Volume 10, Issue 6 (4-2012)                   IJRM 2012, 10(6): 595-600 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ma J, Shao H, Lu X, Zhang B, Zhang G. Safety and efficacy of airbag midwifery in promoting normal vaginal delivery and reducing caesarean section. IJRM 2012; 10 (6) :595-600
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-323-en.html
1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The People’s Hospital of Yuyao, Zhejiang 315400, China
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The People’s Hospital of Yuyao, Zhejiang 315400, China , jiantingmacn@126.com
Abstract:   (2361 Views)
Background: Balloon bionic midwifery has been applied in clinical obstetrics in China for 10 years, although played a certain role in controlling and improving the quality of obstetrics and caesarean section rate, but some questions have not been resolved.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of airbag midwifery.
Materials and Methods: Primiparas (2410 cases) with various medical conditions were randomly divided into airbag and control groups undergoing the same obstetrical treatments, but airbag midwifery as a birthing option was chosen twice when the cervix was dilated to 2-4 cm during labor.
Results: The duration of the first and second stages, as well as the total delivery process, of the airbag group was shorter than that for the controls. The natural delivery rate of the airbag group was higher than that of the control group. The forcep delivery rate, cesarean section rate, amount of vaginal bleeding within 2 h after delivery, rate of postpartum hemorrhage, fetal distress, and pitocin use in the airbag group were all lower than those in the control group. No significant difference in the rate of maternal and fetal complications was observed in the two groups. The bionic airbag midwifery approach did not contribute to the incidence rate of urine retention, leukocyte count, neutrophil proportion, and level of creactive protein and IL-6 24 h after delivery.
Conclusion: Airbag midwifery skill is a simple, effective, and safe procedure.
Full-Text [PDF 459 kb]   (616 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (299 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Guo CS. Air sac midwifery technique for shortening course of labor. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 1991; 26: 266-267.
2. Ma J, Shao H, Lu X, Zhang B, Zhang G. The research on the efficacy and safety of bionic air-bag midwifery. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 4: 254-257.
3. Jin Y. Clinical analysis and application of airbag midwifery. Chin Moderen Doctor 2008; 46: 47-48.
4. Sullivan EA, Chapman MG, Wang YA, Adamson GD. Population-based study of cesarean section after in vitro fertilization in Australia. Birth 2010; 37: 184-191. [DOI:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00405.x]
5. Pozenberg P. Evaluation of caesarean rate a necessary progress in modern obstetrics. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Repord (Paris) 2004; 33: 279-289.
6. Cohen NW, Estner LJ. Silent knife: Cesarean section in the United States. Society 1983; 21: 95-111. [DOI:10.1007/BF02694978]
7. Bogg L, Huang K, Long Q, Shen Y, Hemminki E. Cesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70: 1544-1549. [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.026]
8. Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Uotila J, Raudaskoski T, Ulander VM, et al. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 896-902. [DOI:10.3109/00016349.2010.487893]
9. Salim R, Shalev E. Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010; 8: 68. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-8-68]
10. Pasupathy D, Wood AM, Pell JP, Fleming M, Smith GC. Rates of and factors associated with delivery-related perinatal death among term infants in Scotland. JAMA 2009; 302: 660-668. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2009.1111]
11. Szarka A, Rigó J Jr, Lázár L, Beko G, Molvarec A. Circulating cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia determined by multiplex suspension array. BMC Immunol 2010; 11: 59. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2172-11-59]
12. Hastings-Tolsma M, Vincent D, Emeis C, Francisco T. Getting through birth in one piece: protecting the perineum. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2007; 32: 158-164. [DOI:10.1097/01.NMC.0000269565.20111.92]
13. Liu YJ, Zhao RL, Tian YH. The Effects of Vaginal-cervical Balloon Dilatation on Shorting the Duration of Labour. Chin J Perinatal Med 1998; 1: 77-79.
14. Mazdak H, Abazari P, Ghassami F, Najafipour S. The analgesic effect of inhalational Entonox for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 2007; 35: 331-334. [DOI:10.1007/s00240-007-0120-6]
15. Chi C, Lee CA, England A, Hingorani J, Paintsil J, Kadir RA. Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia in women with inherited bleeding disorders. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 1104-1111. [DOI:10.1160/TH08-10-0694]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb