International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Mon, May 13, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 20, Issue 10 (October 2022)
IJRM 2022, 20(10): 798-806 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Alirezaei S, Taghipour A, Latifnejad Roudsari R. The effect of infertility counseling interventions on marital and sexual satisfaction of infertile couples: A systematic review and meta-analysis. IJRM 2022; 20 (10) :798-806
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-2270-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-2270-en.html
1- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
3- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. , rlatifnejad@yahoo.com
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
3- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. , rlatifnejad@yahoo.com
Keywords: Infertility, Psychosocial intervention, Counseling, Sexual satisfaction, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Couples.
Full-Text [PDF 446 kb]
(937 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (1095 Views)
Full-Text: (142 Views)
- Introduction
Infertility is defined as the inability to achieve pregnancy after 12 months of unprotected intercourse. There are currently 48.5 million infertile couples, of which 19.2 million have primary infertility and 29.3 million have secondary infertility. There are several reasons for infertility, such as male factor, ovulation disorders, tubular problems, endometriosis, sexual disorders, cervical factor, and unexplained causes (1).
Besides, negative physiological and psychological consequences following the diagnosis and treatment of infertility can also have a detrimental effect on marital relationships (2). In most cases, infertility destroys the voluntary and pleasurable aspects of sexual function by setting it as only a means of "having children" (3). This psychological and social burden reduces life satisfaction and increases marital problems (4). Thus, counseling and psychological interventions are needed by couples to combat stress resulting from infertility (5).
There are 5 methods of individual counseling in infertile people: psychodynamic psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral treatment, strategic psychotherapy, crisis intervention, and grief counseling (6). Strategies used in infertility counseling include the following: marital preparation and promotion programs (7), emotional focus therapy (8), accepting feelings, seeking support, relaxation exercises, talking to the partner, increasing information on infertility and sexual function, sex therapy, and pleasant sexual activity (9).
In a systematic review focused on the effect of counseling interventions on pregnancy rate in infertile patients, it found that although counseling interventions could be beneficial, its effectiveness on sexual function and couple’s satisfaction is questionable. In addition, it should be considered that previous meta-analyses had several limitations such as lack of focus on sexual and marital counseling, the high level of heterogeneity, and a number of non-controlled trials (10).
The efficacy of infertility counseling on marital and sexual satisfaction in infertile couples has not been reviewed. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of infertility counseling on sexual and marital relationships in infertile couples.
2. Materials and Methods
Besides, negative physiological and psychological consequences following the diagnosis and treatment of infertility can also have a detrimental effect on marital relationships (2). In most cases, infertility destroys the voluntary and pleasurable aspects of sexual function by setting it as only a means of "having children" (3). This psychological and social burden reduces life satisfaction and increases marital problems (4). Thus, counseling and psychological interventions are needed by couples to combat stress resulting from infertility (5).
There are 5 methods of individual counseling in infertile people: psychodynamic psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral treatment, strategic psychotherapy, crisis intervention, and grief counseling (6). Strategies used in infertility counseling include the following: marital preparation and promotion programs (7), emotional focus therapy (8), accepting feelings, seeking support, relaxation exercises, talking to the partner, increasing information on infertility and sexual function, sex therapy, and pleasant sexual activity (9).
In a systematic review focused on the effect of counseling interventions on pregnancy rate in infertile patients, it found that although counseling interventions could be beneficial, its effectiveness on sexual function and couple’s satisfaction is questionable. In addition, it should be considered that previous meta-analyses had several limitations such as lack of focus on sexual and marital counseling, the high level of heterogeneity, and a number of non-controlled trials (10).
The efficacy of infertility counseling on marital and sexual satisfaction in infertile couples has not been reviewed. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of infertility counseling on sexual and marital relationships in infertile couples.
2. Materials and Methods
-
- Literature and search strategy
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist (11) (Table I). Researchers searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Psych Info, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase, for English- and Persian-language articles published up to March 2020. The search was performed to find article titles, abstracts, and keywords using words indicating the 3 main topics of "infertility", "counseling", and "marital satisfaction" and “sexual satisfaction”. The keywords included 1) "Infertility", "Childlessness", "In Vitro Fertilization", "Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection" and "Fertility Treatment/Problems", and "Assisted Reproductive Technology" 2) "Psychological/Psychosocial Intervention", "Support", "Counseling", "Psycho-Education", and "Sex therapy" 3) "Marital Satisfaction", "Sexual Function", "Sexual Disorders", and "Sexual Satisfaction". Relevant studies were searched manually to identify further trials missed by the electronic search. 2 authors studied all articles, and disagreements were resolved through consensus with a third reviewer.
2.3. Data extraction
The titles and abstracts of retrieved articles were reviewed for selecting eligible articles. Next, the selected papers were thoroughly studied to verify they met the inclusion criteria; those that did not were excluded. The remaining articles then thoroughly studied to verify they met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted separately by 2 researchers, based on a pre-prepared checklist that included the article title, authors, year of publication, journal name, location, number of samples, sampling method, inclusion and exclusion criteria, type of questionnaire to assess the marital and sexual satisfaction of couples, counseling intervention used for infertile couples, reliability and validity of the questionnaire, and the main results.
2.4. Quality assessment and risk of bias
The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist was used with 2 different versions of experimental and quasi-experimental studies to assess the quality of the articles. The experimental studies evaluation checklist had 13 items. The answer to each item was either “Yes”, “No”, “Unspecified”, or “Not stated”. Score 1 was assigned to each “Yes” while zero for others. The total score of the checklist was 0-13. Based on the obtained scores, the studies were divided into 2 general categories: 1) high-quality studies (score ≥ 6), 2) low-quality studies (< 6). The evaluation checklist of quasi-experimental studies had 9 items. The total score of the checklist was 0-9, and based on the obtained scores, the studies were divided into 2 general categories: 1) high-quality studies (≥ 5), and 2) low-quality studies (< 5).
The modified Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. Bias was assessed as a result for individual elements from 6 areas of bias: selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias (12).
A meta-analysis was performed based on the obtained results. The calculations were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2; Biostat, Englewood, NJ) software package.
Moreover, a summary of the article profiles is shown in table II. Thirteen articles including 230 infertile women and 512 infertile couples whose results related to marital and sexual satisfaction were reviewed.
Of the selected 13 articles, 7 were designed and conducted as experimental (randomized clinical trials) (7, 16-21), while 5 were quasi-experimental studies (8, 22, 23). In addition, 11 studies were conducted in Iran, one in Iraq, and one in China. Moreover, 11 studies were published in English while 2 were published in Persian. In all studies, infertile women/couples were treated with ART, but their medical conditions were not fully explained. Of the 13 studies, 8 were conducted on infertile couples and 5 on infertile women. The mean duration of infertility in all studies was 6.5 yr, and the mean age of participants.
Random allocation was performed for all clinical trials. All quasi-experimental studies had a control group. Outcomes including marital and sexual satisfaction were reported as the main result in all studies. While the quality assessment scores of experimental studies were 7 (average quality) to 11 (high quality), it was 7-8 (high) in quasi-experimental studies. In randomized clinical trials studies, none of the studies, except for one (16), met the evaluation criteria No. 4-6, which was related to the blinding method. None of the articles met criterion No. 6 regarding the loss of sample during the study period in quasi-experimental studies. Most studies reviewed the results of the intervention immediately after 3 months. The intervention strategy used was one of the counseling approaches. The duration of each intervention varied from 1-6 hr. The number of counseling sessions was 2-10 sessions per wk. There was no reference to the type of care in the control group in 5 studies. In 8 other studies, it stated that the control group had another caring process as the intervention group. All studies showed no statistically significant difference between demographic and clinical characteristics between intervention and control groups. All studies clearly stated the inclusion criteria for the study.
A review of the studies revealed that they used different counseling methods. One study used mindfulness-based or mindfulness as a psychological intervention. 3 studies used the couple's relationship enrichment model (7, 24). 2 studies used the emotional focus therapy model (8, 23). Collaborative infertility counseling with problem-focused orientation was used in one study (18). 3 studies used cognitive-behavioral theory in counseling (22, 25, 26). One research used reality therapy based on choice theory in their counseling sessions (19). Another study used therapy with active communication skills (16). Finally, one study employed sexual therapy (17).
Different tools used in articles measured marital and sexual satisfaction. The ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale was used in 5 studies (7, 22, 25). This questionnaire is used to assess the strengths and weaknesses of marital relationships. It contains 47 questions on a 5-point Likert scale. A score of < 30 equals severe dissatisfaction, 30-40 dissatisfaction, 40-60 relative satisfaction, 60-70 high satisfaction, while > 70 indicates a very high level of marital satisfaction (27). 3 studies used a sexual satisfaction questionnaire (16, 17, 26) which included 11 questions that measured the degree of satisfaction with the number of times of intercourse, number of orgasms, level of sexual interest, and attraction during sexual intercourse. It also measures a person's experience of stress during intercourse. A higher score indicates higher sexual satisfaction (17). 4 studies used the index of marital satisfaction to assess marital satisfaction (16, 18, 23, 24). This questionnaire included 25 items with a 5-point Likert scale. The minimum score was 25, and the maximum score was 75, and higher scores indicate higher marital satisfaction (18). One study used Linda Berg's sexual satisfaction questionnaire to assess sexual satisfaction, including 19 items (7). Scores of < 30 indicate low sexual satisfaction, 32-47 show average satisfaction, 48-65 indicate good satisfaction, and > 66 show high sexual satisfaction (28). Besides, 3 studies used the dyadic adjustment scale (1976) to assess marital satisfaction among couples (8, 23), which is a 32-item tool with a minimum score of zero and a maximum score of 160. On this scale, scores < 40 indicate low satisfaction, 40-80 show average satisfaction, 80-120 indicate good satisfaction, and 120-160 show excellent satisfaction with the marital relationship.
All studies were evaluated using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute Scale. An important issue in assessing the quality of articles was blinding the intervention for the participants. Due to the nature of counseling for which there is no possibility of blindness, no objections can be made to the studies in this regard. Only one study met the blinding condition (16). This kind of blindness is also explained. The counselor did not know the content of the marriage and sex questionnaires, and the person analyzing the data was not aware of the random assignment of groups.
10 studies examined marital satisfaction. Their combination showed a significant difference in effect size (ES = 1.74) between the intervention and the control groups. Thus, infertility counseling had a positive effect on marital satisfaction.
3 studies examined sexual satisfaction. Their combination showed a significant difference in the effect size (p = 0.14) between the intervention and the control groups. Therefore, psychological counseling had a positive effect on sexual satisfaction.
Significant Q statistics (p < 0.001) and I2 = 93.93 showed heterogeneity between studies. Among the reasons for heterogeneity were the small number of studies, as well as their small sample size.
The effect size of marital satisfaction was significant for both experimental (clinical trial) (mean in diff = 0.71) and quasi-experimental studies (3.436). For sexual satisfaction, the statistical results in experimental studies were 0.80 and 0.75 for quasi-experimental studies.
The findings of this study are in line with the results of a previous study which evaluated the effectiveness of psychological interventions on infertile patients (6). Moreover, the results of another systematic review and meta-analysis, which examined the effectiveness of psychosocial and psycho-cognitive interventions on infertile men and women, showed that these interventions could be effective for infertile couples, reduce their marital distress, and improve their marital relationships (30). In this study, psychological interventions included counseling, education, relaxation techniques, psychotherapy interventions, problem-solving skills, and information about infertility and marital and sexual issues.
The devastating effect of infertility on a couple's relationship affects all aspects of their lives, and one of the significant effects is marital and sexual relationships (31, 32). Some researchers consider counseling necessary to reduce infertility-related stress and, consequently, to moderate couples' behavior and maintain satisfaction in their relationships (33). Other studies have also reported the supportive impact of infertility counseling on various aspects of infertile couples' life (34, 35).
A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis identified sexual dissatisfaction as one of the most important sexual disorders in infertile couples (36). According to one study in 2014, a specialized medical and psychological team should be trained to provide strategies for infertile couples to deal with these issues (37). Therefore, to draw definitive conclusions in this study, the effectiveness and sexual and marital satisfaction of infertile patients was investigated immediately after counseling and psychological interventions. It should be considered that any psychological disorder and sexual and marital dissatisfaction would, ultimately, have a negative effect on the effectiveness of treatment and pregnancy in these couples (38).
In this regard, another reason for increasing marital and sexual satisfaction in infertile patients after counseling interventions may be due to the effect of these interventions on other aspects of infertility treatment, such as treatment success (39). Because the overall success of ART depends on the satisfaction level of infertile patients, the lower the couple's dissatisfaction, the higher the success of the treatment. Therefore, the couples that have an adequate marriage and sexual activity under the influence of counseling and consider it free from dissatisfaction are more prepared to accept a variety of treatments and subsequently are more likely to succeed (40). Also, in studies regarding the needs of infertile couples, many participants have highlighted their need for counseling services, psychological support, and strategies for stress management, especially after the treatment failure (41-43).
Among the strengths of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was a comprehensive review based on standard guidelines to find the most appropriate results. A variety of counseling and intervention methods was used in the studies. Besides, a detailed methodology was used to evaluate the articles’ quality and effect size.
Future research can investigate the impact of different types of psychological interventions in terms of goals (individual, couple, or group interventions), approaches (psychotherapy, counseling, and training), and severity (number and duration) of clinical trial interventions. Future research should also be based on gender differences in counseling infertile people or determining the best counseling method for infertile patients. Studies should accurately consider the causes of infertility, the type of ARTs, and the treatment steps that participants should follow while receiving counseling methods.
Moreover, studies should be conducted in other countries, both developed and developing countries, to make the results generalizable. Counseling for infertile patients should be performed at all infertility diagnosis and treatment stages. It should be emphasized in the field of marital and sexual relationships so that it leads to improvement of the marital and sexual relations of infertile couples. The findings of this study emphasize the supportive role of counseling for infertile couples. Counseling interventions increase the marital and sexual satisfaction of infertile couples.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the support of Vice Chancellor for Research, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest and are solely responsible for the writing and content of the article.
-
- Inclusion criteria
- P) The target population was infertile patients, either infertile women or infertile couples.
- I) The intervention included one of the different approaches of counseling as individual, couple, or group counseling to improve marital and sexual satisfaction.
- C) The comparison group was infertile patients who received only routine care.
- O) The outcome measures included marital and sexual satisfaction.
2.3. Data extraction
The titles and abstracts of retrieved articles were reviewed for selecting eligible articles. Next, the selected papers were thoroughly studied to verify they met the inclusion criteria; those that did not were excluded. The remaining articles then thoroughly studied to verify they met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted separately by 2 researchers, based on a pre-prepared checklist that included the article title, authors, year of publication, journal name, location, number of samples, sampling method, inclusion and exclusion criteria, type of questionnaire to assess the marital and sexual satisfaction of couples, counseling intervention used for infertile couples, reliability and validity of the questionnaire, and the main results.
2.4. Quality assessment and risk of bias
The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist was used with 2 different versions of experimental and quasi-experimental studies to assess the quality of the articles. The experimental studies evaluation checklist had 13 items. The answer to each item was either “Yes”, “No”, “Unspecified”, or “Not stated”. Score 1 was assigned to each “Yes” while zero for others. The total score of the checklist was 0-13. Based on the obtained scores, the studies were divided into 2 general categories: 1) high-quality studies (score ≥ 6), 2) low-quality studies (< 6). The evaluation checklist of quasi-experimental studies had 9 items. The total score of the checklist was 0-9, and based on the obtained scores, the studies were divided into 2 general categories: 1) high-quality studies (≥ 5), and 2) low-quality studies (< 5).
The modified Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. Bias was assessed as a result for individual elements from 6 areas of bias: selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias (12).
-
- Data analysis and description of findings
A meta-analysis was performed based on the obtained results. The calculations were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2; Biostat, Englewood, NJ) software package.
- Results
3.1. Study selection and characteristics
A total of 309 articles were found in the initial search - 154 from PubMed, 3 from Web of Science, 22 from Psych Info, 27 from Cochrane Library, 69 from Scopus, and 18 from Embase. After reviewing the titles and abstracts, 250 articles were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 30 full-text articles, 17 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria, and 13 articles were finally included in the study. Figure 1 presents a flowchart of the selection process.Moreover, a summary of the article profiles is shown in table II. Thirteen articles including 230 infertile women and 512 infertile couples whose results related to marital and sexual satisfaction were reviewed.
Of the selected 13 articles, 7 were designed and conducted as experimental (randomized clinical trials) (7, 16-21), while 5 were quasi-experimental studies (8, 22, 23). In addition, 11 studies were conducted in Iran, one in Iraq, and one in China. Moreover, 11 studies were published in English while 2 were published in Persian. In all studies, infertile women/couples were treated with ART, but their medical conditions were not fully explained. Of the 13 studies, 8 were conducted on infertile couples and 5 on infertile women. The mean duration of infertility in all studies was 6.5 yr, and the mean age of participants.
Random allocation was performed for all clinical trials. All quasi-experimental studies had a control group. Outcomes including marital and sexual satisfaction were reported as the main result in all studies. While the quality assessment scores of experimental studies were 7 (average quality) to 11 (high quality), it was 7-8 (high) in quasi-experimental studies. In randomized clinical trials studies, none of the studies, except for one (16), met the evaluation criteria No. 4-6, which was related to the blinding method. None of the articles met criterion No. 6 regarding the loss of sample during the study period in quasi-experimental studies. Most studies reviewed the results of the intervention immediately after 3 months. The intervention strategy used was one of the counseling approaches. The duration of each intervention varied from 1-6 hr. The number of counseling sessions was 2-10 sessions per wk. There was no reference to the type of care in the control group in 5 studies. In 8 other studies, it stated that the control group had another caring process as the intervention group. All studies showed no statistically significant difference between demographic and clinical characteristics between intervention and control groups. All studies clearly stated the inclusion criteria for the study.
A review of the studies revealed that they used different counseling methods. One study used mindfulness-based or mindfulness as a psychological intervention. 3 studies used the couple's relationship enrichment model (7, 24). 2 studies used the emotional focus therapy model (8, 23). Collaborative infertility counseling with problem-focused orientation was used in one study (18). 3 studies used cognitive-behavioral theory in counseling (22, 25, 26). One research used reality therapy based on choice theory in their counseling sessions (19). Another study used therapy with active communication skills (16). Finally, one study employed sexual therapy (17).
Different tools used in articles measured marital and sexual satisfaction. The ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale was used in 5 studies (7, 22, 25). This questionnaire is used to assess the strengths and weaknesses of marital relationships. It contains 47 questions on a 5-point Likert scale. A score of < 30 equals severe dissatisfaction, 30-40 dissatisfaction, 40-60 relative satisfaction, 60-70 high satisfaction, while > 70 indicates a very high level of marital satisfaction (27). 3 studies used a sexual satisfaction questionnaire (16, 17, 26) which included 11 questions that measured the degree of satisfaction with the number of times of intercourse, number of orgasms, level of sexual interest, and attraction during sexual intercourse. It also measures a person's experience of stress during intercourse. A higher score indicates higher sexual satisfaction (17). 4 studies used the index of marital satisfaction to assess marital satisfaction (16, 18, 23, 24). This questionnaire included 25 items with a 5-point Likert scale. The minimum score was 25, and the maximum score was 75, and higher scores indicate higher marital satisfaction (18). One study used Linda Berg's sexual satisfaction questionnaire to assess sexual satisfaction, including 19 items (7). Scores of < 30 indicate low sexual satisfaction, 32-47 show average satisfaction, 48-65 indicate good satisfaction, and > 66 show high sexual satisfaction (28). Besides, 3 studies used the dyadic adjustment scale (1976) to assess marital satisfaction among couples (8, 23), which is a 32-item tool with a minimum score of zero and a maximum score of 160. On this scale, scores < 40 indicate low satisfaction, 40-80 show average satisfaction, 80-120 indicate good satisfaction, and 120-160 show excellent satisfaction with the marital relationship.
3.2. Risk of bias
The risk of bias is shown in figures 2 and 3. All studies assessed (100%) were classified as presenting a high risk of bias concerning the random selection of participants. However, regarding random allocation, blinding, implementation, and publication bias, all studies (100%) were classified as presenting a low risk of bias. Concerning attrition bias, 20% of studies were classified as studies presenting a high risk of bias, 35% as an ambiguous risk of bias, and 45% as a low risk of bias. All 13 studies reported the number of participants at the beginning of the study. However, only one study reiterated their number during the follow-up period and at the end of the study (7). Therefore, it was impossible to investigate the sample loss in the intervention and control groups. In addition, there was no report concerning the final number of subjects included in the analysis or the way to deal with lost data.All studies were evaluated using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute Scale. An important issue in assessing the quality of articles was blinding the intervention for the participants. Due to the nature of counseling for which there is no possibility of blindness, no objections can be made to the studies in this regard. Only one study met the blinding condition (16). This kind of blindness is also explained. The counselor did not know the content of the marriage and sex questionnaires, and the person analyzing the data was not aware of the random assignment of groups.
3.3.Effect of counseling interventions
Figures 4 and 5 show the results of the meta-analysis. The analysis was performed based on the effect size using mean and standard deviation (SD). Since the reported results of 2 studies (25, 30) were not expressed based on mean and SD, they were not included in the meta-analysis.10 studies examined marital satisfaction. Their combination showed a significant difference in effect size (ES = 1.74) between the intervention and the control groups. Thus, infertility counseling had a positive effect on marital satisfaction.
3 studies examined sexual satisfaction. Their combination showed a significant difference in the effect size (p = 0.14) between the intervention and the control groups. Therefore, psychological counseling had a positive effect on sexual satisfaction.
Significant Q statistics (p < 0.001) and I2 = 93.93 showed heterogeneity between studies. Among the reasons for heterogeneity were the small number of studies, as well as their small sample size.
The effect size of marital satisfaction was significant for both experimental (clinical trial) (mean in diff = 0.71) and quasi-experimental studies (3.436). For sexual satisfaction, the statistical results in experimental studies were 0.80 and 0.75 for quasi-experimental studies.
4. Discussion
The results of the meta-analysis showed that infertile people who receive some psychological intervention experience approximately 2.5 times higher marital satisfaction and 1.5 times higher sexual satisfaction than those who don’t. The results of 10 studies showed a strong relationship between them, even with evidence of publication bias. The estimated accuracy of the effect size was with a possible mean difference of 0.37-2.42.The findings of this study are in line with the results of a previous study which evaluated the effectiveness of psychological interventions on infertile patients (6). Moreover, the results of another systematic review and meta-analysis, which examined the effectiveness of psychosocial and psycho-cognitive interventions on infertile men and women, showed that these interventions could be effective for infertile couples, reduce their marital distress, and improve their marital relationships (30). In this study, psychological interventions included counseling, education, relaxation techniques, psychotherapy interventions, problem-solving skills, and information about infertility and marital and sexual issues.
The devastating effect of infertility on a couple's relationship affects all aspects of their lives, and one of the significant effects is marital and sexual relationships (31, 32). Some researchers consider counseling necessary to reduce infertility-related stress and, consequently, to moderate couples' behavior and maintain satisfaction in their relationships (33). Other studies have also reported the supportive impact of infertility counseling on various aspects of infertile couples' life (34, 35).
A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis identified sexual dissatisfaction as one of the most important sexual disorders in infertile couples (36). According to one study in 2014, a specialized medical and psychological team should be trained to provide strategies for infertile couples to deal with these issues (37). Therefore, to draw definitive conclusions in this study, the effectiveness and sexual and marital satisfaction of infertile patients was investigated immediately after counseling and psychological interventions. It should be considered that any psychological disorder and sexual and marital dissatisfaction would, ultimately, have a negative effect on the effectiveness of treatment and pregnancy in these couples (38).
In this regard, another reason for increasing marital and sexual satisfaction in infertile patients after counseling interventions may be due to the effect of these interventions on other aspects of infertility treatment, such as treatment success (39). Because the overall success of ART depends on the satisfaction level of infertile patients, the lower the couple's dissatisfaction, the higher the success of the treatment. Therefore, the couples that have an adequate marriage and sexual activity under the influence of counseling and consider it free from dissatisfaction are more prepared to accept a variety of treatments and subsequently are more likely to succeed (40). Also, in studies regarding the needs of infertile couples, many participants have highlighted their need for counseling services, psychological support, and strategies for stress management, especially after the treatment failure (41-43).
Among the strengths of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was a comprehensive review based on standard guidelines to find the most appropriate results. A variety of counseling and intervention methods was used in the studies. Besides, a detailed methodology was used to evaluate the articles’ quality and effect size.
4.1. Limitations
One of the limitations of this study was that the setting of most studies were the same, all of them were conducted in Iran. Another limitation was the lack of access to the full text of articles from other settings. Moreover, the results obtained regarding heterogeneity between studies acknowledge that the reason may be the small number of articles on the one hand and the small volume of sample on the other. The studies also varied in the follow-up period from an immediate follow-up to 3 months after the intervention. The present study could not provide information on whether the causes or different duration of infertility led to the effect of counseling on the overall outcome. The results of meta-analysis can only answer the question concerning the effect of counseling on marital and sexual satisfaction in infertile patients.Future research can investigate the impact of different types of psychological interventions in terms of goals (individual, couple, or group interventions), approaches (psychotherapy, counseling, and training), and severity (number and duration) of clinical trial interventions. Future research should also be based on gender differences in counseling infertile people or determining the best counseling method for infertile patients. Studies should accurately consider the causes of infertility, the type of ARTs, and the treatment steps that participants should follow while receiving counseling methods.
Moreover, studies should be conducted in other countries, both developed and developing countries, to make the results generalizable. Counseling for infertile patients should be performed at all infertility diagnosis and treatment stages. It should be emphasized in the field of marital and sexual relationships so that it leads to improvement of the marital and sexual relations of infertile couples. The findings of this study emphasize the supportive role of counseling for infertile couples. Counseling interventions increase the marital and sexual satisfaction of infertile couples.
5. Conclusion
The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that counseling and psychological interventions increase infertile couple’s marital and sexual satisfaction. Therefore, it is recommended that counselors provide counseling interventions to increase the level of infertile couples’ marital and sexual satisfaction.Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the support of Vice Chancellor for Research, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest and are solely responsible for the writing and content of the article.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Reproductive Psycology
References
1. Siristatidis Ch, Pouliakis A, Sergentanis ThN. Special characteristics, reproductive, and clinical profile of women with unexplained infertility versus other causes of infertility: A comparative study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37: 1923-1930. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-020-01845-z] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Alirezaei S. [Effects of infertility on female sexual function: Review article]. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2017; 19: 91-101. (in Persian)
3. Szkodziak F, Krzyżanowski J, Szkodziak P. Psychological aspects of infertility: A systematic review. J Int Med Res 2020; 48: 300060520932403. [DOI:10.1177/0300060520932403] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Homan GF, Davies M, Norman R. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: A review. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13: 209-223. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml056] [PMID]
5. Ghasemi Moghadam K, Bahmani B, Asgari A. Effectiveness of group education of marital enrichment program (Olson style) on improvement of married women's satisfaction. Clin Psychol Personal 2013; 20: 1-10.
6. Yazdani F, Elyasi F, Peyvandi S, Moosazadeh M, Galekolaee KS, Kalantari F, et al. Counseling-supportive interventions to decrease infertile women's perceived stress: A systematic review. Electron Physician 2017; 9: 4694-4702. [DOI:10.19082/4694] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Masoumi SZ, Khani S, Kazemi F, Kalhori F, Ebrahimi R, Roshanaei G. Effect of marital relationship enrichment program on marital satisfaction, marital intimacy, and sexual satisfaction of infertile couples. Int J Fertil Steril 2017; 11: 197-204.
8. Najafi M, Soleimani AA, Ahmadi Kh, Javidi N, Hosieini Kamkar E. The effectiveness of emotionally focused therapy on enhancing marital adjustment and quality of life among infertile couples with marital conflicts. Int J Fertil Steril 2015; 9: 238-246.
9. Verkuijlen J, Verhaak C, Nelen WL, Wilkinson J, Farquhar C. Psychological and educational interventions for subfertile men and women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3: Cd011034. [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011034.pub2] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Maleki-Saghooni N, Amirian M, Sadeghi R, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Effectiveness of infertility counseling on pregnancy rate in infertile patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Reprod BioMed 2017; 15: 391-402. [DOI:10.29252/ijrm.15.7.391] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Page MJ, Moher D. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and extensions: A scoping review. Syst Rev 2017; 6: 263. [DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.d5928] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D, Bourton I. Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2008: 297-333. [DOI:10.1002/9780470712184.ch10] [PMID]
14. Serghiou S, Goodman SN. Random-effects meta-analysis: Summarizing evidence with caveats. JAMA 2019; 321: 301-302. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2018.19684] [PMID]
15. Furuya-Kanamori L, Barendregt JJ, Doi SAR. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2018; 16: 195-203. [DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000141] [PMID]
16. Vizheh M, Pakgohar M, Babaei G, Ramezanzadeh F. Effect of counseling on quality of marital relationship of infertile couples: A randomized, controlled trial (RCT) study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287: 583-589. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-012-2595-9] [PMID]
17. Pakgohar M, Vizheh M, Babaee Gh, Ramezanzadeh F, Abedininia N. [Effect of counseling on sexual satisfaction among infertile women referred to Tehran fertility center]. Hayat 2008; 14: 21-31. (in Persian)
18. Latifnejad Roudsari R, Rasoulzadeh Bidgoli M. The effect of collaborative infertility counseling on marital satisfaction in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization: A randomized controlled trial. Nurs Midwifery Stud 2017; 6: e36723. [DOI:10.5812/nmsjournal.36723]
19. Ebadi Z, Pasha R, Hafezi F, Eftekhar Z. Effectiveness of reality therapy based on choice theory on marital intimacy and satisfaction. J Midwif Reprod Health 2020; 8: 2230-2239.
20. Miri MR, Aizadeh M, Moasheri N, Ataee M, Moodi M. The effects of relationship enrichment program on compatibility and marital satisfaction of infertile couples. J Health Literacy 2016; 1: 53-60.
21. Fahami F, Pahlavanzadeh S, Asadi M. Efficacy of communication skills training workshop on sexual function in infertile women. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2015; 20: 179-183.
22. Solati K, Ja'Farzadeh L, Hasanpour-Dehkordi A. The effect of stress management based on group cognitive-behavioural therapy on marital satisfaction in infertile women. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: vc01-vc03. [DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2016/17836.8077] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Soleimani AA, Najafi M, Ahmadi Kh, Javidi N, Hoseini Kamkar E, Mahboubi M. The effectiveness of emotionally focused couples therapy on sexual satisfaction and marital adjustment of infertile couples with marital conflicts. Int J Fertil Steril 2015; 9: 393-402.
24. Ying L, Wu X, Wu LH, Shu J, Loke AY. A partnership and coping enhancement programme (PCEP)'for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: An intervention study. J Sex Marital Ther 2018; 44: 533-551. [DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2017.1420716] [PMID]
25. Hussein Gardi A. Effect of psychological intervention on marital satisfaction rate of infertile couples. Int J Educ Policy Res Rev 2014; 1: 28-36.
26. Ashrafian F, Sadeghi M, Rezaei F, Kazemi Rezaei SV. [The effect of integrative positive-cognitive behavioral therapy on sexual satisfaction and marital adjustment of infertile woman]. Nurs Midwifery J 2020; 18: 597-607. (in Persian) [DOI:10.29252/unmf.18.7.597]
27. Alirezaee S, Ozgoli G, Alavi Majd H. [Comparison of sexual self-efficacy and sexual function in fertile and infertile women referred to health centers in Mashhad public in 1392]. Pejouhandeh 2014; 19: 131-136. (in Persian)
28. Berg-cross L. Couples therapy. 2nd Ed. London: Taylor and Francis Group; 2011.
29. Abedi Shargh N, Bakhshani NM, Mohebbi MD, Mahmudian K, Ahovan M, Mokhtari M, et al. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive group therapy on marital satisfaction and general health in woman with infertility. Glob J Health Sci 2016; 8: 230-235. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n3p230] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Frederiksen Y, Farver-Vestergaard I, Skovgard NG, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e006592. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006592] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Latifnejad Roudsari R, Allan H, Smith P. A qualitative inquiry into the mediating role of religion and spirituality in adjusting marital relationships of infertile women. J Midwifery Reprod Health 2013; 1: 33-41.
32. Heidari P, Latifnejad Roudsari R. [Relationship between psychosocial factors and marital satisfaction in infertile women]. J Inflammatory Dis 2010; 14: 26-32. (in Persian)
33. Vetriselvi V, Kalavathi. Infertility and counselling. Int J Nursing Educ 2013; 5: 229-232. [DOI:10.5958/j.0974-9357.5.2.101]
34. Latifnejad Roudsari R, Allan HT. Women's experiences and preferences in relation to infertility counselling: A multifaith dialogue. Int J Fertil Steril 2011; 5: 158-167.
35. Rasoulzadeh Bidgoli M, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Montazeri A. The effectiveness of a collaborative infertility counseling (CIC) on pregnancy outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: A randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20: 728. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-020-03417-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. de Mendonca CR, Arruda JT, Noll M, de O Campoli P, do Amaral WN. Sexual dysfunction in infertile women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 215: 153-163. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.013] [PMID]
37. Piva I, Lo Monte G, Graziano A, Marci R. A literature review on the relationship between infertility and sexual dysfunction: Does fun end with baby making? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2014; 19: 231-237. [DOI:10.3109/13625187.2014.919379] [PMID]
38. Li J, Long L, Liu Y, He W, Li M. Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on fertility quality of life and pregnancy rates among women subjected to first in vitro fertilization treatment. Behav Res Ther 2016; 77: 96-104. [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.010] [PMID]
39. Samadaee-Gelehkolaee K, McCarthy BW, Khalilian A, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Peyvandi S, Elyasi F, et al. Factors associated with marital satisfaction in infertile couple: A comprehensive literature review. Glob J Health Sci 2015; 8: 96-109. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p96] [PMID] [PMCID]
40. Amiri M, Sadeqi Z, Hoseinpoor MH, Khosravi A. Marital satisfaction and its influencing factors in fertile and infertile women. J Family Reprod Health 2016; 10: 139-145.
41. Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Janghorban R, Mousavi Bazaz SM, Amirian M, Allan HT. Infertile couples' needs after unsuccessful fertility treatment: A qualitative study. J Caring Sci 2019; 8: 95-104. [DOI:10.15171/jcs.2019.014] [PMID] [PMCID]
42. Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Janghorban R, Bazaz SMM, Amirian M. [Infertile couples needs after unsuccessful treatment with assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review of literature]. J Isfahan Med Sch 2019; 37: 695-707. (in Persian)
43. Hadizadeh-Talasaz F, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Simbar M. Decision for disclosure: The experiences of Iranian infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive donation procedures. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2015; 18: 265-275. [DOI:10.3109/14647273.2015.1076579] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
