1. Forti G, Krausz C. Clinical review 100: Evaluation and treatment of the infertile couple. J Clin Endicrinol Metab 1998; 83: 4177-4188.
2. Taymar Ml. Regulation of follicle growth: some clinical implications in reproductive endocrinology. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 235-247. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58077-7]
3. Fauser BC, Van heudsen AM. Manipulation of human ovarian function: physiological concepts and clinical consequences. Endocrine Rev 1997; 18: 71-106.
4. Lenton E, Soltan A, Hewitt J, Thomson A, Davies W, Ashraf N, et al. Induction of ovulation in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: recombinant human FSH (follitropin alpha) versus highly purified urinary FSH (urofollitropin HP). Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1021-1027. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/15.5.1021]
5. White DM, Polson DW, Kiddy D, Sagle P, Watson H, Gilling-Smith C, et al. Induction of ovulation with low-dose gonadotropins in polycystic ovary syndrome: an analysis of 109 pregnancies in 225 women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81:3821-3824.
6. Taymor ML. The regulation of follicle growth: some clinical implications in reproductive endocrinology. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 235-247. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58077-7]
7. Simoni M, Jockenhövel F, Nieschlag E. Biological and immunological properties of the international standard for FSH 83/575: isoelectrofocusing profile and comparison with other FSH preparations. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1993; 128:281-288. [
DOI:10.1530/acta.0.1280281]
8. Hummel WP, Kettel LM. Assisted reproductive technology: the state of the ART. Ann Med 1997; 29: 207-214. [
DOI:10.3109/07853899708999338]
9. Balasch J, Fábregues F, Arroyo V. Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a new insight into the pathogenesis of ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2718-2730. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.10.2718]
10. Hillier SG. Ovarian manipulation with pure gonadotropins. J Endocrinol 1990; 127: 1-4. [
DOI:10.1677/joe.0.1270001]
11. Loumaye E, Martineau I, Piazzi A, O'Dea L, Ince S, Howles C, et al. Clinical assessment of human gonadotrophins produced by recombinant technology. Hum Reprod 1996: 11 (suppl.): 95-107. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/11.suppl_5.95]
12. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Amin YM, Sattar MA, elAttar E. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in the treatment of patients with history of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 1996; 66:757-760. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58631-2]
13. Van Wely M, Bayram N, van der Veen F Recombinant FSH in alternative doses or versus urinary gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1143-1149. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg229]
14. Azziz R. The Rotteram Criteria are premature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 781-785. [
DOI:10.1210/jc.2005-2153]
15. Veeck L. Oocyte assessment and biological performance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 541: 259-274. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22263.x]
16. Veeck L. An atlas of human gametes and conception. London, Parthenon; 1999. [
DOI:10.1201/b14639]
17. Pakarainen F, Zhang, FP, Nurmi L, Poutanen M, Huhtaniemi I. Knockout of luteinizing hormone receptor abolishes the effects of follicle-stimulating hormone on preovulatory maturation and ovulation of mouse graafian follicles. Mol Endocrinol 2005; 19: 2591-2602. [
DOI:10.1210/me.2005-0075]
18. Strehler E, Abt M, El-Danasouri I, De Santo M, Sterzik K. Impact of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropins on in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 332-326. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01696-4]
19. Daya, S, Gunby J. Recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford, Update Software; 2002.
20. Palagiano A, Nesti E, Pace L. FSH: urinary and recombinant. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115 (Suppl.): 30-33. [
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.023]
21. Al-Inany H, Aboulghar M, Mansour R, SerourG.Meta-analysis of recombinant versus urinary-derived FSH: an update. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 305-313. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg088]
22. Abate A, Nazzaro A, Salerno A, Marzano F, Pavone Cossut MR, Perino M. Efficacy of recombinant versus human derived follicle stimulating hormone on the oocyte and embryo quality in IVF-ICSI cycles: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre trial. Gynecol Endocrinol 2009; 25: 479-484. [
DOI:10.1080/09513590902770156]
23. Selman HA, De Santo M, Sterzik K, Coccia E, El-Danasouri I. Effect of highly purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone on oocyte and embryo quality. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 1061-1067. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04202-4]
24. Manassiev NS, Tenekedjier KI, Collins J. Does the use of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone instead of urinary follicle-stimulating hormone lead to higher pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer cycles? Assist Reprod 1999; 9: 7-12.
25. Balen A, Platteau P, Andersen AN, Devroey P, Helmgaard L, Arce JC. Highly purified FSH is as efficacious as recombinant FSH for ovulation induction in women with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1816-1823. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem075]
26. Bayram N, van Wely M, van Der Veen F. Recombinant FSH versus urinary gonadotrophins or recombinant FSH for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001: CD002121. [
DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD002121]
27. Corbacioğlu A, Baysal B. Effects of endometrial thickness and echogenic pattern on assisted reproductive treatment outcome. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2009; 36: 145-147.
28. le Cotonnec JY, Porchet HC, Beltrami V, Khan A, Toon S, Rowland M. Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). I. Comparative pharmacokinetics with urinary human FSH. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 669-678.