Volume 16, Issue 8 (August 2018)                   IJRM 2018, 16(8): 501-506 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mirabutalebi S H, Karami N, Montazeri F, Fesahat F, Sheikhha M H, Hajimaqsoodi E, et al . The relationship between the expression levels of miR-135a and HOXA10 gene in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium. IJRM 2018; 16 (8) :501-506
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1198-en.html
1- Genetics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2- Abortion Research Center, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3- Reproductive Immunology Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran
4- Abortion Research Center, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , drkarimi2001@yahoo.com
Full-Text [PDF 402 kb]   (849 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (3269 Views)
Full-Text:   (411 Views)
Introduction
 
Endometriosis is considered as an estrogen-dependent, autoimmune and genetic disease, which is characterized by the presence of endometrial cells outside the uterus and abdominal cavity. Endometrial tissue growth outside the uterus (ectopic) in this disease is commonly seen in the abdominal cavity, pelvis (mostly on the ovaries and peritoneum) (1, 2). Approximate incidence of endometriosis in women is estimated to be about 11% in women during reproductive cycle and about 30-50% in infertile women. Also, the infertile women are 6-8 times more likely to suffer from endometriosis than healthy females (3). Despite these statistics, the exact incidence of the disease is not precisely clear, because there are no precise non-invasive tools for diagnosis of endometriosis, and in some cases it is symptomless (4).
Ectopic transcriptome studies showed that processes such as cell adhesion, inflammation, immune system regulation, cell migration, regeneration of the extracellular matrix, and angiogenesis were associated with endometriosis (5-7). The expression of HOXA10 gene in the normal endometrium of healthy women during the reproductive cycle has been observed in the proliferative phase and has a significantly increased expression in the luteal phase (8). In women with endometriosis, the expression of the HOXA10 gene decreases dramatically, indicating a defect in uterine acceptance that may be responsible for reduced fertility in women with endometriosis (9). Micro-RNAs, small internal molecules with a length of about 22-24 nucleotides and non-coding proteins, are epigenetic regulators of the gene expression that are evolutionally maintained and by connecting to the 3̀UTR region of the mRNA posttranscriptional and reducing the translation levels, regulate the expression of the genes (10).
Micro-RNAs, as a responsible factor for endometriosis pathogenesis, can be considered one of the most effective technologies for the treatment of this disease (11). The micro-RNA profile of ectopic tissues is different from that of the utopic tissues obtained from women with endometriosis (12). Micro-ribonucleic acid 135 (miR-135) was considered one of the most important micro-ribonucleic acids involved in endometriosis and also in many cancers, especially in ovarian cancer (13-15). It has been evidenced that the HOXA10 gene is targeted by miR-135a that was increased significantly in endometriosis. So, it may a possible explanation for the reduction in the expression of this gene in women with endometriosis (16).
So far, few studies have been conducted to evaluate the expression of miR-135a and its association with the level of HOXA10 expression in patients with endometriosis, which indicated the relationship between the significant increase in the expression of miR-135a and the reduction of HOXA10 expression in the endometrial eutopic tissue of patients with endometriosis. But, there is no study on the association of miR-135a with its target gene in endometrial ectopic tissue.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression profile of miR-135a and its relationship with the level of HOXA10 gene expression in both endometrial ectopic and eutopic tissues in patients with endometriosis compared to controls.
 
Materials and methods
 
A total of 34 women with history of endometriosis who referred to Shahid Sadoughi hospital between November 2016 to MAY 2017 were enrolled in this Case-Control study. For patients were receiving Tissue from endometriotic ectopic lesions (case-ectopic, n=17) was collected during the laparoscopic session and the eutopic endometrium was obtained by endometrial biopsy in 17 women (aged 20-45 yr) (Table I). Also, endometrial tissue samples (control, n=17) from women who did not have endometriosis but referred to the hospital for some reasons such as pelvic pain or fallopian tube blockage were taken as the control samples.
The tissues were stored in RNase free microtubes containing RNAlater™ Stabilization Solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at -80oC to maintain their RNA stability. The inclusion criteria were women aged 20-45 yr with regular menstrual cycles (28-32 days) and the lack of receiving a hormonal drug in the last three months. Exclusion criteria were the observation of cellular changes in the endometrium, such as hyperplasia and carcinoma, the existence of benign tumors like fibroma and polyps, and not being contaminated with common DNA viruses and the human papillomavirus as well.
 
RNA Isolation and quantitative real time-PCR
In order to examine the expression rate of the HOXA10 gene and miR-135a in the tissues of patients and healthy subjects, the total RNA was first extracted from the tissues using Trizol Kit (Invitrogen, USA). For eliminating the external DNA contaminations, the RNA samples were treated with DNase Ι (Fermentas). The purity and concentration of RNA were determined using spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Thermo Fisher) and OD 260/280. Complementary DNA (cDNA) of HOXA10 was synthesized using Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, Fermentase. Then quantitative real time-PCR (Q-PCR) was performed by 2.0 μl of constructed cDNA, 10 μl of the commercial master mix (Takara, Japan), 0.5μl of forwarding and reverse primers and 7.0 μl of DNase/RNase-free water for the genes expression profile. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the reference gene as well as HOXA10 as the target gene (Table II). cDNA of miR-135a was synthesized using Bon-Mir RT kit (Bonyakhteh, Tehran, Iran) based on the manufacturer’s instructions. MicroRNA gene expression was carried out using thermal cycler (Applied Biosystem, ABI, Step One Plus, USA) and expression levels were evaluated using 2(-∆ct). SNORD was used as the reference gene as well as miR-135a as the target gene (Bonyakhteh, Tehran, Iran) (Table II).
 
Ethical consideration
This study was approved by the ethics committee of Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran )IR.SSU.MEDICIN.REC.1396.16) and written informed consents were obtained from all patients.
 
Statistical analysis
To compare the mean of the relative expression of miR-135a and its target gene HOXA10 in three groups, SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 24.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA) and ONE WAY ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD test were used. A significant difference was considered as p<0.05. The diagrams were plotted using GraphPad Prism 7.3 software.
 
Results
 
The HOXA10 gene expression in the endometrium during the menstrual cycle
Findings showed the significant increase in the expression level of the HOXA10 gene in the endometrium of women as controls in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (p=0.042) compared to the follicular phase. It was observed that the expression of HOXA10 gene has been significantly increased in endometrial lesions in the follicular phase compared with controls. In addition, a significant and remarkable reduced expression was observed in the luteal phase (p=0.001) in the eutopic tissue, and in the ectopic lesions, the expression of this gene did not have a significant difference with that of the control group in the luteal phase (p=0.681).
According to the results, the expression of HOXA10 gene has been altered depending on the phases of the menstrual cycle. The gene expression in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of the control group increased considerably compared to the follicular phase, which was statistically significant. While the gene expression in the case-eutopic group did not have a significant difference with that of the control group in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (p=0.991). In contrast, in the case-ectopic group, the expression of this gene was significantly increased compared to the control (p=0.001) and case-eutopic (p=0.02) groups. In the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, the gene expression in case-eutopic reduced dramatically with respect to the control group, and in contrast, in the case-ectopic group, this gene showed a higher rate despite insignificancy compared to the control group (Figure 1A).
 
The miR-135a gene expression in the endometrium during the menstrual cycle
The findings demonstrated the expression of the miR-135a gene was unlikely to be related to the phases of the menstrual cycle. The miR-135a expression in the luteal phase and follicular phase of the menstrual cycle were not significantly different in the control group. Also, with the respect of the comparing the expression of this gene in the case-eutopic and case-ectopic endometrium of the patients with the controls, the gene expression in the case-ectopic showed a no significant difference in the follicular phase (p=0.007), while a significant increase in gene expression was observed in the case-eutopic tissue in the luteal phase (p=0.026).
It was found that miR-135a expression in both case-eutopic and ectopic groups was not significantly different from the control group in the follicular phase. In contrast, in the luteal phase, ovarian ectopic specimens of this gene showed a significant reduction in expression compared to the case-eutopic (p=0.001) and control (p=0.008) groups (Figure 1B).

Table I. The demographic data of patients based on categorization in three groups.


Table II. Oligonucleotide primers






Figure 1. Comparing the expression of HOXA10 and miR-135 to GAPDH and SNORD in endometrial tissues obtained from the women with endometrium as case-ectopic and case-eutopic groups as well as women without endometrium as a control group. The ratio of gene expression of HOXA10 to GAPDH (A) and the ratio of miR-135 to SNORD (B).
*: p<0.05, **: p<0.001, a: compared with the control group, b: compared with the eutopic group.


Discussion
 
In the current study, we aimed to scrutinize the expression levels of miR135a in eutopic and ectopic tissues in the patients with endometriosis compared to control samples throughout the menstrual cycle and its role in the regulation of HOXA10. The results showed a remarkable increase in the miR-135a expression in the luteal phase in the case-eutopic endometrial tissue as well as a significant decrease in the case-ectopic endometrial tissue. In addition, a significant decrease in the expression of HOXA10 gene was detected in case-eutopic samples during the luteal phase compared to the control samples, nevertheless, in the case-ectopic, the expression of this gene was increased compared to the control samples.
Studying the relationship between the expression levels of miR-135a and HOXA10 genes expression in the eutopic endometrial tissue samples in patients with endometriosis, stated that there was a significant relationship between the higher expression of miR-135a and decreased expression of HOXA10 in the eutopic endometrium of the patients with endometriosis that was in agreement with our findings (16). Previous studies have proven that the expression of HOXA10 gene in the eutopic endometrium is altered in women with endometriosis. Additionally, HOXA10 gene was regulated directly by miR135a and miR-135b (13, 16).
In other study conducted to examine the role of miR-135a tumor suppressor in epithelial tissue of the patients with ovarian cancer, it was found that HOXA10 gene was targeted by miR-135a. Further, they concluded that the expression of miR-135a significantly decreased in epithelial tissue of ovarian cancer, with a higher expression of HOXA10 in contrast (13). In the same study on breast cancer findings showed that miR-135a represented an increased expression in the metastasis of the breast tumor (17). On the other hand, HOXA10 gene was considered as a metastatic suppressor in breast cancer. They showed that miR-135a targeted HOXA10 gene and suppressed its expression both at the mRNA and protein levels, which our results also explained such this relationships between miR-135a and HOXA10 genes. Szczepańska showed the levels of HOXA10 gene expression in the eutopic tissue of infertile women with endometriosis have significantly decreased compared with control subjects in line with ours (18).
This study showed significant differential patterns in the miR-135a expression profile during menstrual cycles of women either with normal endometrium or with endometriosis. Analysis of the miRNA profile in the endometriosis has improved our knowledge about the process of endometrial disease. Comparison of the ectopic and eutopic endometrium revealed the posttranscriptional patterns that have led to the formation of new perspectives in the unique cellular processes for the ectopic endometrium (12). miRNA regulated many different processes during the menstrual cycle, but their hormonal regulation in the endometrial functions and differentiation has still remained unknown (19). Few studies have evaluated the miRNA expression profile during the menstrual cycle. For instance, wang and associates reported the differential expression of miR-142-5p and miRa-146-5p in eutopic endometrium tissue during implantation window of patients with endometriosis that may cause affecting endometrial receptivity (20).
The main challenge for the development of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic tools for endometriosis is our slight knowledge of the pathology of this disease. The genetic factors and the higher rates of estrogenic hormones increased the risk of developing endometriosis (3). The novelty point of our study is that no previous study has investigated the expression profile of the miR-135a in ectopic endometriotic tissue and whether the endometriotic lesions present a different miRNA pattern during menstrual cycles in women with endometriosis.
Several pieces of evidence showed that epigenetic mechanisms such as microRNAs play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease (21). The study by Andersson showed the hypermethylation rates of HOXA10 gene promoter in the eutopic endometrium of the patients than the control samples. In contrast, in the ectopic endometrium of patients affected by endometriosis, few methylation rates of HOXA10 gene promoter was detected than their eutopic endometrium of those patients, stated of the ectopic tissues contribute to a better etiopathologic understanding of endometriosis (22). Although, the role of epigenetic changes in the etiology of endometriosis has not yet been determined, the present study together with mentioned studies (18, 23) supported the hypothesis that HOXA10 homeodomain transcription factor plays an important role in human endometrium, which is related to the success in the implantation, and also explains that HOXA10 is necessary for denovo endometrial development.
 
Conclusion
 
Considering the inverse relations between the over-expression of miR-135a and the reduction of HOXA10 expression, it is concluded that miR-135a may be applied as an endometrial diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker in the early diagnosis of endometriosis, and identification of this relation would also help to understand the etiology of endometriosis.
 
Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank the staff who assisted with this study at the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute.
This article was financially supported by Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
 
Conflict of interest
 
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Nisolle M, Donnez J. Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 585-596. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00191-X]
2. Shao R, Cao S, Wang X, Feng Y, Billig H. The elusive and controversial roles of estrogen and progesterone receptors in human endometriosis. Am J Transl Res 2014; 6: 104-113.
3. Verkauf BS. Incidence, symptoms, and signs of endometriosis in fertile and infertile women. J Fla Med Assoc 1987; 74: 671-675.
4. Rogers PA, D'Hooghe TM, Fazleabas A, Gargett CE, Giudice LC, Montgomery GW, et al. Priorities for endometriosis research: recommendations from an international consensus workshop. Reprod Sci 2009; 16: 335-346. [DOI:10.1177/1933719108330568]
5. Borghese B, Mondon N JC M TM Vaiman D, et al. gene expression profile for ectopic versus eutopic endometrium provides new insights into endometriosis oncogenic potential. Mol Endocrinol 2008; 22: 2557-2562. [DOI:10.1210/me.2008-0322]
6. Eyster KM, Klinkova O, Kennedy V, Hansen KA. Whole genome deoxyribonucleic acid microarray analysis of gene expression in ectopic versus eutopic endometrium. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 1505-1533. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.056]
7. Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Pouly JL, Botchorishvili R, Déchelotte PJ, Mage G. Differential expression of genes in eutopic and ectopic endometrium from patients with ovarian endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 548-553. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.093]
8. Samadieh Y, Favaedi R, Ramezanali F, Afsharian P, Aflatoonian R, Shahhoseini M. Epigenetic dynamics of HOXA10 gene in infertile women with endometriosis. Reprod Sci 2018: 1933719118766255. [DOI:10.1177/1933719118766255]
9. Zanatta A, Rocha AM, Carvalho FM, Pereira RM, Taylor HS, Motta EL, et al. The role of the Hoxa10/HOXA10 gene in the etiology of endometriosis and its related infertility: a review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27: 701-710. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-010-9471-y]
10. Sengupta S, den Boon JA, Chen IH, Newton MA, Stanhope SA, Cheng YJ, et al. MicroRNA 29c is down-regulated in nasopharyngeal carcinomas, up-regulating mRNAs encoding extracellular matrix proteins. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 5874-5878. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0801130105]
11. Fasciani A, D'ambrogio G, Bocci G, Monti M, Genazzani AR, Artini PG. High concentrations of the vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-8 in ovarian endometriomata. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6: 50-54. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/6.1.50]
12. Filigheddu N, Gregnanin I, Porporato PE, Surico D, Perego B, Galli L, et al. Differential expression of microRNAs between eutopic and ectopic endometrium in ovarian endometriosis. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010; 2010: 369549. [DOI:10.1155/2010/369549]
13. Tang W, Jiang Y, Mu X, Xu L, Cheng W, Wang X. MiR-135a functions as a tumor suppressor in epithelial ovarian cancer and regulates HOXA10 expression. Cell Signal 2014; 26: 1420-1426. [DOI:10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.03.002]
14. Guo Lm, Ding GF, Xu W, Ge H, Jiang Y, Chen XJ, et al. MiR-135a-5p represses proliferation of HNSCC by targeting HOXA10. Cancer Biol Ther 2018; 26: 1-28. [DOI:10.1080/15384047.2018.1450112]
15. Kalantar SM, Karami N, Zarei S, Miraboutalebi SH, Montazeri F, Abdian Asl A, et al. miR-135b as a Diagnostic Biomarker in Patients with Endometriosis. J Isfahan Med School 2018; 36: 241-245. (in Persian)
16. Petracco R, Grechukhina O, Popkhadze S, Massasa E, Zhou Y, Taylor HS. MicroRNA 135 regulates HOXA10 expression in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: E1925-E1933. [DOI:10.1210/jc.2011-1231]
17. Chen Y, Zhang J, Wang H, Zhao J, Xu C, Du Y, et al. miRNA-135a promotes breast cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting HOXA10. BMC Cancer 2012; 12: 111-121. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-12-111]
18. Sz z ń k M W P L z k M J z ń k PP, Skrzypczak J. Reduced expression of HOXA10 in the midluteal endometrium from infertile women with minimal endometriosis. Biomed Pharmacother 2010; 64: 697-705. [DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2010.09.012]
19. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004; 116: 281-297. [DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5]
20. Wang Y, Ma CH, Qiao J. Differential expression of microRNA in eutopic endometrium tissue during implantation window for patients with endometriosis related infertility. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2016; 51: 436-441.
21. Schenken RS, Asch RH, Williams RF, Hodgen GD. Etiology of infertility in monkeys with endometriosis: luteinized unruptured follicles, luteal phase defects, pelvic adhesions, and spontaneous abortions. Fertil Steril 1984; 41: 122-130. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47552-7]
22. Andersson KL, Bussani C, Fambrini M, Polverino V, Taddei GL, Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. DNA methylation of HOXA10 in eutopic and ectopic endometrium. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 1906-1911. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu161]
23. Fambrini M, Sorbi F, Bussani C, Cioni R, Sisti G, Andersson KL. Hypermethylation of HOXA10 gene in mid-luteal endometrium from women with ovarian endometriomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 1331-1334. [DOI:10.1111/aogs.12236]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb