International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Sun, Dec 22, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 15, Issue 1 (1-2017)
IJRM 2017, 15(1): 11-16 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zare N, Nouri B, Moradi F, Parvareh M. The study of waiting time to first pregnancy in the south of Iran: A parametric frailty model approach. IJRM 2017; 15 (1) :11-16
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-793-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-793-en.html
1- Department of Biostatistics, Infertility Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. ,bijannouri@muk.ac.ir
3- Family Health Unit, The Office of Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
4- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. ,
3- Family Health Unit, The Office of Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
4- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Abstract: (2792 Views)
Background: Time to first pregnancy (TTFP) has never been studied in an Iranian setting. Lifestyle, occupational and environmental factors have been suggested to affect the female reproduction.
Objective: This study was conducted to measure TTFP in the south of Iran and survey the effects of several similar factors on TTFP by frailty models.
Materials and Methods: The data on TTFP were available for 882 women who were randomly selected from the rural population (the south of Iran). Only the first and the planned pregnancies of every woman were included. The data were collected retrospectively by using self-administered questionnaires. Frailty and shared frailty models were used to determine which factors had the highest impact on TTFP.
Results: The median TTFP was 6.4 months and several factors were surveyed. However, only the age of marriage, height, maternal education and regularity of menstruation prior to conception were selected in the multivariable models.
Conclusion: Among the several factors which were included in the study, the result of frailty model showed that the height, age of marriage and regular menstruation seemed more notable predictors of TTFP.
Objective: This study was conducted to measure TTFP in the south of Iran and survey the effects of several similar factors on TTFP by frailty models.
Materials and Methods: The data on TTFP were available for 882 women who were randomly selected from the rural population (the south of Iran). Only the first and the planned pregnancies of every woman were included. The data were collected retrospectively by using self-administered questionnaires. Frailty and shared frailty models were used to determine which factors had the highest impact on TTFP.
Results: The median TTFP was 6.4 months and several factors were surveyed. However, only the age of marriage, height, maternal education and regularity of menstruation prior to conception were selected in the multivariable models.
Conclusion: Among the several factors which were included in the study, the result of frailty model showed that the height, age of marriage and regular menstruation seemed more notable predictors of TTFP.
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124: 470-480. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114417]
2. Joffe M, Key J, Best N, Keiding N, Scheike Th, Jensen TK. Studying time to pregnancy by use of a retrospective design. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162: 115-124. [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwi172]
3. Axmon A, Rylander L, Albin M, Hagmar L. Factors affecting time to pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1279-1284. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei469]
4. Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1399-1403. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399]
5. Joffe M, Li Z. Male and female factors in fertility. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140: 921-929. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117180]
6. Kalian J, Udry R. The determinants of effective fecundability based on the first birth interval. Demography 1986; 23: 53-66. [DOI:10.2307/2061407]
7. Juul S, Keiding N, Tvede M. Retrospectively sampled time-to-pregnancy data may make age-decreasing fecundity look increasing. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 717-719. [DOI:10.1097/00001648-200011000-00019]
8. Sear R, Allal N, Mace R. Height, marriage and reproductive success in Gambian women. Socio Aspect Hum Behav Ecol 2004; 23: 203-224. [DOI:10.1016/S0190-1281(04)23008-6]
9. Bello B, Kielkowski D, Heederik D, Wilson K. Time-to-pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes in a South African population. BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 565. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-10-565]
10. Idrovo AJ, Sanin LH, Cole D, Chavarro J, Caceres H, Narvaes J, et al. Time to first pregnancy among women working in agricultural production. Int Arch Occup Environment Health 2005; 78: 493-500. [DOI:10.1007/s00420-005-0615-9]
11. Duchateau L, Janssen P. The frailty model. 2008: Springer.
12. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Survival analysis. 2012: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-6646-9]
13. Shih JH, Louis TA. Assessing gamma frailty models for clustered failure time data. Lifetime Data Analysis 1995; 1: 205-220. [DOI:10.1007/BF00985771]
14. Joffe M. Feasibility of studying subfertility using retrospective self reports. J Epidemiol Com Health 1989; 43: 268-274. [DOI:10.1136/jech.43.3.268]
15. Zielhuis GA, Hulscher MEJL, Florack EIM. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on fecundability. Int J Epidemiol 1992; 21: 1151-1156. [DOI:10.1093/ije/21.6.1151]
16. Kaplan B, Nahum R, Yairi Y, Hirsch M, Pardo J, Yogev Y, et al. Use of various contraceptive methods and time of conception in a community-based population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 123: 72-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.033]
17. Hassan MA, Killick SR. Effect of male age on fertility: evidence for the decline in male fertility with increasing age. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1520-1527. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00366-2]
18. Bajracharya A, Amin S. Poverty Marriage Timing, and Transitions to Adulthood in Nepal: A Longitudinal Analysis Using the Nepal Living Standards Survey 2010: Population Council.
19. Singh NS, Sanajaoba N, Narendra RK. Differential Pattern of Duration of Waiting Time to Conception of Women in Manipur. Stud Home Commun Sci 2011; 5: 7-12. [DOI:10.1080/09737189.2011.11885323]
20. Karmaus W, Juul S. Infertility and subfecundity in population-based samples from Denmark, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain. Eur J Public Health 1999; 9: 229-235. [DOI:10.1093/eurpub/9.3.229]
21. Etuk SJ, Keynote A. Reproductive health: global infertility trend. Nigerian J Physiol Sci 2009; 24:85-90.
22. Keiding N, Kvist K, Hartving H, Tvede M, Juul S. Estimating time to pregnancy from current durations in a cross-sectional sample. Biostatistics 2002; 3: 565-578. [DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/3.4.565]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
