Volume 2, Issue 1 (7-2004)                   IJRM 2004, 2(1): 9-11 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dehghani V A, Khalili M A, Zamani N, Dreh-Zereshki F. Comparison between Semen Parameters of Ejaculates Collected Via Masturbation Versus Coitus Interruptus. IJRM 2004; 2 (1) :9-11
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-11-en.html
Comparison between Semen Parameters of Ejaculates Collected Via Masturbation Versus Coitus Interruptus
Valli A Dehghani * , Mohammad A Khalili , Nahid Zamani , Fakhri Dreh-Zereshki
Abstract:   (2889 Views)
Proper collections of human ejaculates are necessary for semen analysis and infertility treatment purposes. The objective of this study was to assess the seminal characteristics of ejaculates collected by patients via masturbation and coitus interruptus. Thirty individuals produced one sample via masturbation and one via incomplete coitus during a 3-days interval. The semen parameters were compared and analyzed with student t-test and Nemar test. The results showed that mean values for progressive motility of spermatozoa were increased from 46.81+15.7% to 58.76+13.5% in coitus interruptus and masturbation, respectively (P<0.01). Also, the mean values for normal sperm morphology was 54.03+25.1% in coitus interruptus and 63.36+13.4% in samples collected via masturbation (P<0.01). In addition, sperm concentration was significantly improved in ejaculates collected with masturbation (P<0.05). Although, insignificant, the concentration of round cells were lower in specimens collected via masturbation than coitus interruptus. Therefore, via masturbation method, better semen characteristics were yielded which subsequently may improve the infertility treatment outcome.
Keywords: Semen Analysis, Masturbation, Coitus Interruptus
Full-Text [PDF 25 kb]   (965 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (926 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Lambard S., Galeraud-Denis I., Martin G., Levy R., and Chocat A. (2004) Analysis and significance of mRNA in human ejaculated sperm from normozoospermic donors: relationship to sperm motility and capacitation. Mol Hum Reprod 20: 302-308. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/gah064] [PMID]
2. Smith D.C., Barratt C.L.R., and Williams M.A. (1989) The characterization of non-sperm cells in the ejaculates of fertile men using transmission electron microscopy. Andrologia, 21: 319-333. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.1989.tb02417.x] [PMID]
3. Sofikitis N.V., and Miyagawa I. (1993) Endocrinological, biophysical and biochemical parameters of semen collected via masturbation versus sexual intercourse. J Androl 14: 366-373. [DOI:10.1002/j.1939-4640.1993.tb00402.x] [PMID]
4. World Health Organization. (1999) WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge. Cambridge University press: 4-5.
5. Zarmakoupis-Zavos P.N., Correa J.R., Zarmakoupis C.N., and Zavos P.M. (1999) Multiple ejaculate collection via the use of a semen collection device at intercourse versus masturbation. Mid East Fert Soc J 4: 228-232.
6. Zavos P.M. (1986) Qualitative and quantitative seminal losses during production of ejaculates via masturbation. Infertility 9: 153-160.
7. Zavos P.M., Kofinas G.D., and Sofikitis N.V. (1994) Differences in seminal parameters in specimens collected via intercourse and incomplete intercourse. Fertil Steril 61: 1174-1176. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56779-X]
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb