1. Ciotti PM, Notarangelo L, Morselli-Labate AM, Felletti V, Porcu E, Venturoli S. First polar body morphology before ICSI is not related to embryo quality or pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2334-2339. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh433]
2. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. Morphological selection of gametes. Placenta 2008; 29 (Suppl.): 115-120. [
DOI:10.1016/j.placenta.2008.08.009]
3. Khalili MA, Nottola S, Shahedi A, Macchiarelli G. Contribution of human oocyte architecture to success of in-vitro maturation Technology. Iran J Rep Med 2013; 11: 1-10.
4. Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iacobelli M, Minasi MG, Romano S, Ferrero S, et al. Significance of metaphase II human oocyte morphology on ICSI outcome. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1692-1700. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.024]
5. Nazari S, Khalili MA, Esmaielzadeh F, Mohsenzadeh M. Maturation capacity, morphology and morphometric assessment of human immature oocytes after vitrification and in-vitro maturation. Iran J Reprod Med 2011; 9: 209-216.
6. Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Razi MH, Nottola SA. The effect of immature oocytes quantity on the rates of oocytes maturity and morphology, fertilization, and embryo development in ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012; 29: 803-810. [
DOI:10.1007/s10815-012-9799-6]
7. Khalili MA, Mojibian M, Sultan AM. Role of oocyte morphology on fertilization and embryo formation in assisted reproductive techniques. Mid East Fertil Soc J 2005; 10: 72-77.
8. Serhal P, Ranieri D, Kinis A, Marchant S, Davies M, Khadum I. Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1267-1270. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.6.1267]
9. Mikkelsen AL, Lindenberg S. Morphology of in-vitro matured oocytes: impact on fertility potential and embryo quality. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1714-1718. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.8.1714]
10. Balaban B, Urman B, Sertac A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R. Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3431-3433. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.12.3431]
11. Sutter PD, Dozortsev D, Qian C, Dhont M. Oocyte morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 595-597. [
DOI:10.1093/HUMREP/11.3.595]
12. Montag M, Schimming T, Köster M, Zhou C, Dorn C, Rösing B, et al. Oocyte zona birefringence intensity is associated with embryonic implantation potential in ICSI cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 239-244. [
DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60580-9]
13. Madaschi C, Aoki T, de Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, de Cássia Sávio Figueira R, Francisco LS, Iaconelli A, et al. Zona pellucida birefringence score and meiotic spindle visualization in relation to embryo development and ICSI outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18: 681-686. [
DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60014-4]
14. Petersen CG, Vagnini LD, Mauri AL, Massaro FC, Silva LF, Cavagna M, et al. Evaluation of zona pellucida birefringence intensity during in vitro maturation of oocytes from stimulated cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011; 9: 53. [
DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-9-53]
15. Keefe D, Tran P, Pellegrini C, Oldenbourg R. Polarized light microscopy and digital image processing identify a multilaminar structure of the hamster zona pellucida. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1250-1252. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.6.1250]
16. Gomes LM, Canha Ados S, Dzik A, Novo NF, Juliano Y, Dos Santos SI, et al. The age as a predictive factor in in vitro fertilization cycles. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2009; 31: 230-234. [
DOI:10.1590/S0100-72032009000500005]
17. El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Hart R, Taylor A, Braude P. Young age does not protect against the adverse effects of reduced ovarian reserve-an eight year study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1519-1524. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.6.1519]
18. Omidi M, Khalili MA, Ashourzadeh S, Rahimipour M. Zona pellucida birefringence and meiotic spindle visualization of human oocytes are not influenced by IVM technology. Reprod Fertil Dev 2013; in press.
19. Lasiene K, Vitkus A, Valanciūte A, Lasys V. morphological criteria of oocyte quality. Medicina (Kaunas) 2009; 45: 509-514.
20. Valeri C, Pappalardo S, De Felici M, Manna C. Correlation of oocyte morphometry parameters with woman's age. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011; 28: 545-552. [
DOI:10.1007/s10815-011-9555-3]
21. Ebner T, Balaban B, Moser M, Shebl O, Urman B, Ata B, et al. Automatic user-independent zona pellucida imaging at the oocyte stage allows for the prediction of preimplantation development. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 913-920. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.106]
22. Oldenbourg R. A new view on polarization microscopy. Nature 1996; 381: 811-812. [
DOI:10.1038/381811a0]
23. Khalili MA, Maione M, Palmerini MG, Bianchi S, Macchiarelli G, Nottola SA. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after vitrification. Eur J Histochem 2012; 56: 236-242. [
DOI:10.4081/ejh.2012.e38]
24. Liu J, Lu G, Qian Y, Mao Y, Ding W. Pregnancies and births achieved from in vitro matured oocytes retrieved from poor responders undergoing stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 447-449. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00665-4]
25. de Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, de Cássia Savio Figueira R, Queiroz P, Madaschi C, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Zona pellucida birefringence in in vivo and in vitro matured oocytes. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2050-2053. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.005]
26. Shahedi A, Hosseini A, Khalili MA, Norouzian M, Salehi M, Piriaei A, Nottola SA. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 167: 69-75. [
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.006]
27. Mohsenzadeh M, Khalili MA, Nazari S, Hemayat-Khah Jahromi V, Agharahimi A, Halvaei I. Effect of vitrification on morphology and in vitro maturation outcome of human immature oocytes. Ital J Anat Embro 2012; 117: 190-198.
28. Rosenwaks Z, Davis OK, Damario MA. The role of maternal age in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 165. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_1.165]
29. Sharif K, Elgendy M, Lashen H, Afnan M. Age and basal follicle stimulating hormone as predictors of in vitro fertilisation outcome. BJOG1998; 105: 107-112.
30. Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY, Schatten H. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Hum Reprodu Update 2009; 15: 573-585. [
DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmp014]
31. Kilani SS, Cooke S, Kan AK, Chapman MG. Do age and extended culture affect the architecture of the zona pellucida of human oocytes and embryos? Zygote 2006; 14: 39-44. [
DOI:10.1017/S0967199406003625]
32. Rankin T, Talbot P, Lee E, Dean J. Abnormal zonae pellucidae in mice lacking ZP1 result in early embryonic loss. Development 1999; 126: 3847-3855.
33. Balaban B, Urman B. Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. Reprod Biomed online 2006; 12: 608-615. [
DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61187-X]