International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Tue, May 14, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 4, Issue 2 (7-2006)
IJRM 2006, 4(2): 63-68 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohammadzadeh A, Heidari M, Soltan Ghoraii H, Hassan Zarnani A, Ghaffari Novin M, Akhondi M M, et al . Induction of Endometriosis by implantation of endometrial fragments in female rats. IJRM 2006; 4 (2) :63-68
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-52-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-52-en.html
Afsaneh Mohammadzadeh * 
, Mahnaz Heidari , Haleh Soltan Ghoraii , Amir Hassan Zarnani , Marefat Ghaffari Novin , Mohammad Mahdi Akhondi , Alireza Mossavie Jarahi , Farzaneh Mohammadzadeh
, Mahnaz Heidari , Haleh Soltan Ghoraii , Amir Hassan Zarnani , Marefat Ghaffari Novin , Mohammad Mahdi Akhondi , Alireza Mossavie Jarahi , Farzaneh Mohammadzadeh
Abstract: (2488 Views)
Background: Endometriosis is defined as the growth of endometrial tissues in ectopic places outside the uterus. This disease has an important effect on the health and fertility of affected women. It’s etiology is not clearly known. For better understanding the pathophysiology of this disease, many researchers study on several aspects of the disease on animals.
Objective: In this experimental study endometriosis was induced in female rats surgically and then its side effects were investigated with special focus on adhesion formation that is a major problem in women with this disease.
Materials and methods: In Protestrous phase, female rats were randomly divided into two groups. In both groups, under intra peritoneal anesthesia, laparotomy was done and left horn and associated fat were removed. In experimented group (A), the removed endometrium was cut to six square pieces (2mm each) and they were sutured to the peritoneum, near ovaries and subcutaneous. In sham group (B), the same procedure was done for the fat tissues around the removed horn and the pieces were sutured to the same places. After 8 weeks, in Protestrous phase, clinical adhesion and size of implants were evaluated.
Results: The total mean size of implants was calculated in each group, and this was significantly larger in experimented group (25.4 mm versus 2 mm p=0.000). The mean diameter of implants that calculated for each site of implantation in experimented group were significantly larger in left peritoneum (p=0.002), followed by right (p=0.000) and left (p=0.000) ovaries. The endometrial tissues grew in 100% of implants in subcutaneous area. Clinical adhesions (Score ≥ 2) were detected in 7 out of 10 in experimented group and in 2 out 10 in control group. The number of Esterous cycle were similar in both groups.
Conclusion: Our study showed that after inducing endometriosis by surgical approach, only endometrial implants grew as a cystic structures and this is a unique aspect of endometrial cells. Our results showed that endometriosis had a direct effect on adhesion formation, not surgery alone and induction of this disease didn't have any adverse effect on ovarian function in female rats.
Objective: In this experimental study endometriosis was induced in female rats surgically and then its side effects were investigated with special focus on adhesion formation that is a major problem in women with this disease.
Materials and methods: In Protestrous phase, female rats were randomly divided into two groups. In both groups, under intra peritoneal anesthesia, laparotomy was done and left horn and associated fat were removed. In experimented group (A), the removed endometrium was cut to six square pieces (2mm each) and they were sutured to the peritoneum, near ovaries and subcutaneous. In sham group (B), the same procedure was done for the fat tissues around the removed horn and the pieces were sutured to the same places. After 8 weeks, in Protestrous phase, clinical adhesion and size of implants were evaluated.
Results: The total mean size of implants was calculated in each group, and this was significantly larger in experimented group (25.4 mm versus 2 mm p=0.000). The mean diameter of implants that calculated for each site of implantation in experimented group were significantly larger in left peritoneum (p=0.002), followed by right (p=0.000) and left (p=0.000) ovaries. The endometrial tissues grew in 100% of implants in subcutaneous area. Clinical adhesions (Score ≥ 2) were detected in 7 out of 10 in experimented group and in 2 out 10 in control group. The number of Esterous cycle were similar in both groups.
Conclusion: Our study showed that after inducing endometriosis by surgical approach, only endometrial implants grew as a cystic structures and this is a unique aspect of endometrial cells. Our results showed that endometriosis had a direct effect on adhesion formation, not surgery alone and induction of this disease didn't have any adverse effect on ovarian function in female rats.
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Denny E, Khan KS. Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. What are the experiences of women with endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;26:501-506. [DOI:10.1080/01443610600797301] [PMID]
2. Tomassetti C, Meuleman C, Pexster SA, Mihalyi A, Kyama C, Sima P, et al. Endometriosis, recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: is there an immunological link? Reprod Biomed Online 2006;13:58-64. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62016-0]
3. Nothnick WB. Treating endometriosis as an autoimmune disease. Fert Steril 2001;76:223-231. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01878-7]
4. Sharpe-Timms KL. Using rats as a research model for the study of endometriosis. Ann Ny Acad sci 2002;955:318-327. [DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02792.x] [PMID]
5. Berkley KJ, Cason A, Jacobs H, Bradshow H, Wood E. Vaginal hyperplasia in a rat model of endometriosis. Neurosci lett 2001;306:185-188. [DOI:10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01906-1]
6. Stilling D. Do endometrial fragments grow? Verch Dtsch Ges Pathol 1903:6:122.
7. Jacobson VC. The autotransplantation of endometrial tissue in rabbit. Arch Surg 1922;5:281. [DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1922.01110140067002]
8. Schenken RS, Asch RH, Williams RF, Hodgen GD. Etiology of infertility in monkeys with endometriosis: luteinized unruptured follicles, luteal phase defects, pelvic adhesions, and spontaneous abortions. Fertil Steril 1984;41:122. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47552-7]
9. Sharp-Thimms KL. Using rats as a reaserch module of the study of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acas sci 2002;:318-327. [DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02792.x] [PMID]
10. Maeda KI, Kura SO, Tsukamura H. Physiology of reproduction, In the laboratory Rat: the handbook of experimental animal, Hrinke, C.J. Ed. Academic press. London. 2000;145-176. [DOI:10.1016/B978-012426400-7/50048-0]
11. Suckow MA, Danneman P, Brayton C. The laboratory animals, CRC press 2001;13-34. [DOI:10.1201/9780849376276] [PMID]
12. Kocak I, Unlu C, Akcan Y, Yakin K. Reduction of adhesion formation with cross linked hyaloronic acid after peritoneal surgery in rats. Fertil Steril 1999;72:873-878. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00368-4]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
