Volume 9, Issue 4 (7-2011)                   IJRM 2011, 9(4): 285-288 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Safdarian L, Movahedi S, Aleyasine A, Aghahosaini M, Fallah P, Rezaiian Z. Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization. IJRM 2011; 9 (4) :285-288
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-245-en.html
1- Infertility Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Infertility Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , shmovahedy@razi.tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2660 Views)
Background: Despite numerous developments in the field of assisted reproduction the implantation rate remains low .Recent studies suggested that local injury to endometrium in controlled ovarian hyper stimulation cycle improves implantation rate. Studies have attempted to intervene in the development of endometrium.
Objective: The aim of the present study was the exploration of the possibility that local injury of the endometrium increases implantation rate.
Materials and Methods: In this interventional study, 100 good responders to hormone stimulation patients were divided into control group (n=50) and experimental group (n=50) which undergo endometrial biopsy by biopsy catheter )piplle) on day 21 of their previous menstrual cycle with use of contraceptive pills before the IVF-ET treatment. In total, 26 patients were removed from the study because the number of stimulated follicles were below 3, or there was no embryo or there was the risk of OHSS. The remaining patients were 33 in experimental group and 41 in the control group.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the age of the patients, duration of infertility and BMI, base line FSH level and responses to hormone stimulation. The rates of embryo implantation, chemical and clinical pregnancy in the experimental group were 4.9%, 18.2% and 12.1% with no significant differences with the control group (6.7%, 19.5%, 17.1%). Cancellation rate was 26%.
Conclusion: In our study, endometrial biopsy didn’t increase the chances to conceive at the following cycle of treatment.
Full-Text [PDF 369 kb]   (502 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (315 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Viganò P, Mangioni S, Pompei F, Chiodo I. Maternal-conceptus cross talk-a review. Placenta 2003; 24: 56-61. [DOI:10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00137-1]
2. Enders AC, Schlafke S. A morphological analysis of the early implantation stages in the rat. Am J Anat 1967; 120: 185-225. [DOI:10.1002/aja.1001200202]
3. Norwitz ER. Defective implantation and placentatin: laying the blueprint for pregnancy complications. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13: 591-599. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60649-9]
4. Li R, Gui Y, Lu L, Hao G, Cai Z. Local injury to the endometrium improves the pregnancy rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. 18th World Congress on Fertil Steril 2004; 1271: 73-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.ics.2004.06.006]
5. Zhou L, Li R, Wang R, Huang HX, Zhong K. Local injury to the endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles improves implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 1166-1176. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.064]
6. Barash A, Dekel N, Fieldust S, Segal I, Schechtman E, Granot I. Local injury of the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1317-1322. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00345-5]
7. Raziel A, Schachter M, Strassburger D, Bern O, Ron-El R, Friedler S. Favorable influence of local injury to the endometrium in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients with high-order implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 198-201. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.062]
8. Humphrey KW. The effects of some anti-estrogens on the deciduoma reaction and delayed implantation in the mouse. J Reprod Fertil 1968; 16: 201-209. [DOI:10.1530/jrf.0.0160201]
9. Mikhailov VM. Life cycle of decidual cells. Int Rev Cytol 2003; 227: 1-63. [DOI:10.1016/S0074-7696(03)01007-6]
10. Basak S, Dubanchet S, Zourbas S, Chaouat G, Das C. Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in mouse blastocysts during implantation: modulation by steroid hormones. Am J Reprod Immunol 2002; 47: 2-11. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0897.2002.1o047.x]
11. Finn CA, Martin L. Endocrine control of the timing of endometrial sensitivity to a decidual stimulus. Biol Reprod 1972; 7: 82-86. [DOI:10.1093/biolreprod/7.1.82]
12. Sharkey A. Cytokines and implantation. Rev Reprod 1998; 3: 52-61. [DOI:10.1530/ror.0.0030052]
13. Akita S, Ishihara H, Mohammad Abdur R, Fujii T. Leukemia inhibitory factor gene improves skin allograft survival in the mouse model. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1026-1031. [DOI:10.1097/00007890-200010150-00007]
14. Sherer D, Abulafia O. Angiogenesis during implantation, and placental and early embryonic development. Placenta 2001; 22: 1-13. [DOI:10.1053/plac.2000.0588]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb