Volume 12, Issue 1 (2-2014)                   IJRM 2014, 12(1): 19-28 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fath Bayati L, Ghaffari Novin M, Fadaei Fathabadi F, Piryaei A, Heidari M H, Bandehpour M, et al . Association between increased expression of endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase in the human fallopian tube and tubal ectopic pregnancy. IJRM 2014; 12 (1) :19-28
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-478-en.html
1- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , mghaffarin@yahoo.com
3- Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Pathology, Kamkar Arab-Niya Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 576 kb]   (653 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2767 Views)
Full-Text:   (415 Views)
Introduction
 
Ectopic pregnancy (EP), the implantation of a fertilized ovum outside the endometrial lining of uterine cavity, accounts for leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women reproductive-age (1-4). It accounts for 1.5-2% of all pregnancies in the western world and more than 95% of EP occurs in the fallopian tubes (FTs), mainly in the ampulla region (5, 6). The etiological causes for EP include damage to the fallopian tube due to previous tubal surgery, pelvic inflammatory disease, cigarette smoking, assisted reproductive technology, endometriosis and history of EP (1, 7-11). Maintaining of embryo within the fallopian tube as a result of improper transport and deleterious tubal alteration can lead to tubal ectopic pregnancy (tEP) (12). Successful tubal transport of gametes and blastocyst is substantial for fertilization, early embryo development, and intrauterine pregnancy. Effective transportation within the tube is obtained by interactions between muscle contractions; ciliary beating and factors that secreted by fallopian tube (13).
Ovarian hormones and other factors produced by the fallopian tube, such as prostaglandins, Nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin and cAMP may also regulate muscle contraction and play significant role in embryo transport (14-21). Also, transport of embryo within the fallopian tube is influenced by ciliary beats which is regulated by factors such as sex steroid hormones and IL-6 (22-24). Results of the previous studies demonstrated that ovarian follicular fluid contains factors that could affect ciliary beating in the fallopian tube during ovulation period (25).
Findings of previous study shown that NO could affect the contraction of fallopian tube smooth muscle and ciliary beat frequency in epithelial cells of airway via cyclic guanosine mono phosphate (cGMP) pathway (17, 18, 26, 27). Others reported that endothelin, a potent contracting factor are produced by bovine oviduct and is able to induce contraction of oviduct (28-30). They also demonstrated that the contractile properties of endothelin-1 on bovine oviducts are enhanced by the presence of N-monomethyl-L-arginine mono acetate (L-NMMA), an inhibitor of NO synthesis. These findings provided the first indirect evidence for endogenous synthesis of NO within the oviduct (30).
NO is a free radical that is produced from L-arginine in the process of its conversion to L-citrullin by the action of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzyme, an enzyme existing in three isoforms (31). Neuronal NOS (nNOS or NOS1) and endothelial NOS (eNOS or NOS3), also referred to as constitutive NOS (cNOS), are responsible for the continuous basal release of NO and both require calcium/ calmodulin for activation (32, 33). Third isoform of NOS is an inducible calcium-independent form (iNOS or NOS2) that is expressed only in response to inflammatory cytokines and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (34, 35). The three isoforms of NOS are products of separate genes that share 50-60% amino acid homology (36).
NO has different physiological activity, including regulation of vascular resistance, contribution in cellular injury, and signal transduction (37-39). NO is a double-edged sword. At low concentration, it alters intracellular Ca2+ levels and induces smooth muscle relaxation (40). But at high concentration, it can lead to immune reaction and tissue damage (41). NO has an important role in smooth muscle relaxation and ciliary activity so has attracted many researches focusing on these fields (38, 23). In fallopian tube impaired ciliary beating and smooth muscle cells contractions may lead to infertility or tubal implantation of blastocyst and the development of EP (13). As mentioned above, production of NO by the human fallopian tube has been previously reported, and effect of this messenger molecule on relaxation of tubal smooth muscle cells was documented (17, 42, 43). Also, in a recent study, iNOS mRNA and protein levels were shown to be greater in the fallopian tube of women with tEP compared with pseudo pregnant women (44).
In the present study, we investigated the expression of eNOS in different group, because eNOS is the main isoform of NOS expressed in the oviduct (27). Our study investigated that whether the fallopian tubes bearing an EP differed from normal tubal tissues in expression of eNOS. As mentioned in previous studies human Fallopian tube is the most frequent site for EP. We hypothesized that regulation of eNOS may be altered in the process of EP, and this can be considered as one of potential causes of inability to successful pregnancy.
 
Materials and methods
 
All techniques, methods and selection of patients were approved by ethical committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Tissue was obtained from patients at Vali-e-asr and Izadi Hospitals in Qom, Iran. The patients were informed in detail about the study and written consent was obtained from each case. Time of sample collection lasted from August 2011 to March 2012.
 
Sample collection and preparation of sections
In this case control study, immune histochemical localization of eNOS were assessed in FTs of women in three groups including, FTs of women bearing an EP (n=10), FTs of women in luteal phase of menstrual cycle (n=10) and FTs of healthy pregnant women (n=10).
 
Case Group
The ectopic pregnancy group (n=10) consisted of women (29.00±3.70 years, range 24-35 and average estimated gestational age calculated from the last menstrual period (LMP) was 5.66±2.55 weeks: data shown at mean±SE) that bearing an ectopic pregnancy. Salpingectomy in this group was performed on clinical management ground. All participants conceived spontaneously and were not taking exogenous progesterone. We excluded cases in which the EP was due to reflux after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Also we excluded the women who were cigarette smoker or have prior history of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
 
Control Group
The luteal phase group (n=10) consisted of women that were at luteal phase of menstrual cycle (38.33 ± 6.63 years, range 28-49 years) who presented for total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) due to benign disease that not affected the fallopian tubes. All women at luteal phase group who donated FTs had regular menstrual cycles and we excluded the women that had evidence of active infection or tubal disorders (44).
The healthy pregnant group (n=10) consisted of women (35.16±4.04 years, range 28-40 years) that were undergoing elective caesarean section (CS) at the time of labour. For this group tubal ligation was performed during CS because they will intend to prevent of pregnancy in the future. So, we collected the FTs samples of these women without any problems and according to their written consent. If women had a tubal disorders, or evidence of active infection, or following induction of labor, they were excluded from the study. We chose healthy pregnant women at term (>37 weeks’ gestation) and non-pregnant women at luteal phase of menstrual cycle as a control group.
Women who bore an EP were chosen as a case group. In this study, the ampullary region of the excised tubes from the three groups was identified and a small section was cut from each region. For the case group, the FTs were excised at least 1cm away from the implantation site to avoid collecting any embryonic or trophoblastic tissue (44). Then samples were washed in 0.1 mol/L phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times and were immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin for immunohistochemistry evaluation.
 
Immunohistochemistry
After fixation, tissues were embedded in paraffin and later cut into 3 μm sections and placed on poly-L Lysine coated slides. Immuno histochemical protocol (horse-radish-peroxidase) was used to visualize the intensity and distribution of eNOS immune staining between three groups. A polyclonal rabbit antihuman antibody was used to detect eNOS (ABcam Company, UK). Paraffin-embedded tubal tissue sections (3 μm) were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in ethanol series (100%, 96%, and 80%). Antigen retrieval was performed in a microwave in 10 mmol/L citric acid buffer, pH 6.0, for 14 minutes.
Slides were allowed to be cool at room temperature and were washed three times in PBS before being incubated with methanol-H2O2 (96:4, v/v) for 15 minutes to inhibit endogenous peroxidase. The slides were then exposed to1.5% normal gaot serum (DAKO Co, Denmark) in humidified chambers for 30 minutes at room temperature to avoid unspecific bindings of antibody.
The primary antibody against eNOS (1:100) was placed on slides and incubated at 37oC for 1h. After rinsing for several times with buffer (0.1 M of phosphate-buffered saline with a pH of 7.4), the sections were incubated with the secondary antibody, a goat anti rabbit IgG (AB cam Co., UK) diluted 1:1000 in PBS. Incubation with the secondary antibody was performed for 1h at 37oC in incubator. Then, 3,3-diaminobenzidine in H2O2 (DAKO Co., Denmark) was added to the sections for 15 minutes. Thereafter, the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted. To validate the specificity of the immune staining, the positive and negative controls were carried out. We used human full term placenta tissue as external positive control (38, 39, 45).
For negative controls, slides were incubated similarly to above protocol, but phosphate-buffered saline replaced the primary antibody. Immuno histochemical staining was evaluated by two independent persons using a light microscope at ×40 and ×400 magnifications. The persons were blinded to the source of tissue, and they agreed on the intensity of staining according to the following semi quantitative scale that reported in the previous studies (43, 44). 0= negative; 1= equivocally positive; 2-4= weakly positive; 5-7= positive; 8-10= strongly positive. The average of these observations was recorded as the final results of study. The results were expressed as percentage optical density (39).

Statistical analysis
Data was processed by SPSS 14 Software (SPSS/PC- 14). The data were expressed as Mean±SE which was used for ANOVA analysis and Tukey post Hoc test. The p<0.05 was considered statistically significant
 
Results
 
Immunohistochemistry of eNOS
The demographics of the three groups of women studied are shown in Table I. The mean age of EP group was 29.00±3.70 years that was lower than other groups (Luteal phase group with mean age of 38.33±6.63 and healthy pregnant group with mean age of 35.16±4.04). Because previous studies did not demonstrate the age of women as the risk factors of EP, we didn’t estimate the age as potential effector on the results of this study (1-6, 8).
Women at luteal phase and healthy pregnant groups decided not to have childbearing in the future, this is naturally that why the EP group had mean age lower than other groups. A positive control for eNOS staining consisted of human placenta in which eNOS was consistently detected (Figure 1A). Placenta tissues that incubated in PBS in the absence of primary antibody (negative control) showed no staining for eNOS antibody (Figure 1B).
Positive eNOS antibody staining was observed in all tissue samples from three groups, including EP (Figure 1 C, 1D), luteal phase (Figure 1E, 1F) and healthy pregnant groups (Figure 1G, 1H). Our studies showed that (in three groups) special cells such as ciliated and secretory cells of luminal epithelium and endothelial lining of blood vessels had positive staining for antibody to eNOS. eNOS antibody strongly labeled the entire part of the epithelial cells. Also, our data showed that endothelial wall of blood vessels had positive staining for eNOS in all groups (Table II, Figure1). We did not observe any differences in expression of eNOS in endothelium of blood vessels between three groups.
No staining was detected in the smooth muscle cells of FT sections from all of groups. All of the epithelial cells were stained in three groups. Although, expression of eNOS in luminal epithelium of FT samples from EP group was higher in comparison with luteal phase and healthy pregnant groups. According to these data, differences between EP group and luteal phase group (p=0.00) and healthy pregnant group (p=0.00) was statistically significant (Figure 2). Significant differences were not seen in immuno staining between the luteal phase and healthy pregnant groups (p=0.78) in expression of eNOS (Figure 2).


Table I. Demographic characteristic of the study population



Table II. Intensity of immune-histochemical localization of eNOS protein in the FTs of three groups of women



Table III. Multiple Comparisons between groups in immunostaining of eNOS in luminal epithelium (Tukey HSD)



Figure 1. (A) Immunohistochemical localization of eNOS enzyme in Human placenta that was used as a positive control. (B) shows staining of placenta tissue without using primary antibody (negative control). Immunohistochemical localization of eNOS enzyme in the ampullary regions of human fallopian tube sections collected from ectopic pregnancy (C and D), luteal phase group (E and F) and healthy pregnant group (G and H). Blank arrows denote the strong immunostaining in the luminal epithelium and red arrows denote to endothelial lining of blood vessels. (A and B were taken at ×10 magnification. D, E, F and G were taken at ×40 magnification. C and H taken at ×10 magnification.



Figure 2. eNOS protein expression by image analysis in luminal epithelium areas of fallopian tubes in ectopic pregnancy group compared with healthy pregnant and luteal phase groups. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and *p<0.05.
Multiple Comparisons between groups in immunostaining of eNOS (Tukey HSD):
P (EP/ Luteal phase)= 0.00                     P (EP/ Healthy pregnant)= 0.00                              P (luteal phase/ Healthy pregnant)= 0.78
P significant differences (p<0.05) between EP/ Luteal phase group
P significant differences (p<0.05) between EP/ Healthy pregnant group


Discussion
 
Nitric oxide as a paracrine molecule regulates many physiological processes that occur in female reproductive system including: hormonal secretion, cervical repening, uterine relaxation and oviduct motility (17, 46). Because these functions are linked to the biology and physiology of various reproductive processes, several studies focused on the mechanism of NO regulation in the different organs of the reproductive system (47, 48). The present work was designed to investigate the existence and distribution of endothelial isoform of NOS in the ampullary sections from FTs samples of different groups of women. Results of this study showed that eNOS express in human FTs tissue of three groups: women with EP, non-pregnant women at luteal phase of menstrual cycle and healthy pregnant women at term. This finding is in accordance with previous studies of eNOS expression in human FT (42, 49).
In this study, changes in expression of eNOS were found in the ciliated and secretory cells of luminal epithelium, where the most changes were in ectopic pregnancy group compared with luteal phase and healthy pregnant groups. This is the first study that shows an increase in the eNOS expression within the human fallopian tube bearing an ectopic pregnancy. We were interested in endothelial isoform of NOS because this isoform of NOS plays an important role in signal transduction associated with ciliary functions (27).
Also, findings of previous studies have shown that eNOS is the main isoform of NOS expressed in the animal’s oviduct. So, they suggested that NO plays an important role in the regulation of oviduct functions (50). NO produced by NOS activity is essential factor in the regulation of smooth muscle cell tone, platelet aggregation, cell growth, apoptosis, neurotransmission and infection-induced immune reactions (51). NO is involved in normal pre-implantation embryo development but uncontrolled synthesis of this molecule could impair the development of embryo (52-54). The significant of NO has been linked to essential fallopian tube functions. The first evidence for the presence, as well as a physiological role of NO in regulating of oviduct contraction, was demonstrated in the bovine oviduct (30).
Results of the previous studies demonstrated that administration of NO donors could decrease the contractility of the human fallopian tube (42). These findings emphasizes on the critical role of this signaling molecule on the human fallopian tube function. In addition, administration of NO inhibitors such as N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) causes to increase the contraction strength of smooth muscle of oviduct (17, 30).
Also, other studies showed that estrogen and progesterone could regulate the production of NO and these sex steroid hormones increase synthesis of NO (46, 55). It has been shown that NO induces relaxation of fallopian tube smooth muscle and ciliary beat frequency in the airway epithelial cells via cGMP pathway (17, 18, 26). Also, another study showed that eNOS is expressed in all of ciliated tissues of rat (27). So, consider to these data, researchers suggest that NO may control ciliary activity by NO-cGMP signaling pathway (26). The previous study hypothesized that high concentrations of NO in fallopian tube may have cytotoxic effects on cells that consequently lead to deleterious alterations of tubal tissue and development of ectopic pregnancy (56, 57).
In the present study, high levels of luminal eNOS protein expression in ectopic pregnancy group support the importance of this enzyme for transport of the gametes and blastocyst within the fallopian tube and it’s over expression as a possible cause of ectopic implantation in these patients. The present study did not show any differences in endothelial micro vascular of eNOS concentrations in fallopian tubes tissue between all groups, suggesting that existence of eNOS in endothelial wall of blood vessels is not a essential factor in the pathogenesis of ectopic pregnancy.
In this study we did not observe the expression of eNOS in smooth muscle cells of fallopian tube. Hence, we can suggest that NO produced by eNOS in luminal epithelium is very important in ciliary beat frequency and consequently over expression of eNOS may affect the transport of gametes or blastocyst within the fallopian tube and may lead to ectopic pregnancy. These results do not deny the paracrine effect of NO produced by luminal epithelial cells and endothelial lining of the vascular bed that affect the underlying smooth muscle layer. This finding is consistent with previous studies (58). So contraction decrease may lead to decrease the movement of blastocyst and ectopic implantation.
Though, eNOS expression in moderate amounts is essential for ciliary beating and smooth muscle contraction, but over expression of eNOS and consequently high concentration of NO in the fallopian tubes of patients with ectopic pregnancy may have cytotoxic effects on tissue and could change the ciliary activity and smooth muscle cell contraction, which could result in maintaining of the gamete or blastocyst within the fallopian tube and development of EP.
In summary, this is the first study that demonstrated the high levels of eNOS expression in FTs of ectopic pregnancy group compared with non-pregnant women at luteal phase of menstrual cycle and healthy pregnant groups. Based on our findings, it could be argued that basal generation of NO by epithelial cells may contribute significantly to the contraction and relaxation of the fallopian tube and hence actively participate in the process of gamete or blastocyst transport. Moreover, impairment of eNOS expression due to pathological factors may decrease ciliary activity and reduce contraction of smooth muscle of the fallopian tube and consequently affect the transport blastocyst through the tube which may lead to ectopic pregnancy.
 
Acknowledgments
 
This article is funded by cellular and molecular biology research center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. The authors would like to appreciate all experts who participate in this study in particular our friends in Qom University of medical sciences.
 
Conflict of interest
 
The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the relevant research and the present article.
 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Seeber BE, Barnhart KT. Suspected Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 399- 413. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000198632.15229.be]
2. Al Azemi M, Refaat B, Aplin J, Ledger W. The expression of MUC1 in human Fallopian tube during the menstrual cycle and in ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2582-2587. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep233]
3. Brown JK, Horne AW. Laboratory models for studying ectopic pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 23: 221-226. [DOI:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283481212]
4. Shaw JL, Fitch P, Cartwright J, Entrican G, Schwarze J, Critchley HO, et al. Lymphoid and myeloid cell populations in the non-pregnant human Fallopian tube and in ectopic pregnancy. J Reprod Immunol 2011; 89: 84-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.jri.2011.01.014]
5. Barnhart KT. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 379-387. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMcp0810384]
6. Refaat B, Amer S, Ola B, Chapman N, Ledger W. The expression of activin-beta A- and -beta B-subunits, follistatin, and activin type ll receptors in Fallopian tubes bearing an ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 293-299. [DOI:10.1210/jc.2007-1654]
7. Pisarska MD, Carson SA, Buster JE. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1998; 351: 1115-1120. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11476-3]
8. Tay JI, Moore J, Walker JJ. Ectopic pregnancy. BMJ 2000; 320: 916-919. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.320.7239.916]
9. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly JL, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 185-194. [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwf190]
10. Varma R, Gupta J. Tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Evid (Online) 2009; Pii: 1406.
11. Shao R. Understanding the mechanisms of human tubal ectopic pregnancies: new evidence from knockout mouse models. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 584-587. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep438]
12. Shaw JL, Dey SK, Critchley HO, Horne AW. Current knowledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 432- 444. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmp057]
13. Lyons RA, Saridogan E, Djahanbakhch O. The reproductive significance of human Fallopian tube cilia. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12: 363-372. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml012]
14. Ziganshin AU, Vafina ZR, Fatkullin IF. Pharmacological characterization of P2-receptors in human fallopian tubes. Bull Exp Biol Med 2004; 137: 242-245. [DOI:10.1023/B:BEBM.0000031559.93848.07]
15. Wanggren K, Lalitkumar PG, Stavreus-Evers A, Stabi B, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Prostaglandin E2 and F2alpha receptors in the human Fallopian tube before and after mifepristone treatment. Mol Hum Reprod 2006; 12: 577-585. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/gal058]
16. Wanggren K, Stavreus-Evers A, Olsson C, Andersson E, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Regulation of muscular contractions in the human Fallopian tube through prostaglandins and progestagens. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2359-2368. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/den260]
17. Ekerhovd E, Brannstrom M, Alexandersson M, Norstrom A. Evidence for nitric oxide mediation of contractile activity in isolated strips of the human Fallopian tube. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 301-305. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.2.301]
18. Ekerhovd E, Norstrom A. Involvement of a nitric oxide-cyclic guanosinemonophosphate pathway in control of fallopian tube contractility. Gynecol Endocrinol 2004; 19: 239-246. [DOI:10.1080/09513590400019296]
19. Arbab F, Goldsby J, Matijevic-Aleksic N, Huang G, Ruan KH, Huang JC. Prostacyclin is an autocrine regulator in the contraction of oviductal smooth muscle. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3053-3059. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.12.3053]
20. Lindblom B, Hamberger L, Ljung B. Contractile patterns of isolated oviductal smooth muscle under different hormonal conditions. Fertil Steril 1980; 33: 283-287. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)44595-4]
21. Lindblom B, Hamberger L, Wiqvist N. Differentiated contractile effects of prostaglandins E and F on the isolated circular and longitudinal smooth muscle of the human oviduct. Fertil Steril 1978; 30: 553-559. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)43637-X]
22. Jansen RP. Endocrine response in the fallopian tube. Endocr Rev 1984; 5: 525-551. [DOI:10.1210/edrv-5-4-525]
23. Paltieli Y, Eibschitz I, Ziskind G, Ohel G, Silbermann M, Weichselbaum A. High progesterone levels and ciliary dysfunction-a possible cause of ectopic pregnancy. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000; 17: 103-106. [DOI:10.1023/A:1009465900824]
24. Papathanasiou A, Djahanbakhch O, Saridogan E, Lyons RA. The effect of interleukin-6 on ciliary beat frequency in the human fallopian tube. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 391-394. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1379]
25. Lyons RA, Saridogan E, Djahanbakhch O. The reproductive significance of human Fallopian tube cilia. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12: 363- 372. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml012]
26. Li D, Shirakami G, Zhan X, Johns RA. Regulation of ciliary beat frequency by the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling pathway in rat airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2000; 23: 175-181. [DOI:10.1165/ajrcmb.23.2.4022]
27. Zhan X, Li D, Johns RA. Expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in ciliated epithelia of rats. J Histochem Cytochem 2003; 51: 81-87. [DOI:10.1177/002215540305100110]
28. Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, et al. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature 1991; 332: 411-415. [DOI:10.1038/332411a0]
29. Rosselli M, Imthurn B, Macas E, Keller PJ. Endothelin production by bovine oviduct epithelial cells. J Reprod Fertil 1994a; 101: 27-30. [DOI:10.1530/jrf.0.1010027]
30. Rosselli M, Imthurn B, Macas E, Keller PJ, Dubey RK. Endogenous nitricoxide modulates endothelin-1 induced contraction of bovine oviduct. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994b; 201: 143-148. [DOI:10.1006/bbrc.1994.1680]
31. Moncada S, Higgs A. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 2002- 2012. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM199312303292706]
32. Griffith OW, Stuehr DJ. Nitric oxide synthase properties and catalytic mechanism. Annu Rev Physiol 1995; 57: 707-736. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.003423]
33. Snyder SH. Nitric oxide: NO endothelial NO. Nature 1995; 377: 196-197. [DOI:10.1038/377196a0]
34. Nussler AK, Billiar TR, Liu ZZ, Morris SM Jr. Coinduction of nitric oxide synthase and arginosuccinate synthetase in a murine macrophage cell line. Implications for regulation of nitric oxide production. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 1257-1261.
35. Morris SM Jr, Billiar TR. New insights into the regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthesis. Am J Physiol 1994; 266: E829-E839. [DOI:10.1152/ajpendo.1994.266.6.E829]
36. Nathan C, Xie QW. Regulation of biosynthesis of nitric oxide. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 13275- 13278.
37. Marletta MA. Nitric oxide: biosynthesis and biological significance. Trends Biochem Sci 1989; 14: 488-492. [DOI:10.1016/0968-0004(89)90181-3]
38. Najafi T, Gaffari Novin M, Pakravesh J, Foghi Kh, Fadayi F. Immunohistochemica localization of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in endometrial tissue of women with unexplained infertility. Iran J Reprod Med 2012; 10: 121-126.
39. Najafi T, Gaffari Novin M, Ghazi R, Khorram O. Altered endometrial expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage and infertility. Reprod BioMed Online 2012; 25: 408-414. [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.004]
40. Telfer JF, Lyall F, Norman JE, Cameron IT. Identification of nitric oxide synthase in human uterus. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 19-23. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/10.1.19]
41. Shao R, Zhang SX, Weijdegård B, Zou S, Egecioglu E, Norström A, et al. Nitric oxide synthases and tubal ectopic pregnancies induced by Chlamydia infection: basic and clinical insights. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 16: 907-915. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/gaq063]
42. Ekerhovd E, Brannstrom M, Weijdegard B, Norstrom A. Localization of nitric oxide synthase and effects of nitric oxide donors on the human Fallopian tube. Mol Hum Reprod 1999; 5: 1040-1047. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/5.11.1040]
43. Refaat B, Simpson H, Britton E, Biswas J, Wells M, Aplin JD, et al. Why does the fallopian tube fail in ectopic pregnancy? The role of activins, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and MUC1 in ectopic implantation. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 1115-1123. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.035]
44. Al-Azemi M, Refaat B, Amer S, Ola B, Chapman N, Ledger W. The expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the human fallopiantube during the menstrual cycle and in ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 833-840. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.020]
45. Foghi Kh, Gaffari Novin M, Madjd Jabbari Z, Najafi T, Heidari M, Rostampour Yasoori A. Immuno-histochemical localization of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in testicular cells of men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Iran J Reprod Med 2011; 9: 277-280.
46. Lapointe J, Roy M, St-Pierre I, Kimmins S, Gauvreau D, MacLaren LA, et al. Hormonal and spatial regulation of nitricoxide synthases (NOS) (neuronal NOS, inducible NOS, and endothelial NOS) in the oviducts. Endocrinology 2006; 147: 5600- 5610. [DOI:10.1210/en.2005-1548]
47. Sikka SC. Relative impact of oxidative stress on male reproductive function. Curr Med Chem 2001; 8: 851-862. [DOI:10.2174/0929867013373039]
48. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2005; 3: 28. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-3-28]
49. Rosselli M, Dubey RK, Rosselli MA, Macas E, Fink D, Lauper U, et al. Identification of nitric oxide synthase in human and bovine oviduct. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2: 607-612. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/2.8.607]
50. Gawronska B, Bodek G, Ziecik AJ. Distribution of NADPH-diaphorase and nitric oxidesynthase (NOS) in different regions of porcine oviduct during the estrous cycle. J Histochem Cytochem 2000; 48: 867-875. [DOI:10.1177/002215540004800615]
51. Afanas'ev IB. Signaling functions of free radicals superoxide & nitric oxide under physiological & pathological conditions. Mol Biotechnol 2007; 37: 2-4. [DOI:10.1007/s12033-007-0056-7]
52. Manser RC, Leese HJ, Houghton FD. Effect of inhibiting nitric oxide production on mouse pre-implantation embryo development and metabolism Biol Reprod 2004; 71: 528-533. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.103.025742]
53. Tranguch S, Steuerwald N, Huet-Hudson YM. Nitric oxide synthase production and nitric oxide regulation of preimplantation embryo development. Biol Reprod 2003; 68: 1538-1544. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.102.009282]
54. Chen HW, Jiang WS, Tzeng CR. Nitric oxide as a regulator in pre-implantation embryo development and apoptosis. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 1163-1171. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01780-0]
55. Panzica GC, Viglietti-Panzica C, Sica M, Gotti S, Martini M, Pinos H, et al. Effects of gonadal hormones on central nitric oxide producing systems. Neurosci 2006; 138: 987-995. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.052]
56. Moncada S, Higgs EA. Endogenous nitric oxide: physiology, pathology and clinical relevance. Eur J Clin Invest 1991; 21: 361-374. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2362.1991.tb01383.x]
57. Moncada S, Palmer RM, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 1991; 43: 109-142.
58. Perez Martinez S, Viggiano M, Franchi AM, Herrero MB, Ortiz ME, Gimeno MF, et al. Effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on ovum transport and oviductal smooth muscle activity in the rat oviduct. J Reprod Fertil 2000; 118: 111-117.

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb