Ethics code: IR.SSU.RSI.REC.1402.016
Dehghani Firouzabadi R, Homayoon N, Arabian S, Dehghanpour F, Mangoli E, Barzegar H et al . Influence of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: An RCT. Int J Reprod BioMed. 2025; 23 (6) :475-484
URL:
http://ijrm.ir/article-1-3495-en.html
1- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
2- Department of Gynecology and Infertility, Shiraz Fertility Center, Shiraz, Iran.
3- Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran. , sahereh_arabian@yahoo.com; s.arabian@semums.ac.ir
4- Neonatal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
5- Student Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. & Children Growth Disorder Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Abstract: (1240 Views)
Background: Advances in assisted reproductive technology have led to improved outcomes through various innovations. The embryo must hatch from its acellular glycoprotein-based outer layer, the zona pellucida, before it can be implanted. Assisted hatching (AH) is a technique proposed to enhance embryo implantation.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AH in improving pregnancy outcomes among women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 170 women with POR (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from December 2023-June 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hatching group or the control group. Clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: No significant difference was observed between the hatching and control group in terms of chemical pregnancy (24.4% vs. 17.3%. p = 0.271), clinical pregnancy (23.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.183), ongoing pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.310), and miscarriage rates (27.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.866). However, a significant difference was observed in the frozen embryo transfer subgroup, with the hatching group demonstrating significantly higher rates of ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared to the control group.
Conclusion: While AH did not demonstrate overall benefits in improving pregnancy outcomes in women with POR, it may enhance the chances of ongoing and clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles.
| * Corresponding Author Address: Amir-Al-Momenin Medical-Educational and Research Center, Shaheed Mostafa Khomeini Blvd., Imam Hossein Sq., Semnan. Iran. |
Send email to the article author