International Journal of
Reproductive Biomedicine
Sun, Dec 22, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 16, Issue 12 (December 2018)
IJRM 2018, 16(12): 745-756 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mardanshahi Z, Karimpour Malekshah A, Talebpour Amiri F, Valadan R. Effects of Benzo(a)pyrene on the endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation in mice: An experimental study. IJRM 2018; 16 (12) :745-756
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1330-en.html
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-1330-en.html
1- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
2- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
3- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. ,Ftaleb2001@yahoo.co.uk
4- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
2- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
3- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. ,
4- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Abstract: (3241 Views)
Background: Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) as an environmental pollutant is ubiquitous in the environment and it has destructive effects on human health. So far, various studies have demonstrated that BaP can cause adverse effects on the female reproductive system, but the existing information is limited about the effects of BaP on the endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of BaP on the endometrial receptivity and implantation in mice.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 40 pregnant BALB/c mice were divided into 5 groups (n = 8/each) as follows: experimental groups received the doses of 100 μg/kg, 200 μg/kg, and 500 μg/kg BaP dissolved in corn oil, the control group received normal saline and sham group received corn oil. Pregnant mice administered these solutions from Day 1 to Day 5 of gestation by gavage. On Day 6, the mice were sacrificed. Then their embryos were counted and the hormonal, histomorphological and molecular analyses were performed on themocusa of uterine tube.
Results: The data revealed that BaP reduces estrogen and progesterone levels, decreases the number of implantation site, endometrium thickness, uterine lumen diameter, stromal cells and endometrial glands, and blood vessels in the endometrium.
However, the expression of Activin receptor-like kinase 5 and E cadherin genes was not changed by BaP with different doses.
Conclusion: The finding of this study showed that BaP can change estrogen and progesterone levels, and endometrial morphology leads to impairing the endometrial receptivity and decreasing the number of implantation site.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of BaP on the endometrial receptivity and implantation in mice.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 40 pregnant BALB/c mice were divided into 5 groups (n = 8/each) as follows: experimental groups received the doses of 100 μg/kg, 200 μg/kg, and 500 μg/kg BaP dissolved in corn oil, the control group received normal saline and sham group received corn oil. Pregnant mice administered these solutions from Day 1 to Day 5 of gestation by gavage. On Day 6, the mice were sacrificed. Then their embryos were counted and the hormonal, histomorphological and molecular analyses were performed on themocusa of uterine tube.
Results: The data revealed that BaP reduces estrogen and progesterone levels, decreases the number of implantation site, endometrium thickness, uterine lumen diameter, stromal cells and endometrial glands, and blood vessels in the endometrium.
However, the expression of Activin receptor-like kinase 5 and E cadherin genes was not changed by BaP with different doses.
Conclusion: The finding of this study showed that BaP can change estrogen and progesterone levels, and endometrial morphology leads to impairing the endometrial receptivity and decreasing the number of implantation site.
Type of Study: Original Article |
References
1. [1] Clementi M, Tiboni GM, Causin R, La Rocca C, Maranghi F, Raffagnato F, et al. Pesticides and fertility: an epidemio- logical study in Northeast Italy and review of the literature. Reprod Toxicol 2008; 26: 13–18. [DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.05.062]
2. [2] Song H, Han K, Lim H. Progesterone supplementation extends uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation in mice. Reproduction 2007; 133: 487–493. [DOI:10.1530/REP-06-0330]
3. [3] Zhao Y, Chen X, Liu X, Ding Y, Gao R, Qiu Y, et al. Exposure of mice to benzo (a) pyrene impairs endometrial receptivity and reduces the number of implantation sites during early pregnancy. Food Chem Toxicol 2014; 69: 244–251. [DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2014.04.021]
4. [4] Cakmak H, Taylor HS. Implantation failure: molecular mechanisms and clinical treatment. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 17: 242–253. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmq037]
5. [5] Elnashar AM, Aboul-Enein GI. Endometrial receptivity. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2004; 9: 10–24.
6. [6] Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12: 731–746. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml004]
7. [7] Movaghar B, Askarian S. Expression of e-cadherin, leukemia inhibitory factor and progesterone receptor in mouse blastocysts after ovarian stimulation. Cell J 2012; 14: 225–230.
8. [8] Peng J, Monsivais D, You R, Zhong H, Pangas SA, Matzuk MM. Uterine activin receptor-like kinase 5 is crucial for blastocyst implantation and placental development. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: E5098–E5107. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1514498112]
9. [9] Gao Y, Duran S, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Burghardt RC, Bayless KJ, et al. Constitutive activation of transforming growth factor Beta receptor 1 in the mouse uterus impairs uterine morphology and function. Biol Reprod 2015; 92: 34. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.114.125146]
10. [10] Li Q, Agno JE, Edson MA, Nagaraja AK, Nagashima T, Matzuk MM. Transforming growth factor receptor type 1 is essential for female reproductive tract integrity and function. PLoS Genet 2011; 7: e1002320. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002320]
11. [11] Archibong AE, Inyang F, Ramesh A, Greenwood M, Nayyar T, Kopsombut P, et al. Alteration of pregnancy related hormones and fetal survival in F-344 rats exposed by inhalation to benzo (a) pyrene. Reprod Toxicol 2002; 16: 801–808. [DOI:10.1016/S0890-6238(02)00058-8]
12. [12] Ba Q, Li J, Huang C, Qiu H, Li J, Chu R, et al. Effects of noma cell angiogenesis, metastasis, and NF- B signaling. benzo [a] pyrene exposure on human hepatocellular carci-Environ Health Perspect 2015; 123: 246–254. [DOI:10.1289/ehp.1408524]
13. [13] Fouladi-Nashta AA, Jones CJ, Nijjar N, Mohamet L, Smith A, Chambers I, et al. Characterization of the uterine phenotype during the peri-implantation period for LIF-null, MF1 strain mice. Dev Biol 2005; 281: 1–21. [DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.01.033]
14. [14] Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quan- tification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29: e45. [DOI:10.1093/nar/29.9.e45]
15. [15] Archibong AE, Ramesh A, Inyang F, Niaz MS, Hood DB, Kopsombut P. Endocrine disruptive actions of inhaled benzo (a) pyrene on ovarian function and fetal survival in fisher F-344 adult rats. Reprod Toxicol 2012; 34: 635–643. [DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.09.003]
16. [16] Li R, Yu C, Gao R, Liu X, Lu J, Zhao L, et al. Effects of DEHP on endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation in pregnant mice. J Hazard Mater 2012; 241: 231–240. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.038]
17. [17] Sharkey A. Cytokines and implantation. Rev Reprod 1998; 3: 52–61. [DOI:10.1530/ror.0.0030052]
18. [18] Dey SK, Lim H, Das SK, Reese J, Paria BC, Daikoku T, et al. Molecular cues to implantation. Endocr Rev 2004; 25: 341– 373. [DOI:10.1210/er.2003-0020]
19. [19] Shweiki D, Itin A, Neufeld G, Gitay-Goren H, Keshet E. Patterns of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptors in mice suggest a role in hormonally regulated angiogenesis. J Clin Invest 1993; 91: 2235–2243. [DOI:10.1172/JCI116450]
20. [20] Pereira RD, De Long NE, Wang RC, Yazdi FT, Holloway AC, Raha S. Angiogenesis in the placenta: the role of reactive oxygen species signaling. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 814543. [DOI:10.1155/2015/814543]
21. [21] Malhotra N, Malhotra J, Malhotra N, Rao J, Mishra N. Endometrial receptivity and scoring for prediction of implantation and newer markers. Donald School Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 4: 439–446. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1164]
22. [22] Kim M, Park HJ, Seol JW, Jang JY, Cho YS, Kim KR, et al. VEGF-A regulated by progesterone governs uterine angiogenesis and vascular remodelling during pregnancy. EMBO Mol Med 2013; 5: 1415–1430. [DOI:10.1002/emmm.201302618]
23. [23] Burton GJ, Jauniaux E, Charnock-Jones DS. Human early placental development: potential roles of the endometrial glands. Placenta 2007; 28: S64–S69. [DOI:10.1016/j.placenta.2007.01.007]
24. [24] Mirabolghasemi G, Kamyab Z. Changes of the uterine tissue in rats with polycystic ovary syndrome induced by estradiol valerate. Int J Fertil Steril 2017; 11; 47–55.
25. [25] Davoudi M, Zavareh S, Ghorbanian MT, Hassanzadeh H. Effects of steroid hormones on uterine tissue remodeling of mouse menopause model. J Paramed Sci 2015; 6: 65–71.
26. [26] Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 147–149. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00413-0]
27. [27] Casper RF. It's time to pay attention to the endometrium. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 519–521. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1096]
28. [28] Winuthayanon W, Hewitt SC, Korach KS. Uterine epithelial cell estrogen receptor alpha-dependent and-independent genomic profiles that underlie estrogen responses in mice. Biol Reprod 2014; 91: 110. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.114.120170]
29. [29] Das A, Mantena SR, Kannan A, Evans DB, Bagchi MK, Bagchi IC. De novo synthesis of estrogen in pregnant uterus is critical for stromal decidualization and angiogenesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 12542–12547. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0901647106]
30. [30] Al-Asmakh M. Reproductive functions of progesterone. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2007; 12: 147.
31. [31] Strowitzki T, Germeyer A, Popovici R, Von Wolff M. The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12: 617–630. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml033]
32. [32] Shubin AV, Demidyuk IV, Komissarov AA, Rafieva LM, Kostrov SV. Cytoplasmic vacuolization in cell death and survival. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 55863–55889. [DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.10150]
33. [33] Maltese WA, Overmeyer JH. Methuosis: nonapoptotic cell death associated with vacuolization of macropinosome and endosome compartments. Am J Pathol 2014; 184: 1630–1642. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.02.028]
34. [34] Gao Y, Li S, Li Q. Uterine epithelial cell proliferation and endometrial hyperplasia: evidence from a mouse model. Mol Hum Reprod 2014; 20: 776–786. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/gau033]
35. [35] Al-Qudsi F, Linjawi S. Histological and hormonal changes in rat endometrium under the effect of camphor. Life Sci J 2012; 9: 348–355.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
