International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Sat, Dec 28, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 10, Issue 4 (8-2012)
IJRM 2012, 10(4): 377-382 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abdollahi Fard S, Mostafa Gharabaghi P, Montazeri F, Mashrabi O. Hysteroscopy as a minimally invasive surgery, a good substitute for invasive gynecological procedures. IJRM 2012; 10 (4) :377-382
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-293-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-293-en.html
1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ,pm_gharabaghi@yahoo.com
3- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4- Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ,
3- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4- Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (3273 Views)
Background: Hysteroscopy is a safe and high efficient procedure so it is changing to a widespread procedure in dealing with many gynecologic and obstetrical conditions.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutical efficiency of hysteroscopy in managing the common conditions including abnormal uterine bleeding, abortion and infertility.
Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study to compare hysteroscopy as a minimally invasive approach with conventional laparatomy and hysterectomy or repair of mulerian anomalies and watch the uterine cavity for intrauterine pathology in cases of infertility. Overall 277 women underwent hysteroscopy were evaluated in three groups: with AUB 226 cases, with infertility 34 cases and with recurrent abortions with septate uterus17 cases. The overall success rate was recorded and analyzed after six months in order of indication of hysteroscopy
Results: Hysteroscopy as sole diagnostic procedure in 16.5, 8.8 and 14.3%of AUB, infertility and abortion cases, respectively. In AUB cases, curettage, myomectomy, polypectomy and hysterectomy were the main diagnostic-therapeutical approaches along with hysteroscopy. In infertiles, myomectomy, polypectomy were the main diagnostic-therapeutical approaches
In abortion group, laparoscopy guided, septum resection adhessiolysis , curettage and myomectomy were the main aproach. There was not any major complication. The diagnostic-therapeutically measures accompanying with the hysteroscopy were successful in 73.5% of the bleeding group and 33.3% of the infertility group in follow-up period.
Conclusion: Based on our results, hysteroscopy is a safe, accurate and highly-efficient procedure in managing women with abnormal uterine bleeding, recurrent abortion due to septate uterus
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutical efficiency of hysteroscopy in managing the common conditions including abnormal uterine bleeding, abortion and infertility.
Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study to compare hysteroscopy as a minimally invasive approach with conventional laparatomy and hysterectomy or repair of mulerian anomalies and watch the uterine cavity for intrauterine pathology in cases of infertility. Overall 277 women underwent hysteroscopy were evaluated in three groups: with AUB 226 cases, with infertility 34 cases and with recurrent abortions with septate uterus17 cases. The overall success rate was recorded and analyzed after six months in order of indication of hysteroscopy
Results: Hysteroscopy as sole diagnostic procedure in 16.5, 8.8 and 14.3%of AUB, infertility and abortion cases, respectively. In AUB cases, curettage, myomectomy, polypectomy and hysterectomy were the main diagnostic-therapeutical approaches along with hysteroscopy. In infertiles, myomectomy, polypectomy were the main diagnostic-therapeutical approaches
In abortion group, laparoscopy guided, septum resection adhessiolysis , curettage and myomectomy were the main aproach. There was not any major complication. The diagnostic-therapeutically measures accompanying with the hysteroscopy were successful in 73.5% of the bleeding group and 33.3% of the infertility group in follow-up period.
Conclusion: Based on our results, hysteroscopy is a safe, accurate and highly-efficient procedure in managing women with abnormal uterine bleeding, recurrent abortion due to septate uterus
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Loffer FD, Bradley LD, Brill AI, Brooks PG, Cooper JM. Hysteroscopic training guidelines. The ad hoc committee on hysteroscopic training guidelines of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000; 7:165. [DOI:10.1016/S1074-3804(00)80032-8]
2. Fard SA, Ebrahimi FS, Montazeri F, Mashrabi O. Diagnostic features and therapeutic consequences of hysteroscopy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding and abortion. Am J Applied Sci 2012; 9: 13-17. [DOI:10.3844/ajassp.2012.13.17]
3. Cooper JM, Brady RM. Hysteroscopy in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26: 217-236. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70068-1]
4. Vercellini P, Zàina B, Yaylayan L, Pisacreta A, De Giorgi O, Crosignani PG. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: long-term effects on menstrual pattern and fertility. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 341-347. [DOI:10.1097/00006250-199909000-00004]
5. Bacsko G. Uterine surgery by operative hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 71: 219-222. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02639-5]
6. Berek JS. Novak's Gynecology: 13th Ed. USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002:114.
7. Baggish MS, Barbot J, Valle RF. Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy: A Text and Atlas: 2nd Ed. USA: Mosby; 1999: 223-227.
8. Liu Y, Cheong Y, Li TC, Xia E, Zhang D, Ma Y. Impact of transcervical resection of endometrium on uterine and ovarian haemodynamics. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 15:57-62. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60692-X]
9. Boe Engelsen I, Woie K, Hordnes K. Transcervical endometrial resection: long-term results of 390 procedures. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 82-87. [DOI:10.1080/00016340500424314]
10. Loffer FD. Improving results of hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy for menorrhagia by concomitant endometrial ablation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 254-260. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.04.001]
11. Van Dongen H, Janssen CA, Smeets MJ, Emanuel MH, Jansen FW. The clinical relevance of hysteroscopic polypectomy in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG 2009; 116: 1387-1390. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02145.x]
12. Alanis Fuentes J. In-office hysteroscopic polypectomy: eight years analysis. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2007; 75: 341-346.
13. Alanis Fuentes J, Martinez Gutierrez M, Mata MP. Hysteroscopy findings in patients with postmenopausal genital bleeding. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2007; 75: 253-258.
14. Lasmar RB, Dias R, Barrozo PR, Oliveira MA, Coutinho Eda S, da Rosa DB. Prevalence of hysteroscopic findings and histologic diagnoses in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 1803-1807. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.045]
15. Cravello L, Agostini A, Beerli M, Roger V, Bretelle F, Blanc B. Results of hysteroscopic myomectomy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2004; 32: 825-828. [DOI:10.1016/S1297-9589(04)00235-8]
16. Mukhopadhayay S, Bhattacharyya SK, Ganguly RP, Patra KK, Bhattacharya N, Barman SC. Comparative evaluation of perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding by transvaginal sonography, hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. J Ind Med Assoc 2007; 105: 624-628.
17. Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Motoyama H, Iwasaki S, Kawamura T. Location of endometrial polyp and pregnancy rate in infertility patients. Fertil Steril 2008; 90:180-182. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.072]
18. Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X, Liu Y, Peng X. Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman's syndrome. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 715-722. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.070]
19. Kaminski P, Gajewska M, Wielgos M, Szymusik I, Ziolkowska K, Bartkowiak R. The usefulness of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in the diagnostics and treatment of infertility. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2006; 27: 813-817.
20. Tiufekchieva E. Hysteroscopy in women with reproductive problems. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 2006; 45: 39-44.
21. Radestad A, Boos JN. Benign uterine pathology can cause infertility. Hysteroscopic surgery increases the chance of normal pregnancy. Lakartidningen 2009; 106: 1726-1728.
22. Boudhraa K, Jellouli MA, Kassaoui O, Ben Aissia N, Ouerhani R, Triki A, et al. Role of the hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in management of the female infertility: about 200 cases. Tunis Med 2009; 87: 55-60.
23. Godinjak Z, Idrizbegovic E. Should diagnostic hysteroscopy be a routine procedure during diagnostic laparoscopy in infertile women? Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2008; 8: 44-47. [DOI:10.17305/bjbms.2008.2996]
24. Guimaraes Filho HA, Mattar R, Araujo Junior E, Pires CR, Moron AF. Diagnosis of uterine synechiae in patients with recurrent miscarriages: contribution of transvaginal hysterosonography. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2006; 52: 308-311.
25. Guimarães Filho HA, Mattar R, Pires CR, Araujo Júnior E, Moron AF, Nardozza LM. Comparison of hysterosalpingography, hysterosonography and hysteroscopy in evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients with recurrent pregnancy losses. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006; 274: 284-288. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-006-0186-3]
26. Dendrinos S, Grigoriou O, Sakkas EG, Makrakis E, Creatsas G. Hysteroscopy in the evaluation of habitual abortions. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008; 13: 198-200. [DOI:10.1080/13625180801920032]
27. Ventolini G, Zhang M, Gruber J. Hysteroscopy in the evaluation of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: a cohort study in a primary care population. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1782-1784. [DOI:10.1007/s00464-003-8258-y]
28. Weiss A, Shalev E, Romano S. Hysteroscopy may be justified after two miscarriages. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2628-2631. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei081]
29. Mostafa-Gharabaghi P, Mansourfar M, Sadeghi-Bazargani. Low dose vaginal misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 Suppository for early uterine evacuation: A randomized clinical trial. Pak J Biol Sci 2010; 13: 946-950. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2010.946.950]
30. Abdollahi SF, Bahlouli A, Mostafa PG, Rasooli S, Morteza G. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies. Saudi Med J 2009; 30: 813-816.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
