Volume 12, Issue 8 (8-2014)                   IJRM 2014, 12(8): 573-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dehghan T, Mozdarani H, Khoradmehr A, Kalantar S M, Bakhshandeh M, Bouzarjomehri F, et al . Evaluation of embryo quality after concurrent use of ovarian stimulating hormones and gamma irradiation. IJRM 2014; 12 (8) :573-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-569-en.html
Evaluation of embryo quality after concurrent use of ovarian stimulating hormones and gamma irradiation
Tahere Dehghan1 , Hossein Mozdarani * 2, Arezoo Khoradmehr3 , Seyed Mehdi Kalantar3 , Mohsen Bakhshandeh4 , Fathollah Bouzarjomehri5 , Seyed Milad Kalantar6 , Morteza Sepehr Javan7
1- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , mozdarah@modares.ac.ir
3- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
4- Department of Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- Department of Medical Physics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
6- Department of Biotechnology, School of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
7- Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (2160 Views)
Background: Radiotherapy has many side effects on fertilization in young women. Radiation can lead to ovarian failure in women who underwent abdomen or pelvic radiotherapy.
Objective: This study helps us to investigate ovarian response of NMRI female mice to ovarian stimulating hormones (PMSG, HCG) after whole-body gamma irradiation.
Materials and Methods: 45 pregnant mice were divided into two groups of control and experimental. The experimental group was classified into three sub-groups: Irradiation group (2 or 4Gy),Superovulation group (10 or 15IU),and superovulation and gamma-radiation group (2Gy & 10IU, 2Gy & 15IU, 4Gy & 10IU,4Gy & 15IU). Female mice were killed and embryos were removed from oviduct .The number of embryos cells counted and the quality of them was evaluated in each group. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test were used to analyze the data.
Results: There was a significant difference in the number of 2-4 cells grade D embryos in 2Gy & 15IU group compared with control and 2Gy groups (p=0.01), and the number of embryos in 4Gy group was more than in 10IU and 15IU (p=0.03) and 2Gy & 15IU groups (p=0.01). It was more significantly embryos in 4Gy & 15IU group compared to 2Gy & 15IU group (p=0.01).In addition There were no significant differences in the number of 2-4 cells grades A, B and C embryos and also number of 4-8 cells grades A, B and C, D embryos in groups.
Conclusion: The concurrent use of ovulation stimulating hormones and gamma rays ameliorates this problem of drastic decrease in number of living embryos due to whole-body irradiation.
Keywords: PMSG-HCG, Gamma rays, Whole body irradiation
Full-Text [PDF 500 kb]   (529 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (324 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, Patrizio P, Wallace WH, Hagerty K, et al. American society of clinical oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2917-2931. [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5888]
2. Arnon J, Meirow D, Lewis-Roness H, Ornoy A. Genetic and teratogenic effects of cancer treatments on gametes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 394-403. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/7.4.394]
3. Markowska A, Pawałowska M, Markowska J, Litwiniuk M, Madry R, Dilmaghani-Tabriz D. Influence of oncological treatment on fertility of women and pregnancy outcome. Ginekol Pol 2010; 81: 446-451.
4. Chung-Hoon K, Gyun-Ho J. Fertility Preservation in Female Cancer Patients. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012; 2012: 807302.
5. Meirow D, Nugent D. The effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on female reproduction. Hum Reprod 2001; 7: 535-543. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/7.6.535]
6. Wallace WH, Thomson AB, Kelsey TW. The radiosensitivity of the human oocyte. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 117-121. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg016]
7. Wallace WH, Thomson AB, Saran F. Predicting age of ovarian failure after radiation to a field that includes the ovaries. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 738-744. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.038]
8. Sklar CA, Mertens AC, Mitby P, Whitton J, Stovall M, Kasper C, et al. Premature menopause in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 890-896. [DOI:10.1093/jnci/djj243]
9. Grigsby PW, Russell A, Bruner D, Eifel P, Koh WJ, Spanos W, et al. Late injury of cancer therapy on the female reproductive tract. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 1281. [DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(94)00426-L]
10. Lushbaugh CC, Casarett GW. The effects of gonadal irradiation in clinical radiation therapy: a review. Cancer 1976; 37: 1111-1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197602)37:2+<1111::AID-CNCR2820370821>3.0.CO;2-E [DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(197602)37:2+3.0.CO;2-E]
11. Bedaiwy MA. Strategies for fertility preservation and gonadal protection during gonadotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2005; 10: 1-21.
12. Wallace WH, Thomson AB, Saran F. The radiosensitivity of the human oocyte. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 117-121. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg016]
13. Prados FJ, Debrock S, Lemmen JG, Agerholm I. The cleavage stage embryo. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: i50-i71. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/des224]
14. Sonmezer M, Oktay K. Fertility preservation in female patients. Hum Reprod 2004; 10: 251-266. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmh021]
15. Wallace WH, Thomson AB, Kelsey T. The radiosensitivity of the human oocyte. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 117-121. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg016]
16. Meirow D, Schenker JG, Rosler A. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with low oestradiol in non-classical 17 alpha-hydroxylase, 17, 20-lyase deficiency: what is the role of estrogens? Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 2119-2121. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019059]
17. Kashchenko LA. The mechanism of radiation damage in the ovary of the mouse. USSR-Journal 1962; 147.
18. Meirow D, Schenker JG, Rosler A. Ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome with low oestradiol in non-classical 17 alpha-hydroxylase, 17, 20-lyase deficiency: what is the role of estrogens? Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 2119-2121. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019059]
19. Grigsby PW, Russell A, Bruner D, Eifel P, Koh WJ, Spanos W, et al. Late injury of cancer therapy on the female reproductive tract. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 1281. [DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(94)00426-L]
20. Fajardo LP. Pathology of Radiation Injury. New York, Masson Publishing; 1982.
21. Rubin P, Casarett GW. Clinical Radiation Pathology. Philadelphia, Saunders Company; 1968.
22. Gosden RG, Wade JC, Fraser HM, Sandow J, Faddy MJ. Impact of congenital hypogonadotropism on the radiation sensitivity of the mouse ovary. Hum Reprod1997; 12: 2483-2488. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.11.2483]
23. Ertzeid G, Storeng R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 221-225. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.2.221]
24. Vander Auwera I, D'Hooghe T. Superovulation of female mice delays embryonic and fetal development. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1237-1243. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.6.1237]
25. Rajaei F, Bazzy P. The ultrastructural effects of super ovulatory drugs on mouse endometrial basement membrane. JQUMS 2007; 11: 18-23.
26. Wu BJ, Xue HY, Chen LP, Dai YF, Guo JT, Li XH. Effect of PMSG/hCG Superovulation on Mouse Embryonic Development. J Integrative Agriculture 2013, 12: 1066-1072. [DOI:10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60485-2]
27. Ben-Rafael Z, Benadiva CA, Ausmanas M, Barber B, Blasco L, Flickinger GL, et al. Dose of human menopausal gonadotropin influences the outcome of an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 964-968. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59592-2]
28. van Hooff MH, Alberda AT, Huisman GJ, Zeilmaker GH, Leerentveld RA. Doubling the human menopausal gonadotropin dose in the course of an in-vitro fertilization treatment cycle in low responders: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 369-373. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138053]
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb