International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Fri, Nov 22, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 18, Issue 9 (September 2020)
IJRM 2020, 18(9): 765-776 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mehdikhani H, Agababa H, Sadeghi L. Effect of Zirconium oxide nanoparticle on serum level of testosterone and spermatogenesis in the rat: An experimental study. IJRM 2020; 18 (9) :765-776
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1068-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1068-en.html
1- Department of Biology, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
2- Department of Biology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran. ,heydar2001@yahoo.com
3- Department of Biology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran.
2- Department of Biology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran. ,
3- Department of Biology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran.
Abstract: (1813 Views)
Background: Zirconium nanoparticles are used as health agents, pharmaceutical carriers, and in dental and orthopedic implants.
Objective: This studyaimed to investigate the effects of Zirconium oxide nanoparticles on the process of spermatogenesis in rat.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 32 male Wistar rats (150-200 gr), with range of age 2.5 to 3 months were used and divided into four groups of eight per each. The control group received 0.5 ml of distilled water and the three experimental groups received 50, 200, and 400 ppm doses of Zirconium oxide nanoparticles solution over a 30-day period, respectively. At the end of the experiment, tissue sections were taken from the testis and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Serum concentration of testosterone was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results: In the experimental group receiving 400 ppm Zirconium oxide nanoparticles, the number of Spermatogonia cells (p ≤ 0.01), Spermatocytes (p ≤ 0.01), Spermatids (p ≤ 0.001), and sertoli and Leydig cells (p ≤ 0.05) showed a significant decrease compared to the control group. Serum testosterone concentration did not change significantly in all experimental groups receiving Zirconium oxide nanoparticles compared to the control group. Experimental group received 400 ppm Zirconium oxide nanoparticles shrinkage of seminal tubules and reduced lumen space compared to control group.
Conclusion: Zirconium oxide nanoparticles are likely to damage the testes by increasing Reactive oxygen species production and free radicals.
Objective: This studyaimed to investigate the effects of Zirconium oxide nanoparticles on the process of spermatogenesis in rat.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 32 male Wistar rats (150-200 gr), with range of age 2.5 to 3 months were used and divided into four groups of eight per each. The control group received 0.5 ml of distilled water and the three experimental groups received 50, 200, and 400 ppm doses of Zirconium oxide nanoparticles solution over a 30-day period, respectively. At the end of the experiment, tissue sections were taken from the testis and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Serum concentration of testosterone was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results: In the experimental group receiving 400 ppm Zirconium oxide nanoparticles, the number of Spermatogonia cells (p ≤ 0.01), Spermatocytes (p ≤ 0.01), Spermatids (p ≤ 0.001), and sertoli and Leydig cells (p ≤ 0.05) showed a significant decrease compared to the control group. Serum testosterone concentration did not change significantly in all experimental groups receiving Zirconium oxide nanoparticles compared to the control group. Experimental group received 400 ppm Zirconium oxide nanoparticles shrinkage of seminal tubules and reduced lumen space compared to control group.
Conclusion: Zirconium oxide nanoparticles are likely to damage the testes by increasing Reactive oxygen species production and free radicals.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Reproductive Andrology
References
1. Masciangioli T, Zhang WX. Environmental technologies at the nanoscale. Environ Sci Technol 2003; 37: 102-108. [DOI:10.1021/es0323998] [PMID]
2. Erb U, Aust KT, Palumbo G. Nanostructured materials: processing, properties and potential applications. New York, Noyes Publications; 2002: 179-222.
3. Aitken RJ, Chaudhry MQ, Boxall AB, Hull M. Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends. Occup Med 2006; 56: 300-306. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/kql051] [PMID]
4. Nakarani M, Misra AK, Patel JK, Vaghani SS. Itraconazole nanosuspension for oral delivery: formulation, characterization and in vitro comparison with marketed formulation. Daru 2010; 18: 84-90.
5. Tan K, Cheang P, Ho IAW, Lam PYP, Hui KM. Nanosized bioceramic particles could function as efficient gene delivery vehicles with target specificity for the spleen. Gene Ther 2007; 14: 828-835. [DOI:10.1038/sj.gt.3302937] [PMID]
6. Caicedo M, Jacobs JJ, Reddy A, Hallab NJ. Analysis of metal ion‐induced DNA damage, apoptosis, and necrosis in human (Jurkat) t‐cells demonstrates Ni2+ and V3+ are more toxic than other metals: Al3+, Be2+, Co2+, Cr3+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Mo5+, Nb5+, Zr2+. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008; 86: 905-913. [DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.31789] [PMID]
7. Wang ML, Tuli R, Manner PA, Sharkey PF, Hall DJ, Tuan RS. Direct and indirect induction of apoptosis in human mesenchymal stem cells in response to titanium particles. J Orthop Res 2003; 21: 697-707. [DOI:10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00241-3]
8. Brunner TJ, Wick P, Manser P, Spohn P, Grass RN, Limbach LK, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol 2006; 40: 4374-4381. [DOI:10.1021/es052069i] [PMID]
9. Demir E, Burgucu D, Turna F, Aksakal S, Kaya B. Determination of TiO2, ZrO2, and Al2O3 nanoparticles on genotoxic responses in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and cultured embyronic kidney cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2013; 76: 990-1002. [DOI:10.1080/15287394.2013.830584] [PMID]
10. Ye M, Shi B. Zirconia nanoparticles-induced toxic effects in osteoblast-like 3T3-E1 cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2018; 13: 353-364. [DOI:10.1186/s11671-018-2747-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Gad MM, Al-Thobity AM, Shahin SY, Alsaqer BT, Ali AA. Inhibitory effect of zirconium oxide nanoparticles on Candida albicans adhesion to repaired polymethyl methacrylate denture bases and interim removable prostheses: a new approach for denture stomatitis prevention. Int J Nanomedicine 2017; 12: 5409-5419. [DOI:10.2147/IJN.S142857] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Banerjee K, Prithviraj M, Augustine N, Pradeep SP, Thiagarajan P. Analytical characterization and antimicrobial activity of nano zirconia particles. J Chem Pharm Sci 2016; 9: 1186-1190.
13. Atalay H, Çeli̇k A, Ayaz F. Investigation of genotoxic and apoptotic effects of zirconium oxide nanoparticles (20 nm) on L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. Chem Biol Interact 2018; 296: 98-104. [DOI:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.09.017] [PMID]
14. Arefian Z, Pishbin F, Negahdary M, Ajdary M. Potential toxic effects of Zirconia Oxide nanoparticles on liver and kidney factors. Biomedical Research 2015; 26: 89-97.
15. Omidi S, Negahdary M, Aghababa H. The effects of zirconium oxide nanoparticles on FSH, LH and testosterone hormones in female Wistar rats. Electron J Biol 2015; 11: 46-51.
16. Lan Z, Yang WX. Nanoparticles and spermatogenesis: how do nanoparticles affect spermatogenesis and penetrate the blood-testis barrier. Nanomedicine 2012; 7: 579-596. [DOI:10.2217/nnm.12.20] [PMID]
17. Tripathi UK, Chhillar S, Kumaresan A, Aslam MM, Rajak SK, Nayak S, et al. Morphometric evaluation of seminiferous tubule and proportionate numerical analysis of Sertoli and spermatogenic cells indicate differences between crossbred and purebred bulls. Vet World 2015; 8: 645-650. [DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2015.645-650] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Pabisch S, Feichtenschlager B, Kickelbick G, Peterlik H. Effect of interparticle interactions on size determination of zirconia and silica based systems-A comparison of SAXS, DLS, BET, XRD and TEM. Chem Phys Lett 2012; 521: 91-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.cplett.2011.11.049] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Chu M, Nguyen LTH, Mai XT, Thuan DV, Bach LG, Nguyen DC, et al. Nano ZrO2 synthesis by extraction of Zr (IV) from ZrO (NO3) 2 by PC88A, and determination of extraction impurities by ICP-MS. Metals 2018; 8: 851-865. [DOI:10.3390/met8100851]
20. Kim YS, Song MY, Park JD, Song KS, Ryu HR, Chung YH, et al. Subchronic oral toxicity of silver nanoparticles. Part Fibre Toxicol 2010; 7: 20-30. [DOI:10.1186/1743-8977-7-20] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Fan YO, Zhang YH, Zhang XP, Liu B, Ma YX, Jin YH. Comparative study of nanosized and microsized silicon dioxide on spermatogenesis function of male rats. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 2006; 35: 549-553.
22. Talebi AR, Khorsandi L, Moridian M. The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on mouse spermatogenesis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30: 1203-1209. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-013-0078-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Braydich-Stolle LK, Lucas B, Schrand A, Murdock RC, Lee T, Schlager JJ, et al. Silver nanoparticles disrupt GDNF/Fyn kinase signaling in spermatogonial stem cells. Toxicol Sci 2010; 116: 577-589. [DOI:10.1093/toxsci/kfq148] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Jia F, Sun Z, Yan X, Zhou B, Wang J. Effect of pubertal nano-TiO2 exposure on testosterone synthesis and spermatogenesis in mice. Arch Toxicol 2014; 88: 781-788. [DOI:10.1007/s00204-013-1167-5]
25. Miresmaeili SM, Halvaei I, Fesahat F, Fallah A, Nikonahad N, Taherinejad M. Evaluating the role of silver nanoparticles on acrosomal reaction and spermatogenic cells in rat. Iran J Reprod Med 2013; 11: 423-430.
26. Greenwald RA. Oxygen radicals, inflammation, and arthritis: pathophysiological considerations and implications for treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1991; 20: 219-240. [DOI:10.1016/0049-0172(91)90018-U]
27. Tucci M, Baker R, Benghuzzi H, Hughes J. Levels of hydrogen peroxide in tissues adjacent to failing implantable devices may play an active role in cytokine production. Biomed Sci Instrum 2000; 36: 215-220.
28. Alzahrani FM, Mohammed Saleh Katubi K, Ali D, Alarifi S. Apoptotic and DNA-damaging effects of yttria-stabilized zirconia nanoparticles on human skin epithelial cells. Int J Nanomedicine 2019; 14: 7003-7016. [DOI:10.2147/IJN.S212255] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Asadpour E, Sadeghnia HR, Ghorbani A, Boroushaki MT. Effect of zirconium dioxide nanoparticles on glutathione peroxidase enzyme in PC12 and N2a cell lines. Iran J Pharm Res 2014; 13: 1141-1148.
30. Mauricio MD, Guerra-Ojeda S, Marchio P, Valles SL, Aldasoro M, Escribano-Lopez I, et al. Nanoparticles in medicine: a focus on vascular oxidative stress. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018; 2018: 1-20. [DOI:10.1155/2018/6231482] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Liu Y, Wang S, Wang Z, Ye N, Fang H, Wang D. TiO2, SiO2 and ZrO2 nanoparticles synergistically provoke cellular oxidative damage in freshwater microalgae. Nanomaterials 2018; 8: 95-106. [DOI:10.3390/nano8020095] [PMID] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
