Volume 13, Issue 9 (10-2015)                   IJRM 2015, 13(9): 549-556 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khosrorad T, Dolatian M, Riazi H, Mahmoodi Z, Alavimajd H, Shahsavari S et al . Comparison of lifestyle in fertile and infertile couples in Kermanshah during 2013. IJRM 2015; 13 (9) :549-556
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-854-en.html
Comparison of lifestyle in fertile and infertile couples in Kermanshah during 2013
Tahereh Khosrorad1 , Mahrokh Dolatian * 2, Hedyeh Riazi3 , Zohreh Mahmoodi4 , Hamid Alavimajd5 , Soodeh Shahsavari5 , Mitra Bakhtiari6
1- Department of Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Student Research Committee, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , mhdolatian@gmail.com
3- Department of Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Social Determinant of Health Research Center, Alborz Univversity of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
5- Department of Biostatistics, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran
6- Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract:   (2290 Views)
Background: Infertility is a major reproductive health in gynecology. According to the world health organization, there are currently 50-80 million infertile couples in the world.
Objective: Considering the critical effects of lifestyle on reproductive health, this study aimed to compare the lifestyle of fertile and infertile couples in Kermanshah during 2013.
Materials and Methods: This research is a descriptive cross sectional study that was done on 216 fertile and infertile couples attending Infertility Center and six medical centers that were selected through the convenience sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic and fertility-related information and also lifestyle items on nutrition, physical activity, perceived social support, responsibility for health, and inappropriate health behaviors. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression analysis, independent t, chi-square and  Generalized Estimating equation were performed to analyze the data.
Results: Fertile and infertile women (86.1% and 73. 1% respectively, p= 0. 03) as well as fertile and infertile men were significantly different in terms of physical activity (87% and 96.3% p<0.001, respectively) and perceived social support (p<0.001). Moreover, there was a significant difference between fertile and infertile women in nutrition (p<0.001). Similar differences were observed in responsibility for health and inappropriate health behaviors between fertile and infertile men. However, all of the dimensions of lifestyle, except nutrition, were significantly different between fertile and infertile couples.
Conclusion: As lifestyle plays a crucial role in reproductive health, the inappropriate lifestyle of infertile couples has to be modified through effective measures such as awareness promotion, behavioral changes, and development of a healthy environment.
Keywords: Lifestyle, Fertile couples, Infertile couples, Social support, Nutrition, Physical activity, Health behaviors.
Full-Text [PDF 153 kb]   (710 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (357 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Gaur DS, Talekar MS, Pathak V. Alcohol intake and cigarette smoking: impact of two major lifestyle factors on male fertility. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2010; 53: 35-40. [DOI:10.4103/0377-4929.59180]
2. Fraser M, Cooper MA. Myles text book for midwives. 15th, editor. London: Churchill living stone Elsivier; 2010.
3. Amin U, Khan N, Ali Bhat I. Prevalence and causes of infertility among women of Jammu and Kashmir. Int J Dev Res 2015; 5: 3771-3774.
4. Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S. Defining infertility-a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 575-588. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmr015]
5. Novak E, Berek JS. Berek & Novak's gynecology. 15th, editor. Stanford,California: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
6. Kamali Fard M, Alizadeh R, Sehati F, Golzadeh M. The effect of lifestyle on the rate af preterm rate. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2007; 10: 55-63.
7. Griffiths A, Dyer SM, Lord SJ, Pardy C, Fraser IS, Eckermann S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization by maternal age and number of treatment attempts. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 924-931. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep418]
8. Homan GF, Davies M, Norman R. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13: 209-223. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml056]
9. Craft-Rosenberg M, Pehler S-R. Encyclopedia of family health. United state America: Sage Publications; 2011. [DOI:10.4135/9781412994071]
10. Moerbeek HHS, Niehof A. Changing families and their lifestyles. Netherland: Wageningen Academic Pub; 2007. [DOI:10.3920/978-90-8686-624-3]
11. Mcdonald S, Thompson C. Women's health: Australia: Elsevier; 2005.
12. Redman LM. Physical activity and its effects on reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 579-586. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61183-2]
13. Revonta M, Raitanen J, Sihvo S, Koponen P, Klemetti R, Männistö S, et al. Health and life style among infertile men and women. Sex Reprod Healthc 2010; 1: 91-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2010.06.002]
14. Braga DP, Halpern G, Figueira Rde S, Setti AS, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Food intake and social habits in male patients and its relationship to intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 53-59. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.011]
15. Twigt J, Bolhuis M, Steegers E, Hammiche F, van Inzen W, Laven J, et al. The preconception diet is associated with the chance of ongoing pregnancy in women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2526-2531. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/des157]
16. Kelishadi R, Ardalan G, Gheiratmand R, Gouya MM, Razaghi EM, Delavari A. Association of physical activity and diatary behaviors in relation to the body mass index in national sample of iranian children and adolescents. Bull Word Health Orga 2007; 85: 19-26. [DOI:10.2471/BLT.06.030783]
17. Kurtze N, Rangul V, Hustvedt B-E. Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trøndelag health study (HUNT) population of men. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 63. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-8-63]
18. Wongpakaran T, Wongpakaran N, Ruktrakul R. Reliability and validity of the Multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS): Thai Version. Clin Pract Epidemio Ment Health 2011; 7: 161-166. [DOI:10.2174/1745017901107010161]
19. Sararoudi RB, Sanei H, Baghbanian A. The relationship between type D personality and perceived social support in myocardial infarction patients. J Isfahan Univ Med Sci 2011; 16: 627.
20. Mirabzadeh A, Dolatian M, Forouzan AS, Sajjadi H, Majd HA, Mahmoodi Z. Path analysis associations between perceived social support, stressful life events and other psychosocial risk factors during pregnancy and preterm delivery. Iranian Red Crescent Med J 2013; 15: 507. [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.11271]
21. Homan G, Litt J, Norman RJ. The FAST study: Fertility ASsessment and advice Targeting lifestyle choices and behaviours: a pilot study. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2396-2404. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/des176]
22. Oborna I, Wojewodka G, De Sanctis JB, Fingerova H, Svobodova M, Brezinova J, et al. Increased lipid peroxidation andabnormal fatty acid profiles in seminal and blood plasma of normozoospermic males from infertile couples. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 308–316. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep416]
23. Colombo O, Pinelli G, Comelli M, Marchetti P, Sieri S, Brighenti F, et al. Dietary intakes in infertile women a pilot study. Nutr J 2009; 8: 53. [DOI:10.1186/1475-2891-8-53]
24. Gudmundsdottir SL, Flanders WD, Augestad LB. Physical activity and fertility in women: the North-Trøndelag Health Study. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 3196-3204. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep337]
25. Esmaeilzadeh S, Delavar MA, Basirat Z, Shafi H. Physical activity and body mass index among women who have experienced infertility. Arch Med Sci 2012; 9: 499-505.
26. Wise LA, Cramer DW, Hornstein MD, Ashby RK, Missmer SA. Physical activity and semen quality among men attending an infertility clinic. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1025–1030. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.006]
27. Aryanpur M, Tarahomi M, Sharifi H, Heydari G, Hessami Z, Akhoundi M. Comparison of spermatozoa quality in male smokers and nonsmokers of Iranian infertile couples. Int J Fertil Steril 2011; 5: 152-157.
28. Wright KP, Trimarchi JR, Allsworth J, Keefe D. The effect of female tobacco smoking on IVF outcomes. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2930–2934. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/del269]
29. Anderheim L, Holter C, Bergh C, Möller A. Does psychological stress affect the outcome of in vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod 2006; 20: 2969-2975. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei219]
30. Slade P, O'Neill C, Simpson AJ, Lashen H. The relationship between perceived stigma, disclosurepatterns, support and distress in new attendees at an infertility clinic. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 2309–2317. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem115]
31. Heidari P, Latifnejad R. Relationship between psychosocial factors and marital satisfaction in infertile women. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci 2010; 14: 26-32.
32. Lund R, Sejbaek CS, Christensen U, Schmidt L. The impact of social relations on the incidence of severe depressive symptoms among infertile women and men. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2810–2820. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep257]
33. Hashemi S, Simbar M, Ramezani-Tehrani F, Shams J, Majd HA. Anxiety and success of in vitro fertilization. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 164: 60-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.05.032]
34. Mercer CH, Fenton KA, Johnson AM, Wellings K, Macdowall W, McManus S, et al. Sexual function problems and help seeking behaviour in Britain: national probability sample survey. BMJ 2003; 327: 426-427. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7412.426]
35. Nekuei N, Kazemi A, Ehsanpur S, Beigi NMA. Preconception risk assessment of infertile couples. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2013; 18: 27-32.
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb