1. Franken DR, Oehninger S. Semen analysis and sperm function testing. Asian J Androl 2012; 14: 6-13. [
DOI:10.1038/aja.2011.58]
2. Liu DY, Baker HW. Evaluation and assessment of semen for IVF/ICSI. Asian J Androl 2002; 4: 281-285.
3. Lewis SE. Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility? Reproduction 2007; 134: 31-40. [
DOI:10.1530/REP-07-0152]
4. Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 629-634. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.024]
5. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor LP, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, Coutifaris C, et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1388-1393 [
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa003005]
6. Tang YG, Tang LX, Wang QL. The reference values for semen parameters of 1213 fertile men in Guangdong Province in China. Asian J Androl 2015; 17: 298-303. [
DOI:10.4103/1008-682X.143251]
7. Barratt CLR, Björndahl L, De Jonge CJ, Lamb DJ, Osorio Martini F, McLachlan R et al. The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23: 660-680. [
DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmx021]
8. Menkveld R. Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 47-58. [
DOI:10.1038/aja.2009.14]
9. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2010.
10. De Vos A, Van De Velde H, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 42-48. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04571-5]
11. Gardner Allison J, Evans Janice P. Mammalian membrane block to polyspermy: new insights into how mammalian eggs prevent fertilisation by multiple sperm. Reprod Fertil Dev 2005; 18, 53-61. [
DOI:10.1071/RD05122]
12. Rath D, Töpfer-Petersen E, Michelmann HW, Schwartz P, Ebeling S. Zona pellucida characteristics and sperm-binding patterns of in vivo and in vitro produced porcine oocytes inseminated with differently prepared spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2005; 63: 352-362. [
DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.044]
13. Huszar G, Jakab A, Sakkas D, Ozenci CC, Cayli S, Delpiano E, et al. Fertility testing and ICSI sperm selection by hyaluronic acid binding: clinical and genetic aspects. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 650-663. [
DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61060-7]
14. Menkveld R, Holleboom CA, Rhemrev JP. Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. Asian J of Androl 2011; 13: 59-68. [
DOI:10.1038/aja.2010.67]
15. Check JH, Check ML, Katsoff D. Prognosis for sperm fertilizability: analysis of different variables in men. Arch Andrology 2002; 48: 73-83. [
DOI:10.1080/014850102753385233]
16. Larson KL, DeJonge CJ, Barnes AM, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1717-1722. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/15.8.1717]
17. Kovac JR, Smith RP, Cajipe M, Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI. Men with a complete absence of normal sperm morphology exhibit high rates of success without assisted reproduction. Asian J Androl 2017; 19: 39-42.
18. Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1289-1295. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.063]