<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine</title>
<title_fa>International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine</title_fa>
<short_title>IJRM</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrm.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2476-4108</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2476-3772</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.29252/ijrm</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1398</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2019</year>
	<month>9</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>17</volume>
<number>9</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>شکست درمان با آزیترومایسین در کلامیدیا تراکوماتیس اوروژنیتال: مرور سیستماتیک و متاآنالیز</title_fa>
	<title>Urogenital chlamydia trachomatis treatment failure with azithromycin: A meta-analysis


</title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa>Review article</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Review Article</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;مقدمه: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;کلامیدیا تراکوماتیس یکی از شایع&#8204;ترین پاتوژن&#8204;های منتقله از راه دستگاه تناسلی در انسان است که منجر به بروز عفونت اوروژنیتال می&amp;shy;گردد.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:arial,sans-serif;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;هدف: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;با توجه به شیوع بالای این عفونت کلامیدیا و پیامدهای نامطلوب آن بر سلامت زنان و مردان، این مطالعه متاآنالیز با هدف تعیین میزان شکست درمان با آزیترومایسین انجام گرفت.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;موارد و روش&amp;shy;ها: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;پایگاه&amp;shy;های اطلاعاتی&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;MEDLINE &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;، &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;ISI Web of Science&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;، &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;PubMed&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;، &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;EMBASE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;، &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;Scopus&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;، &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;ProQuest&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;و&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;Science&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;Direct&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt; برای مقالاتی که از سال 1991 تا 2018 منتشر شده بود مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. برای ارزیابی کیفیت مطالعات انتخاب شده، از &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;Cochrane&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;Risk&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;of&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;Bias Assessment Tool&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt; استفاده شد. از 12 و کوکران کیو-تست برای تعیین هتروژنیسیتی استفاده شد. برای مقایسه شیوع در سطوح مختلف متغیرها از روش &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;Subgroup analysis and meta-regression&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt; استفاده شده است.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:arial,sans-serif;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;نتایج: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;21 مطالعه که معیارهای ورود را دارا بودند در نهایت تجزیه و تحلیل شد. برآورد تلفیقی میزان شکست آزیترومایسین 23/11% بود. همچنین درصد شکست آزیترومایسین در درمان اورتریت (87/15%)، سرویسیت (41/7%) و ژنیتال کلامیدیا (14/7%) بود. برآورد تلفیقی تفاوت میزان شکست 37/2% بود که نشان می&amp;shy;دهد شکست درمان آزیترومایسین در درمان کلامیدیا نسبت به داکسی&amp;shy;سیکلین و سایر داروهای مورد بررسی در مطالعه بیشتر می&amp;shy;باشد. نتایج متارگرسیون حاکی از آن بود که سن بیماران در ایجاد هتروژنیسیتی برای درصد شکست درمان آزیترومایسین تاثیر معنی&amp;shy;داری داشت (826/0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:arial,sans-serif;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;&amp;szlig;=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;017/0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt;&quot;&gt;p=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;نتیجه &amp;shy;گیری: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:b mitra;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11.0pt;&quot;&gt;شکست درمان با آزیترومایسین در عفونت&amp;shy;های کلامیدیایی اوروژنیتال نسبت به داکسی&amp;shy;سیکلین و سایر داروهای مورد بررسی در مطالعه بیشتر &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;می&amp;shy;باشد.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Chlamydia Trachomatis is one of the most common pathogens transmitted through the genital tract in humans that leads to urogenital infection.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; Given the high prevalence of chlamydia infection and its adverse effects on the health of women and men, the present meta-analysis was conducted to determine the rate of treatment failure with azithromycin.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; Databases including MEDLINE, ISI - Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ProQuest, and Science Direct were searched for articles published between 1991 and 2018. The quality of the selected articles was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Heterogeneity was determined using the I2 and Cochrane Q-Test. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to compare the prevalence rates on different levels of the variables.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Results: A total of 21 articles that met the inclusion criteria were ultimately assessed. The pooled estimate of azithromycin failure rate was 11.23% (CI 95%: 8.23%-14.24%). Also, the azithromycin failure rate was 15.87% (CI 95%: 10.20%-21.54%) for the treatment of urethritis, 7.41% (CI 95%: 0.60%-14.22%) for cervicitis, and 7.14% (CI 95%: 10.90%-3.39%) for genital chlamydia. The pooled estimate of failure rate difference was 2.37% (CI 95%: 0.68%-4.06%), which shows that azithromycin has a higher failure rate in the treatment of chlamydia compared to doxycycline and other examined medications. The meta-regression results showed that the patient&amp;#39;s age contributes significantly to the heterogeneity for azithromycin treatment failure rate (&amp;beta; = 0.826; p = 0.017).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Azithromycin has a higher failure rate than doxycycline and other studied medications in treating urogenital chlamydia infections.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Key words:&lt;/strong&gt; Azithromycin, Chlamydia trachomatis, Urogenital, Treatment failure, Meta-analysis.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Abstract&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Chlamydia Trachomatis is one of the most common pathogens transmitted through the genital tract in humans that leads to urogenital infection.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; Given the high prevalence of chlamydia infection and its adverse effects on the health of women and men, the present meta-analysis was conducted to determine the rate of treatment failure with azithromycin.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; Databases including MEDLINE, ISI - Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ProQuest, and Science Direct were searched for articles published between 1991 and 2018. The quality of the selected articles was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Heterogeneity was determined using the I2 and Cochrane Q-Test. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to compare the prevalence rates on different levels of the variables.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 21 articles that met the inclusion criteria were ultimately assessed. The pooled estimate of azithromycin failure rate was 11.23% (CI 95%: 8.23%-14.24%). Also, the azithromycin failure rate was 15.87% (CI 95%: 10.20%-21.54%) for the treatment of urethritis, 7.41% (CI 95%: 0.60%-14.22%) for cervicitis, and 7.14% (CI 95%: 10.90%-3.39%) for genital chlamydia. The pooled estimate of failure rate difference was 2.37% (CI 95%: 0.68%-4.06%), which shows that azithromycin has a higher failure rate in the treatment of chlamydia compared to doxycycline and other examined medications. The meta-regression results showed that the patient&amp;#39;s age contributes significantly to the heterogeneity for azithromycin treatment failure rate (&amp;beta; = 0.826; p = 0.017).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Azithromycin has a higher failure rate than doxycycline and other studied medications in treating urogenital chlamydia infections.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>آزیترومایسین, کلامیدیا تراکوماتیس, شکست درمان</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Azithromycin, Chlamydia trachomatis, Urogenital, Treatment failure, Meta-analysis. </keyword>
	<start_page>603</start_page>
	<end_page>620</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrm.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-652&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Farnaz </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Mohammadzadeh</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0002-4597-2677</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Mahrokh </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Dolatian</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>mhdolatian@gmail.com</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0001-5228-8446</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Masoumeh </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Jorjani</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0003-4790-4747</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Maryam </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Afrakhteh</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0002-1424-1951</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tajrish Shohada Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Hamid </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Alavi Majd</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0001-7772-2923</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Paramedical School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Fatemeh </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Abdi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0002-0280-2969</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Reza </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Pakzad</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0002-8215-2918</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
