Volume 15, Issue 6 (7-2017)                   IJRM 2017, 15(6): 331-344 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pourmasumi S, Sabeti P, Rahiminia T, Mangoli E, Tabibnejad N, Talebi A R. The etiologies of sperm DNA abnormalities in male infertility: An assessment and review. IJRM 2017; 15 (6) :331-344
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-834-en.html
1- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 741 kb]   (1204 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (6636 Views)
Full-Text:   (1455 Views)
Introduction
 
Spermatogenesis includes proliferation, meiotic DNA, and differentiation of spermatids into spermatozoa. Due to the complexity and relatively long period of spermatogenesis, the sperm DNA and chromatin may alter at any stage of this process. During spermiogenesis phase, the nuclear histones are replaced at first by transition proteins and then by protamines. The chromatin stability is achieved by disulfide bonds formation during epididymal transit of spermatozoa (1, 2).
It is shown that protamine-induced sperm chromatin condensation is very essential for normal sperm fertility potential and subsequently for normal fertilization and embryonic development (3, 4). There are many studies indicating the elevation of spermatozoa with abnormal chromatin in infertile patients when they are compared with fertile men (5, 6). In addition, there is a negative relationship between sperm chromatin quality and sperm parameters including morphology and motility (7, 8). The presence of sperm with abnormal morphology indicates that spermatozoa cannot complete the process of spermiogenesis (9, 10). The sperm chromatin/ DNA damage may occur in testis, male genital ducts, and also after ejaculation.
Modifications in chromatin remodeling, abortive apoptosis, and Oxidative Stress (OS) are three main mechanisms contributing (11, 12).
Several etiological factors including intratesticular, post-testicular, and external factors have been correlated with increased levels of human sperm DNA damage which can affect the potential of male fertility. Medical dysfunctions like diabetes mellitus (DM) may have detrimental effects on sperm fertility potential and DNA integrity, also 
varicocele samples contain a higher proportion of spermatozoa with abnormal DNA and immature chromatin than those from fertile men as well as infertile men without varicocele (13). Therefore, varicocele leads to production of spermatozoa with less condensed chromatin and this is one of the potential causes of infertility. In this study, further topics being discussed as well (Figure 1, Table I).


Figure 1. Etiological factors associated with increased human sperm damage
 
Diabetes mellitus
DM is one of the most common diseases that threats human health in the modern world (14). Its effects on human health are mostly due to the hyperglycaemic and hypoinsulinemic states caused by the disease, usually affecting neurological, endocrinological, and reproductive functions (15, 16). DM has been related to the sexual dysfunction, both in men and women. It is supposed that neuropathy, vascular deficiency, and psychological problems may be implicated in the pathogenesis of some phenomenon, for example, impotency and ejaculation disorders (17, 18).
Miralles-Garcia and colleagues found that insulin-dependent diabetes is associated to decrease in ejaculated semen, vitality and motility of the spermatozoa, but no change in sperm viscosity (19). Defects in insulin secretion may change testicular and accessory sexual glands function. Usually, the concentration of seminal insulin is higher than that in the serum. Numerous studies have demonstrated a marked reduction in sperm quality in diabetic male human and animals (16, 20). Mangoli et al showed that DM had negative effects on the sperm parameters and chromatin features in mice (21). also, Talebi et al showed that although, the DM may have detrimental effects on the sperm fertility potential and DNA integrity, but, vitamin C, as a potent antioxidant, has positive effects on sperm parameters, sperm function and also prevents sperm chromatin abnormalities and apoptosis in experimentally-induced diabetic mice (22).
Various mechanisms have been proposed for sperm nuclear DNA anomalies. One of them which is the most important mechanism in the pathogenesis of DM is oxidative stress. However, there are many studies about reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in diabetic patients and beneficial effects of antioxidants (23, 24). Agbaje et al showed that DM is associated with increased sperm nuclear and mtDNA damages measured by Comet assay and Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively, and they may impair the reproductive capability of these men (24). Also, they demonstrated significantly increased levels of 8OHdG (ROS-induced DNA damage marker) in spermatozoa of diabetic patients in comparison with non-diabetics.
The results of another study showed a significant increase in sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation compared to their non-diabetic counterparts, which is imputable to oxidative stress, resulting in a decrease in blastocyst formation and pregnancy rates and increase in miscarriage rates were well-known in the diabetic group. Additional, variation in mitochondrial DNA seen in DM is reliable for the bad changes observed in motility of spermatozoa (25) (Table I).
 
Varicocele
Varicocele is found in approximately 15% of fertile men and 19-41% of infertile patients (26). There are several pathways for varicocele-induced infertility (26). One of the main factors responsible for infertility or subfertility in patients with varicocele is sperm DNA damage. It was reported that the rate of apoptotic spermatozoa in patients with varicocele is higher than in those without varicocele (27, 28).
Another possible reason in varicocele-associated cases is the elevated intra-testicular temperature during spermiogenesis that increases the sensitivity of sperm DNA to denaturation and high levels of seminal oxidative stress that could impair chromatin packaging (29).
Talebi et al examined the effects of varicocele on chromatin condensation and DNA integrity of ejaculated spermatozoa with cytochemical tests (13). The results showed that the varicocele samples have a higher percentage of spermatozoa with abnormal DNA and immature chromatin than fertile men and infertile men without varicocele (13). Smith et al showed that the varicocele is associated with high levels of DNA-damaged spermatozoa even in the presence of normal semen profile (30).
The results also showed that oxidative stress is related to sperm DNA damage in these patients (30). Also, Enciso et al in their study using sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test showed that in infertile men with varicocele there is a high relative proportion of sperm cells with extreme levels of nuclear damage (31).
Studies showed that there is a significant raise in abnormal sperm chromatin condensation in infertile men with varicocele that will noticeably improve following varicocelectomy (32, 33). Werthman et al examined patients who had preoperative levels of >30% of sperm DNA fragmentation index and exhibited a subsequent significant decrease of the percent of DNA fragmentation index values after surgery (26). Ghanaie et al demonstrated that varicocele repair increases the chance of spontaneous pregnancies and live births (34). On the other hand, in an animal model, it is shown that varicocele leads to increased sperm DNA damage and the damage will be decreased by varicocelectomy (35) (Table I).
 
Spinal cord injury
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a medical problem with arising 1000 new cases per year (36). Approximately more than 80% of these patients are men in reproductive age (37, 38). After SCI, some sexual problem such as impaired erection and ejaculation are happened as well as abnormal semen parameters. It was shown that 25% of SCI men have decreased spermatogenesis both in early and late phases of SCI (39). It is known that sperm motility, morphology and viability significantly decreased in SCI subjects, but, sperm count has remained in the normal range in some studies (40, 41). In addition to poor semen parameters, notable sperm DNA damage was reported in both SCI men and experimental animals (42). DNA fragmentation index is seen at a higher rate compared to fertile men (43). This fact is of great importance because DNA integrity is necessary for sperm-oocyte interaction, transmission of genetic information and consequent implantation and embryo cleavage (28, 44). It should be noted that some studies have revealed the importance of DNA fragmentation indices are more important than sperm parameters for prediction of male fertility (45, 46).
As it is shown, spermatozoa with poor DNA integrity may lead to fertilization failure, delayed embryo development, and early pregnancy loss (47, 48). Evenson and Wixon reported that pregnancy rate significantly decreased with semen samples containing more than 30% spermatozoa with fragmented DNA (49). It is well-known that in the cases of SCI, leukocytospermia, lack of ejaculation and seminal fluid stasis, testicular hyperthermia, histologic abnormalities, genitourinary tract infections, and hormonal dysfunction can produce high amounts of ROS (50, 51).
The evidence shows that each 25% increase of seminal ROS induces 10% increase in sperm DNA fragmentation (52). Therefore, high levels of ROS and abortive apoptosis are two main causes of sperm chromatin/DNA damage in SCI men (36). Regard to sperm chromatin condensation, Talebi et al showed that there is a clear relationship between the percentage of spermatozoa with residual histones and DNA fragmentation in SCI men. They also applied the Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) test and found a remarkable percentage of CMA3 positive sperm cells in the SCI group and concluded that SCI has a negative effect on the sperm protamination. Furthermore, they used the Toluidine Blue (TB) and Aniline Blue staining and reported increased sperm DNA fragmentation and abnormal chromatin condensation as well as high DNA denaturation respectively (53). Similarly, Salsabili et al used AB test and found low sperm chromatin condensation and chromatin stability among SCI patients (54) (Table I).
 
Cancer and chemotherapy
Human sperm chromatin is a complex structure; susceptible to damage from different sources including testicular cancer, Hodgkin’s disease, and leukemia which are the most common malignancies affecting men in reproductive age (55, 56).
Several models of cancer therapies have significantly improved survival rates for young patients with some types of malignancies. However, cancer therapies are frequently aggressive, and their side effects are common. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy negatively have an effect on testicular function, spermatogenesis, and sex hormones especially in young men (57, 58). Testicular cancer is a curable malignancy in young men and unilateral orchiectomy is the primary treatment. The majority of young patients with recently diagnosed testicular cancer are worried about future fertility and want to be informed about the influence of different treatment on spermatogenesis (57). Fossa et al in their study showed that testicular cancer patients have the high percentage of spermatozoa with abnormal chromatin structure after orchiectomy (59).
Maselli et al demonstrate in rat testicular cancer that exposure to Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cis-Platinum changes sperm chromatin integrity and sperm head protein profile, but the persistent damage remains in the chromatin structure of spermatozoa (60). O'Flaherty et al examined sperm chromatin quality in testicular cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients prior to chemotherapy, they presented the high incidence of DNA damage and low compaction in spermatozoa from these patients at the time of the diagnosis (61). In another chemotherapy cycle with genotoxic agents in cancer patients, it was shown an increase in sperm DNA damage after treatment (62).
Tanrikut et al also demonstrated that, paroxetine can induce unusual sperm DNA fragmentation in men with normal semen parameters, but they didn’t identify a quantifiable effect of paroxetine on semen parameters (63).
The combination of the comet assay and tests that evaluate sperm DNA compaction, such as the flowcytometry-based CMA3 and Acrydine Orange, is a reliable strategy to better characterize the sperm chromatin quality in cancer patients at the time of sperm banking and after the initiation of chemotherapy. Because, optimal sperm chromatin packaging seems to be necessary for complete expression of the male fertility potential (64, 65).
O'Flaherty showed that some components of the sperm chromatin structure may recover at different rates after chemotherapy; the significant levels of DNA damage and low chromatin compaction can be detected up to two years after treatment (66). Thus, we consider that it is necessary to screen cancer survivors for the presence of sperm DNA damage before they attempt to achieve fatherhood, either by normal conception or with the aid of artificial reproductive techniques.
Moreover, proper counseling for cancer patients at the time of sperm banking and fertility preservation before drug treatment is recommended because of the potential presence of significant sperm DNA damage in the pretreatment semen sample. (Table I)
Infections
It has been shown that people with accessory gland infections show leukocytospermia and increase of ROS production (67). On the other hand, leukocytospermic patients have a significant increase in sperm DNA damage compared to normal samples (68). In fact, high level of ROS in these patients, cause to OS, membrane lipid peroxidation along with sperm DNA damage (69). Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) is a serious risk for human health and it can integrate into human sperm chromosomes (70).
Jian-Min Huang et al suggested that, HBV infection can lead to modification in genetic component and stimulation of chromosome aberrations and in this way, it causes some genetic abnormalities which may be transmitted to the next generation (71). Another study reported that HBVs exposure can induce ROS production, decrease of total antioxidant capacity, and sperm DNA fragmentation (72). Also, Kang et al reported that HBV antigen causes an increase in the sperm DNA fragmentation (72).
Several studies have confirmed that, some types of human papillomavirus cause increase in sperm DNA damage and decrease in sperm motility (73, 74). But, another study, didn’t observe any increase of DNA fragmentation index with semen human papillomavirus or Human Herpes Virus infection (75).
In a study, researchers showed that infection showed that infection with several bacteria and fungi such as Escherichia Coli, Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureplasma urealyticum, Staphylococus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and Mycoplasma had a harmful effect on sperm chromatin and sperm DNA integrity (76). In another study, Villegas et al, expressed that Escherichia Coli and Staphylococcus aureus, stimulate the expression of apoptosis in human spermatozoa (77). Also, Gallegos et al, showed that Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma cause genitourinary infection and the rate of sperm DNA fragmentation in these patients is higher than non-infected controls (78) (Table I).
 
Depression drugs
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are a class of antidepressants that can effect on the quality of sperm parameters and even lead to sperm DNA damage (79). There is increasing evidence of a relationship between psychological treatments drug and endocrine hormones profile (80). Moreover, several studies have shown that the psychological drugs affect the sperm count, motility and morphology (63, 81). Based on the literature, there is a higher possibility of sperm DNA damage in patients who are under psychological treatment (82, 83) (Table I).
 
Alcohol consumption
Alcohol consumption and its related problems are classified among the top five risk factors for disease, disability and death throughout the world (84). Regarding male infertility, experimental and clinical studies have shown that ethanol consumption alters testosterone secretion, spermatogenesis pattern and Leydig cell volume in addition to inherited aberrant epigenetic signature in offsprings (85, 86). It is reported that ethanol intake in male rats causes a reduction in pregnancy rate and number of pups delivered. This is related to a negative effect of alcohol consumption on normal sperm count, motility and morphology as well as sperm DNA integrity (87). Talebi et al evaluated the sperm chromatin condensation with cytochemical assays and reported that although the alcohol consumption did not increase the rate of spermatozoa with residual histones and protamine deficiency, it may cause an increase in the percentage of spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation and apoptosis (88).
Another animal study using three different cytochemical tests including CMA3, TB, and SCD showed a negative influence of ethanol on sperm DNA chromatin condensation and fragmentation which was not dose-depended. But, the rate of apoptosis in ethanol-treated mice was higher than controls and it was clearly dose-dependent (89). It is demonstrated that testicular injury by ethanol leads to Fas system up-regulation and increased caspase activity in the testes of ethanol-treated rats which can induce germ cells apoptosis. It can be one of the main causes of maleinfertility associated with alcohol abuse (90).
It is shown that chronic alcohol use significantly increased the sperm DNA abnormalities index to 49.6±23.3% compared with 33.9±18.0% in non-drinkers (87). Also, it is revealed that alcohol decreases the levels of DNA methyl transferase transcripts which is the key enzymes in the epigenetic modifications of DNA (91). Moreover, both acute and chronic alcohol consumption leads to produce a high level of ROS through the formation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (92). In addition, the products of alcohol metabolism, acetaldehyde, interacts with proteins and lipids to form ROS which affects the plasma membrane and DNA molecules as well as inducing apoptosis in sperm cells (28). Amanvermez et al showed that chronic ethanol exposure induces OS in rat kidney, ovary, lung, and testis via high levels of lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation. They also presented that antioxidant supplements can partially defend tissues from ethanol-induced damages formed by ROS (93) (Table I).
 
Opiate consumption
Due to ethical considerations, the studies on the effects of opiate consumption on human fertility are few. However, it is reported that the illicit drugs have deleterious effects on the sperm morphology and motility (94). Albrizio et al demonstrated that chronic heroin consumption has been broadly associated to OS, and it causes a significant elevation in DNA fragmentation (95). Also, Song et al expressed that ecstasy induces the generation of ROS and reactive nitrogen species and leads to OS (96).
Experimental data indicate the chronic exposure to ecstasy increases sperm DNA damage, tubular erosion and interstitial edema of testes in male rats (97). One of the most commonly used drugs is marijuana, which causes the release of cannabinoids in the body. Battista et al have reported that, these compounds can induce the apoptosis of Sertoli cells and decreases sperm motility, capacitation, acrosome reaction and spermatogenesis (98).
Another study revealed that, amphetamines lead to a dose-dependent decrease of testosterone and DNA damage (99). Also, Safarinejad et al showed that, opiate consumers have a significant increase in the quantity of fragmented DNA in relation to the control group. They also found that the level of catalase-like and superoxide dismutase-like antioxidant activity in opiate consumer were lower and finally, they concluded that illicit drugs have significant adverse effects on the semen quality (100) (Table I).
 
Age
There are some studies which have demonstrated that, increased paternal age is associated with a decrease in sperm morphology, motility and semen volume (101, 102). On the other hand, several studies, have indicated that, there is an association between sperm DNA damage and aging (103, 104). it is shown that sperm nuclear abnormalities such as DNA fragmentation, protamine deficiency and inappropriate chromatin packaging will be increased with age (105, 106). Wyrobek et al showed that young men have a lower percentage of spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation than old men (101). Moskovtsev et al, in a retrospective study reported that DNA fragmentation rate in infertile men over 40 years old is higher than infertile men with 40 years old and below (107).
ROS are the most powerful inducers of the sperm DNA damage (108, 109) and ROS generation increases with age (110). It is believed that in old men, increasing OS may be responsible for the age-dependent sperm DNA damage and it can be considered as an important etiology of assisted reproductive technique (ART) failures (111). Also, reproductive organs in older men are exposed to OS, for a long time, they may produce more DNA-damaged spermatozoa than youngers (112). In addition, multiple studies have shown that OS, which tends to increase with age, has deleterious effects on sperm function and quality and may lead to the sperm DNA damage (113, 114). Also, it is indicated that advanced paternal age could lead to an increase in spontaneous abortions (115). Moreover, it has been revealed that increasing paternal age is along with increasing in chromosomal aneuploidies, autosomal dominant disorders and other diseases (116). (Table I)

Table I. Species and assessment of etiological factors on sperm and male fertility

 
Lifestyle
  • Coffee consumption
Schmid et al  revealed that men who drink three cups or more caffeine per day have significantly higher rates of sperm DNA damage (116). In fact, Shamsi and Hadi explained that, some of the caffeine products can reduce copper (Cu)(II) into Cu(I), and it leads to production of ROS and in turn, it causes OS (117). On the other hand, caffeine may act as an inhibitor of DNA repair and so, it may be a factor for increasing sperm DNA damage (118).
  • Obesity
It is almost generally accepted that male obesity is considered as a main risk factor of infertility and it is correlated with a decrease in sperm motility and an increase in sperm DNA damage (119). Kort et al by using sperm chromatin structural assay (SCSA) showed that obese patients have a lot of spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation in their ejaculates (120). Tamburrino et al suggested that male obesity has negative effects on sperm DNA integrity and fertility (121). In fact, obesity causes an increase in OS and this, in turn is associated with damage to cellular biomolecules such as DNA and fatty acids (122). It should be noted that, there are few studies that they didn’t find any significant correlation between sperm DNA integrity and body mass index but, they used a small sample size in their studies (123, 124).
  • Dietary
Several studies have shown the effect of antioxidant therapy on sperm parameters (125, 126). There are some studies that they have indicated significant progress in sperm concentration, motility and morphology with antioxidant therapy (127). Another study that conducted by Silver et al didn’t show any connection between Vit E, Vit C, β-carotene therapy and the sperm DNA damage (128). Alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking and dieting cause to vitamin and antioxidant deficiency which it can lead to oxidative damage (129).
  • Occupation
It has been shown the occupational exposure such as styrene can change the integrity of DNA in male germ cells (130). Many chemical materials affect the reproductive system (glands and hormones) (131). A study has shown that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can decrease the sperm parameters and pregnancy outcome (132). Also there are several studies that they have reported the negative effects of chemical pesticides on infertility (133, 134).
  • Smoking
The exact effect of smoking on male fertility has remained controversial in the literature. Harmful substances like alkaloids, nitrosamines, nicotine and inorganic molecules are present in tobacco and cigarettes that produce reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (135, 136). There is a significant association between active smoking and reduced seminal quality, sperm DNA integrity and nuclear maturation, increased sperm DNA fragmentation and induced alterations of the sperm plasma membrane (137). High levels of DNA strand breaks in smoker men may be due to the presences of carcinogens and mutagens in cigarette smoke (138). In a study performed on 655 smokers and 1131 non-smokers, a significant decrease was shown in sperm density (15.3%) as well as other parameters including total sperm count (17.5%), and total number of motile spermatozoa (16.6%) (139). Therefore, smoking may have detrimental effects on the quality and quantity of sperm in male and decreases the antioxidant activity in seminal plasma (140).
Saleh et al demonstrated increasing (approximately 48%) in seminal leukocyte concentrations and ROS levels in infertile smoker men when compared with non-smokers. They concluded that there may be a positive association between leukocytospermia and ROS levels (141). Potts et al also investigated sperm DNA damages of 35 fertile smokers and 35 fertile nonsmokers with SCSA and reported the higher sperm DNA damage in smokers compared to nonsmokers (142). Several investigators have shown a correlation between cigarette smoking, OS and sperm DNA damage (143, 144). Regard to sperm chromatin, the results has suggested that the induction of OS by cigarette smoking may negatively affect the protamination process by disrupting protamine 2 in sperm chromatin (143, 144). On the other hand, it is shown that cigarette smoking can suppress the function of miRNAs that play a crucial role in regulating gene expression and epigenetic patterns associated to spermatogenesis and sperm chromatin structure (145, 146).
  • Cellphone
Today, there are multiple studies that focus on the effect of electronic systems such as mobile, telephones, televisions and microwaves on the reproductive system. it has been reported theabnormal semen parameters and defect in acrosomal reaction along with the use of cellphone (147, 148). Recent studies have shown that Radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation, of mobile phones, may cause to increase of mitochondrial ROS production and DNA fragmentation (149, 150). So, it is believed that extensive mobile phone use by men may affect male fertility potential and even the health of their offspring.
  • Air pollution
Over the past decades, many studies have shown that environmental pollution is implicated in poor sperm quality (151, 152). There is some evidence of increased percentage of spermatozoa with chromatin abnormality with fragmented DNA in selected population like motorway workers because of prolonged exposure. However, there was no significant relationship between blood concentrations of Pb, NO2 or SO2 and sperm chromatin and/or DNA damage. Serum levels of LH, FSH, and T did not differ significantly, whereas the sperm parameters were significantly different in motorway tollgate workers (153).
In another study, likely, high levels of sperm DNA damage were seen in men who are in air pollution condition from burning of coal, with no obvious change in other semen parameters (154). Ultimately, it could be hypothesized that a combination of pollutants would be responsible for sperm abnormalities, rather than a single heavy metal (153).
Some findings provided evidence that polymorphisms of some genes may be useful biomarkers to identify individuals susceptible to DNA damage. XRCC1 Polymorphisms may alter sperm polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA (PAH DNA) levels and could be considered as the useful biomarkers to detect individual susceptibility to DNA damage resulting from exposure to PAHs (155). Polymorphisms of the DNA repair genes XPD6 and XPD23 and a polymorphism CYP1A1MspI as a metabolic gene were associated with high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation in men with a high exposure level of air pollution (156). Evidencesuggest that men will respond in a different manner to the same level of exposure and that individual responses may be modified by different level of gene expression (157).
 
High temperature
The High temperature is a physical factor which is concerned about for decades. It can affect the male reproductive system either directly, causing decreased or altered sperm production, or indirectly through the endocrine system causing a hormonal imbalance (158). Data from experimental studies showed scrotal heating due to the posture of sleeping and sitting, driving and clothing may affect testicular function and is related to male infertility (159).
However, making the selection of an appropriate control group is difficult or impossible and current data is not available from human sperm DNA quality in response to heat. However, in an experimental study, when mice were exposed to increased temperature, a stress-induced apoptosis in epididymis and testis which are very functional was seen. Germ cells in the testis were either lost by apoptosis or went on to complete their developmental process and were recovered as motile spermatozoa with fragmented DNA (160).
 
Conclusion
 
In highly compacted toroidal nucleo-protamine complexes, there is a nonrandom distribution of genes have potential to be involved in the genomic activation in the early embryo. In addition, protamines and other sperm chromatin associated proteins may provide epigenetic information to serve the reorganization of paternal chromatin after fertilization. Meanwhile, DNA strand breaks delay the replication until either the damage can be repaired or until embryo development with damaged DNA is no longer probable.
An overall consideration of the current record on human sperm chromatin/DNA shows that environmental, clinical and iatrogenic relevant factors might reflect dysmetabolism. The consequence of dysmetabolism is endocrine disrupting compounds which alter remodeling of sperm chromatin which can be detected in infertile patients. Although SCSA is considered as the gold standard and other detecting methods of individual sperm such as SCD, CMA3, TB, and AB are preferred for their simplicity, this should be noted that post meiotic damage may regularly occur in the sperm DNA and a prognostic test to help as a true screening test to appraise DNA integrity of motile and non-apoptotic fraction of the sperm population have not been achieved.
 
Conflict of interest
 
All investigators disclose no conflict of interest in this study.
 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Godde JS, Ura K. Dynamic alterations of linker histone variants during development. Int J Dev Biol 2009; 53: 215-224. [DOI:10.1387/ijdb.082644jg]
2. Gan H, Cai T, Lin X, Wu Y, Wang X, Yang F, et al. Integrative proteomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal multiple post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of mouse spermatogenesis. Mol Cell Proteom 2013; 12: 1144-1157. [DOI:10.1074/mcp.M112.020123]
3. Erenpreiss J, Spano M, Erenpreisa J, Bungum M, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure and male fertility: biological and clinical aspects. Asian J Androl 2006; 8: 11-29. [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00112.x]
4. Zini A, Sigman M. Are tests of sperm DNA damage clinically useful? Pros and cons. J Androl 2009; 30: 219-229. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.108.006908]
5. Machev N, Gosset P, Viville S. Chromosome abnormalities in sperm from infertile men with normal somatic karyotypes: teratozoospermia. Cytogen Genome Res 2005; 111: 352-357. [DOI:10.1159/000086910]
6. Zini A, Libman J. Sperm DNA damage: clinical significance in the era of assisted reproduction. Canadian Med Assoc J 2006; 175: 495-500. [DOI:10.1503/cmaj.060218]
7. Larson-Cook KL, Brannian JD, Hansen KA, Kasperson KM, Aamold ET, Evenson DP. Relationship between the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques and sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 895-902. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01116-6]
8. Giwercman A, Richthoff J, Hjøllund H, Bonde JP, Jepson K, Frohm B, et al. Correlation between sperm motility and sperm chromatin structure assay parameters. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1404-1412. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02212-X]
9. Sakkas D, Urner F, Bianchi P, Bizzaro D, Wagner I, Jaquenoud N, et al. Sperm chromatin anomalies can influence decondensation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 837-843. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019263]
10. Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, Manicardi G, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, Bianchi U. Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Rev Reprod 1999; 4: 31-37. [DOI:10.1530/ror.0.0040031]
11. Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Novel concepts in male infertility. Int Braz J Urol 2011; 37: 5-15. [DOI:10.1590/S1677-55382011000100002]
12. Gharagozloo P, Aitken RJ. The role of sperm oxidative stress in male infertility and the significance of oral antioxidant therapy. Hum Reprod 2011: 1628-1640. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/der132]
13. Talebi A, Moein M, Tabibnejad N, Ghasemzadeh J. Effect of varicocele on chromatin condensation and DNA integrity of ejaculated spermatozoa using cytochemical tests. Andrologia 2008; 40: 245-251. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2008.00852.x]
14. Meetoo D, McGovern P, Safadi R. An epidemiological overview of diabetes across the world. Br J Nurs 2007; 16: .1002-1007
15. Brucker-Davis F, Thayer K, Colborn T. Significant effects of mild endogenous hormonal changes in humans: considerations for low-dose testing. Environment Health Perspect 2001; 109 (Suppl.): 21. [DOI:10.1289/ehp.01109s121]
16. Ding G-L, Liu Y, Liu M-E, Pan J-X, Guo M-X, Sheng J-Z, et al. The effects of diabetes on male fertility and epigenetic regulation during spermatogenesis. Asian J Androl 2015; 17: 948-953. [DOI:10.4103/1008-682X.150844]
17. Solomon H, Man J, Jackson G. Erectile dysfunction and the cardiovascular patient: endothelial dysfunction is the common denominator. Heart 2003; 89: 251-253. [DOI:10.1136/heart.89.3.251]
18. Lewis RW, Fugl‐Meyer KS, Bosch R, Fugl‐Meyer AR, Laumann EO, Lizza E, et al. Epidemiology/risk factors of sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 35-39. [DOI:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10106.x]
19. Miralles-Garcia J, Garcia-Diez L. Specific aspects of erectile dysfunction in endocrinology. Int J Impotence Res 2004; 16: S10-S12. [DOI:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901237]
20. Pourentezari M, Talebi A, Mangoli E, Anvari M, Rahimipour M. Additional deleterious effects of alcohol consumption on sperm parameters and DNA integrity in diabetic mice. Andrologia 2016; 48: .564-569
21. Mangoli E, Talebi AR, Anvari M, Pourentezari M. Effects of experimentally-induced diabetes on sperm parameters and chromatin quality in mice. Iran J Reprod Med 2013; 11: 53.
22. Talebi AR, Mangoli E, Nahangi H, Anvari M, Pourentezari M, Halvaei I. Vitamin C attenuates detrimental effects of diabetes mellitus on sperm parameters, chromatin quality and rate of apoptosis in mice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 181: 32-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.007]
23. Mangoli E, Pourentezari M, Anvari M, Talebi A, Nahangi H. The improvement of sperm parameters and chromatin quality by vitamin C. Researcher 2012; 4: 43-49.
24. Agbaje I, Rogers D, McVicar C, McClure N, Atkinson A, Mallidis C, et al. Insulin dependant diabetes mellitus: implications for male reproductive function. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1871-1877. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem077]
25. Rama Raju G, Jaya Prakash G, Murali Krishna K, Madan K, Siva Narayana T, Ravi Krishna C. Noninsulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus: effects on sperm morphological and functional characteristics, nuclear DNA integrity and outcome of assisted reproductive technique. Andrologia 2012; 44: 490-498. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01213.x]
26. Werthman P, Wixon R, Kasperson K, Evenson DP. Significant decrease in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1800-1804. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.019]
27. Lin J, Dhabuwala C, Li H. The role of apoptosis in infertile men with varicoceles: Is the FAS system implicated? Fertil Steril 2001; 76 )Suppl.): S197.
28. Moustafa MH, Sharma RK, Thornton J, Mascha E, Abdel‐Hafez MA, Thomas AJ, et al. Relationship between ROS production, apoptosis and DNA denaturation in spermatozoa from patients examined for infertility. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 129-138. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh024]
29. Gual-Frau J, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Hannaoui N, Checa MA, Ribas-Maynou J, et al. Oral antioxidant treatment partly improves integrity of human sperm DNA in infertile grade I varicocele patients. Hum Fertil 2015; 18: 225-229. [DOI:10.3109/14647273.2015.1050462]
30. Smith R, Kaune H, Parodi D, Madariaga M, Ríos R, Morales I, et al. Increased sperm DNA damage in patients with varicocele: relationship with seminal oxidative stress. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 986-993. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei429]
31. Enciso M, Muriel L, Fernández JL, Goyanes V, Segrelles E, Marcos M, et al. Infertile men with varicocele show a high relative proportion of sperm cells with intense nuclear damage level, evidenced by the sperm chromatin dispersion test. J Androl 2006; 27: 106-111. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.05115]
32. Telli O, Sarici H, Kabar M, Ozgur BC, Resorlu B, Bozkurt S. Does varicocelectomy affect DNA fragmentation in infertile patients? Indian J Urol 2015; 31: 116-119. [DOI:10.4103/0970-1591.152811]
33. Mohammed E-EM, Mosad E, Zahran AM, Hameed DA, Taha EA, Mohamed MA. Acridine Orange and Flow Cytometry: Which Is Better to Measure the Effect of Varicocele on Sperm DNA Integrity? Adv Urol 2015; 2015: 814150.
34. Ghanaie MM, Asgari SA, Dadrass N, Allahkhah A, Iran-Pour E, Safarinejad MR. Effects of varicocele repair on spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: a randomized clinical trial. Urol J 2012; 9: 505-513.
35. Öztürk Mİ, Koca O, Keleş MO, Yılmaz S, Karaman MI. Increased sperm DNA damage in experimental rat varicocele model and the beneficial effect of varicocelectomy. Int J Fertil Steril 2012; 6: 95-100. [DOI:10.1016/S1569-9056(13)60250-X]
36. Restelli AE, Bertolla RP, Spaine DM, Miotto A, Borrelli M, Cedenho AP. Quality and functional aspects of sperm retrieved through assisted ejaculation in men with spinal cord injury. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 819-825. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.060]
37. Utida C, Truzzi JC, Bruschini H, Simonetti R, Cedenho AP, Srougi M, et al. Male infertility in spinal cord trauma. Int Braz J Urol 2005; 31: 375-383. [DOI:10.1590/S1677-55382005000400013]
38. da Silva BF, Borrelli M, Fariello RM, Restelli AE, Del Giudice PT, Spaine DM, et al. Is sperm cryopreservation an option for fertility preservation in patients with spinal cord injury-induced anejaculation? Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 564-573. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.022]
39. Hirsch IH, Huang B, Chancellor MB, Rivas DA, Salzman SK, Jost LK, et al. Spermatogenesis in early and chronic phases of experimental spinal cord injury in the rodent model. J Androl 1999; 20: 63-71.
40. Momen MN, Fahmy I, Amer M, Arafa M, Zohdy W, Naser TA. Semen parameters in men with spinal cord injury: changes and aetiology. Asian J Androl 2007; 9: 684-689. [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00277.x]
41. Salsabili N, Mehrsai A, Jalalizadeh B, Pourmand G, Jalaie S. Correlation of sperm nuclear chromatin condensation staining method with semen parameters and sperm functional tests in patients with spinal cord injury, varicocele, and idiopathic infertility. Urol J 2009; 3: 32-37.
42. Talebi AR, Khalili MA, Hossaini A. Assessment of nuclear DNA integrity of epididymal spermatozoa following experimental chronic spinal cord injury in the rat. Int J Androl 2007; 30: 163-169. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00736.x]
43. Brackett NL, Ibrahim E, Grotas JA, Aballa TC, Lynne CM. Higher sperm DNA damage in semen from men with spinal cord injuries compared with controls. J Androl 2008; 29: 93-99. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.107.003574]
44. Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9: 331-345. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmg027]
45. Spanò M, Bonde JP, Hjøllund HI, Kolstad HA, Cordelli E, Leter G, et al. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 43-50. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00462-8]
46. Zini A, Bielecki R, Phang D, Zenzes MT. Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 674-677. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01796-9]
47. Benchaib M, Braun V, Lornage J, Hadj S, Salle B, Lejeune H, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1023-1028. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg228]
48. Høst E, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S. The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 559-563. [DOI:10.1080/j.1600-0412.2000.079007559.x]
49. Evenson D, Wixon R. Meta-analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 466-472. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62000-7]
50. de Lamirande E, Gagnon C. Impact of reactive oxygen species on spermatozoa: a balancing act between beneficial and detrimental effects. Hum Reprod 1995; 10 (suppl.): 15-21. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_1.15]
51. Patki P, Woodhouse J, Hamid R, Craggs M, Shah J. Effects of spinal cord injury on semen parameters. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31: 27-32. [DOI:10.1080/10790268.2008.11753977]
52. Mahfouz R, Sharma R, Thiyagarajan A, Kale V, Gupta S, Sabanegh E, et al. Semen characteristics and sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with low and high levels of seminal reactive oxygen species. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2141-2146. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.030]
53. Talebi AR, Khalili MA, Vahidi S, Ghasemzadeh J, Tabibnejad N. Sperm chromatin condensation, DNA integrity, and apoptosis in men with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2013; 36: 140-146. [DOI:10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000055]
54. Salsabili N, Mehrsai A, Jalaie S. Concentration of blood and seminal plasma elements and their relationships with semen parameters in men with spinal cord injury. Andrologia 2009; 41: 24-28. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2008.00885.x]
55. Bray F, Richiardi L, Ekbom A, Pukkala E, Cuninkova M, Møller H. Trends in testicular cancer incidence and mortality in 22 European countries: continuing increases in incidence and declines in mortality. Int J Cancer 2006; 118: 3099-3111. [DOI:10.1002/ijc.21747]
56. Walsh TJ, Grady RW, Porter MP, Lin DW, Weiss NS. Incidence of testicular germ cell cancers in US children: SEER program experience 1973 to 2000. Urology 2006; 68: 402-405. [DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.045]
57. Paoli D, Gallo M, Rizzo F, Spanò M, Leter G, Lombardo F, et al. Testicular cancer and sperm DNA damage: short‐and long‐term effects of antineoplastic treatment. Andrology 2015; 3: 122-128. [DOI:10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00250.x]
58. Ghezzi M, Berretta M, Bottacin A, Palego P, Sartini B, Cosci I, et al. Impact of Bep or Carboplatin Chemotherapy on Testicular Function and Sperm Nucleus of Subjects with Testicular Germ Cell Tumor. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7: 122. [DOI:10.3389/fphar.2016.00122]
59. Fossa SD, De Angelis P, Kraggerud SM, Evenson D, Theodorsen L, Clausen OP. Prediction of posttreatment spermatogenesis in patients with testicular cancer by flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay. J Urol 1998; 160: 947-948. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62841-6]
60. Maselli J, Hales BF, Chan P, Robaire B. Exposure to bleomycin, etoposide, and cis-platinum alters rat sperm chromatin integrity and sperm head protein profile. Biol Reprod 2012; 86: 166. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.111.098616]
61. O'Flaherty C, Vaisheva F, Hales B, Chan P, Robaire B. Characterization of sperm chromatin quality in testicular cancer and Hodgkin's lymphoma patients prior to chemotherapy. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1044-1052. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/den081]
62. Morris ID. Sperm DNA damage and cancer treatment. Int J Androl 2002; 25: 255-261. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2605.2002.00372.x]
63. Tanrikut C, Feldman AS, Altemus M, Paduch DA, Schlegel PN. Adverse effect of paroxetine on sperm. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1021-1026. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.039]
64. Chan P, Robaire B. Cancer in Males: Implications for Sperm Quality, Fertility, and Progeny Outcome. Sperm Chromatin: Springer; 2011: 351-360.
65. Kobayashi H, Larson K, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, Evenson DP, Toma H, et al. DNA damage in patients with untreated cancer as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 469-475. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01740-4]
66. O'flaherty CM, Chan PT, Hales BF, Robaire B. Sperm chromatin structure components are differentially repaired in cancer survivors. J Androl 2012; 33: 629-636. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.111.015388]
67. Ochsendorf F. Infections in the male genital tract and reactive oxygen species. Hum Reprod Update 1999; 5: 399-420. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/5.5.399]
68. Cocuzza M, Sikka SC, Athayde KS, Agarwal A. Clinical relevance of oxidative stress and sperm chromatin damage in male infertility: an evidence based analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2007; 33: 603-621. [DOI:10.1590/S1677-55382007000500002]
69. Potts JM, Sharma R, Pasqualotto F, Nelson D, Hall G, Agarwal A. Association of Ureaplasma urealyticum with abnormal reactive oxygen species levels and absence of leukocytospermia. J Urol 2000; 163: 1775-1778. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67540-4]
70. Peng HW, Su TS, Han SH, Ho CK, Ho CH, Ching KN, et al. Assessment of HBV persistent infection in an adult population in Taiwan. J Medical Virol 1988; 24: 405-412. [DOI:10.1002/jmv.1890240407]
71. Huang J-M, Huang T-H, Qiu H-Y, Fang X-W, Zhuang T-G, Liu H-X, et al. Effects of hepatitis B virus infection on human sperm chromosomes. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9: 736-740. [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.736]
72. Kang X, Xie Q, Zhou X, Li F, Huang J, Liu D, et al. Effects of hepatitis B virus S protein exposure on sperm membrane integrity and functions. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33471. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0033471]
73. Foresta C, Garolla A, Zuccarello D, Pizzol D, Moretti A, Barzon L, et al. Human papillomavirus found in sperm head of young adult males affects the progressive motility. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 802-806. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.050]
74. Rintala M, Greénman S, Pöllänen P, Suominen J, Syrjänen S. Detection of high-risk HPV DNA in semen and its association with the quality of semen. Int J STD AIDS 2004; 15: 740-743. [DOI:10.1258/0956462042395122]
75. Kaspersen MD, Bungum M, Fedder J, Bonde J, Larsen PB, J Ingerslev H, et al. No increased sperm DNA fragmentation index in semen containing human papillomavirus or herpesvirus. Andrology 2013; 1: 361-364. [DOI:10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00067.x]
76. Sasikumar S, Dakshayani D, Sarasa D. An Investigation of DNA Fragmentation and Morphological Changes caused by Bacteria and Fungi in Human Spermatozoa. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2013; 2: 84-96.
77. Villegas J, Schulz M, Soto L, Sanchez R. Bacteria induce expression of apoptosis in human spermatozoa. Apoptosis 2005; 10: 105-110. [DOI:10.1007/s10495-005-6065-8]
78. Gallegos G, Ramos B, Santiso R, Goyanes V, Gosálvez J, Fernández JL. Sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with genitourinary infection by Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 328-334. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.035]
79. Safarinejad MR. Sperm DNA damage and semen quality impairment after treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors detected using semen analysis and sperm chromatin structure assay. J Urol 2008; 180: 2124-2128. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.034]
80. Pollack MH, Reiter S, Hammerness P. Genitourinary and sexual adverse effects of psychotropic medication. Int J Psychiatr Med 1992; 22: 305-327. [DOI:10.2190/P60R-PLED-TL09-TUEN]
81. Koyuncu H, Serefoglu E, Yencilek E, Atalay H, Akbas N, Sarıca K. Escitalopram treatment for premature ejaculation has a negative effect on semen parameters. Int J Impotence Res 2011; 23: 257-261. [DOI:10.1038/ijir.2011.35]
82. Khazaie H, Rezaie L, Payam NR, Najafi F. Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction during treatment with fluoxetine, sertraline and trazodone; a randomized controlled trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2015; 37: 40-45. [DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.10.010]
83. Khin NA, Kronstein PD, Yang P, Ishida E, Hung HJ, Mathis MV, et al. Regulatory and scientific issues in studies to evaluate sexual dysfunction in antidepressant drug trials. J Clin Psychiatry 2015; 76: 1060-1063. [DOI:10.4088/JCP.14cs09700]
84. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013; 380: 2224-2260. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8]
85. Van Thiel D, Gavaler JS, Cobb CF, Graham TO. Ethanol, a Leydig cell toxin: evidence obtained in vivo and in vitro. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1983; 18: 317-323. [DOI:10.1016/0091-3057(83)90193-4]
86. Salonen I, Eriksson C. Penetration of ethanol into the male reproductive tract. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res 1989; 13: 746-751. [DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1989.tb00414.x]
87. Komiya A, Kato T, Kawauchi Y, Watanabe A, Fuse H. Clinical factors associated with sperm DNA fragmentation in male patients with infertility. Sci World J 2014; 2014: 868303. [DOI:10.1155/2014/868303]
88. Talebi AR, Sarcheshmeh AA, Khalili MA, Tabibnejad N. Effects of ethanol consumption on chromatin condensation and DNA integrity of epididymal spermatozoa in rat. Alcohol 2011; 45: 403-409. [DOI:10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.10.005]
89. Rahimipour M, Talebi AR, Anvari M, Sarcheshmeh AA, Omidi M. Effects of different doses of ethanol on sperm parameters, chromatin structure and apoptosis in adult mice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 423-428. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.038]
90. Eid NA, Shibata MA, Ito Y, Kusakabe K, Hammad H, Otsuki Y. Involvement of Fas system and active caspases in apoptotic signalling in testicular germ cells of ethanol‐treated rats. Int J Androl 2002; 25: 159-167. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2605.2002.00341.x]
91. Ouko LA, Shantikumar K, Knezovich J, Haycock P, Schnugh DJ, Ramsay M. Effect of Alcohol Consumption on CpG Methylation in the Differentially Methylated Regions of H19 and IG‐DMR in Male Gametes- Implications for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res 2009; 33: 1615-1627. [DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.00993.x]
92. Wu D, Cederbaum AI. Alcohol, oxidative stress, and free radical damage. Alcohol Res Health 2003; 27: 277-284.
93. Amanvermez R, Demir S, Tunçel ÖK, Alvur M, Agar E. Alcohol-induced oxidative stress and reduction in oxidation by ascorbate/L-cys/L-met in the testis, ovary, kidney, and lung of rat. Adv Ther 2005; 22: 548-558. [DOI:10.1007/BF02849949]
94. Cacciola G, Chioccarelli T, Ricci G, Meccariello R, Fasano S, Pierantoni R, et al. The endocannabinoid system in vertebrate male reproduction: a comparative overview. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2008; 286: S24-S30. [DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2008.01.004]
95. Pasqualotto FF, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Relationship between oxidative stress, semen characteristics, and clinical diagnosis in men undergoing infertility investigation. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 459-464. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00567-1]
96. Song B-J, Moon K-H, Upreti VV, Eddington ND, Lee IJ. Mechanisms of MDMA (ecstasy)-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and organ damage. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2010; 11: 434-443. [DOI:10.2174/138920110791591436]
97. Barenys M, Macia N, Camps L, de Lapuente J, Gomez-Catalan J, Gonzalez-Linares J, et al. Chronic exposure to MDMA (ecstasy) increases DNA damage in sperm and alters testes histopathology in male rats. Toxicol Lett 2009; 191: 40-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.08.002]
98. Battista N, Pasquariello N, Di Tommaso M, Maccarrone M. Interplay between endocannabinoids, steroids and cytokines in the control of human reproduction. J Neuroendocrinol 2008; 20: 82-89. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01684.x]
99. Fronczak CM, Kim ED, Barqawi AB. The insults of illicit drug use on male fertility. J Androl 2012; 33: 515-528. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.110.011874]
100. Safarinejad MR, Asgari SA, Farshi A, Ghaedi G, Kolahi AA, Iravani S, et al. The effects of opiate consumption on serum reproductive hormone levels, sperm parameters, seminal plasma antioxidant capacity and sperm DNA integrity. Reprod Toxicol 2013; 36: 18-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.11.010]
101. Wyrobek AJ, Eskenazi B, Young S, Arnheim N, Tiemann-Boege I, Jabs E, et al. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2006; 103: 9601-9606. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0506468103]
102. Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ, Sloter E, Kidd S, Moore L, Young S, et al. The association of age and semen quality in healthy men. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 447-454. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg107]
103. Pasqualotto FF, Sobreiro BP, Hallak J, Pasqualotto EB, Lucon AM. Sperm concentration and normal sperm morphology decrease and follicle‐stimulating hormone level increases with age. BJU Int 2005; 96: 1087-1091. [DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05806.x]
104. Morris I, Ilott S, Dixon L, Brison D. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 990-998. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.4.990]
105. Angelopoulou R, Plastira K, Msaouel P. Spermatozoal sensitive biomarkers to defective protaminosis and fragmented DNA. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2007; 5: 36. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-5-36]
106. Youssry M, Ozmen B, Orief Y, Zohni K, Al-Hasani S. Human sperm DNA damage in the context of assisted reproductive techniques. Iran J Reprod Med 2007; 5: 137-150.
107. Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Mullen JBM. Age-related decline in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity in patients evaluated for male infertility. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 496-499. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.075]
108. Cooke MS, Evans MD, Dizdaroglu M, Lunec J. Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease. FASEB J 2003; 17: 1195-1214. [DOI:10.1096/fj.02-0752rev]
109. Wiseman H, Halliwell B. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochem J 1996; 313: 17-29. [DOI:10.1042/bj3130017]
110. Alexeyev MF. Is there more to aging than mitochondrial DNA and reactive oxygen species? FEBS J 2009; 276: 5768-5787. [DOI:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07269.x]
111. Carrell DT. Paternal influences on human reproductive success: Cambridge University Press; 2013. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139169349]
112. Barroso G, Morshedi M, Oehninger S. Analysis of DNA fragmentation, plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine and oxidative stress in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1338-1344. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/15.6.1338]
113. Cocuzza M, Athayde KS, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Pagani R, Lucon AM, et al. Age-related increase of reactive oxygen species in neat semen in healthy fertile men. Urology 2008; 71: 490-494. [DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.041]
114. Potts J, Pasqualotto F. Seminal oxidative stress in patients with chronic prostatitis. Andrologia 2003; 35: 304-308. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2003.tb00862.x]
115. de La Rochebrochard E, Thonneau P. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1649-1656. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.6.1649]
116. Schmid T, Eskenazi B, Baumgartner A, Marchetti F, Young S, Weldon R, et al. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in healthy non-smokers. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 180-187. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/del338]
117. Azam S, Hadi N, Khan NU, Hadi SM. Antioxidant and prooxidant properties of caffeine, theobromine and xanthine. Med Sci Monitor 2003; 9: BR325-BR330.
118. Sarkaria JN, Busby EC, Tibbetts RS, Roos P, Taya Y, Karnitz LM, et al. Inhibition of ATM and ATR kinase activities by the radiosensitizing agent, caffeine. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 4375-4382.
119. Dupont C, Faure C, Sermondade N, Boubaya M, Eustache F, Clément P, et al. Obesity leads to higher risk of sperm DNA damage in infertile patients. Asian J Androl 2013; 15: 622-625. [DOI:10.1038/aja.2013.65]
120. Kort HI, Massey JB, Elsner CW, Mitchell‐Leef D, Shapiro DB, Witt MA, et al. Impact of body mass index values on sperm quantity and quality. J Androl 2006; 27: 450-452. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.05124]
121. Tamburrino L, Marchiani S, Montoya M, Elia Marino F, Natali I, Cambi M, et al. Mechanisms and clinical correlates of sperm DNA damage. Asian J Androl 2012; 14: 24-31. [DOI:10.1038/aja.2011.59]
122. Gandhi G, Kaur G. Assessment of DNA damage in obese individuals. Res J Biol 2012; 2: 37-44.
123. Tunc O, Bakos H, Tremellen K. Impact of body mass index on seminal oxidative stress. Andrologia 2011; 43: 121-128. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.01032.x]
124. Rybar R, Kopecka V, Prinosilova P, Markova P, Rubes J. Male obesity and age in relationship to semen parameters and sperm chromatin integrity. Andrologia 2011; 43: 286-291. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01057.x]
125. Momeni HR, Eskandari N. Effect of vitamin E on sperm parameters and DNA integrity in sodium arsenite-treated rats. Iran J Reprod Med 2012; 10: 249-256.
126. Sabeti P, Pourmasumi S, Rahiminia T, Akyash F, Talebi AR. Etiologies of sperm oxidative stress. Int J Reprod BioMed 2016; 14: 231-240.
127. Agarwal A, Nallella KP, Allamaneni SS, Said TM. Role of antioxidants in treatment of male infertility: an overview of the literature. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 8: 616-627. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61641-0]
128. Silver EW, Eskenazi B, Evenson DP, Block G, Young S, Wyrobek AJ. Effect of antioxidant intake on sperm chromatin stability in healthy nonsmoking men. J Androl 2005; 26: 550-556. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.04165]
129. Sen S, Chakraborty R. The role of antioxidants in human health. Oxidative stress: diagnostics, prevention, and therapy. 2011;1083:1-37. [DOI:10.1021/bk-2011-1083.ch001]
130. Wyrobek AJ. Methods and concepts in detecting abnormal reproductive outcomes of paternal origin. Reprod Toxicol 1993; 7: 3-16. [DOI:10.1016/0890-6238(93)90064-E]
131. Gupta C. Reproductive malformation of the male offspring following maternal exposure to estrogenic chemicals. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 2000; 224: 61-68. [DOI:10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22402.x]
132. Meeker JD, Hauser R. Exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and male reproduction. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2010; 56: 122-131. [DOI:10.3109/19396360903443658]
133. Aktar W, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip Toxicol 2009; 2: 1-12. [DOI:10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7]
134. Roeleveld N, Bretveld R. The impact of pesticides on male fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 20: 229-233. [DOI:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282fcc334]
135. Control CfD, Prevention. Chemistry and Toxicology of Cigarette Smoke and Biomarkers of Exposure and Harm. 2010.
136. Eftekhar M, Pourmasumi S, Sabeti P, Mirhosseini F. Relation of Second Hand Smoker and Effect on Pregnancy Outcome and Newborns Parameters. Womens Health Gynecol 2016; 6: 2.
137. Arabi M, Moshtaghi H. Influence of cigarette smoking on spermatozoa via seminal plasma. Andrologia 2005; 37: 119-124. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2005.00664.x]
138. Briviba K, Kulling SE, Möseneder J, Watzl B, Rechkemmer G, Bub A. Effects of supplementing a low-carotenoid diet with a tomato extract for 2 weeks on endogenous levels of DNA single strand breaks and immune functions in healthy non-smokers and smokers. Carcinogenesis 2004; 25: 2373-2378. [DOI:10.1093/carcin/bgh249]
139. Künzle R, Mueller MD, Hänggi W, Birkhäuser MH, Drescher H, Bersinger NA. Semen quality of male smokers and nonsmokers in infertile couples. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 287-291. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04664-2]
140. Calogero A, Polosa R, Perdichizzi A, Guarino F, La Vignera S, Scarfia A, et al. Cigarette smoke extract immobilizes human spermatozoa and induces sperm apoptosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19: 564-571. [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.004]
141. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ. Effect of cigarette smoking on levels of seminal oxidative stress in infertile men: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 491-499. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03294-6]
142. Potts R, Newbury C, Smith G, Notarianni L, Jefferies T. Sperm chromatin damage associated with male smoking. Mutat Res 1999; 423: 103-111. [DOI:10.1016/S0027-5107(98)00242-5]
143. Yu B, Qi Y, Liu D, Gao X, Chen H, Bai C, et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with abnormal histone-to-protamine transition in human sperm. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 51-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.001]
144. Hamad M, Shelko N, Kartarius S, Montenarh M, Hammadeh M. Impact of cigarette smoking on histone (H2B) to protamine ratio in human spermatozoa and its relation to sperm parameters. Andrology 2014; 2: 666-677. [DOI:10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00245.x]
145. Pembrey ME, Bygren LO, Kaati G, Edvinsson S, Northstone K, Sjöström M, et al. Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. Eur J Hum Genet 2006; 14: 159-166. [DOI:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201538]
146. Olshan AF, Faustman EM. Male-mediated developmental toxicity. Reprod Toxicol 1993; 7: 191-202. [DOI:10.1016/0890-6238(93)90224-U]
147. Mailankot M, Kunnath AP, Jayalekshmi H, Koduru B, Valsalan R. Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8 GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats. Clinics 2009; 64: 561-565. [DOI:10.1590/S1807-59322009000600011]
148. Falzone N, Huyser C, Becker P, Leszczynski D, Franken DR. The effect of pulsed 900‐MHz GSM mobile phone radiation on the acrosome reaction, head morphometry and zona binding of human spermatozoa. Int J Androl 2011; 34: 20-26. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2010.01054.x]
149. Sivani S, Sudarsanam D. Impacts of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) from cell phone towers and wireless devices on biosystem and ecosystem-a review. Biol Med 2012; 4: 202-216.
150. Adams JA, Galloway TS, Mondal D, Esteves SC, Mathews F. Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environment Int 2014; 70: 106-112. [DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.015]
151. De Rosa M, Zarrilli S, Paesano L, Carbone U, Boggia B, Petretta M, et al. Traffic pollutants affect fertility in men. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1055-1061. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg226]
152. Boggia B, Carbone U, Farinaro E, Zarrilli S, Lombardi G, Colao A, et al. Effects of working posture and exposure to traffic pollutants on sperm quality. J Endocrinol Invest 2009; 32: 430-434. [DOI:10.1007/BF03346481]
153. Calogero AE, La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Perdichizzi A, Valenti D, Asero P, et al. Environmental car exhaust pollution damages human sperm chromatin and DNA. J Endocrinol Invest 2011; 34: 139-143. [DOI:10.1007/BF03346722]
154. Rubes J, Selevan SG, Evenson DP, Zudova D, Vozdova M, Zudova Z, et al. Episodic air pollution is associated with increased DNA fragmentation in human sperm without other changes in semen quality. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2776-2783. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei122]
155. Ji G, Gu A, Zhou Y, Shi X, Xia Y, Long Y, et al. Interactions between exposure to environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and DNA repair gene polymorphisms on bulky DNA adducts in human sperm. PLoS One 2010; 5: pii: e13145. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0013145]
156. Rubes J, Rybar R, Prinosilova P, Veznik Z, Chvatalova I, Solansky I, et al. Genetic polymorphisms influence the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutat Res 2010; 683: 9-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.09.010]
157. Pacey AA. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with sperm DNA damage. Hum Fertil 2010; 13: 189-193. [DOI:10.3109/14647273.2010.531883]
158. Horak S, Polanska J, Widlak P. Bulky DNA adducts in human sperm: relationship with fertility, semen quality, smoking, and environmental factors. Mutat Res 2003; 537: 53-65. [DOI:10.1016/S1383-5718(03)00051-2]
159. Jung A, Schuppe HC. Influence of genital heat stress on semen quality in humans. Andrologia 2007; 39: 203-215. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2007.00794.x]
160. 1Banks S, King SA, Irvine DS, Saunders PT. Impact of a mild scrotal heat stress on DNA integrity in murine spermatozoa. Reproduction 2005; 129: 505-514 [DOI:10.1530/rep.1.00531]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb