Volume 18, Issue 2 (February 2020)                   IJRM 2020, 18(2): 121-128 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Momo Tetsatsi A C, Alumeti Munyali D, Bonsou Fozin G R, Ngadjui E, Wankeu-Nya M, Watcho P. Semen quality among men attending urology services in the Dschang Health District, west Cameroon: A retrospective study on 379 cases. IJRM 2020; 18 (2) :121-128
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1352-en.html
1- Animal Physiology and Phytopharmacology Laboratory, University of Dschang-Cameroon, Dschang.
2- Animal Physiology and Phytopharmacology Laboratory, University of Dschang-Cameroon, Dschang. Department of Animal Organisms Biology, University of Douala-Cameroon, Dschang.
3- Animal Physiology and Phytopharmacology Laboratory, University of Dschang-Cameroon, Dschang. , pierre.watcho@univ-dschang.org, pwatcho@yahoo.fr
Full-Text [PDF 500 kb]   (853 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2395 Views)
Full-Text:   (600 Views)
Introduction
Infertility is a major health concern across the world.  It is defined as no conception after at least 12 months of regular intercourse without contraceptive (1). About 80 million of couples (10%-15%) worldwide are victims of different types of infertility (2). About 20%-40% of sub-Saharan Africa’s populations suffer from infertility (3). In Cameroon, the prevalence of infertility remains poorly known (4). Scientific evidence shows that the male factors are involved in 50%-60% of overall infertility; however, they are solely incriminated in case of only 20% of couples (1). Infertility has long been considered as a female-derived problem in Africa; hence, very little effort has been made to identify the male responsibility in infertile couples. In Cameroon, this domain remains unexplored due to cultural, ethical, and religious barriers. A study conducted at the Yaoundé Central Hospital revealed that men are responsible in about 20% of couples attending urology services for infertility problem (5).
Although 50% of cases are idiopathic, many factors, including anatomical, physiological, genetic, and environmental, have been associated with male infertility (6). For instance, the use of pesticides to protect plants from devastators has critically increased in the recent years, even though they are considered as the major environmental factor affecting the male reproductive tract. These pesticides mimic internal hormones leading to endocrine disorders associated with oxidative stress. Abell and colleagues (7) reported about 6% decrease in sperm parameters among farmers and inhabitants of farming areas. Although sperm abnormalities are generally considered as inaccurate predictors of fertility, semen analysis (SA) is however used as a screening test to identify the male factor involvement in infertility (2). Combined to the male reproductive history, SA is the primary screening for male fertility potential according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the American Urological Association guidelines (8). About 30%-50% cases of male infertility worldwide are related to poor sperm quality (7). In Cameroon, Nana and collaborators reported that sperm damage accounted for infertility in 41.7% of infertile men in the urology services of the Yaoundé Central Hospital (5).
Considering the intensive agricultural practices in the West Region of Cameroon, the prevalence of sperm damage-related male infertility in the Dschang Health District was evaluated in this study. Based on the deleterious effects of pesticides on spermatogenesis, we hypothesized that the poor sperm quality could be the major factor associated with male infertility in the Dschang Health District.
This work was therefore undertaken to assess the sperm profile and related sociodemographic factors of infertile men attending some urology services of health centers in the Dschang Health District.
 
Materials and Methods
Study design and data collection
This descriptive retrospective study was conducted in the Dschang Health District. Only the well-equipped hospitals for SA were selected for the study. The results of SA of all patients who consulted for infertility from January 2008 to December 2017 were included, whereas files lacking important information, such as the year of consultation or data regarding semen quality and quantity, were excluded from the study.
From patients’ files, the date of consultation, age, profession, and semen parameters were recorded.
To ensure equal qualitative (asthenozoospermia, teratozoospermia, and necrozoospermia) and quantitative (hypozoospermia, hyperzoospermia, azoospermia, oligozoospermia, normozoospermia, and polyzoospermia) semen analysis, all data (before and after 2010) were reinterpreted according to the guidelines of WHO on the examination and processing of human semen published in 2010 (9), regardless of the previous decision of the medical doctor.
 
Data treatment
From the collected data, the frequency of consultations was calculated. Data were expressed as demographic features and state of spermogram described by the clinician’s decision. For sociodemographic features, patients were grouped based on their age and profession, the respective proportions were calculated. Sperm parameters were grouped into qualitative and quantitative abnormalities as indicated above. The frequency of each abnormality was calculated.
Ethical consideration
This study was performed in accordance with the ethical authorization delivered on July 12, 2017 by the Cameroon National Ethic Committee for Human Health Research (code: 2017/07/926/CE/CNERSH/SP) and all studied participants freely accepted to participate.
 
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as percentage using Epi Info 7 software.
 
Results
Frequency of consultations
Male infertility is a relatively frequent pathology in our context. According to our results, a total of 379 patients were admitted for infertility from 2008 to 2017 in the Dschang Health District. In this group, abnormal spermogram was found in 83.9% of the patients. Contrary to the number of consultations which remarkably increased with years, the number of patients with abnormal spermogram showed a decreasing tendency (Table I).
 
Age of patients
The correlation between age and fertility is well established (10). The average age of patients was 35 yr (SD = 9.64) with extremes of 20 and 68 yr and almost 69.66% of patients were less than 40 yr. As a general tendency, there was no linear relationship between the age and the state of the spermogram. Patients aged above 50 yr had the maximum percentage of abnormal spermogram (Table I).
 
Profession of patients
Out of the 379 patients included in this study, 204 (53.83%) were workers. In this subpopulation, teachers (43; 21.08%) followed by technicians (37; 18.14%) and traders (36; 17.65%) were the most represented (Table I). Although drivers (21; 10.29%) and farmers (19; 9.31%) were the least represented categories, they surprisingly showed the highest percentage of abnormal spermogram, 90.47% and 94.74%, respectively (Table I).
The frequency of consultation increased with years and the percentage of abnormal spermogram showed a relatively stable tendency. The average year of patients included in the present study was 35 yr with extremes of 20 and 68 yr. About 69.66% of patients were aged less than 40 yr and patients aged above 50 yr had the highest percentage of abnormal spermogram.
 
Semen abnormalities
According to the guidelines of WHO on the examination and processing of human semen published in 2010, an abnormal spermogram was found in 318 (83.9%) patients. Asthenozoospermia (16.08%), asthenonecrozoospermia (25.49%). and asthenoteratonecrozoospermia (24.71%) were the most prevalent in patients having qualitative abnormalities (Figure 1), whereas hypozoospermia (95.06%) and oligozoospermia (77.14%) were the most recorded concerning the quantitative abnormalities (Figure 2 A, B).
According to our data, asthenozoospermia, asthenonecrozoospermia, and asthenoteratonecrozoospermia were the most prevalent qualitative sperm abnormalities. Oligozoospermia and hypozoospermia were the most prevalent quantitative sperm abnormalities in men consulting for infertility in the Dschang Health District from 2008 to 2017.
 



Discussion
Infertility is a prevalent problem concerning about 15% of couples during their reproductive age, and in half of this situation, a male factor is responsible (1). As few data are available about the prevalence of male infertility in Cameroon, this study was designed to evaluate the sperm profile and related sociodemographic factors of infertile men attending the urology services of health centers in Dschang Health District. The results of the present study showed that 83.9% of participants suffered from sperm damages. The majority of patients were aged under 40 yr and teachers were the most represented socioprofessional category. However, patients older than 50 yr and farmers had the highest percentages of abnormal spermogram.
The demand in urology services in the district was crescent from 2008 to 2017 (from 15 cases in 2008 to 154 in 2017). This tendency is confirmed by the literature which shows that there is an increasing adhesion of infertile couples to various infertility therapies provided by health centers across the world (11). In Cameroon and Africa, in general, this increasing demand could be explained by the fact that women are no longer solely blamed in childless couples (12). This attitude could also be motivated from the awareness of populations and the sociocultural aspects of infertility (13). The relationship between age and male fertility is well documented. The decline in male fertility potential with increasing age is a well-accepted concept and is consecutive to impairment of sperm parameters and genomic alterations (10). The mean age of the patients included in this study was 35 with extremes of 20 and 68. Similar data were found by Ahmed and colleagues (13) in Nigeria (34.0). Similar to the findings of Moussa and colleagues in Niamey, 69.66% of our patients were aged less than 40 yr (14). The high proportion of young patients in this study could be justified by the prenuptial check-up and the need for fatherhood.
Environmental factors are one of the determinants to male infertility. Thus, exposure to the inadequate socioprofessional environment is harmful to male fertility. Out of the 379 patients included in this study, the working status of 204 (53.83%) was found in the files. From this group, teachers (21.08%) were the most represented. This high prevalence could be associated with their knowledge and awareness on the involvement of both male and female factors in infertile couples. This result is similar to that of Sissoko and colleagues and Kaham and co-workers in Mali who reported that 28% and 30% of patients, respectively, consulting for infertility were civil servants (15, 16). However, our data are lower than those of Moussa and colleagues (14) in Niamey (60.93%). Although drivers (21; 10.29%) and farmers (19; 9.31%) were the least represented categories, they showed the highest percentage of abnormal spermogram, 90.47% and 94.74%, respectively. Infertility is still considered as a taboo in those categories where the common belief points women as the problem. The high prevalence of sperm damage in farmers could be a direct consequence of the exposure to pesticides (17). The toxic impact of pesticides is generally due to the release of free radicals in biological systems and the resulting oxidative stress is responsible for necrosis in surrounding cells, such as Leydig and Sertoli cells in the testis (18). Concerning the drivers, the prolonged exposure to hydrocarbon combined with high temperatures could explain present results. Many studies have reported the detrimental effects of high temperature and heat stress on male fertility (19). Normally, the scrotal temperature must be 2.2°C lower than the abdominal temperature to provide physiological conditions for spermatogenesis. Hence, an increase in scrotal temperature leads to either impaired sperm production or abnormal sperm morphology (20).
In the present study, asthenozoospermia, oligozoospermia, and hypozoospermia were the most prevalent factors associated with male infertility. According to the WHO (2010), asthenozoospermia is the decrease in sperm mobility less than 30% of total sperm. Oligozoospermia and hypozoospermia refer to a reduced number of sperms and semen volume, respectively (1). These features are generally a consequence of poor spermatogenesis and are considered as infertility factors in male. Similar results were published by Masoumi and colleagues (1) who reported in a survey conducted on the main causes of infertility in patients referred to the infertility center in Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan-Iran that, as semen disorder, asthenozoospermia was the most prevalent factor associated to male infertility. Instead, of oligozoospermia, Moussa and colleagues (14) found azoospermia as the most prevalent quantitative semen disorders among men consulting for infertility in the Radio-Isotopes Institute of Niamey. The poor spermogram condition observed in farmers could be related to their working conditions as they continue to use inadequate tools in their activities.
Male infertility remains a serious matter of concern in Africa, in general, and Cameroon, in particular. Till date, little effort has been made by authorities to address the situation. This study indicates that male infertility is a major health problem in the Dschang Health District with about 83.9% of patients consulting for infertility suffering from sperm damage. This situation highly expressed in farmers could be partially justified by the intensive use of pesticides in their activities. Therefore, there is a need for sensitization not only for the safe use of pesticides and other pollutants, but also for the reinforcement of the technical capacities of hospitals for better diagnosis and management of male infertility in Cameroon.
 
Acknowledgments
The Authors would like to thank the sanitary authorities of the Dschang Health District for material support of this study.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors have no competing interests to declare.
 
 
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Reproductive Epidemiology

References
1. Masoumi SZ, Parsa P, Darvish N, Mokhtari S, Yavangi M, Roshanaei G. An epidemiologic survey on the causes of infertility in patients referred to infertility center in Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan. Iran J Reprod Med 2015; 13:513-516.
2. Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ. Current updates on laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of male reproductive failure. Asian J Androl 2016; 18: 392-401. [DOI:10.4103/1008-682X.179161] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Uadia PO, Emokpae AM. Male infertility in Nigeria: A neglected reproductive health issue requiring attention. Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences 2015; 4: 45-53. [DOI:10.4103/2278-960X.161042]
4. Belley Priso E, Nguefack CT, Nguemgne C, Njamen TN, Taila W, Banag E. L'infertilité féminine a l'Hôpital Général de Douala : aspects épidémiologiques et radiologiques (à propos de 658 cas). J Afr Imag Méd 2015; 2: 16-23.
5. Nana PN, Wandji JC, Fomulu JN, Mbu RE, Leke RJI, Woubinwou MJ. Aspects psycho-sociaux chez patients infertiles à la maternité principale de l'hôpital central de yaoundé, cameroun. Clinics in Mother and Child Health 2011; 8: 1-5. [DOI:10.4303/cmch/C100601]
6. Eze UA, Okonof FE. High prevalence of male infertility in Africa: Are mycotoxins to blame? Afr J Reprod Health 2015; 19: 9-17
7. Abell A, Ernst E, Bonde JP. Semen quality and sexual hormones in greenhouse workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2000; 26: 492-500. [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.573] [PMID]
8. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 18-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.103] [PMID]
9. WHO. WHO Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. WHO Press, Switzerland; 2010: 5.
10. Belloc S, Hazout A, Zini A, Merviel P, Cabry R, Chahine H, et al. How to overcome male infertility after 40: influence of paternal age on fertility. Maturitas 2014; 78: 22-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.011] [PMID]
11. Leridon H. Stérilité et hypofertilité : du silence à l'impatience? Population 1991; 46: 225-247. [DOI:10.2307/1533235]
12. Ikechebelu JL, Adinma JL, Orie EF, Ikegwuonu SO. High prevalence of male infertility in southeastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 23: 657-659. [DOI:10.1080/01443610310001604475] [PMID]
13. Kirakoya B, Barnabé Z, Karim PA, Aristide KF, Clotaire Y, Amelie N. Epidemiological and clinical profile of male hypofertility in consultation at the urology-andrology of yalgado ouedraogoteaching hospital (burkina faso). Advances in Sexual Medicine 2015; 5: 1-6. [DOI:10.4236/asm.2015.51001]
14. Moussa D, Soumana A, Amadou SM, Soli I, Tahirou I, Ali A. Profil hormonal chez l'homme en cas d'infertilité au laboratoire de radio immunologie de l'institut des radioisotopes de Niamey. African Journal of Urology 2016; 22: 305-309. [DOI:10.1016/j.afju.2016.01.008]
15. Sissoko SB. Contribution à l'étude des azoospermies au service de cytogénétique et de la biologie de la reproduction de l'INRSP à propos de 50 cas. Mali: Thèse de médecine; 2008.
16. Kaham P. Analyse cytospermiologique à propos de 860 cas. Mali: Thèse médecine Bamako FMPOS du; 2005.
17. Ould Hamouda S, Perrin J, Achard V, Courbière B, Grillo JM, Sari-Minodier I. Association between sperm abnormalities and occupational environment among male consulting for couple infertility. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2016: 45: 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.08.011] [PMID]
18. Hafez EM, Issa SY, AI-Mazroua MK, Ibrahim KT, Abdel Rahman SM. The neonicotinoid insecticide Imidacloprid: a male reproductive system toxicity inducer-human and experimental study. Toxicology 2016; 2: 109-117. [DOI:10.4172/2476-2067.1000109]
19. Hamerezaee M, Dehghan SF, Golbabaei F, Fathi A, Barzegar L, Heidarnejad N. Assessment of semen quality among workers exposed to heat stress: a cross-sectional study in a Steel Industry. Saf Health Work 2018; 9: 232-235. [DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.003] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Hamilton TR, Mendes CM, de Castro LS, de Assis PM, Siqueira AF, Delgado Jde C, et al. Evaluation of lasting effects of heat stress on sperm profile and oxidative status of ram semen and epididymal sperm. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016; 2016: 1687657. [DOI:10.1155/2016/1687657] [PMID] [PMCID]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb