1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. , Dr.a.esmailzadeh@gmail.com
Abstract: (2215 Views)
Background: Although leiomyomas are the most common gynecologic disorders, non-puerperal uterine inversion due to leiomyoma is considered as a rare clinical problem. This condition can occur as a complication of a large sub-mucous leiomyoma that leads to dilate cervix and protrude into vagina. The patient may have several symptoms such as heavy vaginal bleeding, pelvic pain and intermittent acute urinary retention.
Case: We presented a 32-year-old nulliparous woman with 17 years of unexplained infertility and diagnosis of a large vaginal prolapsed non-pedunculated leiomyoma.
Conclusion: Haultain’s procedure was used to reposition uterine inversion and remove leiomyoma through a posterior incision, using laparotomy.
Type of Study:
Original Article |
References
1. Takano K, Ichikawa Y, Tsunoda H, Nishida M. Uterine inversion caused by uterine sarcoma: a case report. Japan J Clin Oncol 2001; 31: 39-42. [
DOI:10.1093/jjco/hye002]
2. Bezircioglu I, Sakarya DK, Yetimalar MH, Kayhan E, Yildiz A, Baser E, et al. A Huge Vaginal Prolapsed Pedunculated Uterine Leiomyoma: A Case Report. J Clin Stud Med Case Rep 2015; 2: 005.
3. Babah O, Afolabi B, Ayanbode O, Atoki A, Okafor O. Prolapsed submucous uterine fibroid with associated uterovaginal prolapsed, a case report. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014; 13: 64-67. [
DOI:10.9790/0853-13346467]
4. Ymele FF, Nana P, Fouedjio J, Bechem E, Mbu R. Non-puerperal uterine inversion following a prolapsed leiomyoma in a Cameroonian woman. Clin Mother Child Health 2011; 8: C110602. [
DOI:10.4303/cmch/C110602]
5. Muhammad Z, Ibrahim S, Yakasai I. Chronic Non-Puerperal Uterine Inversion: A report of two cases. Borno Med J 2012; 9: 18-21.
6. de Vries M, Perquin D. Non-puerperal uterine inversion due to submucous myoma in a young woman: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2010; 4: 21. [
DOI:10.1186/1752-1947-4-21]