Volume 13, Issue 7 (9-2015)                   IJRM 2015, 13(7): 445-450 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pirjani R, Bayani L, Shirazi M. Successful local and systemic medical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy and a subsequent term pregnancy after treatment: a case series. IJRM 2015; 13 (7) :445-450
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-662-en.html
1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arash Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Radiology Arash Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Mahboobeh.shirazi@yahoo.in
Full-Text [PDF 502 kb]   (629 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (3985 Views)
Full-Text:   (643 Views)
Introduction
 
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a relatively rare type of pregnancy. The incidence of CSP has been reported between 1/1800 to 1/2216 pregnancies (1). CSP may be associated with severe complications and may carry a life threatening condition due to the possibility of uterine rapture, invasive placenta and severe bleeding. Increasing rate of CSP during the last two decades necessitates a proper treatment of CSP, but there is no consensus on optimal treatment. In this paper we report our experience in the medical treatment of six women with viable CSP and subsequent pregnancy outcome in one of them.
 
Case Series
 
In this Case Series study CSP was diagnosed on the basis of the following criteria described by Wang et al (2): An empty uterus and cervical canal, with a clearly demonstrated endometrium; a gestational sac located at the anterior wall of the uterine isthmic portion surrounded by the myometrium and fibrous tissue of the scar and separated from the endometrial cavity or fallopian tube. (Figures 1, 2).
Written consent was obtained from all paiteints.
Case 1: A 29-year-old woman with history of two previous curettages and one cesarean section was referred for first trimester screening. Ultrasonography was performed and the gestational sac with a live fetus was seen near the bladder. Gestational age was 11 weeks and five days based on CRL. After confirming cesarean scar pregnancy with abdominal and vaginal probe, the patient was counseled regarding her management options, and she had opted for medical treatment. She had a normal full blood count and liver/renal function test and her vital signs were stable. Abdominal ultrasound-guided potassium chloride (KCL) (2.5 cc KCl 50%) was injected into the fetal heart and fetal death occurred.
Serum level of beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) was 53173 IU/ml before KCL injection and reduced to 45128 IU/ml after 24 hours. Progressive loss of β-hCG titer continued so that 14 days after injection, the level of serum β-hCG was 5708 IU/mL. During this period, the patient's vital signs were stable and no bleeding and no complications occurred. Despite the appropriate decrease in β-hCG titer, the pregnancy mass was massive (56 x 80 mm) and thus two doses of methotrexate (50mg/m2) were administered 14 and 21 days after KCl injection, to prevent possible bleeding. Blood level of β-hCG was negative nine weeks after starting treatment, and finally four months after starting treatment, the pregnancy mass completely absorbed. During treatment, no side effects were observed. A year later the patient became pregnant. Pregnancy continued without any complication and she was delivered by cesarean section at the gestational age of 38 weeks. During caesarean section it was found that the appearance of previous cesarean scar was normal and there was no scar.
Case 2: A 28-yea-old woman, gravida four, para two, abort one was referred to our center after spotting and abdominal pain. She had two previous ultrasounds at six weeks and nine weeks of pregnancy that showed gestational sac with a living fetus. She had a history of two previous cesarean sections and a previous curettage. Vaginal sonograghic examination revealed an empty endometrial cavity and a gestational sac containing an alive fetus between uterine and bladder surrounding by myometrium. Gestational age was nine weeks and five days. She had a normal full blood count and liver/renal function test and her vital signs were stable. Serum β-hCG titer was 104898 IU/ml. After informed consent, 2.5 ml KCl 50% was injected into the fetal heart abdominal ultrasound-guided and then she received a course of treatment with methotrexate (one mg/kg for four doses) and leucovorin (0.1 mg/kg for four doses). One day after KCl injection, serum levels of β-hCG titer fell to 94003 IU/ml. Serum β-hCG was negative eight weeks later and the mass was not visible with ultrasound five months later.
Case 3: The patient was a 42-year old woman, gravida four, para two, abort one who had a history of two previous cesarean sections and a previous curettage. She was referred to our center with a diagnosis of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Physical examination was negative and she had no symptoms. Gestational age was seven weeks and five days, the fetus was alive and serum level of β-hCG was 40413 IU/ml. After confirming cesarean scar pregnancy and obtaining informed consent from the patient, she underwent injection of 2.5 ml Kcl 50% into the gestational sac using transvaginal ultrasound-guide. Two doses of methotrexate (50mg/m2) were administered on one and seven days after injection of KCl. The next day β-hCG level increased to 49283 IU/mL and decreased to 18729 7 days after KCl injection. During follow-up, the patient was stable and no complications occurred. Serum β-hCG was negative 11 weeks later. Four months later the patient had a regular menstrual cycle but an echogenic mass as high as 10 to 12 mm was still presented on sonography six months later.
Case 4: A 34-year-old woman with a history of two previous cesarean section and two previous miscarriages was referred to our hospital. She had an ultrasound that showed an empty uterus with a gestational sac between uterus and bladder. Transvaginal sonography was performed in our center and CSP was confirmed. Gestational age was 13 weeks based on LMP and 12 weeks based on CRL. There was no fetal heart activity and a 71×59 mm hematoma was found around the gestational sac. She had mild abdominal pain, but her vital signs were stable. Her general condition was good and she had a normal, full blood count and liver/renal function test. She was hospitalized and after obtaining informed consent, ultrasound-guided methotrexate injection (60 mg) was performed into the gestational sac. The level of β-hCG on the same day was 874 IU/mL and fell to 329 IU/mL 7 days later. She was hospitalized for a week and during this time received four doses of methotrexate (one mg/kg/Im) and four doses of leucovorin (0.1 mg/kg/Iim). During follow-up, she was stable and no complications happened. Serum β-hCG was negative eight weeks later and the mass was not visible with ultrasound three months later.
Case five: A 37-year-old woman with a history of one previous cesarean section and one previous curettage was presented with complaints of spotting. Serum level of β-hCG was 39403 IU/mL. Transvaginal sonography was performed in our center and revealed CSP. Gestational age was eight weeks based on CRL and the fetus was alive. She had a normal full blood count and liver/renal function test and her vital signs were stable. Informed consent was obtained and 2.5 ml Kcl 50% was injected into the gestational sac. The level of β-hCG on day seven after Kcl injection was 24661 IU/mL. One week after discharge, vaginal bleeding occurred that was not severe and did not require intervention. Serum β-hCG was negative eight weeks later and four months after starting treatment, the pregnancy mass completely absorbed.
Case six: A 40-year-old woman with a history of two previous cesarean sections and one curettage was referred for prenatal care at 6 weeks of gestation. We performed a pregnancy routine ultrasound and during this exam, the presence of CSP was noticed. Gestational age was six weeks based on CRL, fetal heart activity was presented and serum level of β-hCG was 5321 IU/ml. Informed consent was obtained and one dose of systemic methotrexate (50mg/m2) was administered. Two days later, methotrexate (60 mg) was injected into the gestational sac. During follow-up, no complication occurred and five weeks later, serum level of β-hCG was negative.

Table I. Clinical summary of six cesarean scar pregnancy cases




Figure 1. Cesarean scar pregnancy demonstrated by transvaginal sonography showing the gestational sac implanted in the lower segment of the uterus



Figure 2. Transvaginal ultrasonography showing an empty uterine cavity with the gestational sac containing a fetus alive in the lower segment of the uterus (Cesarean scar pregnancy)


Discussion
 
In recent years, many cases of CSP have been reported and various therapies have been introduced. The pathophysiology of CSP is not clearly known. The conceptus may infiltrate through a microscopic dehiscent tract of the myometrium and grow (3). In CSP, fertilization is normal but implantation occurs at the lesion site and bulges from the uterine wall in the cesarean scar (4). In addition, it can be assumed that blastocyst invades to any microscopic lesion, due to other causes such as myomectomy, hysteroscopy and even manual removal of the placenta (5). All of our patients had a previous history of curettage supporting this supposition.
Although the first case of CSP was reported in 1978 and only about 40 case reports and series have been reported up until 2006, within the past three years further studies on CSP have been published, that indicate an increase in CSP incidences. CSP incidences varied among studies (6-11), for example, Fadhlaoui et al were faced with only one case of CSP during a time frame of one year at their department (one of the total 62 ectopic pregnancies) (12). However, Wang, et al. had 71 CSP cases in two years at their hospital (13). They did not mention the incidence of cesarean section and ectopic pregnancy in their hospital, but it appears that the CSP incidences were high at their hospital. We do not know the number of CSP incidences in Iran. Unfortunately, in Iran, the cesarean section rate is high and so we will be faced with more cases of CSP in the future.
Different treatment modalities are used in the management of CSP. Some authors consider surgical methods such as laparoscopy and hysteroscopy (14, 15). Some others make use of medical treatment such as local or systemic MTX or local KCl (16, 17). Wang, et al introduced a new transvaginal surgical approach for CSP (18). Another treatment modality is uterine artery embolization (UAE), which can be used alone or in combination with other methods (19, 20). Some authors proposed a combination of different methods (21, 22). Tulpin, et al. reported a case of CSP, where they injected MTX into the gestational sac during laparoscopy (23). UAE was then performed three times up to 24 days after laparoscopy. To put differently, they applied medical treatment using minimally invasive laparoscopic technique. Timor-Tritsch and. Monteagudo published a review article on the consequences of cesarean delivery (9). They concentrated on placenta previa and CSP. Their research concluded that local MTX and hysteroscopic directed procedure resulted in the lowest level of complications, while in contrast to that, curettage, systemic MTX and UAE as single treatment should be avoided if possible (9).
One hypothesis is that the likelihood of complications and failure may be related to gestational age. Cignini and coworkers (5) reported two cases of CSP, of which one case was at nine gestational weeks and underwent laparotomy. Subtotal hysterectomy was performed duo to severe hemorrhage. Another case was reported at sixth week of pregnancy, which underwent hysteroscopy and the treatment resulted in a success. They concluded that early detection of CSP seemed to reduce complications. It is clear that early detection of CSP will lead to a reduced risk of bleeding and other complications. However, in terms of responsiveness to treatment, our study showed that medical treatment would be successful even at higher gestational age. In case #1, pregnancy was at an advanced stage (12 weeks) and after a successful medical treatment, the patient had a term subsequent pregnancy. Based on our experience, it seems unlikely that serum levels of β-hCG influence the response to treatment.
In our opinion, local MTX or KCl therapy in combination with systemic MTX prove to be an effective method for treatment of CSP. One of the advantages of this method is that it is outpatient basis and does not require hospitalization. Another advantage is that patients could avoid the risks of surgery and anesthesia-related complications. In contrast, the disadvantage of this method is that it takes several weeks to be negative beta-HCG and several months to be indistinguishable CSP mass by ultrasound.
In conclusion, the management of CSP is not well established and there is no consensus about its treatment. However, given our experience and findings, the combination of systemic MTX with local MTX or KCl administration is feasible and can be performed as an outpatient procedure, which will hopefully lead to a successful treatment of CSP.
 
Acknowledgments
 
The authors would like to express their appreciation to patients for their patience. There is no financial support for this study.
 
Conflict of interest
 
The authors report no conflict of interest.
 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancies: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1373-1381. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce]
2. Wang YL, Su TH, Chen HS. Operative laparoscopy for unruptured ectopic pregnancy in a caesarean scar. BJOG 2006; 113: 1035-1038. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01031.x]
3. Takeda A, Koyama K, Imoto S, Mori M, Nakano T, Nakamura H. Diagnostic multimodal imaging and therapeutic transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for conservative management of hemorrhagic cesarean scar pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 152: 152-156. Epub 2010/07/22. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.05.032]
4. Chen CH, Wang PH, Liu WM. Successful treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy using laparoscopically assisted local injection of etoposide with transvaginal ultrasound guidance. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1747 e9-11.
5. Cignini P, Giorlandino M, Caserta L, Dominici L, Giorlandino C. The importance of early diagnosis in cesarean scar pregnancy. J Prenat Med 2007; 1: 29-31.
6. Wang CB, Tseng CJ. Primary evacuation therapy for Cesarean scar pregnancy: three new cases and review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 222-226. [DOI:10.1002/uog.2644]
7. Zhang Y, Gu Y, Wang JM, Li Y. Analysis of cases with cesarean scar pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2012; 39: 195-202. [DOI:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01892.x]
8. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 44 e1- e13.
9. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 14-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007]
10. Bodur S, Gun I, Guido R. What is the role of primary methotrexate treatment in scar ectopic pregnancy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 379-380. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.027]
11. Honda T, Honda R, Yamaguchi M, Uchino K, Ohba T, Katabuchi H. Direct injection of methotrexate preserves fertility in patients with ectopic pregnancy in lower uterine segment. Fertil Sterili 2013; 100: S169. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1466]
12. Fadhlaoui A, Khrouf M, Khemiri K, Nouira K, Chaker A, Zhioua F. Successful conservative treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy with systemically administered methotrexate and subsequent dilatation and curettage: a case report. Obstet Gynecol 2012; doi:10.1155/2012/248564. [DOI:10.1155/2012/248564]
13. Wang G, Liu X, Bi F, Yin L, Sa R, Wang D, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic resection for the management of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 1501-1507. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.045]
14. Khalil LA, Issawi AA, Chammas MF, Massaad ZC. Successful laparoscopic management of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:1234-1236. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.5.1234. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.5.1234]
15. Robinson JK, Dayal MB, Gindoff P, Frankfurter D. A novel surgical treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: laparoscopically assisted operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1497.e13-.e16.
16. Wang J-H, Xu K-H, Lin J, Xu J-Y, Wu R-J. Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without suction curettage. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1208-1213. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1780]
17. Muraji M, Mabuchi S, Hisamoto K, Muranishi M, Kanagawa T, Nishio Y, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies successfully treated with methotrexate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 720-723. [DOI:10.1080/00016340902883141]
18. Wang D-B, Chen Y-H, Zhang Z-F, Chen P, Liu K-R, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low-segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 602-606. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.024]
19. Liang F, He J. Methotrexate-based bilateral uterine arterial chemoembolization for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 1592-1594. [DOI:10.3109/00016349.2010.512973]
20. Zhuang Y, Huang L. Uterine artery embolization compared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:152.e1-.e3.
21. Li H, Guo HY, Han JS, Wang JL, Xiong GW, Shen J, et al. Endoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 31-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.08.002]
22. Chiang AJ, La V, Chou CP, Wang PH, Yu KJ. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section scar. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 2388-2389. Epub 2011/04/19. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.104]
23. Tulpin L, Morel O, Malartic C, Barranger E. Conservative management of a Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report. Cases J 2009; 2: 7794. [DOI:10.4076/1757-1626-2-7794]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb