1. Beddy P, Geoghegan T, Browne RF, Torreggiani WC. Testicular varicoceles. Clin Radiol 2005; 60: 1248-1255. [
DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2005.06.010]
2. Jarow, JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update 2001. 7: 59-64. [
DOI:10.1093/humupd/7.1.59]
3. Clarke, BG. Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among men of different ages. JAMA 1966; 198: 1121-1122. [
DOI:10.1001/jama.1966.03110230137039]
4. Gat Y, Bachar GN, Zukerman Z, Belenky A, Gorenish M. Physical examination may miss the diagnosis of bilateral varicocele: a comparative study of 4 diagnostic modalities. J Urol 2004; 172: 1414-1417. [
DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000138540.57137.5f]
5. Trum JW, Gubler FM, Laan R, Van der Veen F. The value of palpation, varicoscreen contact thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of varicocele. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1232-1235. [
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019362]
6. Dhabuwala CB, Hamid S, Moghissi KS. Clinical versus subclinical varicocele: improvement in fertility after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 854-857. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54970-X]
7. Carlsen E, Andersen AG, Buchreitz L, Jorgensen N, Magnus O, Matulevicuus V, et al. Inter-observer variation in the results of the clinical andrological examination including estimation of testicular size. Int J Androl 2000; 23: 248-253. [
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2605.2000.00240.x]
8. Hargreave TB, Liakatas J. Physical examination for varicocele. Br J Urol 1991; 67: 328. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1991.tb15148.x]
9. World Health Organization. Comparison among different methods for the diagnosis of varicocele. World Health Organization. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 575-582.
10. Petros JA, Andriole GL, Middleton WD, Picus DA. Correlation of testicular color Doppler ultrasonography, physical examination and venography in the detection of left varicoceles in men with infertility. J Urol 1991; 145: 785-788. [
DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38451-3]
11. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70: 213-220. [
DOI:10.1037/h0026256]
12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174. [
DOI:10.2307/2529310]
13. Santoro G, Romeo C. Morphological and surgical overview of adolescent testis affected by varicocele. Scientific World Journal 2013; 2013: 469413-469420. [
DOI:10.1155/2013/469413]
14. Cornud F, Belin X, Amar E, Delafontaine D, Helenon O, Moreau JF. Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 536-545. [
DOI:10.1007/s003300050706]
15. Belay RE, Huang GO, Shen JK, Ko EY. Diagnosis of clinical and subclinical varicocele: how has it evolved? Asian J Androl 2016; 18: 182-185. [
DOI:10.4103/1008-682X.169991]
16. Carlsen E, Andersen AG, Buchreitz L, Jorgensen N, Magnus O, Matulevicuus V, et al. Inter-observer variation in the results of the clinical andrological examination including estimation of testicular size. Int J Androl 2000; 23: 248-253. [
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2605.2000.00240.x]
17. Shakeri S, Malekmakan L, Afrasiabi A, Yazdani M, Shakeri A, Shakeri A. Intra-observer variation in physical examination of varicocele. Int J Current Res 2014; 6: 9239-9241.
18. Olsen LH. Inter-observer Variation in Assessment of Undescended Testis Analysis of Kappa Statistics as a Coefficient of Reliability. Br J Urol 1989; 64: 644-648. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1989.tb05328.x]
19. Pierik FH, Dohler GR, van Muiswinkel JM, Vreeburg JT, Weber RF. Is routine scrotal ultrasound advantageous in infertile men? J Urol 1999; 162: 1618-1620. [
DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68180-3]
20. Sorokin I, Welliver C, Elebyjian L, Feustel PJ, McCullough A. Interinstitutional variability in testicular volumes and varicocele presence by ultrasound: surprising discrepancies and implications for clinical decision making. Urology 2015; 85: 1079-1084. [
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.018]