Volume 12, Issue 7 (8-2014)                   IJRM 2014, 12(7): 471-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ahmari Tehran H, Tashi S, Mehran N, Eskandari N, Dadkhah Tehrani T. Emotional experiences in surrogate mothers: A qualitative study. IJRM 2014; 12 (7) :471-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-564-en.html
1- Research Center for Medicine and Religion, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran , ahmari9929@yahoo.com
2- Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3- Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
4- Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (2699 Views)
Background: Surrogacy is one of the new techniques of assisted reproduction technology in which a woman carries and bears a child for another woman. In Iran, many Shia clerics and jurists considered it permissible so there is no religious prohibition for it. In addition to the risk of physical complications for complete surrogate mothers, the possibility of psychological complications resulted from emotional attachment to a living creature in the surrogate mother as another injury requires counseling and assessment prior to acceptance by infertile couples and complete surrogate mothers.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the emotional experiences of surrogate mothers.
Materials and Methods: This was a qualitative, phenomenological study. We selected eight complete surrogate mothers in Isfahan. We used convenient sampling method and in-depth interview to collect the information. The data analysis was fulfilled via Colaizzi’s seven-stage method. Reliability and validity study of the roots in the four-axis was done.
Results: The findings of these interviews were classified into two main themes and four sub themes: acquired experiences in pregnancy (feelings toward pregnancy, relationship with family, relatives and commissioning couple) and consequences of surrogacy (complications of pregnancy, religious and financial problems of surrogacy).
Conclusion: Surrogacy pregnancy should be considered as high-risk emotional experience because many of surrogate mothers may face negative experiences. Therefore, it is recommended that surrogates should receive professional counseling prior to, during and following pregnancy.
Full-Text [PDF 121 kb]   (756 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (613 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Nourizadeh R. [Ethical challenges of surrogacy in Iran]. Medical Ethic 2009; 3: 155-186. (In Persian)
2. Brinsden P Gestational surrogacy. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9: 483-491. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmg033]
3. Golombok S, Murray C, Jadva V, MacCallum F, Lycett E. Families created through surrogacy arrangements: Parent–Child Relationships in the 1st Year of Life. Dev Psychol2004; 40: 400-411. [DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.400]
4. Garmaroudi S. [Gestational surrogacy in Iran]. J Reprod Infertil 2008; 9: 50-64. (In Persian)
5. Naseri Moghadam H. [Jurisprudential laws of relationship regarding infants born via Surrogacy]. J Reprod Infertil 2008; 9: 14-29. (In Persian).
6. Akhoundi M, Behjati Ardakani Z. [Surrogacy and the necessity for its application in infertility treatment]. J Reprod Infertil 2008; 9: 7-13. (In Persian)
7. Limon C. Surrogacy and parenthood: An overview of the research on the relationship between surrogacy and adoption. Aust J Adoption 2013; 7: 1-16.
8. Shenfield F, Pennings G, Cohen J, Devroey P, de Wert G, Tarlatzis B. ESHRE Task force on ethics and law 10: surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2705- 2707. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei147]
9. van den Akker O. Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Hum Reprod 2007; 13: 53-62. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml039]
10. Kennell J, McGrath S. Starting the process of mother-infant bonding. Acta Paediatrica 2002; 94: 775-777.
11. FazliKhalaf ZMA, Shafiabadi A, Tarahhomi M. [Psychological aspects of surrogate motherhood]. J Reprod Infertil 2008; 9: 43-49. (In Persian)
12. Pashmi M, Ahmadi SA, Tabatabaie SMS. [The need for counseling surrogate mothers before practicing surrogacy]. J Reprod Infertil 2009; 9: 361-372. (In Persian).
13. Abbasi M, Salehi HR, Mashayekhi B. [The nature of medical obligations in the light of comparative study]. Iran J Med Law 2011; 1: 7-24. (In Persian)
14. Abedi HA. [Applying phenomenological method of research in clinical sciences]. Rahbord 2010; 19: 207-224. (In Persian)
15. Parahoo K. Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. 2nd Ed. London, Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
16. Burns N. Grove SK. The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 6th Ed. USA, Saunders; 2009.
17. Holloway I, Wheeler S. Qualitative Research in Nursing. 2nd Ed. Oxford, Great Britain, Blackwell Science Ltd.; 2002: 125.
18. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th Ed. Great Britain, Lipponcott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
19. Haj Bagheri A, Parvizi S, Salsali M. [Qualitative research]. 1st Ed. Tehran, Boshra publication, 2008; 3-10. (In Persian).
20. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. "Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences." In handbook of qualitative research. Edited by Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication; 2000: 163-188.
21. Colaizzi PF. Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York, Oxford University Press; 1978: 119-135.
22. Deal B. A pilot study of nurse's experience of giving spiritual care. The Qualitative Report 2010; 15: 852-863.
23. Ballie L. A phenomenological study of the nature of empathy. J Adv Nurs 1996; 24: 1300-1308. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb01038.x]
24. Sanders C. Application of Colaizzi's method: Interpretation of an auditable decision trail by a novice researcher. Contem Nurse J 2003; 14: 292-302. [DOI:10.5172/conu.14.3.292]
25. Ciccarelli JC, Beckman LJ. Navigating Rough Waters: An Overview of Psychological Aspects of Surrogacy. J Social Issues 2005; 61: 21-43. [DOI:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00392.x]
26. Ber R. Ethical Issues in Gestational Surrogacy. Theoretical Med Bioethics 2000; 21: 153-169. [DOI:10.1023/A:1009956218800]
27. Jadva V, Murray C, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Golombok S. Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mother. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2196-2204. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg397]
28. Tieu M. Inquiry into legislation on altruistic surrogacy in NSW. 2008. Available at: www.parliament.nsw. gov.au/Prod/parlment/.../Submission%2014.pdf.
29. Parkinson J, Tran C, Tan T. Perinatal outcome after in-vitro fertilization-surrogacy. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 671-676. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.3.671]
30. van den Akker O. The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UK. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1849-1855. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/15.8.1849]
31. Dan R. Surrogate pregnancy: a guide for Canadian prenatal health care providers. CMAJ 2007; 176: 483-485. [DOI:10.1503/cmaj.060696]
32. Gurgan T, Demirol A. Unresolved issues regarding assisted reproduction technology. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14 (Suppl.): 40-43. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60724-9]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb