International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Sat, Apr 20, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 12, Issue 5 (6-2014)
IJRM 2014, 12(5): 361-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Yassaee F. Tuboplasty as a reversal macrosurgery for tubal ligation, is pregnancy possible? A case series. IJRM 2014; 12 (5) :361-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-537-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-537-en.html
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , dr_fyass@yahoo.com
Abstract: (4961 Views)
Background: Reversal of tubal ligation is requested by some women for various reasons. The present study aims to determine the rate of pregnancy after tubal ligation reversal.
Case: In these case series, we reported fifteen women who requested tuboplasty after tubal ligation. In these cases reversal of tubal ligation was done in 15 women. Pregnancy occurred in 4 women (26.6%). Two term pregnancy and 2 abortions were determined.
Conclusion: The success rate of pregnancy after macro surgical reversal of tubal ligation is good and can be considered before in vitro fertilization. The type of tubal ligation and the procedure used will determine the best procedure for reversal and have a major impact on chance of success for reversal surgery.
Case: In these case series, we reported fifteen women who requested tuboplasty after tubal ligation. In these cases reversal of tubal ligation was done in 15 women. Pregnancy occurred in 4 women (26.6%). Two term pregnancy and 2 abortions were determined.
Conclusion: The success rate of pregnancy after macro surgical reversal of tubal ligation is good and can be considered before in vitro fertilization. The type of tubal ligation and the procedure used will determine the best procedure for reversal and have a major impact on chance of success for reversal surgery.
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Boeckxtaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tourneys H. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 2660-2664. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem248]
2. Promila J, Bhupinder Kaur G, Shweta G. Reversal of tubal ligation under 4x magnification. J Obstet Gynecol India 2005; 55: 448-450.
3. Narvekar AN. Reversal of sterilization using microsurgical techniques. J Obstet Gynecol India 1988; 38: 211-213.
4. Marshall S, O'Brien BD, Jones K: Women Health Tubal ligation reversal. Health Wise Staff. Updated 2012. Available at: http://www.healthlinkbc.ca.
5. John A Rock, Howard W, Jones III. Reconstructive tubal surgery. Victor Gomel and Elizabeth Taylor. Telind`s Operative Gynecology. 10th Ed. 2008.
6. Sanger K, Rana Ak, Sharma S. Tuboplasty or recanalization: nursing care case study. Nursing J India 1991; 82: 327-328.
7. Timonen S, Tuominen J, Irjala K, Mäenpää J. Ovarian function and regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis after tubal sterilization. J Reprod Med 2002; 47: 131-136.
8. Trussell J, Guibert E, Hedley A. Sterilization failures, sterilization reversal and pregnancy after sterilization reversal of Quebec. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 677-684.
9. Brar MK, Kaur J, Kaur S. A study of microsurgical reanastomosis of the fallopian tubes for reversal of sterilization. J Obstet Gynecol India 2000; 50: 75-78.
10. Singhal V, Li TC, Cooke ID. An analysis of factors in fluencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 98: 628-636. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13447.x]
11. Silber SJ, Cohen R. Micro surgical reversal of tubal sterilization: factors affecting pregnancy rate, with long-term-follow up. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 679-682.
12. Spivak MM, Librach CL, Rosenthal DM. Microsurgical reversal of sterilization: a six year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 355-361. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(86)90671-X]
13. Putman JM, Holden AEC, Olive DL. Pregnancy rates following tubal anastomosis: Pomeroy partial salpingectomy versus electrocautery. J Gynecol Surg 1990; 6: 173-178. [DOI:10.1089/gyn.1990.6.173]
14. Paterson PJ. Factors influencing the success of microsurgical tuboplasty for sterilization. Clin Reprod Fertil 1985; 3: 57-64.
15. Mc Comb P. Microsurgical tubocornual anastomosis for occlusive corneal disease: reproducible results without the need for tubouterine implantation. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 571. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49630-5]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
