27). The severity of hot flash reduction was greater than placebo group, but, the difference between groups was not significant (p=0.23). The severity of hot flashes changed from 5.9±1.5 to 3.4±1.4 (-2.6±1.60) in evening primrose and from 5.9±1.7 to 4.1±2.0 (-1.8±1.2) in placebo group, which was statistically significant. In conclusion, it seems that evening primrose oil is more effective in alleviating hot flashes. Again, more studies are needed to confirm the current results.
 
Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek) on hot flashes
Hakimi et al divided the patients randomly into two groups of trigonella foenum and HRT (28). A gradual decrease was observed in Trigonella foenum (7.08±0.596, 4.36±0.53 and 2.60±0.46) and HRT group (7.47±0.71, 1.72±0.34, 0.84±0.23) at the baseline, after 4 and 8 wk of study. The frequency of hot flashes decreased significantly Trigonella foenum group, at wk 4 and wk 8 of the study compared baseline. That is, the effectiveness of HRT group was greater than Trigonella foenum group.
 
Trigonella foenum
Another trial by Akbari Torkestani et al showed a decrease from 2.20±0.74 to 1.31±0.604 (40%) in Trigonella foenum and from 2±0.74 to 0.8±0.644 (60%) in the flaxseed group (29). The comparison of two groups was significant at 8th wk. To sum up, it seems that Trigonella foenum may be effective in alleviating hot flashes.



Figure 1. Search strategy of the study.


Discussion
 
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review about therapeutic effect of Iranian herbal medicine on hot flashes. Herbal medicine plays a key role in treatment of many diseases. Both Iranian people and health providers are interested in herbal medicine. Overall, studies have shown that Pimpinella anisum, licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra), soy, black cohosh, red clover, evening primrose, Pimpinella anisum, Flaxseed, Salvia officinalis, Passi-Vitagnus, Piascledine (Avacado plus soybean oil), St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), passion flower and Valerian may have alleviate side effects of hot flashes.
 
Determining the suitable wash-out period for cross-over design
Nahidi et al conducted several interviews with women at 1, 2, 3 and 4 wk after cessation of treatment to detect recurrence of hot flashes (30). Women, who reported significant relief 2 wk after therapy cessation, suggested that effects of phytoestrogen in licorice can persist even 2 wk after cassation of treatment. This finding may help determine the sufficient wash-out periods essential between periods of a crossover design. However, it should not be generalized to other phytoestrogens, as Baber et al showed that effects of phytoestrogen in red clover persisted one wk after cassation (2).
 
Clinically treatment effect
To assess the treatment satisfaction threshold, Wyrwich et al used Menopause symptoms treatment satisfaction questionnaire (MS-TSQ) (31). This questionnaire was designed by Hill et al to assess satisfaction of women with level of menopausal symptoms treatment over 4 levels of treatment with desvenlafaxine. It is composed of 7 items on menopausal symptoms, including hot flashes, sweats night, sleep, mood, libido, concentration ability, medication tolerability along with one overall question about treatment satisfaction. Each item is rated on scale of 0-4, which includes “extremely dissatisfied,” “dissatisfied,” “neutral,” “dissatisfied,” and “extremely satisfied,”. The treatment satisfaction threshold is difference between average reductions in two mentioned symptoms for women who reported were “neutral” and “satisfied” about treatment.
Hill et al used only two of 7 items (hot flash and sweat) to measure women’s satisfaction reduction of 1.64 in hot flashes is considered as clinically meaningful threshold with respect to 50% placebo effect (32). It is important to note that they determined the treatment satisfaction threshold based on 50% of placebo effect. Future studies are needed to focus on determining the threshold of treatment satisfaction base on low effect of placebo. Also, future studies should be taken into account both statistical and clinical significance.
 
Low placebo effect
Several factors may involve in placebo response, including doctor-patient relationship, patients' positive or negative expectations of treatment, cultural factors like patients' perception of colors, forms, and drug names, along with their experience and perception of fate and faith are involved in this process (33, 34). This systematic review showed that placebo had a slight effect on alleviating hot flash. One possible explanation for this can be cultural difference. Future research can use mixed method designs with semi-structured interviews and open-ended questions such as RCTs to explore why some participants show low responses to placebo.
 
Suggestion for future trials
Many studies have shown beneficial effects of herbal medicine in decreasing hot flashes. Future studies can compare the effectiveness of herbal medicines with HRT groups. Further studies are required to measure biological parameters of estrogen, including estradiol, estron, Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) to investigate the relationship between biological parameters and intensity and frequency of hot flashes.
 
Limitations
The weak methodology of many studies used in our systematic review can be one of the potential limitations of this study. Small sample sizes, inadequate treatment allocation, lack of intention to treatment report, unclear blinding method and unmentioned randomization technique can degrade the validity of the results.
 
Conclusion
 
This research demonstrated the efficacy of herbal medicines in alleviating hot flashes, which are embraced both with people and health providers of Iran (5, 35). Therefore, herbal medicines can be considered as an appropriate alterative for women experiencing hot flashes.
 
Conflict of interest
 
Authors have no conflict of interests.



 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. MacLennan A, Broadbent J, Lester S, Moore V. Oral oestrogen and combined oestrogen/progestogen therapy versus placebo for hot flushes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 4: CD002978. [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD002978.pub2]
2. Baber R, Templeman C, Morton T, Kelly G, West L. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of an isoflavone supplement and menopausal symptoms in women. Climacteric 1999; 2: 85-92. [DOI:10.3109/13697139909025571]
3. Loprinzi CL, Kugler JW, Sloan JA, Mailliard JA, LaVasseur BI, Barton DL, et al. Venlafaxine in management of hot flashes in survivors of breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 2059-2063. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03403-6]
4. Haghighi L, Zadmohammadi M. [Hormon replacement therapy in menopusal menopausal women reffered referred to Iran University clinics during 2000-2001]. Iran J Med Sci 2003; 10: 25-30. (In Persian)
5. Menati L, Khaleghinezhad K, Tadayon M, Siahpoosh A. Evaluation of contextual and demographic factors on licorice effects on reducing hot flashes in postmenopause women. Health Care women Int 2014; 35: 87-99. [DOI:10.1080/07399332.2013.770001]
6. Saghafi N, Mahmoodinya M, Ayati S, Behdani F, Shakeri MT, Rakhshandeh A. [Comparison of Effects of Black Cohosh and Fluoxetine in Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms]. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2013; 15: 29. (In Persian)
7. Shahnazi M, Nahaee J, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Bayatipayan S. Effect of black cohosh (cimicifuga racemosa) on vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a randomized clinical trial. J Caring Sci 2013; 2: 105.
8. Nahidi F, Kariman N, Simbar M, Mojab F. The study on the effects of Pimpinella anisum on relief and recurrence of menopausal hot flashes. Iran J Pharm Res 2012; 11: 1079.
9. Nahidi F, Kariman N, Simbar M, Mojab F. The Study on the Effects of Pimpinella anisum on Relief and Recurrence of Menopausal Hot Flashes. Iran J Pharm Res 2012; 11: 1079-1085.
10. Abdolahi F, Azad Bakht M, Shabankhani M, Rezaei Abhari F, Moslemizade N. [The effect of aqueous extract of Glycyrriza glabra on menopausal symptom]. Mazandran J Med Sci 2007; 16: 75-82. (In Persian)
11. Kazemian A, Sh B, Parvin N, Delaram M. [The effect of valerian on hot flash in menopausal women]. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci 2006; 8: 35-40. (In Persian)
12. Mirabi P, Mojab F. The effects of valerian root on hot flashes in menopausal women. Iran J Pharm Res 2013; 12: 217-222.
13. Salehi K, Ehsanpour S, Zolfaghari B, Salehi Z, Honargoo M. [Effect of red clover Isoflavones extract on menopausal symptoms]. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2013; 15: 21-28. (In Persian)
14. Ehsanpour S, Salehi K, Zolfaghari B, Bakhtiari S. The effects of red clover on quality of life in post-menopausal women. Iran J Nurs Midwif Res 2012; 17: 34-40.
15. Nelson HD, Vesco KK, Haney E, Fu R, Nedrow A, Miller J, et al. Nonhormonal therapies for menopausal hot flashes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295: 2057- 2071. [DOI:10.1001/jama.295.17.2057]
16. Abbaspoor Z, Hajikhani NA, Afshari P. Effect of vitex agnuscactus on menopausal early symptoms in postmenopausal women: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Med Res 2011; 1: 132-140. [DOI:10.9734/BJMMR/2011/163]
17. Kazemian M, Ghanadi A. [Effect of Vitagnus and Passi-pay on hot flash of menopause in women referred to health centers of Isfahan, 2002]. Iran J Nurs Midwif Res 2010; 11. (In Persian)
18. Kazemian A, Sereshti M, Fruzandeh N, Akbari N.Effects of Passion Flower on Hot Flash in Menopausal Women Supervised by Esfahan Health Centers, 2002. J Ilam Univ Med Sci 2006; 14: 41-47.
19. Hanachi P, Golkho S. Assessment of soy phytoestrogens and exercise on lipid profiles and menopause symptoms in menopausal women. J Biol Sci 2008; 8: 789-793. [DOI:10.3923/jbs.2008.789.793]
20. Abbaspour Z, Mohammadi Nik F, Zand Moghadam A, Saadati N, Latifi S. [A study on effect of isolated soy on hot flushes of menopausal women]. Sci Med J 2003; 36: 18-25. (In Persian)
21. Panahi Y, Beiraghdar F, Kashani N, Baharie Javan N, Dadjo Y. Comparison of piascledine (avocado and soybean oil) and hormone replacement therapy in menopausal-induced hot flashing. Iran J Pharm Res 2011; 10: 941-951.
22. Akbari Torkestani N, Davoodabadi F. [Comparative effects of flaxseed, soy on menopusal hotflashes]. Comp Med J Nurs Midwif 2012; 2: 52-60. (In Persian)
23. Baghdari N, Akbari I A, Ayati Sedicheh E, Ahmad H. [Effect of power of flaxseed on hot flashes in women at the climacteric]. IJOG 2011; 14: 37-47. (In Persian)
24. Sadeghi AH, BakhshiI M, Behboodi MZ, Goodarzi S, Haghani H. [Effect of Sage extract on hot flashes in postmenopausal women]. Comp Med J Nurs Mid 2011; 3: 46-57. (In Persian)
25. Asali Z, Fahami F, Aslani A, Fathizade N. [Comparative evaluation ofJohn's wortand passion flower effect on hot flashand insomnia in menopausal woman]. Iran J Nurs Midwif Res 2010; 15: 202-207. (In Persian)
26. Ghazanfarpour M, Ghaderi E, Kaviani M, Haddadian K. Comparison the efficacy of Hypericum perforatum and vitex agnus-castus in hot flushes: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Chronic Diseases J 2013; 1: 67-73.
27. Farzaneh F, Fatehi S, Sohrabi M-R, Alizadeh K. The effect of oral evening primrose oil on menopausal hot flashes: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 288: 1075-1079. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-013-2852-6]
28. Hakimi S, Mohammd Alizadeh Charadabi S, Siahi Shadbad M, Bamdad Moghadam R, Abbasalizadeh F, Mustafa Ghrebaghi P, et al. [Effect of Fenugreek seed on early menopausal symptoms]. Pharm Sci 2005; 2: 9. (In Persian)
29. Akbari Torkestani N, Attarha M, Heidari T, Narenji F. [The Effect of Fenugreek and Flaxseed on Menopausal Hot Flash]. J Herb Med 2010; 1: 62-68. (In Persian)
30. Nahidi F, Zare E, Mojab F, Alavi-majd H. Effects of licorice on relief and recurrence of menopausal hot flashes. Iran J Pharm Res 2012; 11: 541.
31. Wyrwich KW, Spratt DI, Gass M, Yu H, Bobula JD. Identifying meaningful differences in vasomotor symptoms among menopausal women. Menopause 2008; 15: 698-705. [DOI:10.1097/gme.0b013e31815f892d]
32. Hill CD, Fehnel SE, Bobula JD, Yu H, McLeod LD. Development and preliminary validation of the Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MS-TSQ). Menopause 2007; 14: 1047-1055. [DOI:10.1097/gme.0b013e31803816b8]
33. Moerman DE. Cultural variations in the placebo effect: ulcers, anxiety, and blood pressure. Med Anthropol Quarter 2000; 14: 51-72. [DOI:10.1525/maq.2000.14.1.51]
34. Giorno CD, Fonseca AMd, Bagnoli VR, Assis JSd, Soares Jr JM, Baracat EC. Effects of Trifolium pratense on the climacteric and sexual symptoms in postmenopause. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira 2010; 56: 558-562. [DOI:10.1590/S0104-42302010000500017]
35. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Hoseinian M. Knowledge, attitude and practice toward complementary and traditional medicine among Kashan health care staff, 2012. Comp Ther Med 2014; 22: 126-132. [DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2013.11.009]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb