شنبه 3 آذر 1403
[Archive]
دوره 7، شماره 1 - ( 4-1388 )
جلد 7 شماره 1 صفحات 0-1 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shahrokh Tehrani Nejad E, Hosein Rashidi B, Larti A, Ezabadi Z, Jahangiri N, Azimi Nekoo E. The outcome of in vitro fertilization / intracytoplasmic sperm injection in endometriosis–associated and tubal factor infertility. IJRM 2009; 7 (1) :1-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-139-fa.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-139-fa.html
The outcome of in vitro fertilization / intracytoplasmic sperm injection in endometriosis–associated and tubal factor infertility. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 1388; 7 (1) :1-0
چکیده: (2950 مشاهده)
Background: Endometriosis is one of the most challenging diseases that constitute 20% - 40% of women searching for their infertility diagnosis. Objective: This study was undertaken in order to compare the outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) in women with endometriosis, and tubal factor infertility as controls.
Materials and Methods: From 2005 to 2006 a retrospective study was carried out in patients with endometriosis (n=80) and tubal infertility (n=57) after treatment with IVF/ICSI. The main outcome measures were ovarian responsiveness, quality of oocytes, implantation, pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed using χ2 and student t-tests.
Results: No differences were found in mean number of ampoules of hMG, duration of hMG injection, number of MΙΙ oocytes, number of embryo transferred, and rates of implantation, pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and twin birth between women with endometriosis and tubal infertility and also between women with stages I/II or those with stages III/IV disease with women with tubal factor infertility.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that endometriosis does not seem to have adverse effect on outcome of IVF/ ICSI as compared with tubal infertility.
Materials and Methods: From 2005 to 2006 a retrospective study was carried out in patients with endometriosis (n=80) and tubal infertility (n=57) after treatment with IVF/ICSI. The main outcome measures were ovarian responsiveness, quality of oocytes, implantation, pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed using χ2 and student t-tests.
Results: No differences were found in mean number of ampoules of hMG, duration of hMG injection, number of MΙΙ oocytes, number of embryo transferred, and rates of implantation, pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and twin birth between women with endometriosis and tubal infertility and also between women with stages I/II or those with stages III/IV disease with women with tubal factor infertility.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that endometriosis does not seem to have adverse effect on outcome of IVF/ ICSI as compared with tubal infertility.
نوع مطالعه: Original Article |
فهرست منابع
1. Kuivasaari P, Hippeläinen M, Anttila M, Heinonen S. Effect of endometriosis on IVF/ICSI outcome: stage III/IV endometriosis worsens cumulative pregnancy and live-born rates. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3130-3135. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei176]
2. Barnhart K, Dunsmoor-Su R, Coutifaris C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 1148-1155 Comment in: Fertil Steril 2002 Dec; 78: 1350-1351.
3. Denny E, Mann CH. A clinical overview of endometriosis: a misunderstood disease. Br J Nurs 2007; 16: 1112-1116. [DOI:10.12968/bjon.2007.16.18.27503]
4. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Al-Inany HG, Aboulghar MM. The outcome of in vitro fertilization in advanced endometriosis with previous surgery: a case-controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 371-375. [DOI:10.1067/mob.2003.13]
5. Bergendal A, Naffah S, Nagy C, Bergqvist A, Sjöblom P, Hillensjö T. Outcome of IVF in patients with endometriosis in comparison with tubal-factor infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15: 530-534. [DOI:10.1023/A:1022526002421]
6. Omland AK, Fedorcsák P, Storeng R, Dale PO, Abyholm T, Tanbo T. Natural cycle IVF in unexplained, endometriosis-associated and tubal factor infertility. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2587-2592. Comment in: Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1926-1927. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.12.2587]
7. Matalliotakis IM, Cakmak H, Mahutte N, Fragouli Y, Arici A, Sakkas D. Women with advanced-stage endometriosis and previous surgery respond less well to gonadotropin stimulation, but have similar IVF implantation and delivery rates compared with women with tubal factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 1568-1572. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.037]
8. Mahutte NG, Arici A. Endometriosis and assisted reproductive technologies: are outcomes affected? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001; 13: 275-279. [DOI:10.1097/00001703-200106000-00005]
9. Marcoux S, Maheux R, Bérubé S. Laparoscopic surgery in infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis. Canadian Collaborative Group on Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 217-222. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM199707243370401]
10. Garcia-Velasco JA, Nikas G, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simón C. Endometrial receptivity in terms of pinopode expression is not impaired in women with endometriosis in artificially prepared cycles. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 1231-1233. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01774-5]
11. Omland AK, Abyholm T, Fedorcsák P, Ertzeid G, Oldereid NB, Bjercke S, et al. Pregnancy outcome after IVF and ICSI in unexplained, endometriosis-associated and tubal factor infertility. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 722-727. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh664]
12. Chillik CF, Acosta AA, Garcia JE, Perera J, Van Uem JFH, Rosenwaks Z, et al. The role of in vitro fertilization in infertile patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 56- 61. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48677-2]
13. Yovich JL, Matson PL. The influence of infertility etiology on the outcome of IVF-ET and GIFT treatments. Int J Fertil 1990; 35: 26-33.
14. Baczkowski T, Kurzawa R, Głabowski W. Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol 2004; 4: 5-22.
15. Dmowski WP, Lesniewicz R, Rana N, Pepping P, Noursalehi M. Changing trends in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a comparative study of women with pelvic endometriosis presenting with chronic pelvic pain or infertility. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 238-243. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81904-8]
16. Chandra Sekhar, Netaji Bendi, Baludu Simha G, Roya Rozati. Evaluation of the Phthalate Esters in South Indian Women with Endometriosis. IJFS 2007;1: 165-170.
17. Pal L, Shifren JL, Isaacson KB, Chang Y, Leykin L, Toth TL. Impact of varying stages of endometriosis on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15: 27-31. [DOI:10.1023/A:1022574221115]
18. Díaz I, Navarro J, Blasco L, Simón C, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Impact of stage III-IV endometriosis on recipients of sibling oocytes: matched case-control study. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 31-34. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00570-7]
19. Surrey ES, Silverberg KM, Surrey MW, Schoolcraft WB. Effect of prolonged gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 699-704. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03373-3]
20. Geber S, Paraschos T, Atkinson G, Margara R, Winston RM. Results of IVF in patients with endometriosis: the severity of the disease does not affect outcome, or the incidence of miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1507-1511. [DOI:10.1093/HUMREP/10.6.1507]
21. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005: 1046
22. Hajenius PJ, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, Van Der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000324 Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (1): CD000324.
23. Verhoeve HR, Steures P, Flierman PA, van der Veen F, Mol BW. History of induced abortion and the risk of tubal pathology. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 304-307. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60589-5]
24. Azem F, Lessing JB, Geva E, Shahar A, Lerner-Geva L, Yovel I, et al. Patients with stages III and IV endometriosis have a poorer outcome on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer than patients with tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 1107-1109. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00392-1]
25. Dmowski WP, Rana N, Michalowska J, Friberg J, Papierniak C, el-Roeiy A. The effect of endometriosis, its stage and activity and of autoantibodies on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer success rates. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 555-562. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57425-1]
26. Olivennes F, Feldberg D, Liu HC, Cohen J, Moy F, Rosenwaks Z. Endometriosis: a stage by stage analysis-the role of in vitro fertilization .Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 392-398. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57740-1]
27. Arici A, Oral E, Bukulmez O, Duleba A, Olive DL, Jones EE. The effect of endometriosis on implantation: results from the Yale University in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:603-607. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58162-X]
28. Salehpour S, Khalili L, Zhaam H, Azar Gashb Y, Hakimifard M. Evaluation of Diagnostic Visual Findings at Laparoscopy in Endometriosis. IJFS 2007; 1: 123-126.
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
