Volume 18, Issue 1 (January 2020)                   IJRM 2020, 18(1): 47-56 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kemal A, Maidarti M, Silvia M, Mariana A, Dewi Mutia H, Wiweko B. Knowledge, attitude, intention, and religion aspect toward fertility preservation among obstetrics and gynecology residents in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. IJRM 2020; 18 (1) :47-56
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1284-en.html
1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia. , kemal.achmad@gmail.com
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia.
3- Indonesian Reproductive Medicine Research and Training Center (INA- REPROMED) Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia.
Full-Text [PDF 405 kb]   (1171 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2835 Views)
Full-Text:   (516 Views)
  1. Introduction
According to estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the world age-standardized incidence rate shows that there are 165 new cancer cases for every 100,000 females in the world (1). Oncology Society of Indonesia in 2010 reported that 63.67% of cancer cases were that of women of which 31.4% were under 45 yr old (2). More people with cancer are expected to face long-term side effects of the treatment, especially with regard to their reproductive system (3). Studies by Momen and co-workers suggest that fertility becomes one of the markers of quality of life to be of concern to cancer patients who still want to have children (4). The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommended that physicians promptly build communication with patients especially with cancer about fertility preservation methods and potential complications of reproduction function regarding the age-related decline (5).
Studies by Adams E and colleagues in England suggest that oncologists assume that preservation of the reproductive function is important. However, 87% of them need more information about the preservation of reproductive function beyond sperm storage. Only about 38% of them discussed preservation options with their patients in writing (6). 
ESHRE reviewed that OB/GYN residents and general practice play an important task in giving an understanding of the relationship between age and fertility for patients which integrating with new evidence-based medicine and technologies (7). The lack of knowledge from healthcare providers regarding the preservation of reproductive function certainly affects the patient's knowledge, attitude, behavior, and perspective. A study in Brazil in 2017 showed that the knowledge and attitudes of the patients on the preservation option of the reproductive function are still very poor (8). In Indonesia, no studies have observed the effect of knowledge, attitudes, behavior, and religion perspectives on OB/GYN residents regarding preservation of reproductive function.
Therefore, this study aims to determine the profile of knowledge, attitude, intentions, and religion aspects on the preservation of reproductive function on the OB/GYN residents in Indonesia.
 
  1. Materials and Methods
    1. 1.Measures
This cross-sectional study was conducted on 92 Indonesian OB/GYN residents in the Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between November and December 2017. Data were collected using questionnaires. All items of the questionnaire were developed to measure knowledge, attitude, intentions, and religion aspects regarding age-related fertility decline and oocyte cryopreservation.
 
  1. 2.Instrument design
The questionnaire was based on Yu and colleagues’ and had been tested before. The instruments measured fertility awareness and the clinical experiences of the authors in the fields of OB/GYN, reproductive endocrinology, psychology, and anthropology (9). The survey included demographic background questions, questions about residents’ knowledge toward awareness of fertility issues, questions about residents’ attitudes toward fertility issues and the methods of storing frozen oocytes, and questions about residents’ intentions on concerning the need for discussion or supporting oocyte cryopreservation for different patient situations. Participants were also asked about their religion perspective on the preservation of reproductive functions, they were asked whether the preservation of reproductive functions such as oocytes freezing, sperm freezing, embryos freezing, ovarian cortex freezing, oocyte donors, and sperm donors were allowed or not allowed based on their religion perspective.
 
  1. 3.Procedures
In total, 100 OB/GYN residents were asked to fill out all items of the questionnaire. Five residents refused to fill the questionnaire. After the questionnaires were collected back, three of them were excluded because they did not complete all items of the questionnaire. Finally, 92 OB/GYN residents were included in this study as participants.
  1. 4.Ethical consideration
This study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia (reference number: 985/UN2.F1/ETIK/2017).
 
  1. 5.Statistical analysis
The primary analysis was descriptive. Frequencies and proportions were summarized for characteristics and each questionnaire items. Bivariate test was used for religion perspective on reproductive preservation. The statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In this study, we used three analyses test to compare the data, such as (1) Binomial test with p < 0.05 for Residents’ attitudes toward fertility issues and the use of oocytes cryopreservation, (2) Goodness of fit Chi-square test with p < 0.05 for Likelihood of concerning the need for discussing or supporting oocyte cryopreservation for different patient situations, and (3) Contingency coefficient test with p < 0.05 for Religion perspective on reproductive preservation.
 
  1. Results
    1. 1.Sample of characteristics
Ninety-two OB/GYN residents participated in this study demographic characteristics revealed that more than half of the residents were less than 30 yr old and significantly higher percentage of respondents were women (60.87%). More than half of the OB/GYN residents were Muslim (61.95%), and most of the respondents (26.08%) intended to pursue general practice as an OB/GYN specialist in the future and have no intention to be a trainee (Table I).
 
  1. 2.Knowledge of OB/GYN residents on the awareness of fertility issues
As shown in Figure 1A, more than half of the OB/GYN residents (66%) overestimated the age when fertility declines slightly to be 35–39 yr, and as shown in Figure 1B, almost half of the residents (46%) overestimated the age when fertility declines markedly to be 35–39 yr. Also residents overestimated the overall chance of success in having a child after undergoing one IVF treatment cycle, as half of the OB/GYN residents (50%) believed that the success rate was 20–29% (Figure 1C).
 
  1. 3.Attitudes of OB/GYN residents toward fertility issues and methods of storing frozen oocytes
Our results showed that almost all participants OB/GYNs should initiate counseling with their patients about childbearing desires (96.74%) and age-related fertility decline (94.57%). About 79.34% of participants thought that an annual woman wellness examination with an OB/GYN specialist should present a discussion about age-related fertility decline since this encourages women in deciding their future potential reproduction. Moreover, participants thought that OB/GYNs should establish a discussion about the option of frozen oocyte storage with their female patients (86.95%). Nearly half of the respondents thought this option should be discussed in the part of an annual woman wellness examination (Table II).
 
  1. 4.Intentions of OB/GYN residents toward the need for discussing or supporting oocyte cryopreservation for different patient situations
As shown in Table III, there is a difference in the recommendation between patient situation. OB/GYN residents were very likely to discuss oocyte cryopreservation with patients who had received a cancer diagnosis, regardless of whether that patient was 25 or 35 yr of age. Almost half of the residents highly recommended and were very likely to discuss oocyte cryopreservation in a 25-yr-old patient with a cancer diagnosis (38.04%). In contrast, residents were either somewhat or very unlikely to discuss oocyte cryopreservation with patients who wanted to pursue a career before starting a family in a 25-yr-old patient (16.30%).
 
  1. 5.Religion aspect of OB/GYN residents on the preservation of reproductive functions
Table IV shows the difference between the Muslim, Christian, and Catholic residents on the preservation of reproductive function. Half of the residents in different religion thought that freezing oocyte, freezing sperm, and freezing embryo were allowed. There was no significant difference between the three religions. However, there was a significant difference in the oocyte and sperm donors (p = 0.008 and p = 0.001). Half of the Islamic residents thought that oocyte (54.39%) and sperm donations (61.40%) were not allowed. In contrast, most of the Christian and Catholic residents did not know that oocyte and sperm donations were allowed or not.




پ
 
4.Discussion
In our best knowledge, this is the first study to examine the attitudes, knowledge, intentions, and religion aspect toward fertility preservation among Indonesian OB/GYN residents, especially in Jakarta. Most of residents who completed the survey believed that OB/GYNs should establish discussion about childbearing intentions. Otherwise, 95% of participants said that OB/GYN should discuss about age-related fertility decline with female patients, where 79% said that these discussions should be a part of an annual woman wellness examination. A large study that collected data from 79 countries reported that people who postponed childbearing also have lack knowledge of age-related fertility decline; however, about 56.9% of participants  who reach higher fertility knowledge were women, educated and living in Very High Human Development Index (VHHDI) countries (10). Many women have already known that physicians and healthcare providers have much information on fertility and reproductive health, but they reported that they never discuss the influence of age on their ability to conceive in detail (6). In spite of showing a positive attitude for giving enough information for patients about fertility decline by physicians, most of OB/GYN residents had misled about fertility decline. Dunson et al reported that advancing age of women was strong correlated with decreased of fertility. This previous study highlighted that patients and physicians should aware about fertility decline (11). In this study, we found that almost half of the residents were not well-informed about these basic reproductive facts while OB/GYNs place in the first line to distribute adequate reproductive knowledge, particularly fertility information for society. A previous study found a significant positive correlation that suggested between intention to delay childbearing in a group who got fertility information. Therefore, better education and curriculum about age-related decline in female fertility should be offered in OB/GYN residency programs in Indonesia (12).
In addition in this study resident were misinformed about the success rate of ART based on age-related infertility. Half of the residents (50%) think that the success rate of IVF is high. Practitioners must be educated that the IVF successful rate decrease in women who postponing to conceive from age 20 to 35 (13). Many women have a misperception that the success rate of ART does not relate to age. Only 11.7% of women aged 41-42 had a live birth with ART and the chance decrease in women aged 43-44 years old, which is only 4.5% success rate. But in women aged under 35 have 41.5% could have a chance had a live birth (14). The women aged 40s have a less chance to have live birth with ART than younger women. Therefore, a high educated practitioner should inform the patient and correct this misperceptions.
When OB/GYN residents in this study were asked whether they should initiate discussions regarding oocyte cryopreservation with patients, more than three quarters (87%) believed that OB/GYNs should open a discussion with patient, and more than half (67%) reported that it should be a part of an annual woman wellness examination. A study in 2013 revealed that the oocyte of the 183 women who undergone oocyte cryopreservation cycle with mean age was 38 have reduce the oocytes quality and potential reproductive, Only one-third women discussed with gynecologist before the oocyte cryopreservation procedure, 79% of the women in the study wish they had undertaken the procedure before (15). The current study revealed women aged 31 have greater potential than older women who undergoing oocyte cryopreservation, the OB/GYN resident tends to start a discussion about oocyte cryopreservation at women aged 31. A decision analysis model was conducted by Mesen (2015) showed that women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation before 34 years old have highest probability to achieve live birth outcome (16). OB/GYN has to consider any possibilities factor while inform patients about the decline of fertility and oocyte cryopreservation, the pregnancy plan might be influenced by other factors beyond patient control (15). The physician has to be sensitive and respect to patients’ reproductive autonomy. Ideally, to achieve adequate counseling, OB/GYN should initiate counseling about the highest probability of reproductive potential that could be maximized at 20-30 years old. Knowing the attitudes and knowledge of the physician about fertility preservation is important. In Germany, 120 oncologists believe that fertility preservation was an important issue, 40% of the physicians discussing the issues with patients routinely, and only half who understanding of it (17). A study in Japan found that breast cancer specialist was more positive attitudes toward fertility preservation, they have improved the interdisciplinary communication between physicians and infertility specialists by discussing fertility preservation with patients (18). In this study, residents are more likely to support oocyte preservation for cancer women than age-matched patients. Therefore, further study is needed to assess the financial covering of fertility preservation technologies that might have an impact on attitudes toward and using of oocyte cryopreservation.
Religion perspectives in this study show that most Islamic residents thought that freezing oocyte, sperm, embryos, and ovarian cortex were allowed. In contrast, ovum and sperm donor were not allowed. It could be explained by the principle of assisted reproductive technology in Islamic perspective. The treatment of infertility in Islam is allowed only if it involves the preservation of procreation. The sperm, ovum, and uterus have to come from the same couple that are legally married and during their contract of marriage. Marriage could be ended by death or divorce. If marriage ends, female partners are not allowed to use sperm cell from their ex-husbands, and likewise male partners are not allowed to use ovum from their ex-wives. When sperm or ovum are from anonymous donors, like ovum or sperm donors, the procedure is absolutely forbidden by Islamic law (19, 20). As in Islam, Judaism allowed all the techniques of ART only if the sperm and oocyte are from the wife and husband. Religion has an influence on women authorities in the reproduction aspect, such as fertility treatment. Protestant, Anglican, and other Denominations accept ART treatment, but the Vatican does not accept that procedure. In Catholic, the procreation as not a process of manufacture. The Catholic view of procreation is inseparable from married sexual intercourse, because of the respect of the “gift” and sanctify of created life is fundamental (21). The problem of views about “the good life” is that they rest on a religious or naturalistic presupposition that not all participants necessary to share in the secular view (22). The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) declared that freezing of embryo should no longer be considered experimental in 2012 (23). The secular views were rejected by critical appraisals that the reproduction aspect is a personal thing to which one has a right (22). Additionally, IVF with donor oocyte or donor sperms is not allowed by the law in Indonesia (24).
The knowledge about the different religious perceptions related to the reproduction health problem, especially fertility preservation is important for a practitioner who practices reproduction techniques. Dilemmas associated with fertility therapies and ethical considerations should be addressed because this field continues to evolve. Therapy of fertility should consider the age and marital status, religion or ethical objection to freezing of embryo, treatment, and type of cancer, the risk to benefit ratio of delaying treatment, and prognosis after treatment (25). Greater awareness about psychosexual and psychosocial morbidity associated with cancer patients’ attitudes, emotions, cancer-related infertility, and the choices of having children is needed (26). The loss of fertility might affect sexuality, identify and role expectations, and the pursuit of intimacy and marriage not only inability to have children (27).
Finally, women have to make their choice about fertility preservation. It must be highlighted that the decision is not made by only the women, but include the male partners (28). Some studies revealed that men also overestimate the age-related to fertility declines (29). Furthermore, a desire for having a child are related to whether a male partner desires or not (30). Therefore, discussion of fertility decline and oocyte cryopreservation must include men not only women to give the full range of reproductive options and adequate information of each option (31).
 
5.Conclusion
Our study revealed that there is a highlight critical need to improved OB/GYN resident education about issues related to age-related fertility decline and the use of oocyte cryopreservation for both medical and elective reasons at the Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Most residents assume that age-related fertility decline and oocyte cryopreservation should be discussed during annual examinations. From the religious perspective, it is shown that preservations of reproductive function were mostly accepted except oocyte donor and sperm donor.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants and supervisors who contributed to the work in this study. We declare that no grants were involved in supporting this study.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Fertility & Infertility

References
1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: 359-386. [DOI:10.1002/ijc.29210] [PMID]
2. Tjindarbumi D, Mangunkusumo R. Cancer in Indonesia, present and future. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2002; 32 (Suppl.): S17-S21. [DOI:10.1093/jjco/hye123] [PMID]
3. Meirow D, Nugent D. The effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 535-543. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/7.6.535] [PMID]
4. Momen NC, Ernst A, Arendt LH, Olsen J, Li J, Gissler M, et al. Maternal cancer and congenital anomalies in children-a Danish nationwide cohort study. PloS One 2017; 12: e0173355. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0173355] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2500-2510. [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Adams E, Hill E, Watson E. Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists' current knowledge, practice and attitudes. Br J Cancer 2013; 108: 1602-1615. [DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.139] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, Dondorp W, de Wert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 1231-1237. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/des029] [PMID]
8. Chehin MB, Bonetti TC, Serafini PC, Motta E. Knowledge regarding fertility preservation in cancer patients: a population-based survey among Brazilian people during the Pink October awareness event. JBRA Assist Reprod 2017; 21: 84-88. [DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20170021] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Yu L, Peterson B, Inhorn MC, Boehm JK, Patrizio P. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 403-411. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dev308] [PMID]
10. Bunting L, Tsibulsky I, Boivin J. Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: findings from the International fertility decision-making study. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 385-397. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/des402] [PMID]
11. Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1399-1403. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399] [PMID]
12. Williamson LE, Lawson KL, Downe PJ, Pierson RA. Informed reproductive decision-making: the impact of providing fertility information on fertility knowledge and intentions to delay childbearing. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36: 400-405. [DOI:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30585-5]
13. Wyndham N, Figueira PG, Patrizio P. A persistent misperception: assisted reproductive technology can reverse the "aged biological clock". Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 1044-1047. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.015] [PMID]
14. Aflatoonian A, Eftekhar M, Mohammadian F, Yousefnejad F. Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in women aged 40 years and older. Iran J Reprod Med 2011; 9: 281-284.
15. Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 1343-1349. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.201] [PMID]
16. Mesen TB, Mersereau JE, Kane JB, Steiner AZ. Optimal timing for elective egg freezing. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 1551-1556. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.002] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Buske D, Sender A, Richter D, Brähler E, Geue K. Patient-physician communication and knowledge regarding fertility issues from german oncologists' perspective-a quantitative survey. J Cancer Educ 2016; 31: 115-122. [DOI:10.1007/s13187-015-0841-0] [PMID]
18. Shimizu C, Bando H, Kato T, Mizota Y, Yamamoto S, Fujiwara Y. Physicians' knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding fertility issues for young breast cancer patients: a national survey for breast care specialists. Breast Cancer 2013; 20: 230-240. [DOI:10.1007/s12282-011-0328-8] [PMID]
19. Serour GI. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 34-38. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60328-8]
20. Al-Bar MA, Chamsi-Pasha H. Assisted reproductive technology: Islamic perspective. Contemporary bioethics: Islamic perspective. Switzerland: Spinger; 2015. p. 173-86. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-18428-9_11]
21. Schenker JG. Women's reproductive health: monotheistic religious perspectives. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2000; 70: 77-86. [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00225-3]
22. Lauritzen P. Technology and wholeness: oncofertility and catholic tradition. Cancer Treat Res 2010; 156: 295-306. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_23] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 37-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028] [PMID]
24. Indonesia PPR. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 61 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kesehatan reproduksi. p. 24-49 (Available at http://kesga.kemkes.go.id/images/pedoman/PP%20No.%2061%20Th%202014%20ttg%20Kesehatan%20Reproduksi.pdf.)
25. Kim SS. Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: current developments and future directions. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 1-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.071] [PMID]
26. Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA. Having children after cancer: A pilot survey of survivors' attitudes and experiences. Cancer 1999; 86: 697-709. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<697::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-J [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:43.0.CO;2-J]
27. Carter J, Rowland K, Chi D, Brown C, Abu-Rustum N, Castiel M, et al. Gynecologic cancer treatment and the impact of cancer-related infertility. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97: 90-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.12.019] [PMID]
28. Tsafrir A, Haimov-Kochman R, Margalioth EJ, Eldar-Geva T, Gal M, Bdolah Y, et al. Ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation for prevention of age-related fertility loss: one in five is a low responder. Gynecol Endocrinol 2015; 31: 779-782. [DOI:10.3109/09513590.2015.1062859] [PMID]
29. Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Block JM, Schmidt L. Marital benefit and coping strategies in men and women undergoing unsuccessful fertility treatments over a 5-year period. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1759-1763. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.125] [PMID]
30. Holton S, Rowe H, Fisher J. Women's health and their childbearing expectations and outcomes: a population-based survey from Victoria, Australia. Women's Health Issues 2011; 21: 366-373. [DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.006] [PMID]
31. Azhar E, Seifer DB, Melzer K, Ahmed A, Weedon J, Minkoff H. Knowledge of ovarian reserve and reproductive choices. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32: 409-415. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-014-0415-9] [PMID] [PMCID]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb