Volume 14, Issue 9 (9-2016)                   IJRM 2016, 14(9): 583-588 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Salehpour S, Zamaniyan M, Saharkhiz N, Zadeh modares S, Hosieni S, Seif S, et al . Does intrauterine saline infusion by intrauterine insemination (IUI) catheter as endometrial injury during IVF cycles improve pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent implantation failure?: An RCT. IJRM 2016; 14 (9) :583-588
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-782-en.html
1- Preventive Gynecology Research Center (PGRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Preventive Gynecology Research Center (PGRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , marziehzamaniyan@gmail.com
3- Department of Veterinary Theriogenology and Obstetric, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (3634 Views)
Background: Recurrent implantation failure is one of the most issues in IVF cycles.Some researchers found that beneficial effects of endometrial Scratching in womenwith recurrent implantation failure, while some authors demonstrated contrary results
Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the effect of intrauterine. Salineinfusion as a form of endometrial injury, during fresh in vitro fertilization-embryotransfer cycle, among patients with recurrent implantation failure.
Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial study 63 women undergoing assistedreproductive technology were divided into two groups either local endometrialinjury by intrauterine saline infusion during day 3-5 of the ongoing controlledovarian stimulation cycle, or IVF protocol performed without any other interventionin Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran. The main outcome measure was clinicalpregnancy rates.
Results: Patients who received intra uterine saline infusion (n=20), had significantlylower clinical pregnancy numbers (1 vs. 9, p<0.05) and implantation rates (4.7% vs.41.6%, p<0.05), compared to controls (n=39). However, there was no significantdifference in miscarriage rates (9.4% vs. 8.7%, p>0.05) and multiple pregnancynumbers (1 vs. 3, p>0.05) between groups.
Conclusion: When intrauterine saline infusion as a form of endometrial injury isperformed during the ongoing IVF cycles it has negative effect on reproductiveoutcomes among patients with recurrent implantation failure.
Full-Text [PDF 355 kb]   (853 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (369 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, Erb K, D'Hooghe T, Castilla JA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 2099-2113. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu175]
2. Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 28: 14-38. [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011]
3. Patil M. Recurrent Implantation Failure. In: Rao KA, et al (Eds.), Principles and Practice of Assisted Reproductive Technology. India, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2014: 704-705.
4. Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T. Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 3036-3043. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/del305]
5. Aghajanova L. Leukemia inhibitory factor and human embryo implantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004; 1034: 176-183. [DOI:10.1196/annals.1335.020]
6. Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S, Imani B, Yang JP, Germeyer A, et al. Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology 2002; 143: 2119-2138. [DOI:10.1210/endo.143.6.8885]
7. Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simón C. Wide genomic analysis of human endometrial receptivity: new times, new opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13: 77-86. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml046]
8. Kalma Y, Granot I, Gnainsky Y, Or Y, Czernobilsky B, Dekel N, et al. Endometrial biopsy-induced gene modulation: first evidence for the expression of bladder-transmembranal uroplakin Ib in human endometrium. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1042-1049. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.043]
9. Huang SY, Wang CJ, Soong YK, Wang HS, Wang ML, Lin CY, et al. Site-specific endometrial injury improves implantation and pregnancy in patients with repeated implantation failures. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011; 9: 140. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-9-140]
10. Potdar N, Gelbaya T, Nardo LG. Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25: 561-571. [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005]
11. Nastri CO, Lensen SF, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, et al. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 3: CD009517. [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub3]
12. Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P, Panayotidis C, Van Herendael B, Gomel V, et al. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 1-11. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmp033]
13. Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo PB, Barash A, Or Y, Schechtman E, et al. Local injury of the endometrium induces an inflammatory response that promotes successful implantation. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2030-2036. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.022]
14. Demirol A, Gurgan T. Effect of treatment of intrauterine pathologies with office hysteroscopy in patients with recurrent IVF failure. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 8: 590-594. [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61108-X]
15. Rama Raju GA, Shashi Kumari G, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Assessment of uterine cavity by hysteroscopy in assisted reproduction programme and its influence on pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006; 274: 160-164. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-006-0174-7]
16. Karimzadeh MA, Ayazi Rozbahani M, Tabibnejad N. Endometrial local injury improves the pregnancy rate among recurrent implantation failure patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomised clinical trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 677-680. [DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01076.x]
17. Makrakis E, Hassiakos D, Stathis D, Vaxevanoglou T, Orfanoudaki E, Pantos K. Hysteroscopy in women with implantation failures after in vitro fertilization: findings and effect on subsequent pregnancy rates. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16: 181-187. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2008.12.016]
18. Narvekar SA, Gupta N, Shetty N, Kottur A, Srinivas M, Rao KA. Does local endometrial injury in the nontransfer cycle improve the IVF-ET outcome in the subsequent cycle in patients with previous unsuccessful IVF? A randomized controlled pilot study. J Hum Reprod Sci 2010; 3: 15-19. [DOI:10.4103/0974-1208.63116]
19. Barash A, Dekel N, Fieldust S, Segal I, Schechtman E, Granot I. Local injury to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1317-1322. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00345-5]
20. Raziel A, Schachter M, Strassburger D, Bern O, Ron-El R, Friedler S. Favorable influence of local injury to the endometrium in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients with high-order implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 198-201. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.062]
21. Abate V, De Corato R, Cali A, Stinchi A. Endometrial biopsy at the time of embryo transfer: correlation of histological diagnosis with therapy and pregnancy rate. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Trans 1987; 4:173-176. [DOI:10.1007/BF01555466]
22. Ubaldi F, Bourgain C, Tournaye H, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 521-526. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80080-5]
23. Zhou L, Li R, Wang R, Huang HX, Zhong K. Local injury to the endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles improves implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 1166-1176. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.064]
24. Karimzade MA, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L. Local injury to the endometrium on the day of oocyte retrieval has a negative impact on implantation in assisted reproductive cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281: 499-503. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-009-1166-1]
25. Kim CH, You RM, Kang HJ, Ahn JW, Jeon I, Lee JW, et al. GnRH antagonist multiple dose protocol with oral contraceptive pill pretreatment in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2011; 38: 228-233. [DOI:10.5653/cerm.2011.38.4.228]
26. Veeck L. The morphological assessment of human oocytes and early conception. In: Keel BA. Webster, BW., editors. Handbook of the laboratory diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 1990: 353-69.
27. Humphrey KW. Interactions between oestradiol 3, 17 beta and progesterone on the induction and growth of deciduomata in ovariectomized mice. Aust J Biol Sci 1969; 22: 689-699. [DOI:10.1071/BI9690689]
28. Finn CA, Martin L. Endocrine control of the timing of endometrial sensitivity to a decidual stimulus. Biol Reprod 1972; 7: 82-86. [DOI:10.1093/biolreprod/7.1.82]
29. Parsanezhad ME, Dadras N, Maharlouei N, Neghahban L, Keramati P, Amini M. Pregnancy rate after endometrial injury in couples with unexplained infertility: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med 2013; 11: 869-874.
30. Gibreel A, El-Adawi N, Elgindy E, Al-Inany H, Allakany N, Tournaye H. Endometrial scratching for women with previous IVF failure undergoing IVF treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol 2015; 31: 313-316. [DOI:10.3109/09513590.2014.994603]
31. Baum M, Yerushalmi GM, Maman E, Kedem A, Machtinger R, Hourvitz A, et al. Does local injury to the endometrium before IVF cycle really affect treatment outcome? Results of a randomized placebo controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol 2012; 28: 933-936. [DOI:10.3109/09513590.2011.650750]
32. Ferraretti A, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response'to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1616- 1624 [DOI:10.1093/humrep/der092]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb