1. Berntsen S, Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid NB, et al. The health of children conceived by ART: The chicken or the egg? Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25: 137-158. [
DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmz001] [
PMID]
2. Zhang J, Huang J, Liu H, Wang B, Yang X, Shen X, et al. The impact of embryo quality on singleton birthweight in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 2020; 35: 308-316. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dez287] [
PMID]
3. Zhang J, Wang Y, Liu H, Mao X, Chen Q, Fan Y, et al. Effect of in vitro culture period on birth weight after vitrified-warmed transfer cycles: Analysis of 4,201 singleton newborns. Fertil Steril 2019; 111: 97-104. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.006] [
PMID]
4. Anav M, Phillips S, Ferrieres-Hoa A, Gala A, Fournier A, Vincens C, et al. Cryopreserved embryo replacement is associated with higher birthweight compared with fresh embryo: Multicentric sibling embryo cohort study. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 13402. [
DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-49708-7] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
5. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update 2018; 24: 35-58. [
DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmx031] [
PMID]
6. Barker DJP. The developmental origins of adult disease. J Am Coll Nutr 2004; 23 (Suppl.): 588-595. [
DOI:10.1080/07315724.2004.10719428] [
PMID]
7. Depa-Martynow M, Jedrzejczak P, Pawelczyk L. Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo quality in in vitro fertilization program. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2007; 45 (Suppl.): 85-89.
8. Fasano G, Fontenelle N, Vannin AS, Biramane J, Devreker F, Englert Y, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 241-247. [
DOI:10.1007/s10815-013-0145-4] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
9. Eftekhar M, Mohammadian F, Yousefnejad F, Molaei B, Aflatoonian A. Comparison of conventional IVF versus ICSI in non-male factor, normoresponder patients. Iran J Reprod Med 2012; 10: 131-136. [
DOI:10.18502/ijrm.v10i2.9056] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
10. Dobson SJA, Lao MT, Michael E, Varghese AC, Jayaprakasan K. Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2018; 110: 655-660. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.010] [
PMID]
11. Roberts SA, Hirst WM, Brison DR, Vail A. Embryo and uterine influences on IVF outcomes: An analysis of a UK multi-centre cohort. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 2792-2802. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq213] [
PMID]
12. Van den Abbeel E, Balaban B, Ziebe S, Lundin K, Cuesta MJ, Klein BM, et al. Association between blastocyst morphology and outcome of single-blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27: 353-361. [
DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.006] [
PMID]
13. Oron G, Son WY, Buckett W, Tulandi T, Holzer H. The association between embryo quality and perinatal outcome of singletons born after single embryo transfers: A pilot study. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 1444-1451. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu079] [
PMID]
14. Sun Y, Li E, Feng G, Li M, Fu Y, You J, et al. Influence of cleavage-stage embryo quality on the in-vitro fertilization outcome after single embryo transfer in fresh cycles. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 59: 872-876. [
DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2020.08.003] [
PMID]
15. Zhu J, Lian Y, Li M, Chen L, Liu P, Qiao J. Does IVF cleavage stage embryo quality affect pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes in singleton gestations after double embryo transfers? J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 1635-1641. [
DOI:10.1007/s10815-014-0351-8] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
16. Huang J, Tao Y, Zhang J, Yang X, Wu J, Kuang Y, et al. Poor embryo quality is associated with a higher risk of low birthweight in vitrified-warmed single embryo transfer cycles. Front Physiol 2020; 11: 415. [
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2020.00415] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
17. Aldemir O, Ozelci R, Baser E, Kaplanoglu I, Dilbaz S, Dilbaz B, et al. Impact of transferring a poor quality embryo along with a good quality embryo on pregnancy outcomes in IVF/ICSI cycles: A retrospective study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80: 844-850. [
DOI:10.1055/a-1213-9164] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
18. Demirel C, Goksever Celik H, Tulek F, Tuysuz G, Donmez E, Ergin T, et al. The impact of a poor quality embryo on the implantation chance of a good quality one when transferred together: A study on double blastocyst transfers. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021; 50: 101967. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101967] [
PMID]
19. Li J, Du M, Zhang Z, Guan Y, Wang X, Zhang X, et al. Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together? J Ovarian Res 2018; 11: 78. [
DOI:10.1186/s13048-018-0452-6] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
20. Wang W, Cai J, Liu L, Xu Y, Liu Z, Chen J, et al. Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2020; 18: 97. [
DOI:10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
21. Wintner EM, Hershko-Klement A, Tzadikevitch K, Ghetler Y, Gonen O, Wintner O, et al. Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo together with a good quality embryo affect the in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome? J Ovarian Res 2017; 10: 2. [
DOI:10.1186/s13048-016-0297-9] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
22. Mäkinen S, Söderström-Anttila V, Vainio J, Suikkari AM, Tuuri T. Does long in vitro culture promote large for gestational age babies? Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 828-834. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/des410] [
PMID]
23. Stokes PJ, Abeydeera LR, Leese HJ. Development of porcine embryos in vivo and in vitro; evidence for embryo 'cross talk' in vitro. Dev Biol 2005; 284: 62-71. [
DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.001] [
PMID]
24. Tao T, Robichaud A, Mercier J, Ouellette R. Influence of group embryo culture strategies on the blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30: 63-68. [
DOI:10.1007/s10815-012-9892-x] [
PMID] [
PMCID]