یکشنبه 9 دی 1403
[Archive]
دوره 4، شماره 1 - ( 4-1385 )
جلد 4 شماره 1 صفحات 17-13 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dehghani Firoozabadi R, Klantar S M, Seyed-Hasani S M, Ghasemi N, Asgharnia M, Sheikhha M H. Cytogenetic analysis in couples with recurrent spontaneous abortion. IJRM 2006; 4 (1) :13-17
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-46-fa.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-46-fa.html
Cytogenetic analysis in couples with recurrent spontaneous abortion. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 1385; 4 (1) :13-17
چکیده: (3261 مشاهده)
Background: Recurrent abortion is a difficult medical problem happening in about 1-2% of fertile women. Most spontaneous miscarriages which happen in the first and second trimesters are caused by chromosomal abnormalities.
Objective: The present study tries to find the rate of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Materials and Methods: In total 165 couples were referred to genetic counselling clinic with a history of at least three previous abortions. In all women antibodies against toxsoplasmose, rubella and cytomegalovirus (CMV) were analysed by ELIZA. In 88 couples karyotyping was conducted by analysis of G and/or C banding. Metaphase spreads were made from phytohaemaglutinin-stimulated peripheral lymphocytes using standard cytogenetic techniques. The chromosomal status was analyzed using CytoVision Ultra ver.4.0 from Applied Imaging. The 2-test and ANOVA were used for statistical evaluation. The level of p<0.05 was considered as significance.
Results: Most of the patients had 3 repeated abortions (61.2%). Cytogenetic analysis performed for 88 couples and karyotypes of 12.5% of them were abnormal. The majority of them had monosomy X (6.82%), followed by balanced translocation (2.27%). The number of female carries chromosomal abnormality exceeded significantly than of male. Coefficient of inbreeding in more than 50% of couples had fifth degree of relationship (89 out of 165). Conclusion: Our results showed that 12.5% of the couples with missed abortion had an abnormal karyotype, with no other abnormality. Cytogenetic findings in spontaneous aborted specimens could provide valuable information for genetic counseling and prenatal care in future pregnancies in couples with a history of repeated pregnancy loss.
Objective: The present study tries to find the rate of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Materials and Methods: In total 165 couples were referred to genetic counselling clinic with a history of at least three previous abortions. In all women antibodies against toxsoplasmose, rubella and cytomegalovirus (CMV) were analysed by ELIZA. In 88 couples karyotyping was conducted by analysis of G and/or C banding. Metaphase spreads were made from phytohaemaglutinin-stimulated peripheral lymphocytes using standard cytogenetic techniques. The chromosomal status was analyzed using CytoVision Ultra ver.4.0 from Applied Imaging. The 2-test and ANOVA were used for statistical evaluation. The level of p<0.05 was considered as significance.
Results: Most of the patients had 3 repeated abortions (61.2%). Cytogenetic analysis performed for 88 couples and karyotypes of 12.5% of them were abnormal. The majority of them had monosomy X (6.82%), followed by balanced translocation (2.27%). The number of female carries chromosomal abnormality exceeded significantly than of male. Coefficient of inbreeding in more than 50% of couples had fifth degree of relationship (89 out of 165). Conclusion: Our results showed that 12.5% of the couples with missed abortion had an abnormal karyotype, with no other abnormality. Cytogenetic findings in spontaneous aborted specimens could provide valuable information for genetic counseling and prenatal care in future pregnancies in couples with a history of repeated pregnancy loss.
نوع مطالعه: Original Article |
فهرست منابع
1. Kavalier F. Investigation of recurrent miscarriages. BMJ 2005; 331: 121-122. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.331.7509.121]
2. Harper PS. "Endocrine and reproductive disorders": Practical genetic counselling. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 2003.
3. Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F, Rodrigo L, Pehlivan T, Remohi J. Pellicer A. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod 2003; 18(1): 182-188. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg015]
4. Rubio C, Pehlivan T, Rodrigo L, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Embryo aneuploidy screening for unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Am J Reprod Immunol 2005; 53(4): 159-165. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00260.x]
5. Hogge WA, Byrnes Al, Lanasa NC, Surti U. The clinical use of karyotypeing spontaneous abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189(2): 397-400. [DOI:10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00700-2]
6. Nybo-Andersen M, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ 2000;320: 1708-1712. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708]
7. Stein Z, Susser M. The risks of having children in later life. BMJ 2000 320: 1681-1682. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1681]
8. Hassold T, Chiu D. Maternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy. Hum Genet 1985;70: 11-17. [DOI:10.1007/BF00389450]
9. Cowchock FS, Gibas Z, Jackson LG. Chromosome errors as a cause of spontaneous abortion: the relative importance of maternal age and obstetric history. Fertil Steril 1993;59: 1101-1104. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55920-2]
10. Nybo-Andersen M Hansen D, Andersen K, Davey Smith G. Advanced Paternal Age and Risk of Fetal Death: A Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160(12): 1214 - 1222. [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwh332]
11. Pehlivan T, Rubio C, Vidal F, Minguez Y, Gimenez C, Egozcue J, et al. In vitro fertilization plus preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage: an analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 1999; 71(160): 1033-1039. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00143-0]
12. Morton NE, Chiu D, Holland C, Jacobs PA, Pettay D. Chromosome anomalies as predictors of recurrence risk for spontaneous abortion. Am J Med Genet 1987; 28(2):353-360. [DOI:10.1002/ajmg.1320280213]
13. Sullivan AE, Silver RM, La Coursiere DY, Porter TF, Branch DW. Recurrent fetal aneuploidy and recurrent miscarriage. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104(4): 784-788. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000137832.86727.e2]
14. Campana M, Serra A, Neri G. Role of chromosome aberrations in recurrent abortion: a study of 269 balanced translocations. Am J Med Genet 1986; 24(2): 341-356. [DOI:10.1002/ajmg.1320240214]
15. Castle D, Bernstein R. Cytogenetic analysis of 688 couples experiencing multiple spontaneous abortions. Am J Med Genet 1988; 29(3): 549-556. [DOI:10.1002/ajmg.1320290312]
16. Egozcue J, Blanco J, Antin E, Egozcue S, Sarrate Z, Vidal F. Genetic analysis of sperm and implications of severe male infertility. Placenta 2003; 24 (Suppl B): 62-65. [DOI:10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00186-3]
17. Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage; definition and epidemiology. Lancet 1990; 336: 673-675. [DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(90)92159-F]
18. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The investigation and treatment of recurrent miscarriage. Guideline No 17. London: RCOG Press, 2003.
19. Al-Hassan S, Hellani A, Al-Shahrani A, Al-Deery M, Jaroudi K, Coskun S. Sperm chromosomal abnormalities in patients with unexplained recurrent abortions. Arch Androl 2005; 51(1): 69-76. [DOI:10.1080/014850190518062]
20. Mitelman F. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN). Kareger, Basel. Switzerland. 1995.
21. Wuu KD, Chiu PC, Li SY, Chen JY, Chao MC, Ko FJ, et al. Chromosomal and biochemical screening on mentally retarded school children in Taiwan. Jinrui Idengaku Zasshi 1991; 36(3): 267-274. [DOI:10.1007/BF01910545]
22. Stephenson MD, Awartani KA, Robinson WP. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriage from couples with recurrent abortions: a case-control study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 446-451. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.2.446]
23. Kahraman S, Benkhalifa M, Donmez E, Biricik A, Sertyel S, Findikli N, Berkil H. The results of aneuploidy screening in 276 couples undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24(4): 307-311. [DOI:10.1002/pd.842]
24. Caglar GS, Asimakopoulos B, Nikolettos N, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in repeated implantation failure. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 10(3): 381-388. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61800-7]
25. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Gadea L, Benet J, Wells D, Munne S, Navarro J. Aneuploidy 12 in a Robertsonian (13;14) carrier: case report. Hum Reprod 2005; 20(5): 1256-1260. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh751]
26. Jaber L, Halpern GJ, Shohat M. The Impact of consanguinity worldwide. Community Genet 1998; 1(1): 12-17. [DOI:10.1159/000016130]
27. Ohno M, Maeda T, Funato T, Yabe N, Matsunobu A, Yoshihara K. Cytogenetic studies in couples with repeated spontaneous abortions. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 1989; 41(9): 1387-1393.
28. Donbak L. Consanguinity in Kahramanmaras city, turkey, and its medical impact. Saudi Med J 2004; 25(12): 1991-1994. [DOI:10.14507/epaa.v12n28.2004]
29. Saad FA, Jauniaux E. Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity. Reprod Biomed Online 2002; 5(2): 167-170. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61620-3]
30. Rai R, Cohen H, Dave M, Regan L. Randomised controlled trial of aspirin and aspirin plus heparin in pregnant women with recurrent miscarriage associated with phospholipid antibodies (or antiphospholipid antibodies). BMJ 1997;314: 253. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.314.7076.253]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
