Volume 11, Issue 12 (1-2013)                   IJRM 2013, 11(12): 983-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alizadeh Z, Faramarzi S, Saidijam M, Alizamir T, Esna-Ashari F, Shabab N et al . Effect of intramural myomectomy on endometrial HOXA10 and HOXA11 mRNA expression at the time of implantation window. IJRM 2013; 11 (12) :983-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-377-en.html
1- Endometrium and Endometriosis Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
5- Department of Epidemiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 157 kb]   (577 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2575 Views)
Full-Text:   (326 Views)
Introduction
 
Lack of preparation of the uterus for embryo adoption, is responsible for nearly two-thirds of implantation failures (1). From the causes of implantation failure, some uterine disease such as reduced endometrial thickness, changes in the expression of molecules involved in implantation and immunology factors that decrease endometrial receptivity have been reported (2). Uterine myoma is one of these diseases. Uterine myoma is the most common, benign gynecologic disorder that is presented in 5-10% of infertile woman (3-4). Depending on its location in the uterus can cause infertility and recurrent miscarriage. Myoma may cause changes in the uterine cavity and endometrium and reduce implantation rate in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies, compared with women without a myoma (3, 5).
The outcomes of reproduction become better after myomectomy especially if myoma was the only cause of infertility the differences had more improvements (6). To date there are no molecular data to explain the mechanism behind these clinical observations. It is plausible that myomas adversely affect the endometrium and hence impair endometrial receptivity; however, little is known about the effect of myomectomy on known markers of endometrial receptivity (7). Several genes have been identified that are essential for preparing endometrium to receive embryo, like Homeobox genes, HOXA11 and HOXA10 (8). HOXA10 is a transcription factor that is necessary for embryo implantation. Mice with a targeted mutation of the HOXA10 locus are infertile due to result of failure of implantation (9).
HOXA10 is expressed in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle, in which its expression is regulated by estrogen and progesterone. Endometrial epithelial and stromal HOXA10 expression levels are up-regulated in the midluteal phase, coincident with the time of implantation (10). HOXA11 homebox genes are the best-known transcription factors participating in implantation. In the mid-secretory phase of a menstrual cycle, which is coincide with the time of implantation, HOXA11mRNA expression is up-regulated in both endometrial glandular and stromal cells in women (11).
It is shown that expressions of HOXA10 and HOXA11 were decreased in the presence of myoma (7, 12). To determine whether myomectomy would reverse HOXA11 and HOXA10 expression, we evaluated the transcript levels of these genes in the endometrium of patients before and after myomectomy.
 
Materials and methods
 
This case control study was done from September 2011 to March 2012. The samples were taken at Fatemieh infertility research center of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. All tissue samples were obtained with full and informed patient written consent. The research protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
This study included women of reproductive age, whom had uterine myoma with size greater than 5 cm and were infertile. The subjects were identified prior to surgery, and all subjects underwent myomectomy. At the time of surgery, the following data were obtained: age (under 38), uterine size, obstetric and gynecologic history, medical conditions, medications, surgical history, and last menstrual period. Subjects had not used hormonal medications for at least 3 months prior to surgery.
(Subjects did not have any other condition previously demonstrated to affect endometrial receptivity such as endometriosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome, or hydrosalpinges). Endometrial tissue biopsies were performed during 19-23 days of a menstrual phase (which is overlapped to mid-luteal phase) before and 3 months after myomectomy using an endometrial suction catheter. Each sample was divided into two portions. The first tissue portion was fixed in 10% formalin for histopathological examination.
All samples underwent histological evaluation, and normal mid-secretory phase of the endometrium was identified. The second portion was immediately collected in RNA extraction solution (RNX-Plus, Cinagene Company, Iran) and stored at -80ºC until further analysis was performed. Endometrium from subjects before and after myomectomy was evaluated for mRNA expression of HOXA11 and HOXA10.
 
RNA extraction
To obtain total RNA, each sample was placed in 1 mL of RNA extraction solution (RNX- Plus, Cinagene Company, Iran) and homogenized by homogenizer. The cellular lysate was incubated, chloroform 0.2 mL was added, and the samples were centrifuged (17,000 ×g centrifugal force at 4oC for 15 min). The clear, aqueous phase was collected and transferred to a new tube, and RNA was precipitated with isopropanol and washed with 75% ethanol. The RNA pellet was air-dried, then resuspended with RNase-free water. From all obtained RNA samples, 2 μl was analyzed using the Epoch Microplatespectro-photometer (BioTek, USA).
 
Reverse transcription
Single-stranded cDNA was synthesized using Accu Power® CycleScript RT Pre Mixc DNA Synthesis Kit (Bioneer, Korea) using 1 µg of RNA, according to the manufacturer's protocol. The transcription process included incubation of the reaction mixture at 20oC for 30sec, followed by 5 min at 44oC, 55oC for 30sec and 95oC for 5min. The cDNA was stored at -80oC until further use for polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
 
Quantitative real-time PCR
PCR analyses were performed using C1000 Thermocycler and CFX96 real time system (BioRad) and QuantiFast SYBER Green PCR Kit (Bioneer, Korea) in a final volume of 25 μl with 10 pmol of each primer. The reaction was incubated at 95oC for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 15s at 95oC, 30s at annealing temperature, 30s at 72oC and then fluorescence was measured. Each assay was run in triplicate with each set of primers. Primer pairs for the amplification of cDNA coding for HOXA11 and HOXA10 were designed from the GenBank databases using the AlleleID 6 software and checked for minimum overlap.
The sequences of primers, accession number and products length are presented in Table I. Annealing temperature were 55.9oC and 53.6oC and 53.5oC for HOXA11, HOXA10 and 18S rRNA, respectively. Specificity of PCR amplifications was verified by a melting curve program (70-95oC with a heating rate of 0.5oC/s and a continuous fluorescence measurement) and analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, 1×TBE.
 
Data analysis
Cycle threshold (Ct) values were obtained through the auto Ct function. Following efficiency correction, the mean threshold cycle (Ct) was calculated and then normalized to the reference gene (18S rRNA) using delta (Δ) Ct. Changes in relative expression were calculated using the 2-∆∆ct method (13). The specific transcripts were presented as n-fold change relative to pre-myomectomy level.
 
Ethical considerations
All tissue samples were obtained with full and informed patient consent. The research protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
 
Statistical analysis
ΔCt was reported as means±SEM of three independent experiments. Values of p<0.05 were considered significant. Results were analyzed using student’s t test for comparison between pre and post operation.


Table I. Primer sequences used in PCR


 
Results
 
The clinical characteristics of infertile patients (n=12) with myoma are summarized in Table II. In this study, the mean±SD age of all subjects with myoma was 31.7±2.65 years. The mean size of subjects was 4.02±1.64×6.04±1.44 centimeters. An increase in endometrial HOXA11 expression was seen in 8 of the 12 postmyomectomy endometrial samples compared with corresponding premyomectomy samples (ΔCt values: 11.79±3.06 versus 12.10±1.98; p=0.7). HOXA11 levels were increased by 1.24 fold after myomectomy (Figure 1).
Endometrial HOXA10mRNA expression (normalized to 18S rRNA expression) was higher in uterus with postoperative than preoperative samples but this difference was not also significant. (ΔCt values: 27.50±2.51 and 28.77±3.60, respectively; p=0.15). An increase in endometrial HOXA10 expression was seen in 9 of the 12 postmyomectomy endometrial samples. HOXA10 levels were increased by 2.39-fold after myomectomy (Figure 1).

 
Table II. Demographic characteristics of infertile patients with myoma






Figure 1. Change fold of HOXA10 and HOXA11 mRNAs after myometomy. The fold-chang of HOXA10 and HOXA11 after myomectomy wasn’t significantly different.

Discussion
 
Endometrial changes resulting in its receptivity requires a delicate coordination of a number of different events at structural, cellular and molecular level. "Impaired endometrial growth and differentiation may be an important factor contributing to infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss.It has been reported that 50-75% of the pregnancy loss are due to failure in implantation"(3). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the association between fibroids and infertility, including potential effects on sperm transport, uterine contractility, endometrial changes, and implantation (14-15).
Also multiple studies, including a recent meta-analysis, have shown the presence of non-cavity-distorting intramural fibroids is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing IVF treatment (16). Therefore the overall benefit of myomectomy before IVF in improving reproductive outcome; has been recommended as a therapeutic option for patients with myoma (17). Several genes have been identified as molecular markers of endometrial receptivity: like HOXA10 and HOXA11 (8).
"Homeobox (Hox/HOX) genes encode transcription factors that mediate embryonic development. In the human, HOXA11 is expressed in endometrial glands and stroma throughout the menstrual cycle" (18). HOXA11 is essential for implantation in the mouse as shown that disruption of this gene results in sterility. The ovulation takes place in these animal but their embryos fail to implant (12, 19). HOXA10 is expressed in both endometrial epithelial and stromal cells, where it likely subserves the different physiological functions of the sex steroids (20). In the mid luteal and late luteal phases, epithelial HOXA10 expression is sustained at high levels despite the decline in Pregesteron-receptor concentrations.
Endometrial epithelial HOXA10 expression is driven by both stromal paracrine factors and also HOXA10 auto-regulation; HOXA10 also regulates its own expression in endometrial epithelium (21-22). The expression of HOXA10 and HOXA11 genes were decreased during the secretory phase of endometrium in some nonoptimal conditions such as in adenomyosis, endometriosis, myoma idiopatic infertility (23). To determine whether myomectomy would reverse HOXA11 and HOXA10 expression, we evaluated the transcript levels of these genes in the endometrium of patients with intramural fibroid before and after myomectomy. According to our results, HOXA10 and HOXA11 mRNAs expression in endometrium of post-myomectomy shows a higher level compared to pre-operative; however, the differences failed to reach statistical significance.
Rackow and Taylor investigated the effect of uterine leiomyomas on these markers of endometrial receptivity HOXA10 and HOXA11. The expressions of HOXA10 and HOXA11 were significantly decreased in the presence of submucosal myoma. They found no significant changes in expression of these genes in presence of lyomyoma (7). Our study preformed on patients with intramural (liomyoma) and the results are agreed with Rackow and Taylor study. Rackow and Taylor also suggested that submucosal leiomyomas cause global changes in endometrial instead of local limited to the site of myoma (7). In our study endometrial tissue biopsies were performed randomly through part of endometrium. Although intramural myoma (with no change of endometrial cavity) were not associated with a significant change in HOXA10 and HOXA11 gene expression, a decreased endometrial HOXA10 mRNA and stromal protein expression was noted in this group as compared to control group (3, 7, 24).
The global effect of submucosal myomas on endometrial receptivity was proposed to be mediated by a diffusible signaling molecule that originates from the myoma. The authors suggested that the same signaling pathway might also exist from intramural leiomyomas to the endometrium. However, because of the greater distance and hence low concentration, this signaling molecule causes a less marked effect on markers of endometrial receptivity compared to that seen with submucosalmyomas (4).
In the current study myomectomy was performed for infertile women who had myoma (with average size 4.02±1.64× 6.04±1.44) with distorting the endometrial cavity and who had repeated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer failure over three or more cycles. Horcajadas et al using functional genomics of the endometrium during the window of implantation suggested that endometrial receptivity should not be affected by the presence of intramural leiomyomas not distorting the uterine cavity (24). In agreement with this study, both HOXA10 and HOXA11 genes expression were insignificantly increased in the endometrium after removal of myoma.
Although the increased expression level of these genes were not significant after 3 months. In our study the post-myomectomy endometrial biopsies were performed three months after operation in mid-menstrual cycle. This strategy was employed as the normalization of the endometrium has been accepted as happening after three cycles of continued treatment in certain disorders, such as dysfunctional uterine bleeding (25-26). Performing sequential monthly biopsies to determine the progressive change would have been ideal, but this was not possible due to ethical concerns.
 
Conclusion
 
This study provides evidence that removal of intramural leiomyomas not affecting the expression pattern of HOXA10 and HOXA11 endometrial genes.

Acknowledgments
 
We are most grateful to all the patients who kindly participated in the present study. This research was funded by vice chancellor for research and technology of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services.
 
Conflict of interest
 
The authors declare that there is not any conflict of interest.
 
 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Trolice MP, Amyradakis G. Biomarkers Related to Endometrial Receptivity and Implantation. In: Bin Wu. Advances in Embryo Transfer. InTech, Croatia; 2012: 207-224.
2. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 870-874. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53524-9]
3. Makker A, Goel MM. Uterine Leiomyomas: Effects on Architectural, Cellular, and Molecular Determinants of Endometrial Receptivity. Reprod Sci 2013; 20: 631-638. [DOI:10.1177/1933719112459221]
4. Wallach EE, Vlahos NF. Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 393-406. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000136079.62513.39]
5. Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate? Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1424-1430. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.6.1424]
6. Bernard G, Darai E, Poncelet C, Benifla J-L, Madelenat P. Fertility after hysteroscopic myomectomy: effect of intramural myomas associated. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 88: 85-90. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00123-2]
7. Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Submucosal uterine leiomyomas have a global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 2027-2034. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.029]
8. Riesewijk A, Martín J, Van Os R, Horcajadas JA, Polman J, Pellicer A, et al. Gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH+ 2 versus LH+ 7 by microarray technology. Mol Hum Reprod 2003; 9: 253-264. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/gag037]
9. Satokata I BG, Maas R. Sexually dimorphic sterility phenotypes in Hoxa10-deficient mice. Nature 1995; 374: 460-463. [DOI:10.1038/374460a0]
10. Taylor HS, Arici A, Olive D, Igarashi P. HOXA10 is expressed in response to sex steroids at the time of implantation in the human endometrium. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 1379-1384. [DOI:10.1172/JCI1597]
11. Taylor HS, Igarashi P, Olive DL, Arici A. Sex steroids mediate HOXA11 expression in the human peri-implantation endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84: 1129-1135. [DOI:10.1210/jc.84.3.1129]
12. Szczepańska M, Wirstlein P, Skrzypczak J. [HOXA11 gene expression in women with and without impaired infertility]. Ginekol Pol 2010; 81: 414-421. (In Polish)
13. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. A Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001; 25: 402-408. [DOI:10.1006/meth.2001.1262]
14. Richards PA, Richards PDG, Tiltman AJ. The ultrastructure of fibromyomatous myometrium and its relationship to infertility. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 520-525. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/4.5.520]
15. Olive DL, Pritts EA. Fibroids and reproduction. Semin Reprod Med 2010; 28: 218-227. [DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1251478]
16. Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 418-429. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep396]
17. Li TC, Mortimer R, Cooke ID. Myomectomy: a retrospective study to examine reproductive performance before and after surgery. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1735-1740. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.7.1735]
18. Lee B, Du H, Taylor HS. Experimental murine endometriosis induces DNA methylation and altered gene expression in eutopic endometrium. Biol Reprod 2009; 80: 79-85. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.108.070391]
19. Gendron RL, Paradis H, Hsieh-Li HM, Lee DW, Potter SS, Markoff E. Abnormal uterine stromal and glandular function associated with maternal reproductive defects in Hoxa-11 null mice. Biol Reprod 1997; 56: 1097-1105. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod56.5.1097]
20. Taylor HS. The role of HOX genes in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 75-79. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/6.1.75]
21. Kelly M, Daftary G, Taylor HS. An autoregulatory element maintains HOXA10 expression in endometrial epithelial cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1100-1107. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.025]
22. Daftary GS, Kayisli U, Seli E, Bukulmez O, Arici A, Taylor HS. Salpingectomy increases peri-implantation endometrial HOXA10 expression in women with hydrosalpinx. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 367-372. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.041]
23. Fischer CP, Kayisili U, Taylor HS. HOXA10 expression is decreased in endometrium of women with adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1133-1136. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.060]
24. Alizadeh Z, Shokrzadeh N, Saidijam M, Farimani Sanoee M. Semi-Quantitative Analysis of HOXA11, Leukemia Inhibitory Factor and Basic Transcriptional Element Binding Protein 1 mRNA Expression in the Mid-Secretory Endometrium of. Iran Biomed J 2011; 15: 66-72.
25. Shokrzadeh N, Saidijam M, Dehghan A, Mph FE-AMD, Bahmanzadeh M, Alizadeh Z. Semi-quantitative analysis of endometrial HOXA10 and BTEB1 mRNA expressions in the implantation window of patients with endometriosis and myoma. Tehran Univ Med J 2012; 69: 605-612.
26. Szczepańska M, Wirstlein P, Luczak M, Jagodzinski PP, Skrzypczak J. Expression of HOXA-10 and HOXA-11 in the endometria of women with idiopathic infertility. Folia Histochem et Cytobiol 2011; 49: 111-118. [DOI:10.5603/FHC.2011.0016]
27. Horcajadas JA, Goyri E, Higón MA, Martínez-Conejero JA, Gambadauro P, García G, et al. Endometrial receptivity and implantation are not affected by the presence of uterine intramural leiomyomas: a clinical and functional genomics analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 3490-3498. [DOI:10.1210/jc.2008-0565]
28. Seli E, Kayisli UA, Cakmak H, Bukulmez O, Bildirici I, Guzeloglu-Kayisli O, et al. Removal of hydrosalpinges increases endometrial leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) expression at the time of the implantation window. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3012-3017. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei188]
29. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb