Volume 12, Issue 5 (6-2014)                   IJRM 2014, 12(5): 357-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Baghbani F, Mirzaee S, Hassanzadeh-Nazarabadi M. Association of heteromorphism of chromosome 9 and recurrent abortion (ultrasound diagnosed blighted ovum): A case report. IJRM 2014; 12 (5) :357-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-536-en.html
1- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Pardis Campus, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Pardis Campus, Mashhad, Iran , nazarabadim@mums.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 260 kb]   (673 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (5135 Views)
Full-Text:   (730 Views)
Introduction
 
Blighted ovum, also known as anembryonic pregnancy, may lead to cause of early miscarriage at very early in the first trimester of pregnancy (1, 2). The main characterization of an anembryonic gestation is a normal-appearing gestational sac, but the absence of an embryo (1). This is most likely to happen as a result of early embryonic death with continued development of the trophoblast (2). Three main reasons in relation to blighted ovum might be suspected; chromosomal abnormality, abnormal cell division, as well as poor quality of the sperm or the egg which might be resulted in chromosomal abnormalities leading to the cause of blighted ovum (3, 4). It has been reported that; One third of the products of conception from spontaneous abortion occurring at or before 8 weeks of gestation are blighted ovum (5, 6).
Overall, chromosomal aberrations are the cause of 50% of first trimester spontaneous abortions (7). The most frequent structural chromosome abnormalities in recurrent miscarriage are translocations (reciprocal translocation (62%), robertsonian translocation (16%), inversions (16%) and deletions and duplications (3%) (8). Among the human chromosomes, chromosome no. 9 occurs as a common structural variant which are commonly found in cytogenetic reports and can be observed in 6-8% in the general population (5, 9).
There are some evidences which claim that, there might be potential adverse effects of heteromorphic morphology of chromosome no. 9 and reproductive ability. Until now, the role of any clinical significance of such structural heteromorphism or polymorphism or what is known as heteromorphism which is not thought to has any functional importance is not well understood, but there are some evidences which claim that, there might be a potential adverse effects of heteromorphic morphology of chromosome no.9 and reproductive ability (8).
 
Case report
 
In this study we report a history of habitual miscarriages of a couple with unknown etiology. The 30-year-old man and 27-year-old woman who had consanguineous marriage with no history of normal gestation and have had four recurrent spontaneous abortions which diagnosed blighted ovum at 8-10 weeks of gestation. The family pedigree is shown in (Figure 1).
They were initially referred to the infertility center for searching the cause of such pregnancy complication. Hormonal, immunological and anatomical factors of uterus were normal and the partner particularly mother had no underlying disease related to such complication. After obtaining informed consent, chromosomal investigation was performed on the basis of G-banding technique at high resolution. The results showed similar heteromorphism of chromosome no.9 at the same location in both partner [46, XX (9p11-q13) and 46, XY (9p11-q13)] with normal phenotypes (Figure 2, 3).




Figure 1. Family pedigree with heteromorphism of Chromosome 9.



Figure 2. Chromosomal constitution; 46, XX (9p11-q13)



Figure 3. Chromosomal constitution; 46, XY (9p11-q13)


Discussion
 
Fetal chromosomal abnormalities are the most common case of spontaneous abortion. According to the recent studies chromosomal abnormalities are responsible for 50% of the first trimester spontaneous miscarriage; most of them about 86% are numerical whereas structural and other unknown genetic disorders are 6% and 8% respectively (7). However the most common structural abnormality in couple with experience of recurrent abortion is balanced rearrangement (10). A blighted ovum is characterized through of ultrasound examination by the absence of embryo in the gestation sac (an embryonic pregnancy). One-third of the products of conception from spontaneous abortion occurring at or before 8 weeks of gestation are blighted ovum or an embryonic pregnancy (6).
Most chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo occur de novo. Rarely these defects are inherited as a consequence of parental karyotype such as balanced translocations. Recent study claimed that, the most common structural abnormalities in couple with experiences of recurrent abortion are; reciprocal translocation (62%), robertsonian translocation (16%) whereas pericentric and paracentric inversion are 16% and 3% for other structural chromosome abnormalities (11). Among the human chromosome, chromosome no.9 appears with the high frequency of structural heteromorphism, which is a natural variation that occur 1-2% among the individuals in the general population and transmitted through family as mendelian trait (8).
Molecular studies suggested that the structural organization of chromosome no.9 makes it apparently prone to breakage and may be associated with a higher incidence of observed aberrant morphology of this chromosome (12, 13). The risk of miscarriage in the carriers depends on the affected chromosomal region (14). Since chromosomal heteromorphism is considered as balanced chromosomal rearrangements and may not cause clinical feature in carriers, unless polymorphic region has adverse effect on miotic events or chromosome breakpoint occurs within specific regulatory or structural region of gene which affects gene expression, however other studies claimed that there is an association dose exist between structural morphology and some clinical phenotypes (10).
Therefore parental chromosomal analysis is important for appropriate genetic counseling in relation to an embryonic pregnancy (15, 20). Although several authors showed no any evidence between parental chromosome rearrangements as risk factor of blighted ovum, nevertheless a number of recent studies, focused on the increased prevalence of some structural abnormalities of chromosomes in couple with history of an embryonic pregnancy in comparison with the general population (18, 21). Based on the study observations, it seems that the location of heteromorphic region may be interfere with such meiotic events like the phenomenon of crossing over or miotic segregation of fertilized egg that finally leads to development of fertilized eggs with chromosomal abnormalities and produce abnormal embryo (anembryonic pregnancy).
 
Conclusion
 
In conclusion further investigation will be suggested in couples with the history of blighted ovum pregnancy and chromosome no.9 heteromorphic in order to postulate a correlation between heteromomorphism (chromosome no. 9) and an embryonic pregnancy.
 
Acknowledgments
 
We would like to express our appreciation to Mrs. Rabbani and Hassanzadeh for their excellent technical assistance.

Conflict of interest
 
The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G, Papatheodorou S, Ioannidis JP. Expectant, medical, or surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 1104-1113. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000158857.44046.a4]
2. Albayram F, Hamper UM. "First‐Trimester obstetric emergencies: Spectrum of sonographic findings." J Clin Ultrasound 2002; 30: 161-177. [DOI:10.1002/jcu.10043]
3. Carrell DT, Liu L, Peterson CM, Jones KP, Hatasaka HH, Erickson L, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation is increased in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Arch Androl 2003; 49: 49-55. [DOI:10.1080/01485010290099390]
4. Azmanov DN, Milachich TV, Zaharieva BM, Michailova GI, Dimitrova VG, Karagiozova ZH, et al. Profile of chromosomal aberrations in different gestational age spontaneous abortions detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 131: 127-131. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.037]
5. Brajenović-Milić B, Petrović O, Krasević M, Ristić S, Kapović M. Chromosomal anomalies in abnormal human pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 1998; 13: 187-191. [DOI:10.1159/000020836]
6. Tibiletti MG, Simoni G, Terzoli GL, Romitti L, Fedele L, Candiani GB. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in couples with repeated spontaneous abortion. Acta Eur Fertil 1981; 12: 245-248.
7. Pandya PP, Snijders RJ, Psara N, Hilbert L, Nicolaides KH. The prevalence of non-viable pregnancy at 10-13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 170-173. [DOI:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030170.x]
8. Goddijn M, Leschot NJ. Genetic aspects of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 14: 855-865. [DOI:10.1053/beog.2000.0124]
9. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Knegt AC, Gerssen-Schoorl KB, et al. Selective chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: case-control study. BMJ 2005; 331: 137-141. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.38498.669595.8F]
10. Humphray SJ, Oliver K, Hunt AR, Plumb RW, Loveland JE, Howe KL, et al. DNA sequence and analysis of human chromosome 9. Nature 2004; 429: 369-374. [DOI:10.1038/nature02465]
11. Babu V Rao, Lily Kerketta, Seema Korgaonkar, Kanjaksha Ghosh. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9[inv(9)(p12q13)]: Its association with genetic diseases. Indian J Hum Genet 2006; 12: 129-132. [DOI:10.4103/0971-6866.29856]
12. Kosyakova N, Grigorian A, Liehr T, Manvelyan M, Simonyan I, Mkrtchyan H, et al. Heteromorphic variants of chromosome 9. Mol Cytogenet 2013; 6: 14. [DOI:10.1186/1755-8166-6-14]
13. Elghezal H, Hidar S, Mougou S, Khairi H, Saâd A. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 721-723. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.160]
14. Dana M, Stoian V. Association of pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 and infertility in romanian population. Maedica (Buchar) 2012; 7: 25-29.
15. Madon PF, Athalye AS, Parikh FR. Polymorphic variants on chromosomes probably play a significant role in infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 726-732. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61691-4]
16. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Munné S, Balicchia B, Escudero T, et al. Possible interchromosomal effect in embryos generated by gametes from translocation carriers. Hum Reprod 2002; [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.12.3201]
17. 17: 3201-3207. 17.Dewald GW, Michels VV. Recurrent miscarriages: cytogenetic causes and genetic counseling of affected families. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1986; 29: 865-885. [DOI:10.1097/00003081-198612000-00014]
18. Craig-Holmes AP, Moore FB, Shaw MW. Polymporphism of human C-band heterochromatin. II. Family studies with suggestive evidence for somatic crossing over. Am J Hum Genet 1975; 27: 178-189.
19. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, Tjoa WM, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Knegt AC, et al. Inherited unbalanced structural chromosome abnormalities at prenatal chromosome analysis are rarely ascertained through recurrent miscarriage. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 408-411. [DOI:10.1002/pd.1960]
20. Farcaş S, Crişan CD, Andreescu N, Stoian M, Motoc AG. Structural chromosomal anomalies detected by prenatal genetic diagnosis: our experience. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2013; 54: 377-383.

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb