Volume 12, Issue 6 (8-2014)                   IJRM 2014, 12(6): 435-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghahiri A, Firozmand A, Ghasemi M, Nasiri F, Sharifi M, Abdollahi M. A comparative cohort study for detecting the incidence of trisomy 21 in ART and non-ART neonates. IJRM 2014; 12 (6) :435-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-547-en.html
A comparative cohort study for detecting the incidence of trisomy 21 in ART and non-ART neonates
Ataollah Ghahiri1 , Amin Firozmand2 , Mojdeh Ghasemi * 3, Fahime Nasiri4 , Maryam Sharifi4 , Mehry Abdollahi4
1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3- Shahid Beheshti Hospital. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , md_ghasemi@yahoo.com
4- Azahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (2698 Views)
Background: One of the most important points concerning the patients who undergo assisted reproductive techniques (ART) for getting pregnant can be the possible neonatal chromosomal abnormalities as a result of these methods. Objective: This study was conducted to help answering a part of this question. Materials and Methods: This is a historical cohort study from April 2006 to April 2007. Data were collected from women admitted in Mehregan Hospital and Esfahan Infertility Center. 225 of 2000 infertile women who had taken ART methods and 225 of 1800 women undergoing no ART treatment were included in our study. All of the cases were aged 35 or more. Data were obtained from patient files from 2 infertility centers of Isfahan, Iran. Results: Chromosomal analysis was successfully performed for all clinically suspicious infants for trisobmy 21. As a result, 4 cases of trisomy 21 in ART group and 7 in non-ART group were found. Two cases from IUI, 1 case of IVF and 1 of ICSI were found to have trisomy 21 in infants. There was no statistically difference in occurring trisomy 21 in our two groups of study and this was also the same for women undergoing IVF and ICSI. Conclusion: ART methods did not increase the rate of Trisomy 21 according to our study although we found less in ART group, it was not statistically significant
Keywords: Infertility, trisomy 21, ART, neonate anomaly
Full-Text [PDF 246 kb]   (721 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (392 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Peschka B, Leygraaf J, Van der Ven K, Montag M, Schartmann B, Schubert R, et al. Type and frequency of chromosome aberrations in 781 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. 1999; 14: 2257-2263.
2. Goetzl L, Krantz D, Simpson JL, Silver RK, Zachary JM, Pergament E, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, free β-hCG, nuchal translucency, and risk of pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 30-36. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000129969.78308.4f]
3. Feng C, Wang LQ, Dong MY, Huang HF. Assisted reproductive technology may increase clinical mutation detection in male offspring. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 463-464. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.004]
4. Marchina E, Imperadori L, Speziani M, Omodei U, Tombesi S, Barlati S. Chromosome abnormalities and YQ microdeletions in infertile Italian couples referred for assisted reproductive technique. Sex Dev 2007; 1: 347-352. [DOI:10.1159/000111766]
5. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rose DJ, Spong CY. In: Genetics. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom S L, Hauth JC, Rose DJ, Spong CY. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd Ed. Mc Graw Hill; 2010: 266-286.
6. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Molecular biology for clinicians. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical Gynecology endocrinology and infertility. 8th Ed. Lippincott Williams; 2011: 3-28.
7. Simpson JL, Lamb DJ. Genetic effects of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Semin Reprod Med 2001; 19: 239-249. [DOI:10.1055/s-2001-18043]
8. Basaran S, Engur A, Aytan M, Karaman B, Ghanbari A, Toksoy G, et al. The results of cytogenetic analysis with regard to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in males, females and fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19: 313-318. [DOI:10.1159/000077958]
9. Neri QV, Tanaka N, Wang A, Katagiri Y, Takeuchi T, Rosenwaks Z, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Accomplishments and qualms 2004; 56: 189-196.
10. Macas E, Imthurn B, Keller PJ. Increased incidence of numerical chromosome abnormalities in spermatozoa injected into human oocytes by ICSI. 2001; 16: 115-120.
11. Younes BG, Hazzouri KM, Chaaban MJ, Karam WG, Abou Jaoude IF, Attieh JH, et al. High frequency of sex chromosomal disomy in spermatozoa of Lebanese infertile men. J Androl 2011; 32: 518-523. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.110.010504]
12. Morel F, Douet-Guilbert N, Le Bris MJ, Amice V, Le Martelot MT, Roche S, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A study of 370 couples and review of the literature. Int J Androl 2004; 27: 178-182. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2004.00472.x]
13. Bonduelle M, Van Assche E, Joris H, Keymolen K, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2600-2614. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.10.2600]
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb