1. Gunalp S, Onculoglu C, Gurgan T, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ. A study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: an attempt to develop clinical thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 110-114. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.1.110]
2. Menkveld R, Wong WY, Lombard CJ, Wetzels AM, Thomas CM, Merkus HM, et al. Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1165-1171. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.6.1165]
3. Oehninger S, Chaturvedi S, Toner J, Morshedi M, Mayer J, Lanzendorf S, et al. Semen quality: Is there a paternal effect on pregnancy outcome in in-vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2161-2164. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.8.2161]
4. Spandorfer SD, Avrech OM, Colombero LT, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z. Effect of parental age on fertilization and pregnancy characteristics in couples treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 334-338. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.2.334]
5. Shen S, Khabani A, Klein N, Battaglia D. Statistical analysis if factors affecting fertilization rates and clinical outcome associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil steril 2003; 79: 355-360. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04675-7]
6. Garello C, Baker H, Rai J, Montgomery S, Wilson P, Kennedy CR, Hartshorne GM. Pronuclear orientation, polar body placement, and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in-vitro fertilization: further evidence for polarity in human oocytes? Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2588-2595. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.10.2588]
7. Kahraman S, Kumtepe Y, Sertyel S, Donmez E, Benkhalifa M, Findikli N, et al. Pronuclear morphology scoring and chromosomal status of embryos in severe male infertility. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3193-200. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.12.3193]
8. Tesarik J, Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1318-1323. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.5.1318]
9. Sennl A, Urner F, Chanson A, Primi MP, Writhner D, Germond M. Morphological scoring of human pronuclear zygotes for prediction of pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 234-239. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei282]
10. Fisch JD, Rodriguez H, Ross R, Overby G, Sher G. The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1970-1975. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.9.1970]
11. Saldeen P, Sundstrom P. Nuclear status of four-cell pre-embryos predicts implantation potential in invitro fertilization treatment cycles. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 584-589. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.059]
12. Zollner U, Zollner KP, Hartl G, Dietl J, Steck T. The use of a detailed zygote score after IVF/ICSI to obtain good quality blastocysts: the German experience. Hum reprod 2002; 17: 1327-1333. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.5.1327]
13. Balaban B, Urman B, Isiklar A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R, et al. The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2357-2361. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.11.2357]
14. Placido GD, Wilding M, Strina I, Alviggi E, Alviggi C, Mollo A, et al. High outcome predictability after IVF using a combined score for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2402-2409. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.9.2402]
15. Balaban B, Urman B. Embryo culture as a diagnostic tool. Reprod Biomed online 2003; 7: 671-682. [
DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62090-1]