Volume 11, Issue 2 (4-2013)                   IJRM 2013, 11(2): 133-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Eftekhar M, Rahmani E, Mohammadian F. Comparison of pregnancy outcome in half-dose Triptorelin and short-acting Decapeptyl in long protocol in ART cycles: A randomized clinical trial. IJRM 2013; 11 (2) :133-0
URL: http://ijrm.ir/article-1-384-en.html
1- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , rahmani@bpums.ac.ir
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
3- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 454 kb]   (996 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (4299 Views)
Full-Text:   (730 Views)
Introduction
 
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRh) agonist is used for many women in order to control ovarian stimulation (COH) in assisted reproductive technology )ART( cycles. The benefits of GnRH agonist in COH include: preventing premature LH surge and luteinization, decreasing the cancellation rate of cycles, improving follicular recruitment, increasing the number of follicles, good quality oocyte and embryos. GnRH agonist is routinely used in long protocols (1-3). Two types of GnRH agonist are available which are used for desensitization of hypothesis in ART cycles: one type, short-acting GnRH agonist and another long-acting (depot form) (2, 4, 5).
The pituitary desensitization time is no difference between long and short-acting GnRH-a, but the duration of short GnRH agonist action is shorter and it allows a quicker recovery of pituitary gonadotropin secretion after its withdrawal.
Depot form of GnRH agonist has a longer half-life; however, there is concern about its unfavorable effects on embryo during early gestation (6-8). When short GnRH agonist is used for long protocol, it needs repeated daily administration for several days so this protocol is less acceptable by patients. Patient’s tolerance is better by single administration of depot from of GnRH agonist (5, 7, 9).
The purpose of this study was to compare pregnancy outcome in two types of long GnRH agonist protocols: half-dose long-acting and short-acting GnRH agonist in ART cycles.
 
Materials and methods
 
The study was conducted in a prospective randomized manner from January 2010 to December 2011 at Yazd Research and Clinical Center for Infertility affiliated to Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and was approved by the ethics committee of Yazd Research and Clinical Center for infertility.
A signed informed consent was obtained from all of the patients who participated in the study. A total of 100 patients indicated for ART were included in this prospective randomized clinical trial as consort flow chart (figure 1). The patients were randomly divided into two groups by using packets which included Computerized randomization.
The inclusion criteria was as follows: female age between 18-38 years, history of infertility at least for 1 year, and FSH concentration in day 3 of menstrual cycle <12 mIU/ml. The patients with history of pelvic surgery, abnormal thyroid function or other endocrinopathies, and severe male factor (azoospermia) were excluded from the study.
 
Ovarian stimulation protocol
All patients underwent pituitary desensitization by the administration of GnRH agonist on day 21 of the preceding menstrual cycle. In long-acting GnRH agonist group (group I), half-dose (1.87 mg) of Triptorelin (Diphereline® S.R. 3.75mg, IPSEN, Pharma, France) was administrated in a single intramuscular injection in mid-luteal phase (day 21) of the previous menstrual cycle. In short acting group (group II), Decapeptyl (Decapeptyl® 0.1 mg, Ferring Co., Germany) was started 0.1 mg per day subcutaneously from previous mid-luteal phase and continued until the day of HCG injection.
Ovarian stimulation was done from day 2 of menstrual cycle with daily administration (100-150 IU) of human recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (Gonal-f, Serono Co., Aubnne, Switzerland) and continued until the day of HCG injection. Ovarian response was monitored using serial ultrasound examination. When the leading follicle was larger than 18mm in diameter or at least two follicles were larger than 16mm, 10000 IU HCG (pregnyl, ® organon, oss, Netherlands) was injected intramuscularly. Oocyte was retrieved 36 hours after HCG injection using a 17-gauge aspiration needle under trans-vaginal ultrasound guidance. Oocyte was pre incubated in the medium at 37oC with 6% CO2 for 4-6 hours and inseminated by conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The fertilization was confirmed when two polar bodies and two pronuclear were observed 18-20 hours after insemination and 1-3 embryos were transferred 2-3 days after oocyte retrieval.
The luteal phase support was initiated from the day of oocyte retrieval with 100 mg Progesterone in oil (Progesterone, Abureihan Co., Tehran, Iran) per day. Serum βhCG was measured after 14 days of embryo transfer. The clinical pregnancy was confirmed by observation of the fetal heart activity through trans-vaginal ultrasonography 4-5 weeks after oocyte retrieval.
 
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package for the social science (SPSS software version 15.0 for windows, Chicago, IL). Both t-test and Chi-square test were used to detect significant differences (p<0.05) of the all variables between the two groups.
 
Results
 
A total of 100 patients were scheduled in this study (50 patients in each group). There were no differences in age, BMI, baseline FSH, etiology and duration of infertility between the two groups (Table I).
There were also no differences in the number of Gonal-F used ampoules, estradiol level, and endometrial thickness on the day of HCG injection, and duration of stimulation between the two groups (Table II). The number of retrieved oocyte, total number of embryos, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate were similar in both groups (Table III).


Table I. Basic characteristics of patients in long-acting and short-acting Decapeptyl groups




Table II. Etiology of infertility in long-acting and short-acting Decapeptyl groups




Table III. ART outcome in long-acting and short-acting Decapeptyl groups






Figure 1. Consort flow diagram.


Discussion
 
In the present study, we compared two hypothalamic down-regulation/COH protocols; the half dose of depot form of Triptorelin and short-acting form of Decapeptyl. No difference was observed regarding number of retrieved oocyte and embryo and fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates in both groups. In spite of our study, a recently-published analytical study has concluded that duration of stimulation and total number of FSH ampoules is significantly higher in depot form GnRH agonist group compared to short acting GnRH agonist group (10).
Total doses of gonadotropin are so important that should be taken into careful consideration by both physicians and patients when choosing the type of protocol and it can change the cost of COH (10-13). Dal pratu et al compared half dose (1.87 mg) and full dose (3.75 mg) of depot Triptorelin. They found no significant difference in pregnancy and implantation rates between the two groups, but their results indicated that the number of administrated FSH ampoules were lower in half dose Triptorelin group (1).
In a similar study Yim et al concluded that half-dose of GnRH agonist was as effective as full-dose of GnRH-a. Owing to lower dose of HMG ampoules used, they recommended half-dose of GnRH in order to reduce the cost of treatment (2). Although our results showed that pregnancy rates were similar in both groups. Yael Gonen et al proved the superiority of short-acting GnRH agonist over long-acting agonist in achievement of pregnancy outcome (14).
In some other studies, long-acting and short-acting GnRH agonist were compared and showed similar ART outcome in two types of GnRH agonist. Therefore, depot form was recommended in ART cycles for patients’ convenience (4, 5, 7, 8, 15, 16) .Depot form of GnRH agonist has a longer half-life and blocks GnRH receptors for up to 4 weeks after a single injection (8). Thus, there is potential risk of embryo exposure in early pregnancy. Lahat et al reported a high incidence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in long term follow-up of children exposed to GnRH agonist in early pregnancy (17). However, Tarlatzis reported that the rate of abortion and the health of children born after ART were not affected by the use of GnRH agonist protocol, altough some protocols were different success rate (18-20). Based on our findings, we recommend single dose depot form GnRH agonist for ART cycles, although its long-term effects on children require further investigation.
 
Conclusion
 
No advantage was found concerning implantation and pregnancy rate and number of retrieved oocyte between half-dose long-acting and short-acting GnRH agonist groups in ART cycle.
 
Acknowledgements
 
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the nursing and laboratory staff of Yazd Research and Clinical Center for Infertility of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences due to their assistance.
 
Conflict of interest
 
There is no conflict of interest in this article.
 
Type of Study: Original Article |

References
1. Dal Prato L, Borini A, Coticchio G, Cattoli M, Flamigni C. Half-dose depot triptorelin in pituitary suppression for multiple ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2200-2205. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh415]
2. Yim SF, Lok IH, Cheung LP, Briton-Jones CM, Chiu TTY, Haines CJ. Dose-finding study for the use of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues prior to ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 492-494. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.3.492]
3. Hsieh YY, Chang CC, Tsai HD. Comparisons of Different Dosages of Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, short-acting form and single, half-dose, long-acting form of GnRH agonist during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and in vitro fertilization. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 47: 66-74. [DOI:10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60057-1]
4. Isikoglu M, Ozdem S, Berkkanoglu M, Jamal H, Senturk Z, Ozgur K. Single-dose depot leuprolide is as efficient as daily short-acting leuprolide in ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1657-1661. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem054]
5. Cheon KW, Song SJ, Choi BC, Lee SC, Lee HB, Yu SY, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy between a single administration of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. J Korean Med Sci 2008; 23: 662-666. [DOI:10.3346/jkms.2008.23.4.662]
6. Parinaud J, Beaur A, Bourreau E, Vieitez G, Pontonnier G. Effect of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (Buserelin) on steroidogenesis of cultured human preovulatory granulosa cell. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1989; 28: 389-389. [DOI:10.1016/0020-7292(89)90616-4]
7. Dal Prato L, Borini A, Cattoli M, Bonu MA, Sereni E, Flamigni C. GnRH analogs: depot versus short formulations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115: 40-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.014]
8. El-Nemr A, Bhide M, Khalifa Y, Al-Mizyen E, Gillott C, Lower AM, et al. Clinical evaluation of three different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an IVF programme: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 103: 140-145. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00297-4]
9. Geber S, Sales L, Sampaio MAC. Comparison between a single dose of Goserelin (Depot) and multiple daily doses of leuprolide acetate for pituitary suppression in IVF treatment: A clinical endocrinological study of the ovarian response. J Assist Reprod Genet 2002; 19: 313-318. [DOI:10.1023/A:1016054424966]
10. Albuquerque L, Saconato H, Maciel M. Depot versus daily administration of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary desensitization in assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (3): CD002808.
11. Pang SC. A pen injection device for self-administration of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for fertility treatments. Exp Rev Med Devices 2005; 2: 27-32. [DOI:10.1586/17434440.2.1.27]
12. Tsai HD, Chen CM, Lo HY, Chang CC. Subcutaneous low dose leuprolide acetate depot versus leuprolide acetate for women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2909-2912. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135817]
13. Marcus SF, Ledger WL. Efficacy and safety of long-acting GnRH agonists in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2001; 4: 85-93. [DOI:10.1080/1464727012000199351]
14. Gonen Y, Dirnfeld M, Goldman S, Koifman M, Abramovici H. The use of long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; decapeptyl) and gonadotropins versus short-acting GnRH-a (buserelin) and gonadotropins before and during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1991; 8: 254-259. [DOI:10.1007/BF01139780]
15. Safdarian L, Mohammadi FS, Alleyassin A, Aghahosseini M, Meysamie A, Rahimi E. Clinical outcome with half-dose depot triptorelin is the same as reduced-dose daily buserelin in a long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation for ICSI/embryo transfer: a randomized double-blind clinical trial (NCT00461916). Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 2449-2454. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem223]
16. Tehraninejad ES, Nekoo EA, Ezabadi Z, Rashidi BH, Amirchaghmaghi E, Matroud EP. Half-dose, long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Diphereline) is comparable with daily injections of short-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Suprefact) in IVF/ICSI cycles. Arch Med Sci 2010; 6: 945-949. [DOI:10.5114/aoms.2010.19306]
17. Lahat E, Raziel A, Friedler S, Schieber-Kazir M, Ron-El R. Long-term follow-up of children born after inadvertent administration of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist in early pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2656-2660. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.10.2656]
18. Tarlatzis BC, Bili H. Safety of GnRH agonists and antagonists. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2004; 3: 39-46. [DOI:10.1517/14740338.3.1.39]
19. Davar R, Rahsepar M, Rahmani E. Comparative study of luteal estradiol pre-treatment in GnRH antagonist protocols and in micro dose flare protocols for poor-responding patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287: 149-153. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-012-2522-0]
20. Eftekhar M, Khalili MA, Rahmani E. The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome. Iran J Reprod Med 2012; 10: 543-548.

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb