Volume 12, Issue 2 (2-2014)                   IJRM 2014, 12(2): 117-124 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mosalanejad L, Parandavar N, Gholami M, Abdolahifard S. Increasing and decreasing factors of hope in infertile women with failure in infertility treatment: A phenomenology study. IJRM 2014; 12 (2) :117-124
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-512-en.html
1- Deprtment of Mental Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran , mossla_1@yahoo.com
2- Department of Maternity, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
Abstract:   (2610 Views)
Background: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) provide the hope of pregnancy for infertile women, but do not always turn this hope into reality.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the lived experience of infertile women from increasing and decreasing factors of hope in infertile women with failure in infertility treatment.
Materials and Methods: Using a qualitative research design (Phenomenology study), 23 subjects were selected who had experienced infertility failure visited by gynecologist (Rasekh Infertility center) in 2012. The data were collected through semi structured interviews and analyzed using interpretive research strategies of phenomenology by Collizi's seven-stage method.
Results: Totally 96 codes were identified. The data arranged in two categories. The factors decreasing and increasing hope in infertility treatments. Totally 5 themes and 20 sub themes were extracted. The increasing factors which emerged from the data contain "spiritual source", "family interaction and support" and "information through the media", and decreasing factors contain "nature of treatments" and "negatively oriented mind".
Full-Text [PDF 385 kb]   (655 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (418 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Fahami F, HossiniGhochani S, Ehsanpour S, Zargham A. The life experiences of female infertility. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2011; 13: 45-53.
2. Berek J. Berek & Novak's gynecology. Translated by Valdan M. 14 th Ed. Tehran, Golban; 2007.
3. Gunell DJ, Ewings P. Infertility prevalence, needs assessment and purchasing. J Public Health Med 1994; 16: 29-35. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042931]
4. Aflatoonian A, Seyedhassani SM, Tabibnejad N. The epidemiological and etiological aspects of infertility in Yazd province of Iran. Iran J Reprod Med 2009; 7: 117-122.
5. Wischmann TH. Psychogenic infertility-myths and facts. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003; 20: 485-494. [DOI:10.1023/B:JARG.0000013648.74404.9d]
6. Kedem P, Mikulincer M, Nathanson YE, Bartoov B. Psychological aspects of male infertility. Br J Med Psychol 1990; 63: 73-80. [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1990.tb02858.x]
7. Cousineau Tara M, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 21: 293-308. [DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.003]
8. Ratajska A. Hope in patients with congestive heart failure. Adv Pall Med 2008; 7: 143-146.
9. Peterson C. The future of optimism. Am Psychol 2000; 55: 44-55. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.44]
10. Gum A, Snyder CR. Coping with terminal illness: role of hopeful thinking. J Palliative Med 2002; 5: 883-894. [DOI:10.1089/10966210260499078]
11. Snyder CR. Hope theory: rainbows in mind. Psychol Inquir 2002; 13: 249-275. [DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01]
12. Clarke D. Faith and hope. Aust Psychiatry 2003; 11: 164-168 . [DOI:10.1046/j.1039-8562.2003.00550.x]
13. Su TJ, Chen YC. Transforming Hope: The lived experience of infertile women who terminated treatment after. J Nurs Res 2006; 14: 46-54. [DOI:10.1097/01.JNR.0000387561.03823.8e]
14. Wilson DM, Marin A, Bhardwaj P, Lichlyter B, Thurston A, Mohankumar D. A Hope Intervention Compared to Friendly Visitors as a Technique to Reduce Depression among Older Nursing Home Residents. Nurs Res Pract Epub 2010. doi:10.1155/2010/676351. [DOI:10.1155/2010/676351]
15. Snyder CR, Peterson C. Handbook of hope: theory, measures & applications. San Diego, Academic Press; 2000.
16. Brandes M, van der Steen JO, Bokdam SB, Hamilton CJ, de Bruin JP, Nelen WL, et al. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care sub fertility population. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 3127-3135. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep340]
17. Gameiro S, Boivin J, Peronace L, Verhaak CM. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 652-669. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dms031]
18. Jones LS. Hope Deferred: Theological Reflections on Reproductive Loss (Infertility, Stillbirth, Miscarriage). Modern Theology 2001;17: 227-245 . [DOI:10.1111/1468-0025.00158]
19. Dancet EAF, Van Empel IWH, Rober P, Nelen WLD, Kremer JAM, D'Hooghe TM. Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient's voice. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 827-833. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/der022]
20. Schultz GS, Cobb-Stevens R. Husserl's theory of wholes and parts and the methodology of nursing research. Nurs Philos 2004; 5: 216-223. [DOI:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2004.00190.x]
21. Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York, Oxford University Press; 1978.
22. Valle R, Kings M. Existential Phenomenological Alternative for Psychology. New York, Oxford University Press;1978: 48-71.
23. Wertz FJ. Phenomenological research methods for counseling psychology. J Counsel Psychol 2005; 52: 167-177. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.167]
24. Mapp T. Understanding phenomenology: the lived experience. Br J Midwif 2008; 16: 308-311. [DOI:10.12968/bjom.2008.16.5.29192]
25. Lincoln YS, Guba EA. Naturalistic inquairy. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, Newbury Park; 1985.
26. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2 th Ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks; 2002.
27. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Reserch method in eduction. 6th Ed. New York, Rutledge; 2007.
28. Nieuwenhuis J. Qualitative research designs and data gathering techniques. In: K Maree. First steps in research. Pretoria, Van Schaik; 2007.
29. Bleil ME, Pasch LA, Gregorich SE, Millstein SG, Katz PP, Adler NE; Infertility Outcomes Program Project Group. Fertility treatment response: is it better to be more optimistic or less pessimistic? Psychosom Med 2012; 74: 193-199. [DOI:10.1097/PSY.0b013e318242096b]
30. Dafaei M, Dehghani A. The relationship between ways of coping with religious beliefs and social activities in infertile couples referred to Yazd Infertility Center. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ 2002; 10: 871-880. (In Persian)
31. Vassard D, Lund R, Pinborg A, Boivin J, Schmidt L. The impact of social relations among men and women in fertility treatment on the decision to terminate treatment. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3502-3512. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/des353]
32. Peddie VL, van Teijlingen E, Bhattacharya S. A qualitative study of women's decision-making at the end of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1944-1951. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh857]
33. Morshed-Behbahani BL, Mossalanejad L, Shahsavari S, Dastpak M. The Experiences of Infertile Women on Assistant Reproductive Treatments: A Phenomenological Study. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2012; 14: 382-383.
34. Fontenot MC. A phenomenological study of couples who pursue infertility and the impact on their lives. [Phd dissertation], luisanan State university; 2008.
35. Imeson M, McMurray A. Couples' experiences of infertility: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs 1996; 24: 1014-1022. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb02938.x]
36. Domar AD, Penzias A, Jeffery D.A, Magana A, Meria D, Nielsen B, Paul D.The stress and distress of infertility: Does religion help women cope? Sex Reprod Menopause 2005; 3: 45-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.sram.2005.09.007]
37. Miles LM. Predictors of distress in women being treated for infertility. ETD Collection for Fordham University. Available at: http://fordham.bepress.com/ dissertations/AAI3166575 .
38. Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, van Minnen A, Kremer JA, Kraaimaat FW. Hum Reprod. A longitudinal, prospective study on emotional adjustment before, during and after consecutive fertility treatment. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2253-2260. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dei015]
39. van Empel IW, Nelen WL, Hermens RP, Kremer JA. Coming soon to your clinic: high-quality ART. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1242-1245. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/den094]
40. Dancet EA, Nelen WL, Sermeus W, De Leeuw L, Kremer JA, D'Hooghe TM. The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 467-487. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmq004]
41. van Empel IW, Nelen WL, Tepe ET, van Laarhoven EA, Verhaak CM, Kremer JA. Weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care according to patients. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 142-149. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep362]
42. Van den Broeck U, Holvoet L, Enzlin P, Bakelants E, Demyttenaere K, DH T. Reasons for Dropout in Infertility Treatment. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2009; 68: 58-64. [DOI:10.1159/000214839]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb