Volume 2, Issue 1 (7-2004)                   IJRM 2004, 2(1): 29-33 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Taheripanah R, Karimzadeh M A, Ghafourzadeh M. Efficacy of Low Dose, Long-acting Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Analogues (GnRH-a) Compared with Daily Injections of Short-acting GnRH-a in ART Cycles. IJRM 2004; 2 (1) :29-33
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-15-en.html
Efficacy of Low Dose, Long-acting Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Analogues (GnRH-a) Compared with Daily Injections of Short-acting GnRH-a in ART Cycles
Robabeh Taheripanah * , Mohammad A Karimzadeh , Mohammad Ghafourzadeh
Abstract:   (3786 Views)
Background: The retrieval of good quality oocytes that is accomplished with selection of the best induction ovulation protocol on the basis of patients condition, age and cause of infertility, is one of the most important aspects of ART cycles. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of low dose, long acting GnRH-a (Decapeptyle) for pituitary desensitization and outcome of ART compared to long protocol of short acting GnRH-a (Busereline). Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial that was performed at Yazd IVF Center, 60 patients with 61 cycles of ART were included. Patients with endometriosis or age > 40 were excluded in this study. Using COH-ET, patients were randomly divided into two groups. In group one, 30 patients received a single half dose of Decapeptyle (1.87mg) in mid-luteal phase. In the other group, 31 patients received Buserelin daily (0.5mg), starting from previous mid-luteal phase. This was reduced to 0.25mg from gonadotropin administration day and was continued until the day of hCG injection. In these groups, the number of oocytes, the fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy and cancellation rates were compared. Results: In two groups, there was no case of cancellation due to premature LH surge. In group I, the mean number of gonadotropins was 27.5+4.2 ampoules while in the second group, it was 28.4±2.8 ampoules (P>0.05). 312 oocytes from group I and 294 oocytes from group II were retrieved. Oocyte quality in group II was better than group I (84.3% vs 77.2%, P<0.05). In long-acting GnRH-a group fertilization rate was 81.9% versus 71.1%in group II (P<0.01). However, embryo development in Group I (85.6% vs 94.1%, P<0.05) was lower than group II. Although, pregnancy rate was 20% in Group I which was higher than group II (12.6%) but, there was no significant difference in cancellation, pregnancy rate and gonadotropins dose in two groups. Conclusion: The low dose long acting GnRH-a is a useful method for pituitary suppression. Low dose GnRH-a combined with gonadotropins permitted the retrieval of good quality oocytes and had no effect on oocytes. The fertilization and pregnancy rates with this method are acceptable and its cost and tolerance is valuable for patients.
Keywords: Decapeptyle, GnRH agonists, Buserelin, Assisted Reproductive Technology, Infertility, Induction Ovulation
Full-Text [PDF 101 kb]   (634 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (389 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Albuquerque L.E., Saconato H., and Maciel M.C. (2002) Depot versus daily administration of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary desensitization in assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3:CD002808. [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD002808] [PMID]
2. Balasch J., Cornez P., CasamitJana R., et al. (1992) Pituitary-ovarian stimulation by the standard and half doses of D-Trp-6-luieinizing, hormone-releasing hormone depot. Hum Reprod: 7:1230-1234. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137832] [PMID]
3. Ben-Rafael Z., Dirnfeld M., Gonen Y., et al. (2001) Comparison of the efficacy of the gonadotropin releasing hormone analoge buserlin given intranasally and Subcutaneously at different doses for I vitro fertilization. Infertility Reproductive Med. 12(1): 59.
4. Dada T., Salha O., Baillie H.S., and Sharma V. (1999) A comparison of three gonadotropin-releasing hormones analogus in an in vitro fertilization programme: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod 14:288-293. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.2.288] [PMID]
5. Daya S. (1999) Long versus short gonadotropin releasing hormone agonisi protocols for pituitary desensitization in assisted reproduction cycles (Cochrane review), in The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Oxford, Update Software.
6. Dekel N., Lewysohn O., Ayalon D., et al. (1988) Receptors for GnRH are present in rat oocytes. Endocrinology 123:1205-1209. [DOI:10.1210/endo-123-2-1205] [PMID]
7. Dekel N., and Granot I. (1996) Interaction between oocyte and surrounding granulosa cells, molecular basis for an effect of GnRH-a on the oocyte-comulus complex. Presented at the fourth International Symposium on GnRH Analogues in Cancer and Reproductive Medicine, Genev.
8. Devreker F., Govaerts I., Bertand E., Van den Bergh M., Gervy C., and Englert Y. (1996) The long acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs impaired the implantation rate. Fertil Steril 65:122-126. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58038-8]
9. El-Nemr A., Bhide M., Khalifa Y., Al-Mizyen E., Gillott C., Lower A.M., Al-Shawaf T., and Grudzinskas J.G. (2002) Clinical evaluation of three different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an IVF programme: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 10;103:140-145. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00297-4]
10. Fleming R., Adam A.H., Barlow D.H., et al. (1982) A new systematic treatment for infertile women with abnormal hormone profiles. Br J Obstet Gynecol 89:80-83. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04642.x] [PMID]
11. Geber S., Sales L., and Sampaio M.A. (2002) Comparison between a single dose of goserelin (depot) and multiple daily doses of leuprolide acetate for pituitary suppression in IVF treatment: a clinical endocrinological study of the ovarian response. J Assist Reprod Genet. 19:313-318. [DOI:10.1023/A:1016054424966] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Gemzell C.A., Kemman E., and Jones J.R. (1998) Premature ovulation during administration of hMG in nonovulatory women. Infertility 1;1-10.
13. Gianaroli L., Ferraretti A.P., Felciani E., Tabanelli C., Magli C., and Fetini D. (1994) Progressive randomized study of D-Trp-6-LHRH versus buserelin in long desentizitation protocols for medically assisted conception cycles. Hum Reprod 9:220-225 [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138485] [PMID]
14. Hazout A., de Ziegler D., Cornel C., et al. (1993) Comparison of short 7-day and prolonged treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist desensitization for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 59:596-600. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55806-3]
15. Hughes E.G., Fedorkow D.M., Daya S., et al. (1992) The routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to in vitro fertilization and gamete irmeta-analysis of randomized trials. Fertil Steril 58:888-896. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55430-2]
16. Juan B., Fernando G., and Roser C. (1992) Pituitary ovarian suppression by the standard and half doses of D-Trp-6-luteinizing hormone releasing hormone depot. Hum Reprod 7:1230-1234. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137832] [PMID]
17. Porcu E., Dal Parto L., Serachioli R., Fabbri R., Longhi M., and Flamingni C. (1994) Comparison between depot and standard release triptoreline in in vitro fertilization: pituitary sensivity, Luteal function, Pregnancy outcome, and perinatal results. Fertil Steril 62:126-132. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56827-7]
18. Porter R.N., Smith W., Craft I.L., et al. (1984) Induction of ovulation for in vitro fertilization using buserelin and gonadotropins. Lancet 2:1284-1285. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(84)92840-X]
19. Racoowsky C., Prather A.L., and Johnson M.K. (1997) Prematurely condensed chromosomes and meiotic abnormalities in unfertilized human oocytes after ovarian stimulation with and without gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril 63;932-938. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81410-0]
20. Ron-EI R., Herman A., Golan A., et al. (1990) The comparison of early follicular and mid-luteal administration of long-acting gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril 54:233-237. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53695-4]
21. Samuel K.W., Well G., and Souler R. (1993) Psychological stress as a cause of infertility. Fertil Steril 59:685-689. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55824-5]
22. Tarlatitzis B.G., Billi H., and Bontis J. (1994) Follicular cyst formation after administration of different GnRH analougues for assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 9: 1983-1986. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138378] [PMID]
23. Tsai H.D., Chen C.M., Lo H.Y., and Chang C.C. (1995) Subcutaneous low dose leuprolide acetate depot versus leuprolide acetate for women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization .Hum Reprod 10:2909-2910. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135817] [PMID]
24. Veeck L.L. (1986). Atlas of the human oocytes and early conceptus.Williams & Wilkins,Baltimore
25. Wiesman A., and Shoham Z. (1993) Favorable pregnancy outcome after administration of a long acting GnRH in the mid-luteal phase. Hum Reprod 8:496-497. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138079] [PMID]
26. Wren M., Tan S.L., Waterstone J., et al. (1991) The optimum dose and mode of administration of luteinizing hormone analogue in in vitro fertilization: A comparison of three regimens. Hum Reprod 6:1370-1372. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137270] [PMID]
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb