Volume 5, Issue 5 (7-2007)                   IJRM 2007, 5(5): 165-170 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khosravi Farsani S, Mahmoudi R, Abdolvahhabi M A, Abbasi M, Malek F, Sobhani A. Comparing the viability and in vitro maturation of cumulus germinal vesicle break down (GVBD) oocyte complexes using two vitrification techniques in mice. IJRM 2007; 5 (5) :165-170
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-92-en.html
1- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
3- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Sobhania@tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2766 Views)
Background: Vitrification is assumed to be a promising method to cryopreserve human oocytes but still needs optimizing.
Objective: The aim of this study was to improve the single step and step-wise vitrification effects on maturing mouse GVBD oocytes by ethylene glycol (EG) in conventional straws.
Materials and Methods: Oocytes with compact cumulus cells were cultured for 3hr in TCM199 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in 5% CO2 in air. GVBD oocytes were randomly allocated into three groups. (1) Control (non-vitrified group), (2) exposed to single-step vitrification (contained of EG 20%+0.5M sucrose), (3) exposed to step-wise vitrification (2%, 5%, 10%, 20%EG +0.5M sucrose). In vitrification groups,oocytes were thawed and underwent additional 21 hr maturation. Viability of oocytes and maturation to MII stage were analyzed using inverted microscope and additionally by staining of propidium iodide and Hoechst 33342.
Results: All non-vitrified oocytes were viable after 24 hr; however, viability of vitrified samples in single-step group was significantly lower than that of the step-wise and control Groups. Also, the maturation rate in the step-wise group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to single-step.
Conclusion: These results suggest that step-wise vitrification of  GVBD oocytes as compared to single step vitrification  was better in the rate of  survival and in vitro maturation of oocytes.
Full-Text [PDF 147 kb]   (505 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (369 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Kuleshova LL, Lopata A. Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 449-454. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03305-8]
2. Van der Elst J. Oocyte freezing: here to stay? Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9:463-470. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmg032]
3. Cooper A, Paynter SJ, Fuller BJ, Shaw RW. Differential effects of cryopreservation on nuclear or cytoplasmic maturation in vitro in immature mouse oocytes from stimulated ovaries. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 971-978. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.4.971]
4. Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1986; 1: 884-886 [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90989-X]
5. Fabbri R, Porcu E, Marsella T, Rocchetta G, Venturoli S, Flamigni C. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:411-416. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.3.411]
6. Porcu E, Ciotti PM, Fabbri R, Magrini O, Seracchioli R , Flamigni C. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1997; 68:724-726. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00268-9]
7. Tucker MJ, Morton PC, Wright G, Sweitzer CL, Massey JB. Clinical application of human egg cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:3156-3159. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.11.3156]
8. Otoi T, Yamamoto K, Koyama N, Tachikawa S, Suzuki T. Cryopreservation of mature bovine oocytes by vitrification in straws. Cryobiology 1998; 37:77-85. [DOI:10.1006/cryo.1998.2103]
9. Lane M, Gardner DK. Vitrification of mouse oocytes using a nylon loop. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 58:342-347. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200103)58:3<342::AID-MRD13>3.0.CO;2-X [DOI:10.1002/1098-2795(200103)58:33.0.CO;2-X]
10. Aono N, Naganuma T, Abe Y, Hara K, Sasada H, Sato E, Yoshida H. Successful production of blastocysts following ultra rapid vitrification with step-wise equilibriation of germinal vesicle-stage mouse oocytes. J Reprod Dev 2003; 49:501-506. [DOI:10.1262/jrd.49.501]
11. Hong SW, Chung HM, Lim JM, Ko JJ, Joon TK, Yee B, et al. Improved human oocyte development after vitrification: a comparison of thawing methods. Fertil Steril 1999; 72:142-146. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00199-5]
12. Lane M, Bavister BD, Lyons EA, Forest KT. Containerless vitrification of mammalian oocytes and embryos. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17: 1234-1236. [DOI:10.1038/70795]
13. Yoon TK, Chung HM, Lim JM, Han SY, Ko JJ, Cha KY. Pregnancy and delivery of healthy infants developed from vitrified oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 180-181. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00572-0]
14. Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at _196 8C by vitrification. Nature 1985; 313: 573-375. [DOI:10.1038/313573a0]
15. Gupta MK, Uhm SJ, Lee HT. Cryopreservation of immature and in vitro matured porcine oocytes by solid surface vitrification. Theriogenology 2007; 67: 238-248. [DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.07.015]
16. Cai XY, Chen GA, Lian Y, Zheng XY, Peng HM. Cryoloop vitrification of rabbit oocytes. Human Reprod 2005; 20: 1969-1974. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh805]
17. Mandelbaum J, Anastasiou O, Lévy R, Guérin JF, de Larouziére V, Antoine JM. Effects of cryopreservation on the meiotic spindle of human oocytes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113:17-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.005]
18. Hyttel P, Vajta G, Callesen H. Vitrification of bovine oocytes with the open pulled straw method: Ultra structural consequences. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; 56: 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(200005)56:1<80::AID-MRD10>3.0.CO;2-U [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(200005)56:13.0.CO;2-U]
19. Otoi T, Yamamoto K, Koyama N, Suzuki T. In vitro fertilization and development of immature and mature bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ethylene glycol with sucrose.Cryobiology 1995; 32: 455-460. [DOI:10.1006/cryo.1995.1045]
20. Men H, Monson RL, Rutledge JJ. Effect of meiotic stages and maturation protocols on bovine oocyte's resistance to cryopreservation. Theriogenology 2002; 57:1095-1103. [DOI:10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00679-3]
21. Ambrosini G, Andrisani A, Porcu E, Rebellato E, Revelli A, Caserta D, et al. Oocyte's cryopreservation: state of art. Reprod Toxicol 2006; 22: 250-262. [DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.04.024]
22. Hochi S, Ito K, Hirabayashi M, Ueda M, Kimura K, Hanada A. Effect of nuclear stages during IVM on the survival of vitrified-warmed bovine oocytes. Theriogenology. 1998; 49:787-796. [DOI:10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00028-4]
23. Albarracin JL, Morato R, Izquierdo D, Mogas T. Vitrification of calf oocytes: effects of maturation stage and prematuration treatment on the nuclear and cytoskeletal components of oocytes and their subsequent development. Mol Reprod Dev 2005; 72:239-249. [DOI:10.1002/mrd.20326]
24. Zhang X, Li XH, Ma X, Wang ZH, Lu S, Guo YL. Redox-induced apoptosis of human oocytes in resting follicles in vitro. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2006; 13:451-458. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsgi.2006.05.005]
25. Lim JM, Ko JJ, Hwang WS, Chung HM, Niwa K. Development of in vitro matured bovine oocytes after cryopreservation with different cryoprotectants. Theriogenology 1999; 51:1303-1310. [DOI:10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00074-6]
26. Martino A, Pollard JW, Leibo SP. Effect of chilling bovine oocytes on their developmental competence. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 45:503-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199612)45:4<503::AID-MRD13>3.0.CO;2-X [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199612)45:43.0.CO;2-X]
27. Zeron Y, Pearl M, Borochov A, Arav A. Kinetic and temporal factors influence chilling injury to germinal vesicle and mature bovine oocytes. Cryobiology 1999; 38:35-42. [DOI:10.1006/cryo.1998.2139]
28. Goud A, Goud P, Qian C, Van der Elst J, Van Maele G, Dhont M. Cryopreservation of human germinal vesicle stage and in vitro matured M II oocytes: influence of cryopreservation media on the survival, fertilization, and early cleavage divisions. Fertil Steril 2000; 74:487-494. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00672-5]
29. Sirard MA, Florman HM, Leibfried-Rutledge ML, Barnes FL, Sims ML, First NL. Timing of nuclear progression and protein synthesis necessary for meiotic maturation of bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 1989; 40: 1257-1263. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod40.6.1257]
30. Hunter AG, Moor RM. Stage-dependent effects of inhibiting ribonucleic acids and protein synthesis on meiotic maturation of bovine oocytes in vitro. J Dairy Sci 1987; 70:1646-1651. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80192-3]
31. Mahmoudi R, Subhani A, Pasbakhsh P, Abolhasani F, Amiri I, Salehnia M, et al. The Effects of cumulus cells on in vitro maturation of mouse germinal vesicle stage oocytes. IJRM 2005; 3:74-78.
32. Hurt AE, Landim F, Seidel GE, Squires EL. Vitrification of immature and mature equine and bovine oocytes in an ethylene glycol, ficoll and sucrose solution using open-pulled straws. Theriogenology 2000; 54:119-128. [DOI:10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00330-7]
33. Cetin Y, Bastan A. Cryopreservation of immature bovine oocytes by vitrification in straws. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 92:29-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.05.016]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb