International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Sat, Dec 28, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 5, Issue 3 (7-2007)
IJRM 2007, 5(3): 61-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Allameh T, Mohammadizadeh F. Diagnostic value of hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding compared to pathology reports. IJRM 2007; 5 (3) :61-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-68-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-68-en.html
1- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , t_allameh@med.mui.ac.ir
2- Department of Pathology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Isfahan, Iran
2- Department of Pathology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Isfahan, Iran
Abstract: (2480 Views)
Background: According to age, history and physical examination findings, there are different diagnoses including anatomic lesions for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). In these conditions, hysteroscopy can be performed as a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure.
Objective: The aim of this study was defining the diagnostic value of hysteroscopy in evaluating uterine cavity in patients with AUB compared to pathologic findings.
Materials and Methods: This was a prospective descriptive-analytic study in which hysteroscopy was performed for 105 patients with AUB .The patients were in reproductive and perimenopausal (86.7%) or postmenopausal ages (13.3%). Hysteroscopy was done and biopsy was taken from any pathology. After removing of hysteroscope, dilatation and curettage were done. Both samples were sent for pathologist. At the end, reports of hysteroscopic findings were compared with pathologic results.
Results: Diagnostic value of hysteroscopy in evaluation of uterine cavity showed 100% sensitivity, 80.5% specificity, 88.9% positive predictive value (PPV) and 100% negative predictive value (NPV). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the procedure for endometrial polyp were 93%, 100%, 100%, and 95.4%, respectively. These results were respectively 100%, 96.4%, 88% and 100% for submucosal myoma, and 25%, 89.7%, 12.5% and 93.3% for endometrial hyperplasia.
Conclusion: The results of this study show that hysteroscopy is a reliable method for evaluation of AUB, especially in benign lesions such as endometrial polyp and submucosal myoma and it can be used as the first line diagnostic method for these abnormalities. However hysteroscopy without directed biopsy has insufficient value for diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia.
Objective: The aim of this study was defining the diagnostic value of hysteroscopy in evaluating uterine cavity in patients with AUB compared to pathologic findings.
Materials and Methods: This was a prospective descriptive-analytic study in which hysteroscopy was performed for 105 patients with AUB .The patients were in reproductive and perimenopausal (86.7%) or postmenopausal ages (13.3%). Hysteroscopy was done and biopsy was taken from any pathology. After removing of hysteroscope, dilatation and curettage were done. Both samples were sent for pathologist. At the end, reports of hysteroscopic findings were compared with pathologic results.
Results: Diagnostic value of hysteroscopy in evaluation of uterine cavity showed 100% sensitivity, 80.5% specificity, 88.9% positive predictive value (PPV) and 100% negative predictive value (NPV). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the procedure for endometrial polyp were 93%, 100%, 100%, and 95.4%, respectively. These results were respectively 100%, 96.4%, 88% and 100% for submucosal myoma, and 25%, 89.7%, 12.5% and 93.3% for endometrial hyperplasia.
Conclusion: The results of this study show that hysteroscopy is a reliable method for evaluation of AUB, especially in benign lesions such as endometrial polyp and submucosal myoma and it can be used as the first line diagnostic method for these abnormalities. However hysteroscopy without directed biopsy has insufficient value for diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia.
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. Caserta D, Toro G, Porretta M, Mancini E, Moscarini M. Hysteroscopic vs histologic diagnosis: Study of 222 cases of abnormal uterine hemorrhage . Minerva Ginecol 1999; 51:169 -172.
2. Lalchandani S, Phillips K. Evaluation of endometrial cavity-investigation option. Rev Gynecol Prac 2003; 3:165-170. [DOI:10.1016/S1471-7697(03)00065-0]
3. Wieser F, Albrecht A, Kurz C, Wenzl R, Nagele F. Ambulatory hysteroscopy in evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1999;111:289-293.
4. Malinova M. Ultrasonographic hysteroscopy, new approach for the investigation of the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Akush Ginekol ( Sofiia ) 1999;38:36-38.
5. Lo KW, Yuen PM. The role of outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy in identifying anatomic pathology and histo pathology in the endometrial cavity. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000; 7:381 -385. [DOI:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60482-3]
6. Guido RS, Stovall DW. Hysteroscopy. Official reprint from Up To Date. 2006 Up to Date.
7. Kelekci S,Kaya E, Alan M, Alan Y, Bilge U, Mollamahmutoglu L. Comparison of transvaginal sonography , saline infusion sonography, and office hysteroscopy in reproductive-aged women with or without abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril 2005;84:682-686. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.036]
8. Nichols DH, Clarke - Pearson DL. Gynecologic, obstetric, and related surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000:720 -750.
9. Jakab AJ , Ovari L , Juhasz B , Birinyi L , Bacsko G , Toth Z. Ultrasound diagnosis of focal intrauterine lesions. Orv Hetil 2002;143:1739 - 1743 .
10. Paschopoulos M, Lois ED, Alamanos Y, Kolipoulos G , Paraskevaidis E. Vaginoscopic hysteroscopy and transvaginal sonography in the evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001; 8:506-510. [DOI:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60612-3]
11. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging , transvaginal sonography , hysterosonographic examination and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2001; 76:350-357 [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01900-8]
12. Bonnamy L , Marret H , Perrotin F , Body G , Berger C , Lansac J . Sonohysterography : a prospective survey of results and complications in 81 patients . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 102:42-47. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00567-X]
13. Pasqualotto EB, Margossian H , Price LL , Bradley LD . Accuracy of preoperative diagnostic tools and outcome of hysteroscopic management of menstrual dysfunction. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000; 7:201-209. [DOI:10.1016/S1074-3804(00)80041-9]
14. Epstein E, Ramirez A , Skoog L , Valentin L . Trans vaginal sonography , saline contrast sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of women with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrium > 5 mm. Ultrasound Obstect Gynecol 2001;18 :157-162. [DOI:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00472.x]
15. Rayan KJ ,Kistner RW. Kistner's gynecology and women's health.7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby;1999:121-142.
16. Sousa R , Silvestre M , Almeida e Sousa L , Falcao F , Dias I, Silva T , et al . Transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal bleeding: a prospective study .Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80:856-562. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080009856.x]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
