International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Wed, Apr 24, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 10, Issue 3 (7-2012)
IJRM 2012, 10(3): 249-256 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Momeni H R, Eskandari N. Effect of vitamin E on sperm parameters and DNA integrity in sodium arsenite-treated rats. IJRM 2012; 10 (3) :249-256
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-276-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-276-en.html
Full-Text [PDF 337 kb]
(881 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (3170 Views)
Full-Text: (487 Views)
Introduction
Arsenic, a sulfhydryl-reactive metalloid, is a major environmental toxicant produced by the burning of arsenic contaminated coal and glass manufacturing (1). In drinking water, inorganic arsenics are found as pentavalent (arsenate) and trivalent (arsenite) forms. In the human body, pentavalent arsenate is reduced to trivalent arsenite and it has been shown that the toxicity of arsenite compounds is higher than arsenate (2).
Arsenic is a known human carcinogen (3) and is able to induce malformations in male reproductive system (4, 5). Beside the main source of arsenic in contaminating drinking water (1), it is used in drugs (6, 7), herbicides, insecticides and rodenticides (1, 8). Human are therefore exposed to this pollutant not only via inhalation but also via contaminated foods, water and drugs. Chronic arsenic exposure may exert serious harmful effects including cancers (9), melanosis, hyperkeratosis, lung disease, peripheral vascular disease (Blackfoot disease), gangrene (10), diabetes mellitus (11), hypertension and ischemic heart disease (10, 12).
Arsenic can also induce male reproductive toxicity such as dose-dependent decrease in testes and accessory sex organ weights (13). It may also reduce epididymal sperm count (14), viability, and motility (15). Normal morphology (16) and the activity of antioxidant defense system (17). Alteration in the level of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone and also massive degeneration of the germ cells in testis tissue (14, 18, 19) is reported to be an account for arsenic toxicity. Oxidative stress and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) could also be a consequence of arsenic exposure (20). ROS generation as well as the binding of arsenic to protein thiol groups can alter many protein functions (2).
The integrity of sperm DNA is an important factor for the success of fertilization as well as normal development of the embryo, fetus and child (21). Several line of studies have shown the effect of environmental contaminates such as arsenic on DNA damages through inducing oxidative stress and the generation of ROS (3, 22, 23).
It is now documented that vitamin E (Vit.E), as a potent antioxidant (24), protect the organism against oxidative stress via the inhibition of propagation of ROS reactions (24). In reproductive system, the antioxidant's role of this vitamin has also been reported to reduce testicular oxidative stress (25, 26). Previous studies have reported the adverse effects of sodium arsenite on adult male reproductive tract. To our knowledge, however, no study has examined the effect of Vit.E on sodium arsenite mediated toxicity in epididymal sperm of adult rat. The present study was therefore performed to examine the effect of Vit.E on epididymal sperm parameters, sperm DNA integrity and sperm histon-protamine replacement in sodium arsenite-treated adult rats.
Materials and methods
Animals and treatments
This experimental study was performed on adult albino male Wistar rats (250±20 gr). The animals were purchased from Pasture's Institute, Iran. The animals were housed in plastic cages at 12-h light/dark cycle, 24±2oC and fed with standard commercial laboratory chew and water.
Adult rats were divided into four groups (n=6 for each group): control which received distilled water, sodium arsenite (8 mg/kg/day, Merck, Germany), Vit.E (100 mg/kg/day, Sigma, USA) and sodium arsenite +Vit.E. The reagents were orally given to the rats by gavage for 8 weeks “as the duration of spermatogenesis in wistar rats is 52 days” (27).
At the end of the treatments, the animals were weighed, anesthetized by the injection of pentobarbital (60 mg/kg) and sacrificed. Left testis and cauda epididymis of the animals were dissected. The testis was cleared from fat tissue and its weight was recorded.
Sperm count
The dissected epididymis of each animal was transferred into 10 ml Ham's F10 medium and cut to small slices, in order to swim out the sperm into the medium. After 10 min of diffusion, 1 ml of the solution was diluted with 9 ml formaldehyde fixative. The diluted solution was transferred into each chamber of Neubauer hemocytometer and sperm heads was manually counted under a microscope. Sperm count was performed according to WHO guidelines (28) and data were expressed as the number of sperm per ml.
Sperm motility
Assessment of sperm motility was done according to WHO protocol (28). In brief, 10 μl of the sperm suspension was placed on semen analysis chamber. A minimum of five microscopic fields were assessed to evaluate sperm motility on at least 200 sperm for each animal. The percentage of sperm motility was analyzed for following motion patterns: Progressively motile sperm (PMS), nonprogressively motile sperm (NPMS) and nonmotile sperm (NMS).
Sperm viability
Eosin-nigrosin staining was used to asses sperm viability according to WHO protocol (28) Briefly, eosin (1%, Merck, Germany) and nigrosin (10%, Merck, Germany) was prepared in distilled water. One volume of sperm suspension was mixed with two volume of 1% eosin. After 30 second, an equal volume of nigrosin was added to this mixture. Thin smears were then prepared and observed under a light microscope at 1000X magnification. Viable sperm remained colorless while nonviable sperm stained red.
Sperm morphology
The eosin-nigrosin stained slides were used to evaluate sperm morphology. One hundred sperm were observed to detect sperm abnormalities in each sample.
Sperm chromatin quality
Thin smears were prepared from the sperm solution and allowed to air-dry. To test sperm DNA integrity, the smears were stained with acridine orange (AO). AO staining was performed according to a protocol described by Tejada and co-workers (29). In brief, the smears were fixed for 14 hrs in
Table I. Body and testis weight.
89-136-5/Table_1.jpg)
Table II. Epididymal sperm number, sperm motility, sperm viability and sperm morphological anomalies.
89-136-5/Table_2.jpg)
Table III. DNA integrity (acridine orange staining) and histon-protamine replacement (aniline blue staining) in rat’s epididymal sperm.
89-136-5/Table_3.jpg)
89-136-5/Figure_1.jpg)
Figure 1. Sperm abnormalities in sodium arsenite-treated rats. a) Banana head (flattened head or reduced hook). b) Bent neck. c) Pin head. Eosin-nigrosin staining. Magnification: 1000X.
89-136-5/Figure_2.jpg)
Figure 2. Rat spermatozoa stained with acridine orange (AO) and aniline blue (AB). AO staining: a) Control group. b) Sodium arsenite group (8 mg/kg/day). AB staining: c) Control group. d) Sodium arsenite group (8 mg/kg/day). Magnification: 1000X.
Discussion
This study examined the adverse effect of sodium arsenite on epididymal sperm parameters in adult rats. In addition, Vit.E showed to reverse the toxic effect of sodium arsenite on these parameters.
In present study no significant difference was observed in the body and testis weight in sodium arsenite-exposed rats. Our results were in agreement with previous findings regarding the effect of sodium arsenite on the body (19) and testis (31) weight. However, certain studies have reported a reduction in the body and testis weight (4, 13) in arsenic treated animals. These different results might be due to the duration of treatment or administrated dosages (32).
In agreement with pervious study (15), our results also showed a significant decrease in the total sperm number in rats treated with sodium arsenite. One possibility for this effect might be due to a decrease in hormones such as FSH, LH or testosterone which intern reduce sperm count (14). On the other hand, it has been reported that sodium arsenite by inducing oxidative stress exerts harmful effects on organs such as testis (17). We therefore hypothesized that the toxic effect of sodium arsenite on the reduction of sperm number could be as a result of sodium arsenite-induced stress oxidative. If our hypothesis was true, Vit.E, a well-known antioxidant (24, 33), should have reversed hazardous effect of sodium arsenite on sperm number. Interestingly, we showed that in sodium arsenite+Vit.E group, Vit.E significantly ameliorated sodium arsenite-mediated decrease in sperm number. In spite of the decreased sperm number, the testis weight remained unchanged. This result suggests that the reduction in sperm number might not be as a result of testicular damages induced by sodium arsenite. Instead, other factors e.g. oxidative stress affected produced spermatozoa, leading to decreased sperm number.
Chromatin and flagellum in mammalian spermatozoa contain large amount of thiol rich protamine and sulfhydryl groups respectively which involve in the maintenance of sperm stability and motility (16). The decrease in sperm motility observed in the present study might be ascribed to the binding of arsenic to sulfhydryl or thiol groups on sperm proteins or the inhibition of enzymes involved in sperm motility (2, 16). Arsenic can also induce free radical such as ROS which exerts the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acid in the sperm (5, 17). It may consequently lead to the destruction of sperm mitochondria, resulting in sperm ATP depletion (5) and reduced sperm motility and viability. It is therefore likely to assume that reduced sperm motility and viability induced by sodium arsenite has been due to the ability of this toxicant in the induction of oxidative stress. To support this idea, we showed that Vit.E, as a potent antioxidant, significantly reversed the viability and motility pattern of sperm in sodium arsenite+Vit.E group compared to sodium arsenite group.
An interesting finding in sperm viability and motility assay was that Vit.E alone increased these parameters compared to the control. This effective result of Vit.E might also be due to its antioxidant role. This vitamin plays an important protective role for preventing the production of lipid peroxides by scavenging free radicals which are toxic for biological membranes (24). Therefore, it could be speculated that this vitamin by improving the activity of sperm defense antioxidant system including superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase exerted its role in increasing sperm viability and motility.
Our results showed a significant increase in sperm morphological anomalies in rats treated with sodium arsenite. It is documented that ROS generation can induce abnormal sperm morphology (34). It is therefore likely that ROS produced by arsenic has been responsible for sperm morphological anomalies in sodium arsenite-treated rats. The compensation of this parameter by the administration of Vit.E in sodium arsenite+Vit.E group might be attributed to the antioxidant properties of this vitamin and therefore support oxidative stress hypothesis in sodium arsenite-mediated sperm morphological anomalies.
AO and AB staining are methods for determining sperm DNA integrity (double strand DNA versus single strand DNA) (29) and histone-protamine replacement (35) respectively. Although observer subjectivity, heterogeneous slide staining, long time of fixation (in the case of AO staining) and microscopic study might be the limitations of these assesses, the methods are simple, inexpensive and still useful tools for assessing sperm chromatin structure in wide variety of basic and clinical studies (36-38). Using AO and AB staining, rats exposed with sodium arsenite displayed no significant difference in sperm DNA integrity and histon-protamine replacement. No study has examined the effect of sodium arseniteon these parameters in epididymal sperm of adult rat. It is likely that the effect of sodium arsenite on these parameters has been dose and duration-dependent.
Arsenic is a potent endocrine disruptor (39). Therefore, another possibility for the alteration of sperm parameters in this study might be related to this property of arsenic. Hormonal measurement in arsenic-treated rats is suggested to provide insights toward this possible mechanism.
Conclusion
Our results indicate that sodium arsenite has a negative influence on sperm number, sperm motility, sperm viability and normal sperm morphology but not on DNA integrity and histon-protamine replacement in adult rats exposed with this toxicant. In addition, Vit.E is able to compensate the adverse effects of sodium arsenite on sperm number, motility, viability and normal sperm morphological anomalies.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Arak University. We would like to thank Monireh Mahmoodi and Mehdi Farahani for their excellent helps during this study.
Arsenic, a sulfhydryl-reactive metalloid, is a major environmental toxicant produced by the burning of arsenic contaminated coal and glass manufacturing (1). In drinking water, inorganic arsenics are found as pentavalent (arsenate) and trivalent (arsenite) forms. In the human body, pentavalent arsenate is reduced to trivalent arsenite and it has been shown that the toxicity of arsenite compounds is higher than arsenate (2).
Arsenic is a known human carcinogen (3) and is able to induce malformations in male reproductive system (4, 5). Beside the main source of arsenic in contaminating drinking water (1), it is used in drugs (6, 7), herbicides, insecticides and rodenticides (1, 8). Human are therefore exposed to this pollutant not only via inhalation but also via contaminated foods, water and drugs. Chronic arsenic exposure may exert serious harmful effects including cancers (9), melanosis, hyperkeratosis, lung disease, peripheral vascular disease (Blackfoot disease), gangrene (10), diabetes mellitus (11), hypertension and ischemic heart disease (10, 12).
Arsenic can also induce male reproductive toxicity such as dose-dependent decrease in testes and accessory sex organ weights (13). It may also reduce epididymal sperm count (14), viability, and motility (15). Normal morphology (16) and the activity of antioxidant defense system (17). Alteration in the level of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone and also massive degeneration of the germ cells in testis tissue (14, 18, 19) is reported to be an account for arsenic toxicity. Oxidative stress and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) could also be a consequence of arsenic exposure (20). ROS generation as well as the binding of arsenic to protein thiol groups can alter many protein functions (2).
The integrity of sperm DNA is an important factor for the success of fertilization as well as normal development of the embryo, fetus and child (21). Several line of studies have shown the effect of environmental contaminates such as arsenic on DNA damages through inducing oxidative stress and the generation of ROS (3, 22, 23).
It is now documented that vitamin E (Vit.E), as a potent antioxidant (24), protect the organism against oxidative stress via the inhibition of propagation of ROS reactions (24). In reproductive system, the antioxidant's role of this vitamin has also been reported to reduce testicular oxidative stress (25, 26). Previous studies have reported the adverse effects of sodium arsenite on adult male reproductive tract. To our knowledge, however, no study has examined the effect of Vit.E on sodium arsenite mediated toxicity in epididymal sperm of adult rat. The present study was therefore performed to examine the effect of Vit.E on epididymal sperm parameters, sperm DNA integrity and sperm histon-protamine replacement in sodium arsenite-treated adult rats.
Materials and methods
Animals and treatments
This experimental study was performed on adult albino male Wistar rats (250±20 gr). The animals were purchased from Pasture's Institute, Iran. The animals were housed in plastic cages at 12-h light/dark cycle, 24±2oC and fed with standard commercial laboratory chew and water.
Adult rats were divided into four groups (n=6 for each group): control which received distilled water, sodium arsenite (8 mg/kg/day, Merck, Germany), Vit.E (100 mg/kg/day, Sigma, USA) and sodium arsenite +Vit.E. The reagents were orally given to the rats by gavage for 8 weeks “as the duration of spermatogenesis in wistar rats is 52 days” (27).
At the end of the treatments, the animals were weighed, anesthetized by the injection of pentobarbital (60 mg/kg) and sacrificed. Left testis and cauda epididymis of the animals were dissected. The testis was cleared from fat tissue and its weight was recorded.
Sperm count
The dissected epididymis of each animal was transferred into 10 ml Ham's F10 medium and cut to small slices, in order to swim out the sperm into the medium. After 10 min of diffusion, 1 ml of the solution was diluted with 9 ml formaldehyde fixative. The diluted solution was transferred into each chamber of Neubauer hemocytometer and sperm heads was manually counted under a microscope. Sperm count was performed according to WHO guidelines (28) and data were expressed as the number of sperm per ml.
Sperm motility
Assessment of sperm motility was done according to WHO protocol (28). In brief, 10 μl of the sperm suspension was placed on semen analysis chamber. A minimum of five microscopic fields were assessed to evaluate sperm motility on at least 200 sperm for each animal. The percentage of sperm motility was analyzed for following motion patterns: Progressively motile sperm (PMS), nonprogressively motile sperm (NPMS) and nonmotile sperm (NMS).
Sperm viability
Eosin-nigrosin staining was used to asses sperm viability according to WHO protocol (28) Briefly, eosin (1%, Merck, Germany) and nigrosin (10%, Merck, Germany) was prepared in distilled water. One volume of sperm suspension was mixed with two volume of 1% eosin. After 30 second, an equal volume of nigrosin was added to this mixture. Thin smears were then prepared and observed under a light microscope at 1000X magnification. Viable sperm remained colorless while nonviable sperm stained red.
Sperm morphology
The eosin-nigrosin stained slides were used to evaluate sperm morphology. One hundred sperm were observed to detect sperm abnormalities in each sample.
Sperm chromatin quality
Thin smears were prepared from the sperm solution and allowed to air-dry. To test sperm DNA integrity, the smears were stained with acridine orange (AO). AO staining was performed according to a protocol described by Tejada and co-workers (29). In brief, the smears were fixed for 14 hrs in
methanol/acetic acid (3:1) at 4oC and stained with AO solution (0.19% in phosphate citrate buffer, pH=2.5) for 10 min. The slides were gently washed by distilled water for 5 minutes and air dried. The stained smears were then observed under fluorescence microscope at 1000X magnification. Three types of staining patterns were considered in sperm head; green spermatozoa (double-stranded DNA), yellow and red spermatozoa (single-stranded DNA). At least 100 spermatozoa per slide were count to evaluate the percentage of double-stranded DNA in the spermatozoa.
To test sperm histon-protamine replacement, the smears were stained with aniline blue (AB). AB staining was carried out based on the method described by Wongand co-workers (30). In brief, the sperm smears were fixed in 4% formalin solution for 5 min, rinsed in distilled water, and stained in 5% AB in 4% acetic acid (pH 3.5) solution for 5 min. The slides were washed in distilled water, stained in 0.5% eosin for 1 min and allowed to air-dry. The slides were then examined at 1000X magnification in a light microscope. Immature sperm characterized by nuclear histone proteins stained dark blue, whereas mature sperm with protamine stained red-pink. At least 100 spermatozoa per slide were count to analyze the percentage of red-pink spermatozoa.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SD for six animals per group. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the statistical significance of the data. p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Body and testis weight
For each animal, body and testis weight were recorded at the end of the treatments. There was no significant difference in body and testis weight in the four groups (Table I).
Sperm count
Results showed a highly significant decrease (p<0.001) in epididymal sperm number in sodium arsenite group compared to the control (Table II). Sodium arsenite+Vit.E group showed a highly significant increase (p<0.001) in sperm number compared to sodium arsenite group (Table II).
Sperm motility
The treatment of animals with sodium arsenite significantly (p<0.001) decreased the percentage of PMS and increased (p<0.001) the percentage of NPMS and NMS compared to the control (Table II).
Rats treated with sodium arsenite+Vit.E showed a significant increase (p<0.001) in the percentage of PMS and decrease (p<0.001) in the percentage of NPMS as well as NMS as compared with sodium arsenite group (Table II). Animals treated with Vit.E alone also revealed a significant increase (p<0.001) in the percentage of PMS and decrease in the percentage of NPMS and NMS when compared with the control (Table II).
Sperm viability
There was a significant decrease (p<0.001) between the percentage of viable sperm in sodium arsenite group compared to the control. A significant increase (p<0.05) was observed in sperm viability in rats exposed to sodium arsenite+ VE compared to sodium arsenite group (Table II). Rats treated with Vit.E alone also showed a significant increase (p<0.05) in sperm viability when compared with the control (Table II).
Sperm morphological anomalies
Rats treated with sodium arsenite showed a significant increase (p<0.001) in abnormal sperm. In sodium arsenite+Vit.E group, Vit.E could significantly (p<0.05) reverse sperm morphological anomalies as compared with sodium arsenite group (Table II). Some sperm morphological anomalies such as banana head (Flattened head or reduced hook), pin head and bent neck induced in sodium arsenite animals are shown in Figure 1.
Sperm chromatin quality
Spermatozoa stained with AO showed that sodium arsenite had no significant effect on the sperm DNA integrity compared to the control (Figure 2a-b and table III). In addition, AB staining revealed no significant effect on the histon-protamine replacement during the sperm maturation process in sodium arsenite-exposed rats compared to the control (Figure 2c-d and table III).
To test sperm histon-protamine replacement, the smears were stained with aniline blue (AB). AB staining was carried out based on the method described by Wongand co-workers (30). In brief, the sperm smears were fixed in 4% formalin solution for 5 min, rinsed in distilled water, and stained in 5% AB in 4% acetic acid (pH 3.5) solution for 5 min. The slides were washed in distilled water, stained in 0.5% eosin for 1 min and allowed to air-dry. The slides were then examined at 1000X magnification in a light microscope. Immature sperm characterized by nuclear histone proteins stained dark blue, whereas mature sperm with protamine stained red-pink. At least 100 spermatozoa per slide were count to analyze the percentage of red-pink spermatozoa.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SD for six animals per group. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the statistical significance of the data. p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Body and testis weight
For each animal, body and testis weight were recorded at the end of the treatments. There was no significant difference in body and testis weight in the four groups (Table I).
Sperm count
Results showed a highly significant decrease (p<0.001) in epididymal sperm number in sodium arsenite group compared to the control (Table II). Sodium arsenite+Vit.E group showed a highly significant increase (p<0.001) in sperm number compared to sodium arsenite group (Table II).
Sperm motility
The treatment of animals with sodium arsenite significantly (p<0.001) decreased the percentage of PMS and increased (p<0.001) the percentage of NPMS and NMS compared to the control (Table II).
Rats treated with sodium arsenite+Vit.E showed a significant increase (p<0.001) in the percentage of PMS and decrease (p<0.001) in the percentage of NPMS as well as NMS as compared with sodium arsenite group (Table II). Animals treated with Vit.E alone also revealed a significant increase (p<0.001) in the percentage of PMS and decrease in the percentage of NPMS and NMS when compared with the control (Table II).
Sperm viability
There was a significant decrease (p<0.001) between the percentage of viable sperm in sodium arsenite group compared to the control. A significant increase (p<0.05) was observed in sperm viability in rats exposed to sodium arsenite+ VE compared to sodium arsenite group (Table II). Rats treated with Vit.E alone also showed a significant increase (p<0.05) in sperm viability when compared with the control (Table II).
Sperm morphological anomalies
Rats treated with sodium arsenite showed a significant increase (p<0.001) in abnormal sperm. In sodium arsenite+Vit.E group, Vit.E could significantly (p<0.05) reverse sperm morphological anomalies as compared with sodium arsenite group (Table II). Some sperm morphological anomalies such as banana head (Flattened head or reduced hook), pin head and bent neck induced in sodium arsenite animals are shown in Figure 1.
Sperm chromatin quality
Spermatozoa stained with AO showed that sodium arsenite had no significant effect on the sperm DNA integrity compared to the control (Figure 2a-b and table III). In addition, AB staining revealed no significant effect on the histon-protamine replacement during the sperm maturation process in sodium arsenite-exposed rats compared to the control (Figure 2c-d and table III).
Table I. Body and testis weight.
Table II. Epididymal sperm number, sperm motility, sperm viability and sperm morphological anomalies.
Table III. DNA integrity (acridine orange staining) and histon-protamine replacement (aniline blue staining) in rat’s epididymal sperm.
Figure 1. Sperm abnormalities in sodium arsenite-treated rats. a) Banana head (flattened head or reduced hook). b) Bent neck. c) Pin head. Eosin-nigrosin staining. Magnification: 1000X.
Figure 2. Rat spermatozoa stained with acridine orange (AO) and aniline blue (AB). AO staining: a) Control group. b) Sodium arsenite group (8 mg/kg/day). AB staining: c) Control group. d) Sodium arsenite group (8 mg/kg/day). Magnification: 1000X.
Discussion
This study examined the adverse effect of sodium arsenite on epididymal sperm parameters in adult rats. In addition, Vit.E showed to reverse the toxic effect of sodium arsenite on these parameters.
In present study no significant difference was observed in the body and testis weight in sodium arsenite-exposed rats. Our results were in agreement with previous findings regarding the effect of sodium arsenite on the body (19) and testis (31) weight. However, certain studies have reported a reduction in the body and testis weight (4, 13) in arsenic treated animals. These different results might be due to the duration of treatment or administrated dosages (32).
In agreement with pervious study (15), our results also showed a significant decrease in the total sperm number in rats treated with sodium arsenite. One possibility for this effect might be due to a decrease in hormones such as FSH, LH or testosterone which intern reduce sperm count (14). On the other hand, it has been reported that sodium arsenite by inducing oxidative stress exerts harmful effects on organs such as testis (17). We therefore hypothesized that the toxic effect of sodium arsenite on the reduction of sperm number could be as a result of sodium arsenite-induced stress oxidative. If our hypothesis was true, Vit.E, a well-known antioxidant (24, 33), should have reversed hazardous effect of sodium arsenite on sperm number. Interestingly, we showed that in sodium arsenite+Vit.E group, Vit.E significantly ameliorated sodium arsenite-mediated decrease in sperm number. In spite of the decreased sperm number, the testis weight remained unchanged. This result suggests that the reduction in sperm number might not be as a result of testicular damages induced by sodium arsenite. Instead, other factors e.g. oxidative stress affected produced spermatozoa, leading to decreased sperm number.
Chromatin and flagellum in mammalian spermatozoa contain large amount of thiol rich protamine and sulfhydryl groups respectively which involve in the maintenance of sperm stability and motility (16). The decrease in sperm motility observed in the present study might be ascribed to the binding of arsenic to sulfhydryl or thiol groups on sperm proteins or the inhibition of enzymes involved in sperm motility (2, 16). Arsenic can also induce free radical such as ROS which exerts the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acid in the sperm (5, 17). It may consequently lead to the destruction of sperm mitochondria, resulting in sperm ATP depletion (5) and reduced sperm motility and viability. It is therefore likely to assume that reduced sperm motility and viability induced by sodium arsenite has been due to the ability of this toxicant in the induction of oxidative stress. To support this idea, we showed that Vit.E, as a potent antioxidant, significantly reversed the viability and motility pattern of sperm in sodium arsenite+Vit.E group compared to sodium arsenite group.
An interesting finding in sperm viability and motility assay was that Vit.E alone increased these parameters compared to the control. This effective result of Vit.E might also be due to its antioxidant role. This vitamin plays an important protective role for preventing the production of lipid peroxides by scavenging free radicals which are toxic for biological membranes (24). Therefore, it could be speculated that this vitamin by improving the activity of sperm defense antioxidant system including superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase exerted its role in increasing sperm viability and motility.
Our results showed a significant increase in sperm morphological anomalies in rats treated with sodium arsenite. It is documented that ROS generation can induce abnormal sperm morphology (34). It is therefore likely that ROS produced by arsenic has been responsible for sperm morphological anomalies in sodium arsenite-treated rats. The compensation of this parameter by the administration of Vit.E in sodium arsenite+Vit.E group might be attributed to the antioxidant properties of this vitamin and therefore support oxidative stress hypothesis in sodium arsenite-mediated sperm morphological anomalies.
AO and AB staining are methods for determining sperm DNA integrity (double strand DNA versus single strand DNA) (29) and histone-protamine replacement (35) respectively. Although observer subjectivity, heterogeneous slide staining, long time of fixation (in the case of AO staining) and microscopic study might be the limitations of these assesses, the methods are simple, inexpensive and still useful tools for assessing sperm chromatin structure in wide variety of basic and clinical studies (36-38). Using AO and AB staining, rats exposed with sodium arsenite displayed no significant difference in sperm DNA integrity and histon-protamine replacement. No study has examined the effect of sodium arseniteon these parameters in epididymal sperm of adult rat. It is likely that the effect of sodium arsenite on these parameters has been dose and duration-dependent.
Arsenic is a potent endocrine disruptor (39). Therefore, another possibility for the alteration of sperm parameters in this study might be related to this property of arsenic. Hormonal measurement in arsenic-treated rats is suggested to provide insights toward this possible mechanism.
Conclusion
Our results indicate that sodium arsenite has a negative influence on sperm number, sperm motility, sperm viability and normal sperm morphology but not on DNA integrity and histon-protamine replacement in adult rats exposed with this toxicant. In addition, Vit.E is able to compensate the adverse effects of sodium arsenite on sperm number, motility, viability and normal sperm morphological anomalies.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Arak University. We would like to thank Monireh Mahmoodi and Mehdi Farahani for their excellent helps during this study.
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Akter KF, Owens G, Davey DE, Naidu R. Arsenic speciation and toxicity in biological systems. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 2005; 184: 97-149. [DOI:10.1007/0-387-27565-7_3]
2. Wang TC, Jan KY, Wang AS, Gurr JR. Trivalent arsenicals induce lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, and oxidative DNA damage in human urothelial cells. Mutat Res 2007; 615: 75-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.10.003]
3. Balakumar B, Ramanathan K, Kumaresan S, Suresh R. DNA damage by sodium arsenite in experimental rats: ameliorative effects of antioxidant vitamins C and E. Ind J Sci Tech 2010; 3: 322-327.
4. Chang SI, Jin B, Youn P, Park C, Park JD, Ryu DY. Arsenic-induced toxicity and the protective role of ascorbic acid in mouse testis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2007; 218: 196-203. [DOI:10.1016/j.taap.2006.11.009]
5. Das J, Ghosh J, Manna P, Sinha M, Sil PC. Taurine protects rat testes against NaAsO(2)-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis via mitochondrial dependent and independent pathways. Toxicol Lett 2009; 187: 201-210. [DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.03.001]
6. Lu DP, Qiu JY, Jiang B, Wang Q, Liu KY, Liu YR, et al. Tetra-arsenic tetra-sulfide for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia: a pilot report. Blood 2002; 99: 3136-3143. [DOI:10.1182/blood.V99.9.3136]
7. Hu J, Fang J, Dong Y, Chen SJ, Chen Z. Arsenic in cancer therapy. Anticancer Drugs 2005; 16: 119-127. [DOI:10.1097/00001813-200502000-00002]
8. Kannan GM, Flora SJ. Chronic arsenic poisoning in the rat: treatment with combined administration of succimers and an antioxidant. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2004; 58: 37-43. [DOI:10.1016/S0147-6513(03)00096-4]
9. National Research Council. Arsenic in drinking water. Washington D.C., National Academy Press; 2001.
10. Das HK, Mitra AK, Sengupta PK, Hossain A, Islam F, Rabbani GH. Arsenic concentrations in rice, vegetables, and fish in Bangladesh: a preliminary study. Environ Int 2004; 30: 383-387. [DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2003.09.005]
11. Tseng CH, Tai TY, Chong CK, Tseng CP, Lai MS, Lin BJ, et al. Long-term arsenic exposure and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a cohort study in arseniasis-hyperendemic villages in Taiwan. Environ Health Perspect 2000; 108: 847-851. [DOI:10.1289/ehp.00108847]
12. Wang CH, Jeng JS, Yip PK, Chen CL, Hsu LI, Hsueh YM, et al. Biological gradient between long-term arsenic exposure and carotid atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002; 105: 1804-1809. [DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000015862.64816.B2]
13. Ahmad I, Akhar K, Hussain T. Arsenic induced microscopic changes in rat testis. Prof Med J 2008; 15: 287-291.
14. Jana K, Jana S, Samanta PK. Effects of chronic exposure to sodium arsenite on hypothalamo-pituitary-testicular activities in adult rats: possible an estrogenic mode of action. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2006; 4: 9. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-4-9]
15. Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay P. Studies on Arsenic Toxicity in Male Rat Gonads and its Protection by High Dietary Protein Supplementation. Al Ameen J Med Sci 2009; 2: 73-77.
16. Pant N, Murthy RC, Srivastava SP. Male reproductive toxicity of sodium arsenite in mice. Hum Exp Toxicol 2004; 23: 399-403. [DOI:10.1191/0960327104ht467oa]
17. Manna P, Sinha M, Sil PC. Protection of arsenic-induced testicular oxidative stress by arjunolic acid. Redox Rep 2008; 13: 67-77. [DOI:10.1179/135100008X259169]
18. Sarkar M, Chaudhuri GR, Chattopadhyay A, Biswas NM. Effect of sodium arsenite on spermatogenesis, plasma gonadotrophins and testosterone in rats. Asian J Androl 2003; 5: 27-31.
19. Sanghamitra S, Hazra J, Upadhyay SN, Singh RK, Amal RC. Arsenic induced toxicity on testicular tissue of mice. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 2008; 52: 84-90.
20. Shi H, Shi X, Liu KJ. Oxidative mechanism of arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem 2004; 255: 67-78. [DOI:10.1023/B:MCBI.0000007262.26044.e8]
21. Zhu P, Ma Y, Huang Y. Role of sperm DNA integrity in male infertility. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2004; 10: 222-226.
22. Nava-Hernandez MP, Hauad-Marroquin LA, Bassol-Mayagoitia S, Garcia-Arenas G, Mercado-Hernandez R, Echavarri-Guzman MA, et al. Lead-, cadmium-, and arsenic-induced DNA damage in rat germinal cells. DNA Cell Biol 2009; 28: 241-248. [DOI:10.1089/dna.2009.0860]
23. Biswas R PS, Mukherjee A. An investigation on the Genotoxic Effects of Long-Term Administration of Sodium arsenite in Bone marrow and Testicular Cells in vivo using the Comet Assay. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Onc 2007; 26: 29-37. [DOI:10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.v26.i1.40]
24. Yue D, Yan L, Luo H, Xu X, Jin X. Effect of Vitamin E supplementation on semen quality and the testicular cell membranal and mitochondrial antioxidant abilities in Aohan fine-wool sheep. Anim Reprod Sci 2010; 118: 217-222. [DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.08.004]
25. Momeni H, Soleimani Mehranjani M, Abnosi M, Mahmoodi M. Effects of vitamin E on sperm parameters and reproductive hormones in developing rats treated with para-nonylphen ol. Iran J Reprod Med 2009; 7: 111-116.
26. Chandra AK, Chatterjee A, Ghosh R, Sarkar M. Vitamin E-supplementation protect chromium (VI)-induced spermatogenic and steroidogenic disorders in testicular tissues of rats. Food Chem Toxicol 2010; 48: 972-979. [DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2010.01.008]
27. Freitas F, Cordeiro-Mori F, Sasso-Cerri E, Lucas S, Miraglia S. Alterations of spermatogenesis in etoposide-treated rats: a stereological study. Interciencia 2002; 27: 227-235.
28. Word health organization (WHO) laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 1999.
29. Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S. A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 87-91. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47963-X]
30. Wong A, Chuan SS, Patton WC, Jacobson JD, Corselli J, and Chan PJ. Addition of eosin to the aniline blue assay to enhance detection of immature sperm histones. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1999-2002. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.026]
31. Pant N, Kumar R, Murthy RC, Srivastava SP. Male reproductive effect of arsenic in mice. Biometals 2001; 14: 113-117. [DOI:10.1023/A:1016686113763]
32. Chattopadhyay S, Ghosh S, Debnath J, Ghosh D. Protection of sodium arsenite-induced ovarian toxicity by coadministration of L-ascorbate (vitamin C) in mature wistar strain rat. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2001; 41: 83-89. [DOI:10.1007/s002440010223]
33. Zhou DX, Qiu SD, Zhang J, Tian H, Wang HX. The protective effect of vitamin E against oxidative damage caused by formaldehyde in the testes of adult rats. Asian J Androl 2006; 8: 584-588. [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00198.x]
34. Venkatesh S, Singh G, Gupta N, Kumar R, Deecaraman M, Dada R. Correlation of sperm morphology and oxidative stress in infertile men. Iran J Reprod Med 2009; 7: 29-34.
35. Hofmann N, Hilscher B. Use of aniline blue to assess chromatin condensation in morphologically normal spermatozoa in normal and infertile men. Hum Repord 1991; 6: 979-982. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137472]
36. Kazerooni T, Asadi N, Jadid L, Kazerooni M, Ghanadi A, Ghaffarpasand F, et al. Evaluation of sperm's chromatin quality with acridine orange test, chromomycin A3 and aniline blue staining in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009; 26: 591-596. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-009-9361-3]
37. Virant-Klun I, Tomazevic T, Meden-Vrtovec H. Sperm single-stranded DNA, detected by acridine orange staining, reduces fertilization and quality of ICSI-derived embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2002; 19: 319-328. [DOI:10.1023/A:1016006509036]
38. Huszar G, Ozenci CC, Cayli S, Zavaczki Z, Hansch E, Vigue L. Hyaluronic acid binding by human sperm indicates cellular maturity, viability, and unreacted acrosomal status. Fertil Steril 2003; 7 (Suppl.): 1616-1624. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00402-3]
39. Davey JC, Bodwell JE, Gosse JA, Hamilton JW. Arsenic as an endocrine disruptor: effects of arsenic on estrogen receptor-mediated gene expression in vivo and in cell culture. Toxicol Sci 2007; 98: 75-86. [DOI:10.1093/toxsci/kfm013]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
